Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Mets @ Cubs: Matz vs. Hammel (Game 171; NLCS Game 4)

Looks like we picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

NYM: LHP Steven Matz
CHC: RHP Jason Hammel
First pitch: 7:07pmCT

Hammel started the clinching Game Four against the Cardinals but only went 3 innings and gave up 2 runs. In his game against the Mets this year (May 13 in Flushing), he went 8 strong, giving up only 1 ER. The Mets are 26-105 (.248) against him. Granderson is 7-21 with 2 HRs. Johnson is 9-30 with 2 HRs.

Matz lost to LA on Tuesday (5 IP, 3 ER). In his four games on the road this year, he’s 2-0 with a 2.45 ERA. None of the Cubs have faced him.

Go, Cubs!

Comments

The disappointing thing about this is that I didn't expect such a complete flameout from this bunch. It's really been a team effort.

It is quite remarkable that every low strike, every break, every pitch slightly up in the zone hit, etc., has gone against the Cubs. The Cubs have gone into a complete buzz-saw, and the Mets are playing nearly perfect baseball for three games in a row (and against the Dodgers too). In loking at this morning's stats, Bryant, Miggy, Rizzo, Castro, Ross, are having terrible series at the plate. So, as stated here, if you are not gonna be able to match the pitching from your opponent, you sure better make every play in the field and find other ways to scratch a run across. This team will for sure buy/trade for pitching for next season, and I don't expect Fowler to be on the team either.

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

Last night those low strikes DeGrom was getting were really pissing me off. I hate it when umpires have such a direct effect on a game. I gotta think those young Cubs hitters went to the bench after getting rung up and said to to Mallee, "dude, how do we NOT expand the strike zone when he makes calls like that?"

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

On the other hand, I though Hendricks got squeezed on a few calls. The difference was, Hendricks got nothing on either side of the plate, including a few tailing fastballs thrown inside to lefthanded batters that appeared to tail back over the inside edge, while DeGrom got low pitches, particularly changeups, consistently called for strikes. I though Hendricks was OK, and I was a little surprised he was taken out when he was. The Murphy HR was on a pitch off the plate. You could argue not far enough off the plate, given how hot Murphy has been, but it was outside. Hendricks' stuff is such that if he does not get calls on the sides of the plate, he has a tough time. If Arrieta misses his spots, it's still 96 mph with movement. Let's get them tonight.

[ ]

In reply to by dcf

My wife isn't a baseball fan but has been watching the games with me in support of me during my time of need, and even she made a comment about how the ump was not consistent with Hendricks. "How come the other guy gets balls called in his favor?" I never thought I'd be in favor of robo umps for balls/strikes but I am now. I used to like the human element, including the breaking in of rookies. Not no more.

Well... This team will still go down as my second favorite Cub team (1984). The future is bright folks, this not a flash in the pan. Peace.

I would start  Jon Lester today in Game 4, for a couple of reasons. 

1. If Lester starts Game 4, he would also be available to start Game 7 on Sunday in NY. Granted it's not optimum to start Lester on three days rest, but desperate times require desperate measures. 

2. It would be better if David Ross starts against a LHSP (Matz) today rather than a RHSP (Harvey) on Thursday. Although Ross has marginally better (less-worse) numbers against RHP than LHP this season, his career numbers are actually fairly decent versus LHP. 

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Hammel is the stated starter but I'd think The Great Maddonnini will at least ask Lester how he feels today. Nothing wrong with a surprise starter against a team that is obviously very well prepared. And, sorry to bring up the money thing, but he is making $150 million, and during the end of that contract, almost surely will not be earning it. I wouldn't push it - I think this team has many more post season appearances left in it, but if Lester says he can go then it's a better option for sure.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

Lester will not be in the pen. This game is not worth 3 wins. Need someone to pitch tomorrow. Logically, there is more of a chance that Arrieta would pitch from the pen today considering it would be a warm up day for him....but that isn't happening either.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

To say that I disagree with this sentiment is an understatement....and it was NEVER a consideration by Maddon according to all accounts to pitch Lester today. This wouldn't just mean that Lester has to pitch on short rest, it would mean the entire staff pitches on short rest. Lester has been mediocre in the playoffs, something clearly is wrong for Arrieta with his notable velocity dip. Starting Lester today simply does not give the Cubs the best chance to win the series. Down 3-0. Cubs best chance is to roll the dice today against the Mets #4, hope to catch a break, and then have your two best pitchers on regular rest give you a shot to even the series. Readjusting pitching rotations down 3-2 makes sense. You gamble one game, and all you need is one more. Doing it down 3-0, and lowering your odds for each of the next 3 games simply doesn't make any sense. It is even more of a slam dunk knowing that Arrieta is tired and not right.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

I'd argue there is a difference between pulling out all the stops when down 3-2 versus down 3-0. Down 3-2, you just need to do anything and everything to get to game 7, even if you lower your odds of winning game 7. Just get to the final game and hope for a lucky break. Down 3-0, I think you do what gives you the best overall chance to win the next 4 games. Anything done to lower your chance of winning game 5 and 6, for the sake of increasing chances in game 4, won't improve your odds to get to the final game.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

The idea of starting Lester on three days rest today and pushing Hammel back to Thursday has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Jake Arrieta's next scheduled start on Saturday.  

Down 3-0, the Cubs are faced with playing what are essentially four Wild Card games in a row. They MUST win each game, they MUST win four in a row, and they MUST do whatever it takes to win each game. 

The rationale behind pitching Lester on three days rest today and pushing Hammel's start back to tomorrow is to make Lester (instead of Hendricks) available to start Game 7 (if necessary) on Sunday, and to have David Ross start today versus LHSP Matz instead of two games in a row (today versus Matz and tomorrow catching Lester against Harvey), since the Cubs offense is presently challenged enough facing the Mets SP without the additional albatross of having David Ross in the lineup two days in a row (especially in the game against Harvey). 

Unfortunately, this will likely be a moot point, since only one team (the 2004 Boston Red Sox) in the long history of MLB has ever come back from a 3-0 hole to win a best-of-seven series, and the 2004 Red Sox are also the only MLB club down 3-0 to ever even force a game seven. 

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Following you a bit more now, but still disagree. I don't think Lester on short rest today and Sunday would increase our chance of winning the series. I believe this option was off the table the moment Maddon decided he needed to start Lester game #1 and Arietta game #2.

Don't expect to win the series, obviously, but a win today would be nice. Getting swept leaves a very bad taste. So -- win today, then Lester, then Arrietta, then...??

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

Exactly so. How do you win four? By winning one. Then trot out Lester (great postseason pitcher). Then Arrietta (Cy Young or nearly so). Then game 7. I don't believe the Cubs have been ahead at any point in the series. Playing uphill the whole time. How many Cubs get an "A" grade for the series so far? None, I think. "B" grade? None, I think.

My "favorite" part of being at the game last night was when after Bryant made the out in the 8th, it was quiet and a "fan" yelled, "YOU FUCKING SUCK, BRYANT!" How great would it be to watch a game without people like that there?

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

"Just think what this team will be like when Schwarber, Bryant and Soler actually learn to hit :-)" I worry about this for next year, as it seems like while the hitters can get better, the pitchers will also know the book on them more and have a better plan. Is that part of what is impacting Bryant's Sept/Oct slump.

[ ]

In reply to by blockhead25

My concern for next year's team is "expectations". This year has been, as Sammy Davis Jr. would say, a giggle and a gas. Nobody could believe they would win 90!...95!!...97!!! games. Next year, they will be expected to win 95-100 games, and when it's freezing cold and the wind is blowing in during April & May, and those summer home runs are outs at the warning track, they will have to deal with all the "what's wrong?" questions on a daily basis. Next season won't be nearly as much fun as this one, although it will hopefully be as (or more) successful.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

Bryant drove in a LOT of runs without hitting home runs. Russell looks he can do that, too. Rizzo can, as well, although he's had a rough patch at a bad time. Soler hits lasers all over the place. Schwarber is really just learning how to hit at the MLB level, and I think he already has a great idea of how to go about things. This isn't a line up full of Dave Kingmans. I'm not too concerned.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

Yep -- but it sure seemed like a lot of those Aug/Sep. HRs were basket shots. Very few players hit well at Wrigley in April and May, because the conditions are brutal, while pitchers can look artificially good in those months. I'm more focused on the overall expectations of this team next year -- will the disco ball bit get stale? I'm also concerned that every NL team is watching this series and writing "steal 3rd base" in their Cub notes.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

There's no doubt expectations will be high. That's the price of success. Maddon seems awfully good at the psych angle, though. There will be changes, too. Martinez may get hired away as a manager. David Ross bench coach? I don't want this season to end, but when it does, I'm excited about next year. Starlin has improved his trade value tremendously if they decide to move him. So has Baez despite looking a little shaky sometimes out there in the field. There's a slew of young talent down on the farm. Guys like Torres and Willie Contreras and McKinney and maybe even Almora. They're bound to bring in some more pitching, they need that, but I hope they don't go crazy on a TOR. Just get some good middle of the order guys, preferably young. The next few years are gonna be fun. Now, let's have that little 4 game winning streak.

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

the playoffs bring out some of the worst of "fans" compared to the regular season. a lot of people who rarely/very-casually/never watch games fill the park screaming stuff they assume baseball fans scream in order to make themselves feel part of the game. ...they also seem to not know the difference between a popout that's not even going to reach the warning track and a 500ft HR based on the noise they make for both. luckily, or not, it's not exclusive to wrigley field...it's all teams so far...and for many years.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

I was at game 6 in 2003. I thought that the atmosphere in the park turned very ugly as things melted down on the field, topped by the Bartman incident. There were a lot of bad things being shouted. You got the feeling that something bad could happen. I'm thankful that they got Bartman out of there, but also that there were no fights, etc. I was there with my kids, who were little then, and my wife, and I was worried about getting us all out of there without incident, my kids witnessing people doing something dumb, etc. The fact that it was a cruel, soul-crushing loss aside, I am in no hurry to see people behave that way again.

[ ]

In reply to by dcf

I consider myself a hard core fan in the sense that it feels heart breaking, like a bad romance, when things go wrong, but jeesh, it's just a game. And this particular crew i have more fondness for than any other team I've rooted for, including the 69 Cubs. So if they lose tonight, I'm gonna be really, really bummed. But that's as far as it goes. There's no room for acting like an animal, or tweeting crap about these guys. It's a game, and these guys have been fun to watch develop. Now. Time for a little four game winning streak.

Meanwhile, what the heck happened to Rizzo since Sept 1? For rookies, I can understand, but Rizzo started striking out and popping up much more than he was early in the year. Tired? Injured? Pitchers figuring him out?

Well, if this is my last game at the "yard" this year, it is October 21st (!), the Cubs are finally fun to root for, the weather is unseasonably warm, and I hope they put up a motherfucking great fight. If the Mets look like they are gonna wrap up. however, in the late innings, I am gonna do a "Dodgers Fan move" and leave early. I can't bear to watch that. Yesterday about 100 Mets fans were cheering by the dugout post-game. Turned my stomach.

Somebody should tell us, right at the start of our lives, that we are dying. Then we might live life to the limit, every minute of every day. Do it! I say. Whatever you want to do, do it now! There are only so many tomorrows.

6 steals in 4+ games, for Mets. They had 51 steals in 162 games this year. Achilles heal.

If the Cubs can score five runs in this game, they can win. They have scored five runs in this series.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

it's been painful...he's never been this bad even if he's not been awesome. he's average...not harmful, not expected to make the killer plays. arm isn't bad. he's far from a bad option out there so far. but wow, the past 2 games makes it seem like he plays LF like hanley ramirez.

"Give me a double header funeral in Wrigley Field On some sunny weekend day (no lights) Have the organ play the "National Anthem" and then a little 'na, na, na, na, hey hey, hey, Goodbye' Make six bullpen pitchers, carry my coffin and six ground keepers clear my path Have the umpires bark me out at every base In all their holy wrath Its a beautiful day for a funeral, Hey Ernie lets play two! Somebody go get Jack Brickhouse to come back, and conduct just one more interview Have the Cubbies run right out into the middle of the field, Have Keith Moreland drop a routine fly Give everybody two bags of peanuts and a frosty malt And I'll be ready to die

[ ]

In reply to by blockhead25

Don't think it would have mattered. Mets are doing everything right, their excellent starting pitchers are on their games, they are running at will, they have men on base every fucking inning, the Cubs have not scored more than one run in an inning in the entire fucking series, and Schwarber is the only Cub who can hit the ball with any fucking authority. When I think of this team, I will try to remember the WC game and the Cardinals series. I really don't want to remember them like this: feeble at the plate, striking out on pitches that hit them, outfielders unable to field, Ross losing track of the count....really an embarrassing end to a wonderful season. I never imaged it would end this pathetically.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

Mets really have played a perfect series. No question. Cubs have been pretty much awful. In 2003 I have few memories but the NLCS collapse. I vaguely remember the Cubs clinching in Atlanta, and I remember Sosa hitting the 2-out tying Home Run in game 1 against the Marlins, but the rest is a blur. 12 years from now, I am fairly confident I'll remember absolutely nothing about this Mets series, but suspect I'll still remember the WC game and the Cardinals clincher. If nothing else from this season, I have memories of a lifetime from being at the Arrieta no-hitter in LA.

BABIP: Games 1-3 Mets .317 Cubs .190 Let's be sure to remember - the Mets both out-played AND out-lucked the Cubs. #WeAreStillGood

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

In such a small sample size, I don't buy that as being about luck. They had better pitchers and we were always playing from behind so put better located pitches in play which will lead to more outs.

Goodnight everyone. Thanks for welcoming me back here this year. May the hot stove start boiling over soon...to '16 we go.

After ending an 9 loss playoff streak, we now have a 7 loss NLCS streak to deal with in future story lines.

Boy, Miggy and Bryant have really chased pitches this series they were laying off during the season. Miggy has also just been flat-out terrible at the plate.

Fitting way to end the series. I hope Murphy goes 0-25 in the WS. Well, it was a hell of a year. Very discouraging end, but hopefully the kids got some good experience about how quality pitches will attack them. So, on to the 2016 questions -- CF? Who plays 2B? And how many SP can we get?

cubs fans sticking around to show the team some love. ugg...no more cubs baseball til march....but hey, cubs baseball in late october. neat.

Sigh...the park was electric again until Hammel shitted himself once more. It is quite challenging to have a positive Maddon outlook when it is 4-0 before you've had time to get your first beer. After the Cards game, wtf was up with Maddon? Why not fucking start Lester??? or Wood?? Its win or go home!! I am really furious he did not put the team in the best chance to win. This one move just was so Dusty to me. Hammel's playoff record sucks, and is worse after tonight. Nice job tonight, Joe. Of couse as has been noted throughout the thread, the played a team that played perfect baseball, and had nice assists bfrom umps calling low strikes taking our already overmatched players and making them useless. It is not a lock that the team will be in the same place next year as the competition is fierce with Cards, Bucs, Mets, Giants, Nats, all going to be good again... It just would have been nice to have seen ONE fucking win in four games over a team they swept earlier in the year. Hopefully Hammel will only be a #5 or traded, and they can buy or trade for some better pitching. Thanks for a fun dialog this year, gents! Here is to another great season in 2016! It was fun while it lasted.

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

Seriously? Cubs got swept 4-0 and were outscored 21-8. Cubs had as many hits as the Mets had runs. It wasn't Maddon. It wasn't Hammel. It wasn't Miggy, it wasn't Bryant. It wasn't Schwarber's defense, etc. etc. It was just pure and simple an epic team fail on one side, and brilliant baseball on the other side.

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

"It is not a lock that the team will be in the same place next year as the competition is fierce with Cards, Bucs, Mets, Giants, Nats, all going to be good again..." Actually, the Mets are suspect in any listing of top teams and up-and-coming teams, although I love their three righty aces. But they're going to be one sore shoulder or elbow away from fading back in the pack. Their only under-25 position players were Flores and Conforto, not exactly the stars of the series. (D'Arnaud will be 27 in February.) Compare Flores to Addison Russell, who is two years younger. We did play the series without our starting shortstop. The Mets were a more mature team and therefore readier for prime time. Their team has been longer a-building than ours. MacLeod had his first June draft for the Cubs in 2012. That's not much time for starting pitchers to develop. DeGrom and Harvey were drafted in 2010, Matz in 2009. The Cubs won the Carolina League with starting pitching this year, and Theo says there's a wave of pitchers heading to double-A. This Cub team is going nowhere but up. Look at their ages: Russell, 21, Schwarber, 22, Bryant and Soler, 23. What jump-started the Mets was the development of Syndergaard and D'Arnaud, both acquired from Toronto in a brilliant deal for R. A. Dickey three years ago.

Recent comments

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I guess I'm not looking for that type of AB 

    Just a difference of opinion

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!