The Marshall-Cherry Relief Plan

Cubs manager Lou Piniella and pitching Larry Rothschild have been talking lately about the stress and strain Cubs relievers are under this month, what with the Cubs playing twenty days in a row, the "Dog Days" of August, and the pressures of a pennant race. Both Cousin Larry and Uncle Lou have mentioned that on September 1st, bullpen reinforcements can be added, because that's when the rosters can be expanded from 25 to 40 players. And that's true. They are correct. But actually, they really don't have to wait that long... Because of Carlos Zambrano's 43-pitch rain-shortened outing on Sunday night, "Z"'s next start has been moved up a day, to Thursday afternoon at San Francisco. And Sean Marshall's next outing has been pushed back a day, where he will be pitching Friday night at Arizona instead of Thursday afternoon at SF. So here's what the Cubs should do (and I'm sure they've already thought of this): No matter how Marshall pitches on Friday night (even if he throws a perfect game), the Cubs should option him to the minors on Saturday and recall Rocky Cherry from Iowa. (Of the Cubs relievers on optional assignment to the minors, Cherry has been the most-effective lately, going 8 IP, 5 H, 2 ER, 2 BB, 4 K over his last seven outings). It doesn't really matter whether Marshall is optioned to Peoria, Daytona, Tennessee, Iowa, or Siberia, though, because he actually wouldn't go anywhere. He would just remain with the Cubs and get his normal pre-game bullpen side sessions in, just as he would if he had not been optioned out. See, with the off-day on Monday, the Cubs can skip Marshall's turn next week (which should have been Thursday 8/30 vs MIL), because after this Friday, a 5th starter won't be needed again until Saturday 9/1 vs HOU. And the "ten-day rule" (where players on optional assignment to the minors must remain in the minors for at least ten days, unless they are recalled to replace a player on the 25-man roster who is placed on the DL) is suspended as of September 1st (it is possible to option a player to the minors on August 31st, and then recall him the very next day). So even though Marshall will have spent only seven days on optional assignment, he can be recalled on September 1st and start the game that day versus the Astros at Wrigley Field (and that would have been his next scheduled start anyway). The only downside would be that Marshall would not be on the 25-man roster as of midnight August 31st, and thus normally would not be eligible for the Cubs post-season roster. However, because Mark Prior, Angel Guzman, and Roberto Novoa are on the 60-day DL, any or all of the three can be replaced on the post-season roster by any other pitcher in the organization as of 8/31, so Marshall could be added to the Cubs post-season roster even if he is not on the 25-man roster on August 31st. So if they don't want to wait until September 1st to add an extra arm to the bullpen, the Cubs could do it as early as this Saturday! (But they probably won't...)


phew...these "site hiccups" are getting pretty predictable.

TCR...blogging the cubs to death 18-21 hours a day.

The only reason I wouldn't do exactly that, AZ Phil, would be if I felt like my starters needed the extra day of rest.

If Sunday's rainout gets made up on the 10th, the Cubs starters would go 37 days pitching every fifth day, essentally without an off-day.

Another option would be for Gallagher to make a spot start (maybe @ PIT 7/8-10?) after the rosters expand.

But if you hold to the theory that your starter are essentially the five best pitchers on your roster, why would we not want to have Marshall available out of the bullpen in the playoffs? (Assuming that we go...) I would think that it would be better to have a proven pitcher available for long relief like that in a playoff game.

would work well in a scenario like Z's start if the game had resumed in the postseason. Throw another starter out there.


That hypothetical about 37 straight days is, of course, considering that Marshall would not pitch on Monday as you said.

WES: Next Monday is an of day, so Hill and Zambrano will be pitching on five days rest versus the Brewers on Tuesday 8/28 (Hill) and Wednesday 8/29 (Zambrano). It would just be a matter of pushing Marshall back two days, from 8/30 versus the Brewers to 9/1 vs HOU, and moving Lilly and Marquis up one (although they both would still be pitching with four days rest, thanks to the off day next Monday).

In exchange for that, the Cubs could add a reliever to the pen starting this Saturday at AZ, one full week before rosters expand.

Barring injuries or postponements, the Cubs starting rotatuiin could go like this the rest of ithe way:

8/21 - at SF (Marquis)
8/22 - at SF (Hill)
8/23 - at SF (Zambrano)
8/24 - at AZ (Marshall)
8/25 - at AZ (Lilly)
8/26 - at AZ (Marquis)
8/27 - OFF DAY
8/28 - MIL (Hill)
8/29 - MIL (Zambrano)
8/30 - MIL (Lilly)
8/31 - HOU (Marquis)
9/1 - HOU (Marshall)
9/2 - HOU (Hill)
9/3 - LAD (Zambrano)
9/4 - LAD (Lilly)
9/5 - LAD (Marquis)
9/6 - LAD (Marshall or Gallagher)
9/7 - at PIT (Hill)
9/8 - at PIT (Zambrano)
9/9 - at PIT (Lilly)
9/10 - STL (Marquis) - 8/19 MAKE-UP GAME
9/11 - at HOU (Marshall)
9/12 - at HOU (Gallagher)
9/13 - at HOU (Hill)
9/14 - at STL (Zambrano)
9/15 - at STL (Lilly) - GAME #1 DAY GAME
9/15 - at STL (Marquis) - GAME #2 NIGHT GAME
9/16 - at STL (Marshall)
9/17 - CIN (Gallagher)
9/18 - CIN (Hill)
9/19 - CIN (Zambrano)
9/20 - OFF DAY
9/21 - PIT (Lilly)
9/22 - PIT (Marquis)
9/23 - PIT (Hill)
9/24 - OFF DAY
9/25 - at FLA (Zambrano)
9/26 - at FLA (Lilly)
9/27 - at FLA (Marquis)
9/28 - at CIN (Hill)
9/29 - at CIN (Gallagher/Marshall, or Zambrano if game is critical)
9/30 - at CIN (Gallagher/Marshall, or Lilly if game is critical)

NOTE: If 9/29 and 9/30 not critical, then Zambrano and Lilly would not pitch that weekend.

The Siberian Cubs?

Archie — August 21, 2007 @ 12:37 pm
But if you hold to the theory that your starter are essentially the five best pitchers on your roster, why would we not want to have Marshall available out of the bullpen in the playoffs? (Assuming that we go…) I would think that it would be better to have a proven pitcher available for long relief like that in a playoff game.

would work well in a scenario like Z’s start if the game had resumed in the postseason. Throw another starter out there.



ARCHIE: As long as a club has players on the DL on August 31st, it's easy to add a player who is not on the club's 25-man roster as of 8/31 to the post-season roster after the season.

Here's how you do it:

All players on a club's 25-man roster AND 15-day DL and 60-day DL as of 8/31 are eligible to be placed on the post-season roster.

Once the regular season is over, a club can replace any player who was on the 15-day or 60-day DL as of 8/31 with a player who was not on the 25-man roster as of 8/31, and it can be any player who was a member of the organization as of 8/31, not just players on the 40-man roster. (So theoretically, Darwin Barney could play SS for the Cubs in the World Series this year).

So if Sean Marshall is not on the Cubs 25-man roster as of 8/31 and they want to add him (or Sean Gallagher, Jose Ceda, Rocky Roquet, Casey Lambert, or Mark Pawelek, any pitcher in the Cubs organization as of 8/31) to the post-season roster, it's no big deal. All the Cubs have to do is replace Mark Prior, Roberto Novoa, Angel Guzman, or Angel Pagan with Sean Marshall. That's how K-Rod was added to the Angels post-season roster in 2002.

It's called post-season roster shenanigans, but you have to make sure that you have guys on the DL on 8/31 (the more the better), or else somebody has to get hurt in September.

Something else to remember is that it is now possible to replace an injured player DURING a post-season series (LDS, LCS, or WS). It used to be a club would have to wait until the series was over before replacing a player, but now it can be done just like it is during the season... you just put the player on the DL the day after he gets hurt and replace him with somebody else, although the injured player cannot be reactivated at any point during the post-season, and the replacement player must play the same position as the injured player.

can cliff floyd come back or what?

He is back today.

N. - I don't remember the K-Rod situation but I assume he was on the 15-day DL. Prior is already on the 60-day and thus is not part of the 40-man roster, so you couldn't do that here. Still, if it gets down to the last week of the year and it looks like the Cubs are playoff-bound there would be nothing stopping whoever the worst reliever is at the time from coming down with some kind of spontaneous ailment that would allow Marshall to sneak in. I mean, after pitching for 6-months doesn't pretty much every pitcher have some sort of ailment in their shoulder/arm that could at least pass the smell test for a DL stint?

I see now, AZ Phil.

I just misread. My mistake. Sorry.

Floyd was back yesterday I think, too. Lou says he needs some time to tune up.

RE: Marshall, I'm with johnd -- I like the idea of having Marshall around during postseason even if as a reliever. He's earned it, and he'd be a good long man if somebody gets torched early in the game.

Floyd was back yesterday I think, too.

He was with the team, but he wasn't on the active roster. He is supposed to get activated for tonight's game.


johnd — August 21, 2007 @ 2:34 pm

Prior is already on the 60-day and thus is not part of the 40-man roster, so you couldn’t do that here.


JOHN D: All players on a club's 25-man roster, the 15-day DL, and 60-day DL as of 8/31 are eligible for the playoffs, and players who were on the DL as of 8/31 can be replaced by any player in the organization (doesn't even have to be a player from the 40-man roster). The only thing is that if the replacement was not already on the 40-man roster, a spot must created for that player on the club's 40-man roster before he can be activated for the post-season. Also, post-season rosters can be changed from series to series (LDS, LCS, and WS), as long as the players are eligible to play in the post-season.

The key is to have injured guys to replace. You don't want to be too healthy!

Another thing to remember is that players acquired from another club or another organization or players signed as free-agents after 8/31 are absolutely never eligible for the post-season with the new club. A player must be in the organization as of 8/31 to be eligible for the post-season, although not necessarliy on the 40-man roster. And a player not on the 40 must be added to the 40 before he can be activated for the post-season.

If you're wondering how this all started, it happened because somebody noted that it is possible that an MLB club might have only two catchers on its 40-man roster as of 8/31, and if one gets hurt in September, there would be no back-up catcher available for the post-season unless the club is allowed to add a player (catcher) not previously on it's 40-man roster to it's playoff roster.

Of course the other solution would be to say that this roster exception should apply only to catchers, or clubs should make sure to have three or four catchers on their 40-man roster as of 8/31, but the owners chose not to do it that way, for some reason.

So now the rule is open to abuse (because it can be applied even when players on the 40-man roster from the same position are available), and it has indeed been abused.

Cliff Floyd was reactivated from the Restricted List and Henry Blanco was reactivated from the 60-day DL after yesterday's game, and both are now back on the Cubs 25-man roster and are with the Cubs in San Francisco.

To make room for Floyd and Blanco, Ronny Cedeno was optioned to Iowa and Koyie Hill was Designated for Assignment (and probably is riding the waiver wire as we speak).

"can cliff floyd come back or what?"

DAVE: "He is back today."

I think the poster meant emotionally, not physically. To that I have to say, we'll soon see...Death of a loved one, divorce, etc., are very debilitating emotionally and I would have no idea if Cliff can "turn it off" and just play baseball. Ward has given us more pop from the left side, anyway.

Having Marshall in the pen as our only capable long reliever in the playoffs (IF they make it) wouldn't be bad at all.

Rob G. — August 21, 2007 @ 3:18 pm
Krod wasnt even on the 40-man roster before Sept 1st.


ROB G: And the thing about K-Rod is that he was (is) really an exceptional young pitcher.

Most clubs wouldn't WANT to add somebody to their playoff roster with zero or little MLB experience or who wasn't already on the 40-man roster as of 8/31, simply because guys not on the 40-man roster are either not that good, or else probably not ready for the spotlight of the post-season.

K-Rod was an exception.

I doubt very much that that there are any players in the Cubs organization right now who are not presently on their 40-man roster who the Cubs would want on their post-season roster as a replacement.for a veteran player.

The Cubs (and most every MLB club) will look to their 40-man roster for a replacement before ever considering somebody who wasn't on the 40 as of 8/31.

I thought Marmol was our long reliever?

"I think the poster meant emotionally, not physically."

actually, i did mean physically, but yeah, i do hope he's checked in mentally.

I'm sure Marshall wouldn't appreciate losing a month of MLB pay and getting kicked off the playoff roster. The Devil's Advocate would tell him to pitch better.

I'd rather have Marshall in October than, say, Samarzdija.

series preview up...

No offense, but I don't think 1 or 2 Rocky Cherry appearances are worth losing Marhsall for the playoffs.

Recent comments

The first 600 characters of the last 16 comments, click "View" to see rest of comment.
  • there's nothing like crapping out of the playoffs with a strong/young cheap team after pinching pennies for years then having theo talk about having to be creative with money to make things work for 2016...but hey, baseball isn't baseball without a farmer's market and beer garden plaza with ice rinks.

    they can do both...then again, if you want to look at it from a business point of view, they don't have to do both because the team is expected to be competitive and the merch+tickets+eyes-on-team are going to be at a peak unless they fail badly.

  • Really ?

    They are trying to bring the facility to the 20th century.
    I think they know what they are doing.

  • With the Cubs adding Pierce Johnson to their roster and not exposing/losing him to the Rule 5 Draft keeps the trade ancestry tree alive that started in 1999 with Tom Gordon and undrafted Adam Morrissey and includes 17 players, the trade tree progressed to involve the Hee Sop Choi for Derrek Lee deal and the famous Aramis Ramirez/Kenny Lofton deal..Pierce Johnson is the compensation pick for Aramis Ramirez in 2012

  • Well played.

  • Yeah, the Rex brothers, Tyrannosaurus and Oedipus

  • When I first saw the Tweet, I thought there were two guys. Happy Thanksgiving gang! And TheoJed!

  • They can use another Brother

  • Cubs acquired Rex Brothers. Awesome fit for this team. Wander Cabrera going to COL.

  • "MLB announces #Cubs Minor League RHP Tanner Griggs receives 50-game suspension without pay after testing positive for amphetamine"

    2014 12th rounder...

    it's hard to know who to blame...on one hand he's a baseball player, on the other he sells cars in the offseason...either job leads to amphetamine abuse. =p

  • Thanks PHIL! I thought only the Cubs had control until the last day of the MLB 2015 Season.

  • that's awesome...makes me look forward to hearing theo talk some more about how the team needs to be creative with finances because money is tight.


  • See What The Cubs Are Building This Off-Season For Wrigley Plaza, Clubhouse

  • CUBBIES-4-EVER: It's not unusual for a PTBNL to be chosen after the Rule 5 Draft from the list of Rule 5 eligible players who were not selected. That way, a club gets a player they like (perhaps somebody like OF Jeffrey Baez) without the cumbersome Rule 5 roster restrictions that go with a Rule 5 Draft pick.

  • Clayton Richard is absolutely, positively NOT a free-agent. He is under club control through the 2016 season. 

  • Haren was 4-2 with a 4.01 ERA with the Cubs. Seems like he worked out just as expected.