Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Soriano and Lee Named to NL All-Stars

Scott Eyre though is still waiting for his phone call. Soriano got edged out by MLB public relations in the final vote as Bonds surpassed him. As the MLB.com article states:
He trailed Soriano 1,332,581 to 1,213,423. In the final vote total, Bonds had 2,325,391 to Soriano's 2,202,513.
Hmm, two-plus months of voting results in a million-plus votes but in the last week they doubled their vote total? Okay, sure. Richard J. Daley approves. MLB public relations is also trying to save the managers of the respective teams some flak by telling us who are the manager's choices and who got in by player vote. One such player who got in by player vote was Derrek Lee, so congrats Derrek. The Cubs do have a shot to add one more All-Star to the team as the fans can vote for the final roster spot. Naturally, the man who is 10th in the NL in OPS (second among third basemen), leads the Cubs in RBI's and is tied for the team lead in home runs was put on the list - Aramis Ramirez. Wait...let me check that...nope, it's the guy with an ERA over four - Carlos Zambrano. Okay. Z's competition for the final spot are Chris Young, Tom Gorzelanny, Brandon Webb and Roy Oswalt. I guess they decided they needed an extra pitcher. If you just want to see another Cub at the All-Star Game, go vote for Z, if you want to give it the player who actually deserves it, then go vote for Chris Young and his 8-3 record and microscopic 2.14 ERA. Congrats to Derrek and Soriano, well-deserved All-Stars.

Comments

You shouldn't advocate voting for that little bitch Young. Maybe he deserves it but he's a punk that threw at Lee.

Ram got cheated. His numbers were better than Lee or Pujols. Adrian Gonzalez deserves to be there more than those two also. He has been our MVP of 1st half and has really put in more of a effort into hussling this season. If this game is suppose to count for who gets home field in the World Series the fans shouldn't be allowed to vote and the stupid kids rule of each team needs one guy has to go also David Wright and Freedy Sanchez should be the on a 4 day vaction instead of Ram and Adrian Gonzalez.

Z has been effective of late but has not earned a spot on the all star team for his overall performance. Nice to see that Lee got in. You can bet he would not have gotten in if it had been up to Larussa.

As far as I'm concerned, Ramirez will do better with the days off-and thats probably what the organization thinks. I think any manager in the league would say Ramirez is the most feared hitter on the Cubs. The Cubs are sure sucking up to Z these days. Hope it pays off when contract talk resumes...

maybe aram will do the HR derby...who knows... still, cant say im upset he's not there for reasons similar to #5.

MLB is weird about how they count the votes. You can make up that much in a week, because I believe MLB only counts international votes and online votes and specific intervals. There was probably 3 weeks of online voting not included in the last rankings that were then all rolled into this one. With modern technology, there should be frequent and accurate updates.

WISC, Maybe that explains the total numbers but making up more than 100,000 votes? that is a statistical anomaly. Even John Kerry couldn't overcome a margin like that even with a recount in the most democratic of counties in Ohio.

the punk is on my fantasy team but there's no denying he's the most deserving player. How he's left off in the first place is mind-boggling. Deserves it over Smoltz, Sheets and Hamels. the 3 days off for Aramis are needed so we have that going, but in terms of respect and deserving it and probably All-Star bonuses, it's a croc of s***.

can Lee use the allstar game to serve the first game of his suspension ? cubs only 4 games out of the wild card in the loss column.....i know it's early to think about those sorts of things but nice to know that it's right there.

“Far more deserving”? "It’s not like D-Lee is Jacque Jones." He might as well be considering Ryan Howard and Adrian Gonzazlez got snubbed in his favor.

Z's has the worst ERA among our current starters, does have the most wins, IP and K's though (4 K lead over Hill with 13 more innings).

Hey, I need some help. We'll be going to a game for the Astro's series after the all star break and we'll be coming from out of town. We usually drive to Wrigley and park, but this year we want to park and take the L or bus to the game. We'll be coming from Indiana. Any suggestions?

*He might as well be considering Ryan Howard and Adrian Gonzazlez got snubbed in his favor.* Do you mean the Ryan Howard that was hurt for a month and is hitting a robust .250--that Ryan Howard? Maybe you think he should be there for sentimentality because of his long, storied MLB career?

I think we need a poll for best play of June: a. Lee punching Chris Young b. Zambrano punching Michael Barrett c. Theriot's squeeze bunt d. Soriano's comeback 2-rbi flare hit to beat the Rox e. Security guard's tackle of crazy fan f. Walk-off HR by Ramirez to beat the Brews Plays of honorable mention: Izzy's fondling of Ramirez after walk-off homer. Soriano's 3 HR game.

Like the internet photo of the one-eyed kitten (eeeuuuggh) I intend to just pretend I never saw the slo-mo Youtube of Izzy reachin' and a-grabbin'.. I'm gonna puke again. but I do understand that this sort of thing happens during an NFL pile-on after a fumble, though not with such jocular intent. Jock-ular. I made a funny.

I don't vote. Like a real "election", you should only get to vote once. Not 25 times. When the final votes get counted, the Republicans can decide which way they want to sway the vote... sorta like Barry "steroid" Bonds (or Bush) getting in. It's all B.S. Can't decide which Cub is more deserving... like a great team, it differs week by week, game by game.

geez you Bonds haters act like he is having a lousy year or something. His OBP is obscene again. Too bad for Sori, but Bonds is definitely one of the three best NL OFs.

"cubs only 4 games out of the wild card in the loss column…..i know it’s early to think about those sorts of things but nice to know that it’s right there." Never too early those 4 losses can totally be overcome with great play in the second half. Good spot. "the Republicans can decide which way they want to sway the vote…" "His OBP is obscene again.' No on cares. No one goes to the hall because of OBP. I am probably the biggest Bonds hater at this board and I say that he belongs in the game as he is the best player on his team and the most deserving. My problem is that I don't believe that he was actually voted in.

Narron fired? A week before the break? Odd. I don't understand Wayne Krivsky, nor I ever will.

Chad - I've looked all over and can't find them, but if you can find me both the total number of votes cast (I think they said approximately 18 million) and most importantly the total number of votes cast on June 25th (the last report before the final), I can in fact tell you statistically the likelihood of getting a specific proportion on June 25th given the actual proportion of the final vote. It's a simple equation and would take 30 seconds, I just need the data. It probably won't be a perfect predictor since you can vote for 3 OFs including both Soriano and Bonds, but I can get close enough to know if it was just chance or if the MLB voting is suspect.

So the same MLB that has tried as hard as it can to distance itself from Bonds and downplay his soon-to-be record all of a sudden decides to fix the vote so he can start the all-star game? Doesn't make sense to me.

No one cares about On Base Percentage? Oh, I see, by "No one cares" you really meant "I don't care".

Dude, when it comes to All Star voting, OBP is not a consideration for anyone. If so, Todd Helton and Mark Loretta would be all stars. But for an all star team home runs, batting average and stolen bases is what fans vote for. When you go to build an actual team that is going to play 162 games, that's an entirely different thing.

Never mind that Bond's OBP is inflated due to his intentional walks and HGH use that helps him see alot better.

Oh crap Willie Taveras and Chris Duncan have better OBPs than Alfonso Soriano and the NL leading vote getter, Carlos Beltran.

And chifan, don't ignore that you cannot throw a strike to Bonds anywhere near the belt or knee. His strike zone is is crush zone anything outside of that will never be called a strike. I tivoed some highlights last night that was a perfect example.

*jwadd says: July 1st, 2007 at 7:53 pm I don’t vote. Like a real “election”, you should only get to vote once. Not 25 times. When the final votes get counted, the Republicans can decide which way they want to sway the vote…* Sure they can...which is why "they" "decided" to lose the House in 2006. *sorta like Barry “steroid” Bonds (or Bush) getting in.* So people can't be trusted with *any* sort of vote. Gotcha. Yet another brilliant "troofer", I take it. "Those common folk are so damn stupid. Only Al Gore, John Kerry and Kenny Lofton should win elections, damnit! *HGH use that helps him see alot better.* HGH helps your eyes? And to think of all those dumb fucks getting LASIK like Greg Maddux who could've just shot up and avoided the [albeit low-] potential blindness. Suckers.

no, i was with you on most your post but its suggested that steroids and hgh actually improves your vision. That may or may not be true but it is definitely a possible side effect of those drugs.

I have no idea how anyone would think that Barry Bonds did not deserve to be in the ASG. I also have no idea how anyone would think that Ryan Howard would deserve to be in the ASG. I also have no idea how anyone would think that D-Lee would NOT deserve to be in the ASG. And Adrian Gonzales? Lets take a look... Lee - 917 OPS Ardian - 841 OPS Howard does have a higher OPS than Lee (934), but he also missed a month. On top of that, Lee has a significant advantage in both BA and OBP. And Lee is the far superior defender. Anyone who says Lee doesn't belong in the ASG vastly overvalues the home run in relation to other statistical categories.

AB HR AVG RBI R SB 316 14 .275 51 44 0 285 6 .340 40 40 3 this is why ops is vastly overrated. I love Derrek Lee but Gonzalez has out-produced Lee so far with a lower batting average. AND the Padres have a lower team OBP than the Cubs. (if you could possibly believe that a team with a better won/loss record could have WORSE obp.)

Chad, There have been academic studies done on the subject and they shown that HGH can improve vision. The comment was half made in jest though, because I doubt it gave him Superman vision.

Chad, nobody is suggesting that OBP is the ONLY important statistic, many including I, would argue it is the MOST iof the standard batting stats. I'm sure you are familiar with studies that indicate that OBP correlates with runs scored (and thus wins) more than any other batting stat. Further, I'm not sure how the stats you show indicates that OPS is overrated at all. Of course you are aware that Runs Scored and Runs Batted In have serious limitations when assessing an individual player, because those are more team dependent than OBA or SLG. OPS does have its limitations, it does not factor in base running and its possible that it does overvalue (but only slightly) intentional walks. I've been lurking on this board for years and I've enjoyed the non-"stathead" perspective you bring. But I'm sure you would admit that the move to embrace stats other than the traditional (R, RBI, BA) has given all of us a greater understanding of the game, right?

Dave, Did you Park Factor those numbers because Gonalez plays in the biggest pitcher's park in MLB. You also have to factor that Lee gets to hit in a line-up where 6 of the 8 other spots Lee has a superior hitter with CF being an upgrade for Gonzalez (Cameron over JJ and Pie) and the catchers being equal.

its a f'n popularity contest...given how horrible some of these teams have been through the past decades its practically a success when people are only debating 1-2 of the selections.

chifan, i was saying that there was reason to think that hgh and such has helped bonds et all's eyesight. I was giving credence to what you said. I haven't read a lot about it but i do know that there is science behind it. I just didn't want him to think that I was saying it but merely that your statement wasnt' a wild joke. Voodoo, OBP is the most overrated stat in baseball and is horribly misused. Manny Ramirez has a great OBP but you don't need to look at obp to know if he's a great player. It's almost a self fulfilling prophecy. if a guy hits a ton and hits tons of homers he's a great player. by default he'll have a great obp. but a guy can have good obp but not be that great of a player. so its deeply flawed. I don't know how long you've posted here or read this site but I've been doing this for years here. so try if you want but it won't do any good. in the end, a team with a very high obp but low slugging and not much speed won't score many runs.

This : in the end, a team with a very high obp but low slugging and not much speed won’t score many runs. while undoubtedly true does not mean this : OBP is the most overrated stat in baseball I don’t know how long you’ve posted here or read this site but I’ve been doing this for years here. so try if you want but it won’t do any good. Fair enough. I'll let you keep your head in the sand. Go Cubs!

I love you enlightened saberheads. you're more annoying than devout religious people. like you have the way to God and if I don't follow, i"m going to hell. Have you ever stopped to understand why barry bonds obp is so high? cause he gets intentionally walked (and totally pitched around) so often. WHy? cause they know how little of a threat he poses while standing on first. so teams would rather give him a free pass. he has 41 runs. 16 of those were via home run. so after being on base (53h+74bb) 127 times he only scored 25 times. that's about 20 percent. not great. sure that is a testament to the guys batting behind him. No question. but it shows how little bond's great obp helps the giants. I have said it before and i'll say it again. if he would swing at pitches that weren't perfect, his average would go down as well as his slugging and obp but his rbis would go up and he would help his team more.

I think I am going to vote 25 times for Zambrano and consider it a 'team vote' for the Cubs' rotation. As of Friday Soriano's WARP was higher than Bonds', and that doesn't even count base running and throws that don't make outs/assists.

Everyone else: "Bonds blah blah blah. ASG blah blah blah. HGH blah blah blah." Me: {yawn} Player salaries aren't the only expenditures on hold for the Cubs as Tribune Co. prepares to sell the team... A $1 million project to install a new infield and drainage system at Wrigley Field, one of the park's biggest needs, could be sacrificed for another season... The permit process required for the work was under way, with the plans allowing options to add up to two rows of seating from dugout to dugout -- premium sections that likely would recoup the cost of the project in as little as a year... The Cubs are said to be worth $600 million, but the bidding for the team could reach as high as $1 billion, Fortune Magazine has estimated... A new infield and drainage system has been considered a long-needed capital improvement at Wrigley. New facilities are level with underground drainage systems, compared with Wrigley's rounded configuration for drainage. http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/cubs/451781,CST-SPT-csep02.arti… The sale will easily crack $1 bn.

I'm calling shenaningans on the Bonds vote. Last week Eastern Seaboard Programming Network was whining how BB wasn't even close in the vote and hmmm...? Steve Phillips (no comment needed here -sheesh), on "Baseball Tonight," kept emphasizing how the FANS put him over. Whatever. Smells like booshit to me. I'll vote for Z because even though Tractor Boy might deserve it, I loathe the A**@#$*s. The Reds fired Narron because the fans are staying away from the ballpark. The Cardinals fans outnumbered the Reds fans in the stands and that's something Castellini hates. He wants fannies in the $eats. $$ They're using free gas a promotion for craps sake.

I have never been a fan of Jim Hendry, going way back to his days at Creighton University. I do need to concede that one of his off season pickups, that I thought was a complete waste of money has been, to this point, a success. Marquis has definitely exceeded my expectations. I know his history has been a first half pitcher, but even if he fades in the second half his pickup has been much better than I could have imagined.

I'll reiterate my earlier post: If anyone can find me both the total number of votes cast (I think they said approximately 18 million) and most importantly the total number of votes cast on June 25th (the last report before the final), I can in fact tell you statistically the likelihood of Bonds making up that much ground. It’s a simple equation and would take 30 seconds, I just need the data. If I can get the vote totals for both of those results we can lay this "rigged election" debate to rest.

[...] • When Smurfs Attack. Big excitement in Chicago, as Jason Marquis gave up only four hits over seven innings to win for the first time in almost two months, giving the Cubs a 5-1 win over the Brewers. Chicago has won eight of nine and trail first-place Milwaukee by 6 1/2 in the Central. But never fear, Cubs fans will always find something to complain about. [...]

The Bonds vote "surge" would even make the late Mayor Daley ill. When is Lee going to do his suspension? I would suggets this week right before All-star game and then he can play the rest of the season.

I'm not buying this whole "Bonds vote surge". How come no one is talking about Griffey? He was down to Beltran on the last vote by 100K and beat him by 400K!!! There were a lot of shifts like that throughout the voting, not just Bonds. The percetage of OF votes that both Bonds and Soriano got from the last result to the final were very close. If I had the totals from the June 25th vote I could calculate a confidence interval and margins of error, but even without it seems reasonable. They were both named on about 12-13% of ballots cast both on the June 25th totals and on the final totals. The change that flip-flopped the two was likely within the margin of error. Heck, on the first set of results listed Bonds was second behind Beltran, with Soriano third and Griffey 4th!! This is not even taking into account the craziness of the voting, with 11.8 million of the 18.5 done online and a full 3 million entered online in the last 48 hours.

I dont think they count the international vote until the fan balloting is closed. It seems every year Ichiro seems to have a "surge" at the end also.

Not to pick on Pagan, but he missed another one yesterday, Jenkins's fifth inning so-called triple. Pagan's glove was brushing against the vines when the ball unfortunately landed somewhere else, in the middle of the Underarmor door. If you look at the replay and study Pagan's path toward the ball, he started toward the door, then veered to the right toward straightaway center, then hooked back around toward the door, describing a sort of question-mark shape--a shape that is appropriate to this clueless outfielder. I would just play Pie, but if you insist on a guy who can hit, free Sam Fuld!

Not to pick on Pagan, but he missed another one yesterday, Jenkins’s fifth inning so-called triple. VA Phil... I agree with you on this one. That was a ball that should have been caught. But even if it didn't get caught, it shouldn't have been turned into a triple. Very poor play by Pagan. And it wasn't the under armor door. I believe it was a blank door.

I'm wondering why there is so much clamor to vote Big Z into the All-Star game. I'm sure Z would love to go and be part of the festivities, but I see two major drawbacks to him making the team. #1 Less time to rest, the ASG just gives him greater odds for injury #2 More expensive to re-sign him if he is an 2 time allstar. Don't get me wrong, I think it is cool to have three Cubs allstars and I'm sure Z would love being there (as most players do), but in my own selfish thoughts of desiring the things that will help the Cubs win at all costs, Z to the ASG just doesn't fit that thought pattern.

his is why ops is vastly overrated. I love Derrek Lee but Gonzalez has out-produced Lee so far with a lower batting average. Derrek Lee has 61 Runs Created in 2007. Gonzales has 54.

I would think that if the MLB had any balls, they'd force the Cubs current owners to fix the infield before any sale gets approved.

This is just mischievous, I don't have a particular point, but Barrett was traded for two guys, one at Boise, Kyler Burke, and one in Chicago, Bowen. The guy at Boise is 0 for 22 and Bowen is 1 for 17. That's 1 for 39 or .026.

Derrek Lee has 61 Runs Created in 2007. Gonzales has 54. And Gonzales has more win shares (14 to 12). They seem to pretty even this year in production.

If you want to see the Cubs win, don’t vote for Z. Very true. And if you want to see someone who deserves it, don't vote for Z.

Re: Bowen, yeah I get it... 1-17 is pretty bad. All things considered, though, I have no complaints with Bowen. He'll be a fine replacement to Blanco. Long term, I think the Cub's plan on replacing Barrett with Soto.

*no, i was with you on most your post but its suggested that steroids and hgh actually improves your vision. That may or may not be true but it is definitely a possible side effect of those drugs. * This revelation really puts a wrinkle in my plan to clone Ted Williams' eyes and sell them as implants to guys struggling to hit .240.

Dave- That reason too. Chris Young definitely deserves to go.

The difference between Bowen and Barrett is Bowen is a catcher, Barrett is what we used to call a boxer. A boxer is guy behind the plate without proper mechanics, a guy who doesnt frame a pitch, doesnt help his pitcher on the close pitches and is simply content to catch the ball and get it back to the pitcher.

Would a trade for Buehrle be stupid or imposible for the Cubs? Cendeno, Murton and Jones and Cash to offset Jones contract for Buehrle

guinessman #69.......If you were the White Sux, how long wpuld you laugh at an offer like that. IMPOSSIBLE

Good trade!!!!! guinnessman your name should be genius-man! White Sox would be stupid not to jump at that!

cubs could use another lefty starter...esp. one looking to get 10-15m bucks who's a flyball pitcher. cubs only got 3 of them. like zito, someone's gonna pay too much for him next year...pretty much cuz after Z he is the FA starter market for younger pitchers.

like zito, someone’s gonna pay too much for him next year Except Buehrle is better than Zito.

kinda crazy...the cubs really dont need anything. even with the flakey pen, its in a lot better shape than it was in april/may...there's some decent arms in there if they all dont race for 70-80 appearances. well, they could use a "real" RF...some would argue for a SS...not much of either to be had.

guess they could use a C, too...also a pretty thin market for even moderate impact types.

Marmol has NASTY stuff and a great, competitive attitude to go along with it. when he struck out the final batter of the game he threw a fist in the sky and was like "Game over b**ch!" __________________

So Marmol has my vote for new Closer !!!!! Effective Immediately!!! Besides Dempsster & Howry scares me in the 9th inning they give up too many lead-off hits,walks,runs and you can't trust them if we had a 3-2 lead in the 9th they would blow the save.

Ugh... Dempster has been a very good closer all year. There is very little reason to move him out of that role unless his injury does not allow him to do so.

Hopefully Dempster & Marmol, can become a lidge & dotel 8th and 9th inning kick in the sack to the other team.

I like a Zeus 8th & Dempster 9th inning. It was only 2 short years ago, the Cub's couldn't find a closer for the life of them. Nice that they have 3 guys now that can get the job done.

"I do need to concede that one of his off season pickups, that I thought was a complete waste of money has been, to this point, a success." Quite a few of us have given Hendry shit for falling asleep two years in a row. However, and I posted this a week or so ago, his AVOIDANCES as well as signings, combined with young players making their marks have for the most part done very, very well. A begrudging tip of the hat from me. Floyd Ward (what a professional PH!) Marquis Lilly Theriot Fontenot DeRosa Pie Pagan Marmol Soriano Marshall Avoidances: Schmidt (3/44) Lugo Schmidt (3/44) Jennings Schmidt (3/44) Bradley Padilla Schmidt (3/44) Got rid of: Barrett Stuck With: Jones

hendry also stated he wasnt actively shopping and had great faith in both marmol and hill. hill i could understand, but marmol threw me. great stuff only goes so far when you cant control it, but damn...this marmol's great since his callup. it sure isnt the marmolaide that was around last year walking the park nor the guy who hit a ton of guys in AAA. hendry also managed to trade neifi and his contract which is just...weird. dont understand his love affair with blanco...

Throwing a young guy in the closer role out of anything but necessity is typically a bad idea. Most managers throw an unexperienced guy in there if you don't have a better option. I know he's got electric stuff, but at this point in the season we can't afford for him to struggle in that role. He's got closer stuff, and he's got the closer mentality, but if he struggles and blows saves, we'd be falling further behind. He can say all the right things he wants. He can tell the press that he really likes being in there late & close, but it's typically not a smooth transition. We've got a guy who's been much better than the average closer this year. Let's take it easy, eggs and cheesey.

"Hopefully Dempster & Marmol, can become a lidge & dotel 8th and 9th inning kick in the sack to the other team." I was thinking KRod/Percival, or even, dare is say, Rivera/Wettland. And yes, it has to do with race.

"Except Buehrle is better than Zito." I could argue you on that. Both Zito and Buehrle walk the tight rope, but Zito's got the edge based on his ability to strike batters out, as opposed to Buerhle's total-control-dependance.

"Buerhle’s total-control-dependance." Sounds like he needs Depends.

Dependence. And Buehrle's 28. He won't need to use Depends for a good 20 years.

I wasn't pointing out any spelling errors. i didn't even notice it. I was just making a joke about Buerhle's 'control issues'.

Buehrle 102 70 with a 122 +ERA Zito 108 71 with a 124 +ERA crunch wins. dave loses. "hendry also managed to trade neifi and his contract which is just…weird. dont understand his love affair with blanco" Well it turned out that Neifi didn't have a 2 year $5 million contract like was commonly reported. Maybe the numbers on Blanco's contract are exagerated as well.

Recent comments

  • crunch (view)

    happ, right hamstring tightness, day-to-day (hopefully 0 days).

    he will be reevaluated tomorrow.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I guess I'm not looking for that type of AB 

    Just a difference of opinion

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.