Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Rotation Shuffle

In the wake of yesterday's tragedy, the Cubs will likely shuffle their rotation a bit. Angel Guzman was scheduled to be called up tomorrow but Lou is now leaning towards Sunday May 6th against the Nationals as he wants to split up Rich Hill and Ted Lilly from going back to back days. So the rotation will likely be: Today @ Pittsburgh: Rich Hill May 1st @ Pittsburgh: Ted Lilly May 2nd @ Pittsburgh: Jason Marquis May 4th vs. Washington: Carlos Zambrano May 5th vs Washington: Rich Hill May 6th vs Washington: Angel Guzman May 8th vs. Pittsburgh: Ted Lilly May 9th vs. Pittsburgh: Jason Marquis May 10th vs Pittsburgh: Carlos Zambrano May 11th @ Philadelphia: Rich Hill May 12th @ Philadelphia: Angel Guzman May 13th @ Philadelphia: Ted Lilly and so on... In actuality, the Cubs really don't need a 5th starter until May 12th as they have two more scheduled off-days between now and then on May 3rd and 7th. Lou could stick with the plan to have Guzman go tomorrow and still break up the lefties but Angel isn't quite stretched out completely as a starter and PNC is usually friendlier to lefty pitchers, so waiting until May 6th makes some sense and gives Angel one more AAA start and an easier 2007 starter debut versus the Nationals. Also, Bob Howry should be 100% by tonight after injuring his back moving a barbecue grill over the weekend. Too many jokes, too little time.

Comments

yeah, Duke vs. Cubs 6 GS, 4-1, 45 IP, 1 CG, 1 SO, 1.40 ERA, 39 H, 7 ER, 2 HR, 8 BB, 22 K I think he had a good start his last start but he's 1-2 with a 6.92 ERA this year. Murton better get the start tonight though 9/17 .529/556/824 career Cedeno 438/438/438 against him as well just about owns everyone else Barrett 0/10 Izturis 3/10 Ramirez 3/15 Theriot 1/8 Jones/Floyd combined: 0/11 Soriano: 2/5 Lee: 3/13

That's true...we'd be about the only ones not hitting him this year: 1-2, 6.92 ERA, 26 IP, 38 Hits, 6K/5BB, 3 HR's The Cubs don't hit lefies very well it seems...I could be wrong.

Yes, the Cubs certainly have a history of making even mundane lefties look unhittable. I hope that there are enough new faces in the lineup to reverse that trend.

Hmmm...career splits indicate that everyone is decent againt LHP except Jones and Cedeno, with Duke being the exception, with Izzy, Murton, Theriot, and DeRosa significantly better against LHP.

Dusty Baylor: "The Cubs don’t hit lefies very well it seems…I could be wrong." No, you are right on: Cubs vs. LHP: .218/.277/.368/.645 Cubs vs. RHP: .277/.333/.423/.756

Those numbers above were this year. 2006 was nowhere as bad: vs. LHP: .253/.314/.397/.711 vs. RHP: .274/.321/.432/.753

Kind of off the subject a little. Did anyone catch the Lou Piniella to Joe Girardi comment on the Saturday telecast on FOX? Lou basically said that he is playing Cliff Floyd over Matt Murton not because Floyd is the better player. More because not playing your proven vets can cause trouble in the clubhouse. I have long suspected that this is a route cause in alot of Dusty's questionable moves and it explains some of Lou's as well. Jim Hendry absolutely new that signing Floyd would put Lou in this situation.

I don't think it is just lefties that this team does not hit very well. It seems to me, and I don't have the numbers in front of me to back this up, but they don't hit pitchers who change speed very well at all. It seems that any pitcher who relies on the change up or other pitches that rely on deception and location baffles the cubs over the last several years. And since there are more lefties that throw this way make it look worse against them. Of course, I could be way off base here and there are probably numbers that will make me look like an idiot, but I will still throw this out there as a thought.

"More because not playing your proven vets can cause trouble in the clubhouse" Anyone want to apologize for the misguided abuse you threw at Dusty for doing this, now that you know it's SOP in the MLB?

uh no.... Lou doesn't seem to have a problem sitting Jones, Floyd or Izturis at the moment. We haven't faced a lot of lefties and we have too many OF'ers, Murton will play. I didn't hear the actual comment, but Floyd hasn't been playing a whole lot to be honest, nor has Murton. Both are hitting about the same. As long as no one's bitching too much and he's giving the AB's to capable players, I don't care and I doubt the team does either. On other hand, giving Neifi any AB's is an egregious mistake by any means. :)

Anyone want to apologize for the misguided abuse you threw at Dusty for doing this, now that you know it’s SOP in the MLB? No, not really. Even if it is SOP, which I doubt, it's still stupid.

My point, Andrew, is not whether it's stupid or not. My point is that this is a practice not limited to Dumb Dusty Baker. So the frustration and outrage at Dusty was misguided.

Actually, Chad's kind of right about it. It is SOP, most places. Rookies and young guys don't get to whine and complain about not playing. Veterans do.

The big difference between Dusty and Lou from what I've seen is that Lou actually seems to like the competition between his players and will reward the better performed with additional playing time. Theriot played well, and now he's going to take a big chunk of the SS playing time away from Izzy. I love Murt and would like to see him playing everyday, but he hasn't really performed yet for Lou at the level that would earn him the regular starting position.

Rob G.: "On other hand, giving Neifi any AB’s is an egregious mistake by any means. :)" If that's the case, giving Izturis and/or Cedeno any AB's is an equally egregious mistake. :)

yeah, except Izturis and Cedeno already lost their gigs to a better hitter, Dusty had a 3 yr running joke that wasn't really funny.

Vorare: "I love Murt and would like to see him playing everyday, but he hasn’t really performed yet for Lou at the level that would earn him the regular starting position." But Murton is supposedly an above average LF and had a .912 OPS in the 2nd half last year. That's not good enough for Lou??? (sarcasm)

DeRosa may not have any ABs against Duke, but he killed lefties in '06 (342/394/589). Soriano must be about ready to explode. This lefty whammy against the Cubs could end pretty soon. Also, as someone who likened Lou to Dusty a couple of weeks ago--I take it back. They're not at all the same. While a certain deference may be owed to older players, Dusty took this to an extreme, to the point of seldom using pinch runners and defensive replacements. Lou uses almost the entire non-pitching roster in close games, whereas Dusty mostly managed the bullpen. If Lou had a bigger roster he would use even more subs. With Dusty, the expanded roster in September meant more young guys on the bench watching the older guys.

But Murton is supposedly an above average LF and had a .912 OPS in the 2nd half last year. That’s not good enough for Lou??? Which is why I wrote that he has not "PERFORMD YET FOR LOU". Because, if you remembr correctly, Lou wasn't the manager last year. But thanks for the useless smartass remark, as per usual.

Chad did say it was SOP. He didn't say why. I said why. That's what I'm saying. Not what Chad's saying. You know what I'm saying?

Vorare: "Because, if you remembr correctly, Lou wasn’t the manager last year." Yes I do remember. But thanks for the useless smartass remark, as per usual...:)

I really don't get how anyone (sorry, Chad) can harbor any fond feelings for Dusty after what he didn't accomplish here. The best quote to come out of the 2003 NLCS was, "One manager managed game 6 as if it was the 7th game of the World Series, and the other as if it was the rubber game of a mid-August series with a division rival." He again had enough talent in 2004 to AT LEAST make the playoffs and his laid-back managerial style let Cub broadcasters become the players' central issues instead of the NL Central. By any objective measurement, Dusty was a FAILURE as a manager: 1. He played favorites 2. He made playing time for Neifi, Holly, et al more important than who could actually benefit the team. 3. He mis-managed his pitching staff, especially his bullpen. 4. He let peripheral issues interfer with his team's focus on winning the Division. 5. Etc.,etc., etc. AND I was in favor of the Cubs getting Dusty from the Giants in 2002. I don't know if Lou will produce any better results, but here's the thing if you've ever held a management position: The team's with the most talent (or payroll) don't get it done, it's the team who's manager gets everyone to perform to their best capabilities that win. That wasn't Dusty in Chicago, and that's why he's gone.

Better yet... anyone want to argue about the correct terminology for over/under five hundred?

George, I was strictly talking about Dusty always getting heat from this board about sticking with 'proven vets'. Plain and simple. dave, and emerging beane/sabremetric argument? Where ever would you get that idea?

George, I was strictly talking about Dusty always getting heat from this board about sticking with ‘proven vets’. well if that was your point, Lou has done nothing of the sort.

"aaronb — April 30, 2007 @ 11:40 am Kind of off the subject a little. Did anyone catch the Lou Piniella to Joe Girardi comment on the Saturday telecast on FOX? Lou basically said that he is playing Cliff Floyd over Matt Murton not because Floyd is the better player. More because not playing your proven vets can cause trouble in the clubhouse. " This is what started the whole thing.

Under Dusty- Theriot spent a month on the bench in favor of Neifi and Tony Womack Under Lou- Theriot playing time and now starting gig.

Vorare: "Better yet… anyone want to argue about the correct terminology for over/under five hundred?" Yeah, where is Cubfan at this year??? Haven't heard from him.

Under Dusty: Murton got 508 PA's in 2006 Under Lou: Murton on pace for 310 PA's in 2007

manny... i don' remember cliff floyd and alfonso soriano on the roster last year, do you? don't you think that changes a few things?

Okay, change of pace- Is Craig Biggio the worst 3000 hit hitter ever? 4 seasons over .300 1 over 200 hits Just asking.

I don't have the 3000 hit guys memorized but considering where he played a lot of games and how well he did as a leadoff guy, I'd say no. Not to mention a position switch from catcher to 2b. The end of his career is killing his career stats though.

I looked them up. He's the 'worst' IMO. I think it's a bad way of putting it but I'd pretty much want ever other player on my team before him.

Chad- Agreed "I’d pretty much want ever other player on my team before him. " Team do you mean by the Cubs this year?

It isnt like Lou made the Theriot move right away. It did take 22 games to make an obvious move. And we still dont know how permanent such a move is. To me the main difference is that Dusty had zero testicular fortitude to sit a vet. Lou has some sack, but it is alot easier for him to bench a 5'7 shortstop than it is for him to sit a 6'4 Outfielder.

Eddie Murray?? Murray was a frigging stud!!! He played most of career pre-steroid, pre early 90's expansion...back when hitting 20 HR's was a really good season, and 35 put you int the top 5 for the league lead. I'm just sayin'

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.