Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Random Trade Ideas

The offseason has kind of been slow going for the Cubs on the player side...they're in hot pursuit of Jon Lester, but every team with big wallets is gonna make an offer before it's over, and many of them are in better positions to win next year than the Cubs. Thus my doubts that Lester will actually sign if the claims that it won't just be about the money are true. Yeah, the Cubs might be better set-up for a long run of playoff appearances, but I think they're 2-3 years away from that run myself. It's close, but not quite there yet. That being said, it's pretty hard to acquire all the crucial pieces for said playoff run in one offseason, so I'm all for the Cubs making a run at some pieces this offseason like Lester or Max Scherzer, although I think going all in is a bit premature.

On the other hand, every baseball fan likes a good trade...so here's a few that I wondered about.

A few rules here...

- Fans and organizations overvalue their own players....

- You have to give up something good to get something good.

- I'm not necessarily advocating these trades, just some ideas to get the discussion going.

- The basic premise here is what I think the Cubs need to give up to actually get these players, not some fanciful penny on the dollars type trades that will never happen.

COLE HAMELS

Once the big 3 free agents land, the Hamels trade sweepstakes will heat up and if the Dodgers (Joc Pederson as the main center piece) or Red Sox (Bogaerts or Betts) are involved, I don't know know if the Cubs will be offering Baez or Bryant. Phillies seem pretty content with keeping Jimmy Rollins (shrug) unless they get something really good for him (not happening), so I don't know if they have an interest in Starlin Castro. But ultimately it's gonna probably take one top end prospect, another top 10 prospect and another interesting piece to get Hamels.

So maybe Baez, P. Johnson and Vogelbach? Maybe Phillies have some interest in Welington?  If Castro is the center piece instead of Baez, I think Castro's attractive contract would make any other players going from the Cubs of far less quality.

YASMANI GRANDAL

He'd be a good left-handed bat in the lineup and make a good platoon with Welington or make him expendable. He's not the vet leadership the Cubs are looking for and his receiving skills are in question. I think any interest here is more fan-based, but I could be wrong. Hoyer was gone from the Padres by the time they made that trade for Grandal so I don't think there is any connection or necessarily interest...but if there is...

Personally I think Luis Valbuena (highly underrated by Cubs fans imo) and a middle of the road pitching prospect (Jen-Ho Tseng quality) should be enough, I'm guessing the Padres are looking for something sexier. Word on the rumor mill is they are looking for bats to compete immediately, so I'm thinking more in the line of something involving Starlin Castro.

I know, I know, Cubs will only trade Castro for your two finest young hurlers and a golden egg and that's probably the case. But let's say a deal of Castro and his very attractive age and contract for Grandal and maybe Andrew Cashner (throw in some prospect fodder from Cubs like P. Johnson or D. Underwood) would be pretty interesting...to me at least. I know I cheated with throwing Cashner in there and once again, Padres would probably be looking for a bigger and more headline worthy haul if they moved him. But Cashner's lack of health has to be a major concern for any team trading for him, regardless of the upside when he does pitch.

DEXTER FOWLER

Here's the story on Fowler, the Astros have plenty of outfielders and plenty that can play center field. Fowler has one year of club control left and it's certainly plausible he could be moved...the Blue Jays were seemingly interested. His defensive numbers are less than great, but he's played in some pretty big outfields, so I think he'd be more than passable there for the Cubs. As for why the Cubs might need him, they don't, but he could provide a decent leadoff option and make Alcantara available in a trade or as the guy playing second base if Baez is traded or still missing every time he swings. Fowler doesn't bring the contact skills you like, but he does bring the speed and on-base abilities (.375 OBP last year, projected for .345).

As for what the Astros are looking for, I'm not quite sure, relievers seem to be an area of interest and I'm sure any longer club controllable players. Maybe Armando Rivera and Justin Grimm? Maybe Alcantara in a trade, but the Cubs would need to get a decent prospect back from Astros for that to happen.

MIGUEL MONTERO

This is the vet leadership play that we've heard so much about. Rumor was the D'Backs wanted pitching in return and the Cubs don't have much of that to offer. It would probably take a 3-team deal and those are too hard to predict. I certainly could see them parting with a P. Johnson or D. Underwood in a deal for Montero, but guessing D'Backs want someone in the majors already. If they liked Travis Wood, I think two guys off down years could make some sense, but I'm guessing DBacks could do better than that as there are usually plenty of teams in search of veteran catchers with good leadership reputations. D'Backs sure could use a 3bmen it appears, so maybe Luis Valbuena?

STARLIN CASTRO

A lot of buzz earlier that the Cubs were destined to move him this offseason and after coming off a strong rebound season, it makes sense for the Cubs to sell high. As for the return, it would have to be something like Matt Harvey for Castro or maybe deGrom and Wheeler for Castro or the aforementioned Castro for Hamels with other pieces. I floated a Castro to Nationals rumor when that Jordan Zimmerman news popped. I could see the Nats having some interest there if they know Ian Desmond isn't returning next season. Ultimately Castro has been a good player so far at a very young age (2-3 WAR). He could become a real good player in his prime years (3-4 WAR or maybe 5 on a real breakout season) and the contract is quite nice. The downside is that his defense is merely adequate and likely to get worse as he gets older and I'm sure most teams are aware of this. But if the Cubs do move him, they are gonna want impact talent, no question marks in a deal, so you have to be looking at either expensive talent where a team wants to shed some payroll or someone a year or two from free agency. I could see high end pitching prospects near the majors as a possibility too, but teams are reluctant to move those.

How about Sonny Gray for Castro? A's seem to have a SS need and have plenty of pitching. I'm sure they'd rather deal Samardzija for Castro, but don't see the Cubs taking that back on since they know Samardzija is gonna test the market.

EDWIN JACKSON, TRAVIS WOOD OR TSUYOSHI WADA

The Cubs have too many back-end rotation options and I'm sure would be just fine in moving any of these contracts. Jackson is only gonna go for another bad contract (M. Bourn, BJ Upton, etc). I honestly don't know if there is much of a market for Wood or Wada, but I'm sure they'll be brought up plenty of times in talks at the Winter Meetings and beyond.

Alright, mock me in the comments! But before you do, what are some of your ideas and what do you think would be fair value?

 

Comments

twitter note that DBacks will give Yasmany Tomas a chance to win 3b, thought he was an outfielder exclusively, so there's that

Padres signed Bames today, probably a back-up though. They do have Amarista at SS, mostly glove there though.

A few weeks ago, I floated Alex Cobb + salary dump (either Balfour, DeJesus, and/or Loney) to the Cubs for Castro and low-end pieces plus cash. Cobb is probably the closest thing to an ace available by trade except for Hamels (Phils want too much) and Cueto (don't trade good prospects within the division for a guy with 1 year left). It's unknown if Cobb is available but I imagine he would be at the right price. The Cubs don't need a shortstop but I would do the Tulo trade as well if it doesn't involve Bryant, Russell, Rizzo, Soler, Arrieta, and at least one of Baez or Castro. Guys like that typically don't get traded, so it's a real opportunity to acquire an elite talent.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

Cobb/Castro trade is intriguing to me, regardless of the superflous extra pieces.

Tulo's injuries would worry me too much and imagine Rockies aren't moving him in a strict salary dump, meaning top prospects will need to be involved. I do like him quite a bit of course, but I doubt Cubs are looking for middle infielders as you mentioned.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Absolutely they would want some talent. I would offer the Rockies' choice of Castro or Baez, plus Almora, and Vogelbomb. For me, the injury risk is worth a guy who's one of the top 5 talents in MLB today. Guys like that are almost never available. Sure he's entering his decline years, but it's a long decline from the top.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/chi-theo-epstein-on-…

"Free agency is important...you have to be aggressive....But, you also have to maintain some sense of disclipline and limits and long-term prospective, if you go into free agency that you're one player away...you're probably gonna end up getting burned and probably end up with an organization that is not as healthy down the line."

"You have to be prepared that if you do land a player, that contracts don't always work out, so the key in that respect is to build the organization up to a point where you can recover from any one player not performing, you have young players ready to step in, you have depth, you have redundancy."

...says they think they've built organization up to that point, are being aggressive, but not gonna enter any negotation as if it's do or die.

Derick Lardner named DBacks scouting director, was a rumor that Tim Wilkens was up for job (he's still with Cubs right?)

Tags: Because I'm Bored Edwin Jackson, Mike Olt and $4 million to the Yankees for Bryan Mitchell. Mock away.

[ ]

In reply to by QuietMan

Seems reasoable enough...just don't know how many back-end of the rotation guys Cubs really need at this point.

A deal centered around Castro to Mets for Syndegaard. Miss the Cubs having a pitcher whose name starts with a "s" that I can't spell.

heh; http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-week-14-mailbag/

Q: Please take it easy on Jay Cutler George. Marc Trestman’s play calling is atrocious. Since 1970, only 18 teams ran the ball less than 9 times in a game. Want to guess their record? Yep, 0-18. On Thanksgiving, Chicago joined that list with 47 passes and 8 rushes in Dallas (despite having a 14-3 lead at one point!). Marc Trestman is a FRANCHISE KILLER. He’s a journeyman coach and a horrible play caller. He can’t make any in-game adjustments. He’s a poor game manager. He doesn’t understand run/pass balance. This “QB Whisperer” crap that the media has been touting for 2 years is just plain wrong. How does that happen in the first place? How does one attain a completely false moniker, and how is that then perpetuated ad nauseam and unchecked throughout the media? Trestman is awful, he needs to go back to being a lawyer. —Jeff, Lakeland, FL

BS: Yup, you only have three more weeks to top Jeff from Lakeland’s Trestman rant as the “Most Scathing Email Under 150 Words From a Disgruntled NFL Fan.” The only way that email would have been funnier would be if Trestman had written a book in 2010 called Perseverance: Life Lessons on Leadership and Teamwork. Wait, what???

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

"Marc Trestman’s play calling is atrocious." My favorite play-call of the year, and maybe of five decades of watching this team's dull offense, was the quarterback sweep left on fourth-and-one out of the shotgun against the Vikings. For some reason, Cutler didn't get in. Trestman: "I have no idea why that play didn't work." Nor do I. The play developed beautifully, but then I think what happened was that Cutler raced for the flag rather than simply following his very big blocker (Bushrod) against a single defender. At any rate, it wasn't the usual thick-skulled sneak or handoff into a brick wall, or the field goal that is the Bear fan's traditional reward for the offense's getting inside the five. Let's see, so Matt Forte had 1,933 yards rushing and receiving last season, and is on pace for about the same (1,942) this year. That's 400 yards better than his season average in five years under Lovie Smith. Third-year receiver Alshon Jeffery is closing in on his second 1,000-yard season. Martellus Bennett will pass 900 yards and may reach 1,000, which is remarkable, since balls tend to bounce off him: he doesn't have very good hands. Somebody must be whispering to somebody.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

could be wrong, but feels like turnovers are the big culprit for the lack of points, rather than playcalling (imho)

2013: 23/28 for a +5 in 16 games

2014: 25/19 for a -6 in 13 games

More offensive turnovers is obvious, but more defensive turnovers usually means shorter field and more scoring as well.

Although when 40% of your playbook is throw it up for Ashlon or Marshall to catch it, I guess that can lead to a fluctuation in turnover numbers. :)

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I think play calling could be better, could be worse. What sucks about the offense is how they play the game. They seem sloppy and unprepared, and that's on the coach. I didn't see much of yesterday's game because I've had enough, but I have not seen a game where I haven't seen offensive linemen completely miss an assignment. It could be that they are under a lot of pressure to score. My God, if they don't score every possession, it's pretty much a loss.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

Football Outsiders shows the Bears as the #26 ranked offense in 2012.

23.43 to 21.61 average pts I'm getting in favor of 2012

Also getting a +20 turnover ratio for Bears 24/44 which would explain the difference in scoring versus the actual ability to move the ball.

(5.4 Y/P in 2014 vs 5.0 Y/P in 2012)

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Bears are ranked 18th in points this year, 17th in total yards, and a lot of that has been garbage yards. Last game for instance, most of their points were meaningless and after they were already getting slaughtered. I had high hopes for Trestman, especially after seeing how they were building things last year. That hope is gone. For me it's more the way the team plays than anything. I don't think the play calling is that atrocious. Sometimes it's pretty good, even. But this team just plays bad football, and that's on the head coach. NFL teams also make adjustments, which is why I think Trestman will be back next year. The league adjusted to him and I think they'll give him one shot to adjust back. Look at how the league adjusted to Kaepernick. He tends to throw off to his left a lot when he's rolling out of the pocket and somehow that just always fooled teams but now they've stopped that in its tracks. I'm always amazed at how good professional ballplayers and coaches are. I thought he was gonna be huge and he still might be but they've figured him out for now. So I think they'll give Trestman one more chance. But damn, if they keep Tucker, I'm not spending a dime on watching the NFL next year.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

I agree on the remarkable ability for coaches to adjust -- two years ago, Kaepernick seemed virtally unstoppable because of his ability to execute the read-option. D coordinators adjusted and largely took that away, and now he is an average QB, at best. Defenses seem to realize that Trestman does not trust Cutler to throw deep, and that the Bears WRs aren't fast, so they play the shorter routes and every pass is contested.

Tigers signed RHP Alberto Cabrera to a minor league contract. Rafael Dolis too.

it's gotta be hard being a HOU fan knowing that your team has decided to spend loot...and their top priority seems to be throwing $10+ million a year at someone who's job involves throwing 50-70 innings per season.

via rotowurld... "Diamondbacks general manager Dave Stewart indicated Friday that the team is not actively shopping catcher Miguel Montero. Stewart quipped, "Believe me, if I was motivated to move him, he would probably be gone by now."" ...and of course that means something strong, but it doesn't mean he's totally off the table.

I don't see dreadlocks... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMsVK82HKK0 Muskat post includes Baez info:
New Cubs hitting coach John Mallee will get to work with Javier Baez, joining the infielder in Puerto Rico. Baez is expected to begin playing for Santurce on Dec. 11, and will start four to five games a week, Epstein said. “Javy’s had some time away from the game and decompressed a little bit, and I think it’s certainly a testament to his work ethic and his desire to improve that he’s out there getting ready to play winter ball and get ready for the season,” Epstein said. There’s no set number of at-bats for Baez, who batted .169 in 52 games with the Cubs this past season, striking out 95 times in 213 at-bats.
http://muskat.mlblogs.com/2014/12/05/125-dascenzo-baez-more/

Phew-tility? Excerpts from the Hardball Times 2015 Annual, coming out...
It’s been a long night for the Cubs franchise. Since 1945, the end of World War II, the Cubs have had exactly one above-average offense: The 2008 Cubs, who hit .278/.354/.443 for a 104 weighted runs created plus (wRC+). That means—after we control for era and park factors—the Cubs have had an average or below-average offense in 68 of their last 69 seasons. In fact, in only one season (1998) did they hit at exactly league average (100 wRC+), and the group of 69 seasons averages only 89 wRC+. But dawn is coming.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/taking-a-closer-look-at-the-hardball-times…

"Rob Bradford and Alex Speier of WEEI.com report Red Sox owner John Henry flew to Atlanta Friday to meet with Jon Lester."

http://chicagosuntimes.com/sports/free-agency-isnt-a-strength-for-cubs-…

Maybe they’re not very good at big-ticket free agency. And they know it.

Whether that says more about the Cubs’ leadership tandem or the risks inherent in the process can be debated. But there’s little debate when it comes to their spotty track record of free-agent spending that includes $230 million in swings and misses on Julio Lugo, Carl Crawford and Edwin Jackson in two cities over the last decade.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

i just hope they learned their lesson from crawford. a "sexy" WAR shouldn't so heavily dictate a contract...especially for a light hitting LF'r...and very especially when others are buying into it, driving the price up. his legs/speed effect a whole slew of his stats, especially slugging, that his bat cannot make up for. giving him a contract for that much loot taking him through age 35 was a hell of a red flag. dude's an above average contact hitter, but he's not got a whole lot more going for him.

Recent comments

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.

  • crunch (view)

    booooooooooo

    also, wisdom and taillon are both in chicago.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Tonight’s game postponed. Split games on Saturday.

  • crunch (view)

    cubs getting crazy good at not having player moves leak.

    taillon we 100% know is pitching tonight.  who he's replacing and any additional moves are unknown as far as i can tell.

    p.wisdom was not in today's lineup in iowa (rained out) and he was removed from the game last night mid-game, but not for injury.  good bet he's with the team in the bigs, too.

  • Bill (view)

    A good rule of thumb is that if you trade a near-ready high ceiling prospect, you should get at least two far-away high ceiling prospects in return.  Like all rules-of-thumb, it depends upon the specific circumstances, but certainly, we weren't going to get Busch for either prospect alone.

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Right on schedule, just read an article in Baseball America entitled "10 MLB Prospects Outside The Top 100 Who Have Our Attention".  Zyhir Hope was one of the prospects featured. It stated that he's "one of the biggest arrow-up sleeper prospects in the lower levels right now."

     

    Not sharing to be negative about the trade, getting a top 100 prospect who is MLB ready should carry a heavy prospect cost.  But man, Dodger sure are good at identifying and developing young talent. Andrew Friedman seems to have successfully merged Ray's development with Yankees financial might to create a juggernaut of an organization.  

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    I suspect Brown will spend some time in the bullpen due to inning restrictions.  Pitched only 93 innings last year and career high is 104 innings in 2022.  I would expect them to be cautious with a young player with his injury history.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!