Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Cubs @ Brewers: Hendricks vs Davies (Game 137)

Cubs 7, Brewers 2
W: Hendricks (14-7); L: Davies (10-7)PREVIEW
CHC (88-48): RHP Kyle Hendricks (13-7, 2.09)
MIL (60-76): RHP Zach Davies (10-6, 4.07)
First pitch: 12:10pmCST

Hendricks beat the Pirates on Tuesday (7 IP, 0 ER, 4 K, 1 BB). He went 4-0 with a 1.28 in August, to earn the NL Pitcher of the Month nod. He’s 0-1 with a 4.35 in his two starts against the Brewers this season. Overall, they are 12-70 (.171) against him. Carter is 2-4 with a double.

Davies had a no-decision against the Cardinals his last time out (6.1 IP, 3 ER, 9 K, 0 BB). He went 2-2 with a hefty 5.56 in August. He’s 1-1 with a 6.97 against the Cubs this season, Overall, they are 15-58 (.259) against him. Bryant is 4-9 with a HR.

Hammel (14-7) versus Peralta (5-9, 5.53) continue the series tomorrow at 7:10pmCST.

Go Cubs!

Comments

TLS gets the start at 3rd. Slashing .000/.000/.000 since his, not sure what to call it -- recall? reinstatement? do-over?

montero goes 2nd to home running faster than he has in years...sweet. cubs take the lead in the 7th off a coghlan double.

The Coghlan-LaStella-Montero game. Who woulda thunk it. Hendricks vs Davies. The University of Greg Maddux post-doc laboratory is in session.

The absolute soonest the Cubs can clinch is next Saturday vs Astros. Any combo of Cub losses and Cardinal wins in multiples of two, count for pushing the clincher out by x days. It is possible to happen with a win (or three) in StL but I would be happiest with it happening on Wrigley soil vs Brewer series that follows. That series starts Thursday but Friday the 16th is Kyle Schwarber "Home Run" Bobblehead giveaway (things that make me say, hmmmm). I can live with them clinching with the Cardinals and their fans watching up close and in person. Whatever happens, this is baseball karma at it's best.

Cubs score just in time to get a win for Kyle! Now 14-7, 2.07 ERA. 0.99 WHIP. Probably won't win Cy Young, but, damn!

The hot/cold Pirates picked a really bad time to go cold -- now 7 straight losses after getting stomped by the Cards today. Giants, Cards & Mets separated by 1.5 games for the 2 WC spots.

WAR WTF? Hendricks vs. STL's Martinez: Hendricks has thrown 1 more inning, WHIP of 0.99 vs. 1.20, ERA of 2.07 vs 3.07, 145K vs. 143K....and Martinez has a WAR of 4.7 to Hendricks' 4.1. What the hell?

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

it goes the opposite way with nearly the same amount of lead using fangraph's version of WAR (2.9 martinez vs 3.6 hendricks) while being off overall in comparison by over a point. fun stuff.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

That's my big issue with a lot of the advanced stats -- you can get (potentially) drastically different results depending on who is doing the calculation. That's pretty messed up for quantitative analysis. Usually, quants will get the same answer for a given set of inputs -- then debate what the answer means. FIP, WAR, etc. -- depends on who you ask. Weird.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

It's been talked about in another thread but BR and FG use different inputs which are explained so it's not some mysterious thing why they might be different. BR starts out using runs allowed per 9 and FG starts out using FIP for one thing. With some digging and calculating you could double check the #s and figure out the difference. As far as why Hendricks might have a lower WAR than Martinez though one possibility is the offensive rank of competition of opponent which is one component of WAR. Also the Cardinals defense is pretty bad I believe so that will help Martinez's WAR #s some Look I argued in another thread that Kyle's soft hit #s are very important and not valued enough by WAR but WAR is not nearly as subjective as you think and you shouldn't dismiss it simply because you haven't taken the time to read up on and understand it. With ERA you've basically decided all the runs are the pitchers fault which is almost more subjective because you've basically decided to make all defenses equal which they clearly aren't. The defense of the Cubs is going to prevent more runs than that of, say, the Cardinals, so is it really fair to punish the Cardinals pitchers for that or over reward the Cubs pitchers? Again though I think Hendricks is an exception because of the soft contact but even that exception requires digging into the #s more than just ERA and WHIP.

[ ]

In reply to by johann

we have the 2 main versions of WAR giving conflicting "better" outcomes that have significant values separating them on both sides. adding to that, we're over 1 point off between the 2 versions. this is a bit of extreme variation taken as a whole. the adoption of WAR as if it's evolution is finished isn't something all people are going to buy into, especially when stuff like this pops up. hell, they're still having trouble with factoring in defensive quirks with some formulas (famously, the "brett lawrie isn't really that good in the field issue" from a few years ago) as well as defensive over-valuation critiques...and more. given how some people use WAR and throw it around like it's ob% or whip, some of us out there would like it to be used with a bit more care...especially at this point in it's evolution.

[ ]

In reply to by johann

No, I haven't decided all ERA runs are equal. I never said any such thing. I said that ERA is quantitatively pure (everyone agrees on the inputs and will calculate the same answer), and WAR and/or FIP aren't (different absolute and, remarkably, relative answers from different sources). The fact that BR and FG use different inputs to calculate the same metric should be a red flag. Do FIP and WAR (you're right, I'm not an expert) factor in inherited runners that the bullpen allows to score? That can be a big factor in ERA.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

The only weirdness is that they call it the same thing (WAR). Throws everyone off. But they're essentially different ways they decided to value pitching. It's best to label them fWAR and bWAR but not everyone does it. Anyone can quibble about what goes into those numbers and what they actually represent, as I (and many others) can quibble that ERA treats all defenses and bullpens the same or that pitcher wins are/were dumb or RBI's are silly way to determine MVP's or BA is a silly way to value a hitter and so on. Yeah, WAR takes a little effort to understand what goes into it and understandable that everyone doesn't want to do that. I'm not sure about inherited runners, fairly sure fWAR would not factor that in, not sure about bWAR. As for the Carlos Martinez vs Kyle Hendricks comp, it's damn close and frankly .3 WAR is pretty miniscule. (usually .5 or more is kind of my cutoff of okay, this guy is almost certainly having a better or worse season). Looking at numbers, Martinez has a slightly better HR rate and a much more reasonable BABIP is all I can think of. I would think the BB/9 and Runs allowed would offset most of that though, but I'm not sure.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

There is no issue with the different inputs if you treat them as two completely different numbers telling you different things about a player. Call them bWAR and fWAR and don't try to compare them to each other just as you wouldn't directly compare ERA and WHIP. No stat is perfect but fWAR has shown itself to be a better indicator of future value than bWAR, ERA or WHIP so to me is earned it's place in player discussions. A lot of bad contracts could have been avoided if things like park value, level of opposition and defensive skill behind a pitcher had been taken into account when ERA and AVG are thrown around. Also since FIP and by extention much of fWAR is focused on HRS, walks and Ks a pitcher isn't being punished for a reliever giving up inherited runs instead looking at how those runners got there. Also crunch re your last paragraph I'd say while no stat is perfect and I love looking at many different #S if you're going to throw around one # fWAR is a more comprehensive predictor than OBP or WHIP. Rizzo was hit by 30 pitches last year and this upped his OBP but it's not a product of his skill. I still like OBP as a stat and it's certainly better than AVG but it requires just as much explanation and expansion as WAR to be a worthwhile judge of player skill. The trick isn't thinking WAR and the defensive stats are perfect but rather are they better than what we had before and to me they are. But yes you should still look at many different #s to really understand player value and thankfully they're all available.

[ ]

In reply to by jacos

I have been to Bears/Packers games in Chicago and it is Green Bay South, so I get that.

Recent comments

  • Bill (view)

    A good rule of thumb is that if you trade a near-ready high ceiling prospect, you should get at least two far-away high ceiling prospects in return.  Like all rules-of-thumb, it depends upon the specific circumstances, but certainly, we weren't going to get Busch for either prospect alone.

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Right on schedule, just read an article in Baseball America entitled "10 MLB Prospects Outside The Top 100 Who Have Our Attention".  Zyhir Hope was one of the prospects featured. It stated that he's "one of the biggest arrow-up sleeper prospects in the lower levels right now."

     

    Not sharing to be negative about the trade, getting a top 100 prospect who is MLB ready should carry a heavy prospect cost.  But man, Dodger sure are good at identifying and developing young talent. Andrew Friedman seems to have successfully merged Ray's development with Yankees financial might to create a juggernaut of an organization.  

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    I suspect Brown will spend some time in the bullpen due to inning restrictions.  Pitched only 93 innings last year and career high is 104 innings in 2022.  I would expect them to be cautious with a young player with his injury history.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Teheran minor league deal is done, per MLB.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Based on Phil’s sound analysis it sounds like a no brainer for Almonte to be placed on waivers as today’s roster move. We shall see.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team.