Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

39 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (one slot is open), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL and one player has been DESIGNATED FOR ASSIGNMENT (DFA)   

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, and nine players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, three players are on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-23-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
* Luke Little
Hector Neris 
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
* Matt Mervis
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 9 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL: 3
Kyle Hendricks, P 
* Drew Smyly, P 
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P

DFA: 1 
Garrett Cooper, 1B 
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Tied to the Trax

The Cubs once again find themselves the sole proprietors of the NL Central's top spot with tonight's series win over the Houston Astros. Lou won the first leg of the 4-start parlay he laid down earlier this week as Tricky Trachsel hemmed and hawed his way to a laborious 5-inning win, most of it thanks to a 4-spot the Cubs hung on Woody Williams before he could remember where he stashed any foreign substances on his uniform. The power show the Cubs put on tonight was certainly an encouraging sign but the key item to take away from the game was that we stole a win with one of Hendry's worst ideas ever on the mound. The first three innings were a chore enough to watch as Trachsel continuously balanced a tightrope, an act which he made all the more difficult by adding a degree of difficulty each inning. One inning on a bike, the next balancing some bowling pins and finally riding a bike and balancing some bowling pins. By the time the fourth showed up, he was lucky there was that 4-run safety net ready to catch him. Let's take a quick peek at what was going on in Trachsel's head during the 4th. (81 mph junk to Cub-killer Carlos Lee hammered to left) Trachsel: Man, he hit that hard, lucky this park is huge, Soriano should have that one. (Lee rounding the bases, the crowd in a frenzy) Trachsel: WTF? How did that get out? When the hell did they put those ridiculous seats in left field and what happened to the Astroturf? Eight wonder of the world, my ass. And why the f*** is there a train whistle going off? (Lamb steps up to the plate) Trachsel: Lamb huh? Lamb chops don't sound bad for dinner. Man there's a real good place downtown I recall. I wonder if Archie still works the bar there. That guy made the best hi-balls. (The entire stadium patiently awaits for the first pitch) Trachsel: Aw crap, I guess I better throw something. Will it be the 75 mph junk that goes to the left or the 80 mph junk that goes down? (Lamb grounds out to second, Luke Scott to the plate) Trachsel: Luke Scott huh? I hate it when people have two first names. It's really weird. You know what else was weird? That man-hug McGwire gave his first base coach when he hit #62 off me. That was really uncomfortable. (Trachsel finally gets around to throwing a pitch to Scott) Trachsel: Almost as uncomfortable as watching Mark Grace trying to pick up chicks when he was in a slump. When he meant fat, he meant fat. My arm's starting to hurt. (At some point he retires Scott and then Loretta hits a liner that ends up falling in the first few rows) Trachsel: Damn, that might be a double....WTF? When did we start playing at Thillens? And seriously why the f*** is there a train whistle? (The #8 hitter Eric Munson walks on 6 pitches) Trachsel: Did I really just walk the #8 hitter with no one on? I even put myself to sleep when I pitch. (About 26 pitches into the inning and pitcher Woody Williams fouls off a ball) Trachsel: Damn this is taking forever and damn my shoulder hurts. God, I always said I would never bother you about baseball, lord knows you have bigger things to worry about. But if you could make this pain in my shoulder stop for ten minutes, I would really appreciate it. Well you know the rest, a nice series win; would have been nicer if it was a sweep, but first place for a day either way. Time to put an end to the Cards season....

Comments

Funny post Rob G. I'm concerned about DLee being out today. He looked like he was really hurting yesterday. Then again, DWard is da man.

FROM A PREVIOUS THREAD: cubster — September 13, 2007 @ 3:05 pm I don’t think they could put Soto (or any of the Sept 1 callups) on the roster unless he was there replacing someone by injury…please correct me if I’m wrong. =========================== CUBSTER: Here are the MLB rules for post-season rosters as of 2007 (some are new, some remain unchanged): All players on a club's 25-man roster, 15-man and 60-day DL as of midnight 8/31 are eligible for the post-season. Of that pool of players, any player on the club's 15-day DL or 60-day DL can be replaced on the 25-man roster prior to the start of any post-season series (LDS, LCS, or WS) by any player who was in the organization as of 8/31 (regardless of position), and the player does not have to have been on the 40-man roster as of 8/31, either, although the player would need to be added to the 40 prior to being made active for a post-season series. A club's 25-man roster can be changed from series to series (maybe the NLDS might be best played with three lefty starters, while the NLCS might be better served with one less lefty in the pen or an extra bat off the bench), but the roster changes must be made between series, and the only way roster changes can be made is if the club has players on the DL (because these are the only players who can be "swapped" for other players). Fortunately, the Cubs have four such players (Guzman, Novoa, Pagan, and Prior). HOWEVER -- If a player is injured during the LDS, LCS, or WS, the player can (with MLB approval) be placed on the DL and replaced by another player without having to wait until the start of the next series, but for a player going on the DL during a post-season series this way, the player must be replaced by a player who plays the same position (and again, it doesn't have to be a player who was on the 40-man roster or 15-day or 60-day DL as of 8/31, it can be any player who was in the organization as of 8/31), and the injured player must remain inactive for the duration of the post-season.

Last year the A's used a player, Mark Kiger who never appeared in a amjor league game. So with injuries anything is possible as far as the playoff roster goes.

If I may comment on the Florida Marlins from the thread yesterday: Crunch nailed a lot of the reasons behind the attendance problems in #180. I would suggest the following applies as well: Miami, and southeast Florida, is a football town, more specifically, a Dolphins town. The Dolphins dominate the radio and water cooler conversation scene, even when the Marlins or Heat or the Hurricanes are playing for a championship. It was expected that "the Cubans" would fill the ballpark because, well, everyone knows they're crazy for baseball. That hasn't been the case. Youth baseball (mostly Hispanic) from tee ball through high school does very well here, but that hasn't translated into Marlins attendance. There is a very real sense here that the Marlins here have betrayed the fans, with talent dumps after their World Series wins, especially after the 1997 season. It really poisoned the well. The current Marlins ownership could hardly be worse in terms of public image, with their constant wheedling and whining for public financing of a new stadium. Most evenings, it rains. When there's nice weather for a day game, people have too many other things to do. Now, the big push is to build a new stadium where the Orange Bowl presently stands. I work 6 blocks from the OB, and if you've ever been there, you know it would be difficult to choose a worse place to put a baseball stadium. The general public attitutde towards the Marlins is one of hostility or indifference. I'm not sure which is worse. The Marlins need to leave and go to Vegas or whatever other community is willing to fork over the hundreds of millions the Marlins demand for the pleasure of their company. BuhBye.

No offense to Danville Joe, he's certainly not the only one who has ever done it, but I hate it when people carry conversations over. It's not like the last thread was closed. What's with the Trachsel hatred, anyway, Rob G? Did he not sign an autograph or something? Sure, he's no good (Jones, call the freaking ball!), but he did the job tonight in what should be his last start for the Cubs.

The Real Neal: I hate it when people carry conversations over. It’s not like the last thread was closed. But... A lot of people only read the most recent thread. The only time this annoys me is when it isn't baseball related. Not cool carrying over a political, religious, etc. argument.

Nice post, Rob G. Reminds me of the scene from Bull Durham when Kevin Costner is talking to himself while at bat. I wonder what it's like in Soriano's head? Soriano at Bat: [rubbing pine tar on bat] I like to swing, this is a big bat. [walking to plate] I hope I get a good pitch. It's gonna be a fastball. [windup for first pitch] Here it comes, I know it, I can tell, it's a fastball down the middle! Annie, Annie, Annie! [swing and a miss] Who the f--- is this Annie? When can I swing again? I'm looking forward to the "Voices inside Z's Head" installment after tonight's game.

Like Ryno said, people never read the last thread, and who cares as long as the topic is relevant.

I think it's safe to say that Mel Hall will not be a feature in the "Cub Alumni Notebook" section of the magazine Vine Line anytime soon. By far, Mel Hall's best moment as a Cubs was being part of the Joe Carter/Rick Sutcliffe trade in 1984. But this kinda puts things in perspective. http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=ArKS0fRkWoclOZCds6VYkZIo0bYF?slug… FORT WORTH, Texas (AP) -- Former major league outfielder Mel Hall was indicted Wednesday on charges that he sexually assaulted two girls -- ages 12 and 14 -- who played on elite basketball teams he coached in the 1990s. The 46-year-old Hall could face life in prison if convicted, said Tarrant County Assistant District Attorney Kim D'Avignon. Hall was indicted on three counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child, two counts of sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency/fondling.

Rob G.: "Time to put an end to the Cards season…." True That... The Cubs have a 4 game lead in the loss column over STL. Taking 3 of four against the flailing Red Birds would eliminate them, while put tons of pressure on MIL to have to take 2 of 3 from the Reds just to keep pace with Cubs for first place. Go Cubs!!!

Rob G., outstanding Thillens reference. I had to bring up my Thillens memory. I remember playing there in the 12-year-old little league tourney and we played some team from South Shore with this catcher named Carlos who had a moustache. He was the 1983 version of Danny Almonte--hit two homers and we lost 2-0.

Trachsel is such a throwback. I remember how much he sucked from my childhood lol

Interesting note in the Sun-Times this morning. Here are Scott Eyre's #'s since the break: 21G 1.02ERA 17.2IP 12H 2ER 11BB 16K Now I know he hasn't pitching in many meaningful game situations in that time span, but those numbers are really good regardless of when you're pitching. WHIP's a bit high, though. 1.3 or so.

Interesting note in the Sun-Times this morning. Here are Scott Eyre’s #’s since the break: Is that not what I have been saying for a while now? :) And a 1.3 WHIP isn't terrible. Not great, but not bad either.

Trachsel has basically showed me nothing since his acquisition. His K rate has really fallen this year. Currently 3.05 K/9 IP (counting both Baltimore and Cubs games). Was 4.32 last year with the Mets, which is still pretty bad. Nice to get some innings out of him last night, but he was getting hit pretty hard.

"put tons of pressure on MIL to have to take 2 of 3 from the Reds just to keep pace with Cubs for first place." Unfortunately the Brewers miss Arroyo and Harang. Cubs need to take 3 out of four.

Guys - I really like the poetic license you guys use when summarizing games sometimes. Rob and Trans are especially good at it. We don't come on here to get the box score and generic recap. We come on here to read what people think about the game, and where we go from here. Just wanted to say thanks...

Rob G, your first link doesn't work. You get this message using Firefox (1Trackback pings and Comments must use HTTP POST) I'm surprised no one told you yet. I can't be the only one who actually reads the articles, ....? But I wanted to follow it, because if the speculation that Trachsel won't start again is true, then who pitches for us on the 19th against Cincy? Here are the previous six games followed by the upcoming probables and days rest and please correct whatever's wrong: 8 Z 9 Trachsel 10 Lilly 11 Marquis 12 Hill 13 Trachsel ------------------------- 14 Z (6) 15 Lilly (5) 15 Marshall (-) 16 Marquis (5) 17 Hill (5) 18 Z (4) 19 ?

cwtp - I think that they mentioned that Lilly was going to have to go on short rest at some point. I would guess that the 19th is the day...

cwtp.... if I recall correctly, Lilly is going to be throwing on the 19th on 3 days rest.

Which is more annoying: the train whistle for the 'Stros, or that ridiculous "rattler" sound effect that's pumped up during the D - Back's games?

re: Trachsel Hendry basically replaced Marshall with Marshall at his worst: Trachsel's 3 starts: 13 IP, 20 Hits Marshall's worst 3 game stretch: 13 IP 22 Hits Why Trashel? I thought we were going with the horses that got us here...

FWIW, The "probably pitchers" report on Cubs.com states that Lilly pitches the first game on Saturday (against Looper) and Marshall the second game (against Pineiro). And it lists Z for the 18th, on three days rest. I don't mind putting Z on three-days rest. Z gets unhinged mentally and needs positive reinforcement or ratification, but not of the "atta-boy" variety. You can't just tell Z that you're giving him an extra day of rest because you think he needs it. Instead, may Lou has set this up so that Z now believes he is so "important" that we "need" him for the "big" Cardinal series. And since he will be so rested and sharp, we have the confidence to "push" him out there on three-days rest next Tuesday because we need him again to win this division for us.

I went to bed with the Cubs up 6-2 after 7. For the last 2 innings, I figured Lou would pitch Wood for a second inning and Wuertz, or someone else for the last inning. I was surprised to see Marmol pitch 2 innings. With a big series with the Cards this weekend, I think pitching Marmol 2 innings in a game with a 4 run lead was a huge mistake. If the Astors got a couple men on base, maybe you bring him in. I hope this dosn't come back to bite us this weekend. Let's put the Cards out of the race!

TJ, I thought the same thing when Marmol came out in the 8th. Then when he came back out in the 9th, I almost cried. I want him fresh for this weekend. If Lou thought that he needed a bit of work to stay sharp, then that is one thing, but to trot him out there for two innings...that seems a bit reckless. With a 4 run lead, why do you have Carmen Pignatello in the bullpen anyway? Let him mop up.

DC Tom: "The “probably pitchers” report on Cubs.com states that Lilly pitches the first game on Saturday (against Looper) and Marshall the second game (against Pineiro)." I hope Marshall does pitch the night game. Look at these 2007 splits: Marshall (Day starts): 3-5, 4.60 ERA, 1.67 WHIP Marshall (Night Starts): 4-2, 3.35 ERA, 1.14 WHIP Lilly (Day Starts): 8-3, 3.11 ERA, 0.94 WHIP Lilly (Night Starts): 7-4, 4.53 ERA, 1.36 WHIP No brainer to have Lilly go in the day game. Plus it gives Lilly just the few extra hours to get ready to go on short rest.

DC TOM:'I’m blaming Will Ohman for all of this. And Michael Barrett." I second this, brother.

So - does going 10-6 from tonight's game wrap the Division for the Cubs at 85 wins?

Not that I'm going to actually do this, or expect anyone else to, but it would be really cool to see a 162-game graph of the BP postseason odds, overlaid with the Brewers' postseason odds.

One other thing - I was driving on 90-E yesterday and saw a billboard for TBS' MLB playoff coverage. It was basically a collage of various players on playoff teams in action. It pictured guys like Jeter, Ortiz, and Wright. Guess who was front and center, mid-windup? Carlos Zambrano. I hope that's not a jinx.

TBS will broadcast all of the Division series plus the NL Championship Series; Fox has the AL Championship Series. So while we can expect to get our traditional heavy dose of Yankees-Red Sox promos from Fox, the folks at TBS must be praying to the baseball gods every day that the Cubs win the division. If you go to the TBS "Hot Corner" video streaming site, all they seem to have are Cubs stuff (Wrigley Field "tour", interview with DeRosa). Well, that and Alyssa Milano.

FWIW the Brewers are 5 - 7 against the Reds this year and I think that the Reds are built to beat a team like the Brewers. So I can see disastrous thing happening to them. GO BIG RED!

"TBS will broadcast all of the Division series plus the NL Championship Series;" So...IF the Cubs make the playoffs, we don't have to hear one game announced by Joe Buck? Wow! Thank God!

I thought it was a good move to leave Marmol in. 4 run lead in the JuiceBox isn't all that much, and, when you can lock down a September win, you should do it. I have never liked the idea of leaving a 2nd-tier picther in an important game under the assumption that your bullpen can stop the bleeding if the other team starts to rally, particulalry when that other team is at home. So, take the W, and move on. Also, Howry and Dempster had the night off.

Terry Mulholland is now starting the game on the 19th. Or, maybe in Miami, where he has a condo.

With the mention of Mullholland, I dont know if anyone else had a flash back to 1998 when the Cubs turned the game ending double play against the Astros on Wednesday. In one of the must win games against the Astros at the end of 1998 Mullholand got a come backer hit to him and he air mailed it over Grace's head to lose the game.

Good news for the Cubs: Padres are only 1.5 games ahead of LA and COL for the Wild Card. Let's hope it stays close so that those last 4 games against the Brewers are meaningful.

Archie, A four-run lead isn't exactly a walk in the park. Especially in that park. Throw Piggy out there and let him mop up? What if he struggles? He's 3 base hits away from the tying run being at the plate in that ballpark. Then what do you do? Burn your closer for the third straight day so he's CERTAINLY unavailable tonight? You can't throw Howry. You've already used Marmol. What's the planley, stanley? Marmol can still throw tonight. Lou didn't burn him up. He only threw like 8 pitches in the 8th or whatever he was. No wonder he threw him in the 9th.

The double play was a thing of beauty. I've been hard on Dempster, but to get in position to close out a 3-6-1 with the tying run on third was huge. The degree of difficulty on that play was exceptionally high. All three players involved get really high marks. That's a fantastically hard play to pull off.

Billy Bucks: "I thought it was a good move to leave Marmol in. 4 run lead in the JuiceBox isn’t all that much, and, when you can lock down a September win, you should do it." You make an excellent point, but Lou could of had Wuertz go in the 8th, and if he got out of it, then you could use Maremo in the 9th and give him the 1 inning of work to keep him sharp. If Wuertz struggled, then you could of brought Marmol in the 8th to bail him out. Not the end of the world, but I would of preferred only 1 inning for Marmol last night.

Marmol has gone 2 or more innings 10 times this season. Each time, Lou did not pitch him the next game. But the good news is that Marmol has not given up a single run coming off a 2 inning stint. I expect Marmol won't pitch today but will pitch in one of the two games on Saturday. I think it was a good decision to stick with Marmol. A win is a win. If you limit him to one inning on Thursday so you "save" him for today, that means he's gone two days in a row and makes it hard to use him in *either* game on Saturday. If you trot Wuertz out there and he gives up a couple hits, then you risk having to go to the well again and then you are totally screwed. The way Lou did it, he sealed the Thursday win and the entire pen except for Marmol is as rested as they can be going into four games in three days.

"I didn't get to see him myself. Cubs officials say lots of good things, but you'd expect them to do so. For me, this is is a real "need more information" case. I really don't know what to think here." ah...john sickels...honesty. good stuff. seriously. its refreshing in the era where "talking heads" who wanna get on TV/radio to be an "expert" can be human and real with their information instead of trying to be the undeniable oracle of self-worth.

34.1ip 68h... 53 runs in 34.1ip (42 earned) 11 HR in 34.1ip ...mike maroth, you're no jeff weaver.

Will Alyssa Milano be part of the TBS broadcast team? The only thing better would be Jessica Alba as a field reporter.

"How to explain a trade like Scott Moore and Rocky Cherry for Steve Trachsel? Nobody noticed this one, but it might be the worst trade in several seasons..." umm...its scott moore and rocky cherry. yeah, i personally think those 2 could have brought more, but umm...well...scott moore is all arm while his glove is digressing. they might also wanna watch moore swing a bat. he's far from refined with his swing no matter what he's feasting on in AAA. seen him with the cubs and seen him in BAL and his swing is still pretty damn hacky. cherry's umm...old and something (no idea what) has come unglued between his 1st half and 2nd half...and he's not exactly young. i personally feel with very little doubt they could have snagged more, esp. with moore's age and both guy's relative cheapness for years...but that is one hell of a drama queen statement. the whole thing seems to be the author overvaluing scott moore. the whole "but he's a young guy and look at those #s" thing only goes so far.

What’s with the Trachsel hatred, anyway, Rob G? Did he not sign an autograph or something? Just having some fun, chill. Rob G, your first link doesn’t work. You get this message using Firefox (1Trackback pings and Comments must use HTTP POST) I’m surprised no one told you yet. I can’t be the only one who actually reads the articles, ….? Fixed, it was the link to the Sullivan blog entry mapping out the rotation. The 4-start parlay I referred was Trachsel last night, Z tonight and then Z and Lilly back on 3 days rest. Marmol came in the 8th to face the Astros best hitters. It was the right move.

"worst trade..." Agree that the two guys weren't likely in the Cubs plans, with Ram (and DeRosa to fill-in) and Lee at the corners-- but, they might have yielded more than a so-so pitcher who was rented for 3 starts.

I’m looking forward to the “Voices inside Z’s Head” installment after tonight’s game. Sneak preview for you... ((Crickets))))

"Predictably, Trachsel was awful in his first two starts, allowing nine runs in eight innings, with the Cubs losing both games." Talk about revisionist history. His first game: 6.0 ip, 7 h, 3 er, 1 bb, 3 k Sure he was tagged with the loss, but that start actually qualifies as a 'quality start'. Then his third game he pitched well enough. Yes the second game was horrid, but if not for a misplay by Jones he could have escaped that inning and gone five and given up 2 or 3.

Nothing...just going to chill and hopefully watch the game with Carlos M. since he'll have the night off.

Sickels sure had a bad week, father-in-law in a bad car accident and brother-in-law had a serious stroke. That's tough...

“The worst trade in several seasons….” hmm... worst trade? the cubs traded for a mediocre/bad pitcher for two mediocre prospects, one of which had nowhere to play on the Cubs. something tells me that this isn't as bad as say, the aj for nathan/liriano/bonser trade. anyone else agree? could moore and cherry have gotten more? possibly... but I don't think I am really going out on a limb by saying it won't hurt the Cubs either. Go Teflon Jim!!!!!!! Yea... damn hendry - what the hell was he thinking having such a bad off-season. i mean, who would sign soriano, derosa, lilly, marquis, ward, etc. They all have sucked.

Sneak preview for you… ((Crickets))) Well played.

The key question in the Trachsel trade is was his 3 starts so far appreciably better than what Marshall could have done. I say no. Marsahll could have done better based upon his stats up to this point. Marshal's era is under 4. The means it was a bad trade to give up two "prospects" (we can agrue about that) for one month of a pitcher we didn't need or (most of us) want.

"something tells me that this isn’t as bad as say, the aj for nathan/liriano/bonser trade. anyone else agree?" cubs didnt trade away c.young (the pitcher) and adrian gonzalez for adam eaton and a.otsuka last i checked, too. all that aside, i cant believe he thinks that highly of s.moore. i can understand the notion that hendry sold low on that lot of talent, but i dont think the talent is as damning to lose as the author of the piece is saying.

If Trachsel starts again and gets clobbered, can you use Blood on the Trax as the headline? Thanks.

The key question in the Trachsel trade is was his 3 starts so far appreciably better than what Marshall could have done. I say no. See post #27 for more ammo.

dave: "Yea… damn hendry - what the hell was he thinking having such a bad off-season. i mean, who would sign soriano, derosa, lilly, marquis, ward, etc. They all have sucked." Yeah, and his team is 4 games above .500 in the worst division in baseball.

MANNY: No pleasing you, is there? Look at the starter's records lately? Weren't you pushing for Hendry NOT to sign the FA pitchers he did? Indeed, they turned out to be the BEST signings in MLB for starters, I believe. And DeRosa? You didn't like him as well, right? I mean, you are sour grapes it seems unless the team is 20 games out in front and off the chart statistics for the entire team. It hasn't worked out that way, but it certainly has been a very entertaining year and a HUGE improvement over last year. And, they MAY end up as the Division champs with 85 wins. But it isn't good enough for you is it?

"Blood on the Trax" nice.... Manny's like my Dad, if there isn't something to bitch about there isn't something to talk about. I'm sure we all know someone like that.

"Yeah, and his team is 4 games above .500 in the worst division in baseball." Manny, Your unabashed hatred of Jim Hendry has gone on long enough. Dusty led the Cubs to 66 wins last year. Hendry fired his incompetent ass, brought in Piniella, and made a bunch of smart signings in the offseason. Now, his team is on the brink of making the playoffs. I swear, sometimes I feel like as long as Hendry is the GM you'd rather see the cubs lose 100 games than win the world series.

Yeah, and his team is 4 games above .500 in the worst division in baseball. Well... I will take the 15-20 game improvement or whatever it will end up being, especially if they make the playoffs. That type of improvement is quite significant.

E-Man: "MANNY: No pleasing you, is there?" A World Series would please me. "Weren’t you pushing for Hendry NOT to sign the FA pitchers he did?" No, that is incorrect. I like the lilly signing, did not like the Marquis signing. "And DeRosa? You didn’t like him as well, right?" AGAIN, that is incorrect. I did like him as a supersub, not the everyday starting 2B, like Hendry said he signed him for. "And, they MAY end up as the Division champs with 85 wins. But it isn’t good enough for you is it?" It would be OK, but with all the money spent and as bad as the division and pretty much the NL is, to really make me happy this team needs to get to the WS.

And, they MAY end up as the Division champs with 85 wins. ====== Manny expects 83.4 wins, don't misquote him.

I imagine inside Z’s head... ====== visions of a piñata umpire being smashed to smithereens with clubs

Doug D.: "I swear, sometimes I feel like as long as Hendry is the GM you’d rather see the cubs lose 100 games than win the world series." Sorry man, I don't think Hendry can put together a WS winning team. And no, I would be the happiest person alive if the Cubs won the WS no matter who the manager or GM was, but again, I don't think Hendry is that man. Now Terry Ryan, he can be that man.

dave: "Well… I will take the 15-20 game improvement or whatever it will end up being, especially if they make the playoffs. That type of improvement is quite significant." Yes, a 17 game improvement is very good, but doesn't mean too much to me if they don't make it to the playoffs.

Yes, a 17 game improvement is very good, but doesn’t mean too much to me if they don’t make it to the playoffs. Perhaps... but I am not sure what you expected. I don't think you can expect much more improvement in a year. I still think that this team will make the playoffs. And I still think that this team can compete in the playoffs (though a lot of that depends on what is going on in Z's head/mechanics). It is also important to remember that the the Cubs still have the best record in the NL since June 3rd. That too is fairly impressive.

What is manny going to complain about when Hendry is gone? Any guesses? I'm thinking... Wrigley's grounds crew, or possibly the food vendors.

dave: "Perhaps… but I am not sure what you expected. I don’t think you can expect much more improvement in a year." Well, I predicted the Cubs were going to win 83 games this year, and I would be willing to bet if you looked at the thread were we all made out predictions I was well on the low side. In fact, there were many of a poster who blasted me for predicting so low. So there was many a poster who expected more improvement. "It is also important to remember that the the Cubs still have the best record in the NL since June 3rd. That too is fairly impressive." 52-40 is the best record in the NL since June 3? Did not know that, that is impressive, I guess.

Wild Thing: "What is manny going to complain about when Hendry is gone? Any guesses?" I thought the same thing about TCR if Baker and Neifi were gone....:) But everyone finds something.

How many "Worst to First" Division winners are there in the last 7-10 years, anyway?

52-40 is a damn good record. Winning at that rate will get you 91 wins over the course of an entire season.

Well, I predicted the Cubs were going to win 83 games this year So, you knew the Cubs would suffer an unprecedented power outage this year? You factored that in? You knew Alfonso Soriano would be hurting most of the year?? You factored that in? You knew Theriot would win the SS job and Barrett would be traded mid season? You knew Z would suffer two major slumps this year?? You knew the Cubs would underperform their pythagoreans?? You knew the Cubs starters would be the most stable staff in the NL, with four SP's in the top 25 for innings pitched?? BS, nobody knew any of that would happen. So everyone's predictions are irrelevant at this point. Enough.

e-man - NL from the last 20 years AZ 98/99 San Diego 97/98 Philly 92/93 (even harder as it was only 2 divisions) Atl 90/91 (same note about philly)

if hendry would just make aram, dlee, and j.jones hit homers it'd help. he's over 50, out of shape, and doesnt throw a ball or swing a bat...aka, he's one of the most important factors to how aram, dlee, and jjones are playing. screw him if he can make them hit homers. hire some other old fat man who knows how to make players play baseball.

CHAD: Geez! Only a few. Well, they have not done it yet, but it certainly is quite an achievement based on what you show. BTW, just found out today Ryan Braun dad is Israeli. They were polling Milwaukee bloggers on if he should play on Yom Kippur. Did you catch?

"endry fired his incompetent ass..." Watching Dusty pontificate his wordly baseball knowledge on ESPN is hilarious - he's a good match for Kruk and the other knuckleheads who blather on that show. His interview with Joe Morgan was priceless, since they were both ragging on Torre about his alleged racism as outlined by Sheffield and Lofton. Dusty must've thought they weren't playing enough in the hot weather during the mid - point of the season.

thanks Chad for that link... It will be interesting to see if Ryan Braun doesn't play next Friday night and Saturday in Atlanta, since he shouldn't play if he is observing Yom Kippur. Interestingly, Jason Marquis (according to the Paul Sullivan link in this thread) is scheduled to pitch the Friday game at Wrigley vs Pittsburgh. But it's a day game and Yom Kippur observation doesn't start until sundown Friday (thru sundown Saturday)

When Scott Moore and Rocky Cherry become useful players than we can say that trade was bad...as of right now they are just fringe major leaguers.

It's so funny to see Manny Trillo with this gloomy anti-Hendry vibe when he was the great Cubs apologist of 2004, signing off every damn post with: In Dusty We Trusty!!!!!! He likewise defended Hendry.

When Scott Moore and Rocky Cherry become useful players than we can say that trade was bad…as of right now they are just fringe major leaguers. That's true, Jeff, except that Trachsel took Marshall's spot in the rotation. I'd rather take my chances with Marshall than Trax. Hopefully, Trax picks it up a bit these last few weeks and gets hot if we make the playoffs.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    I don’t buy that. They had been doing that for years.

    They did it with Matt Holliday. They did it with John Lackey. They did it with Mark Mulder. They did it with Jason Heyward, who had a great year for them. I’m sure there’s more but those come to mind immediately.

    I attribute it more to a breakdown in what they’re doing in terms of development than a culture thing.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    They won those trades and sacrificed their culture. That’s exactly their problem.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    The other part that’s kind of crazy is they made two very high profile trades, one for Goldschmidt and one for Arenado, and they very clearly won those trades. They just haven’t been able to develop players the last handful of years the way they usually do.

    I guess the moral there is it’s hard to stay on top of your game and be good at what you do in perpetuity.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Marmol was extended at the beginning of the year. Two years I believe.

  • crunch (view)

    Jesse Rogers @JesseRogersESPN
    Craig Counsell doesn’t have a timetable for Cody Bellinger who technically has two cracked ribs on his right side. CT scan showed it today.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Thought it might have been David Peralta given the open 40 man spot and how PCA has played so far. 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    I hope they keep Mozeliak a few more years. Marmol too!

  • crunch (view)

    wow, counsell coming with the early lineup.  rarity.

    canario/tauchman/happ RF/CF/LF

  • crunch (view)

    PCA called up.

  • crunch (view)

    welp...

    bellinger...fractured rib.

    a not-very-ready PCA will probably be called up when it would be much better for him to be in AAA getting regular ABs.