Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

39 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (one slot is open), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL and one player has been DESIGNATED FOR ASSIGNMENT (DFA)   

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, and nine players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, three players are on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-23-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
* Luke Little
Hector Neris 
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
* Matt Mervis
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 9 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL: 3
Kyle Hendricks, P 
* Drew Smyly, P 
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P

DFA: 1 
Garrett Cooper, 1B 
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

TCR Game 1 Roundtable

The Cubs first playoff game in four years ended just about as well as their last one. Your TCR writers had a little running dialogue during and after the game. -------------- Rob G: The Cubs leadoff the third with a double by Z and promptly ended the inning with Z still standing on second. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is losing to the Braves in 1998 and 5 is the ball getting through Leon's Durham glove in 1984 how disappointing was that inning? Or as Cubs fans were we conditioned enough to fully expect that exact outcome. Cubnut: I was completely unphased by it. I figured Zambrano stranding Young in the first inning was a momentum boost for us. Now we're just back to even. Plus yes, we are conditioned to expect failure. Rob G: Judging by the home plate umps O'Hare size strike zone and the current groundball ratio of about 18:1 between the two pitchers, anyone else think this game will still be scoreless in the 10th? 11th? 21st? And how many pitches should Z go so he's good enough to go for Game 4 on three days rest? Cubnut: Before answering your question, Rob, I'm going to take a moment to register my upset at Drew's bomb: Crap! Regarding the pitch count question, 100 seems like a nice number, don't you think? We're at 52 pitches through four innings, so I would say we're on a nice pace. I'm more concerned that Zambrano might be the only guy in our lineup who can hit Webb, and if we put in a reliever, we'll lose Z's bat! (After Theriot reaches 2nd on an error in the top of the 5th) Rob G: Man on 2nd again, no outs and Lou lets Z hit away and he promptly lines out to lil' Drew. Why oh why? Cubnut: Okay, okay. I'm going to say if we don't get Theriot in from second, it's officially a bummer. Can you see that Soriano adjusts his stroke in any way given the game situation? Rob G: Sure I've seen Soriano adjust his swing from "try to hit it out" to "try to hit out of the stadium", but that's about it. Cubnut: I feel like Chicago sports fans are unduly hard on network announcers...but boy, is Ron Darling awful! So far, I have followed this game on MLB Gameday, WGN Radio, ESPN Radio and WTBS. In order of preference, I would rank the presentations thusly: First-WGN; Second-ESPN Radio (I think Buck Martinez is quite good); Third-MLB Gameday (which is silent); Fourth-Dick Stockton and Ron Darling. Transmission: Ok, I'll jump in. The one observant thing that Stockton and Darling have pointed out on the broadcast is that for as dominant as Z and Webb have looked at times, and as nice as their box scores are, they've had precious few 1-2-3 half-innings. They're working for their dominance, if that makes any sense. Right now, I'm not liking our chances to win on the road when down 1 against Webb and this bullpen. Rob G: Whenever I hear Dick Stockton's voice I fully expect to be watching the NCAA tournament so I'm a little disillusioned by the whole thing. But after listening in on most of the 3 games today and the the tiebreaker game Monday I think TBS made a conscious effort to try and put their viewers asleep. Those Nielsen ratings still register if you fall asleep and can't flip the channel. Are there magnets in the DBacks gloves or something? Christian: I'm a little behind, watching it on Tivo, (just saw Drew's homer). My main thought about the first few innings is how it's exactly what we expect (and fear) from Webb and Zambrano. Cubs hitters pounding the ball into the ground, and Z going 3-0 on every batter. 4th - Now it's 1-0, and I'm worried that that run might hold up! (Lee singles to leadoff the sixth and advances to second after Aramis strikes out) Cubnut: So far our two best offensive plays are the Throwing Error and the Wild Pitch. I'd like to see us try the Catcher's Interference. (With the bases loaded in the 6th) Transmission: Who among you take down Theriot for Ward to pinch hit, here? Bring in Cedeno for the rest of the game, but this might be our only good shot at the D-backs today. Cubnut: Santo says Theriot is due. It would be cruel of Theriot to let Ronny down. Transmission: This crew is horrid. And OK, leaving Theriot in wasn't TOO bad, heh. Cubnut: Fabulous! Game tied and our best hitter is coming up! Rob G: I wouldn't have taken out Theriot but I would have Ward sit on lil' Drew who's putting on a show tonight. Home run, robbed Z on a hit with a RISP, and then kept Theriot's bouncer in the infield to save a run. Shouldn't Drew be staring at strike 3 in a crucial situation like his big brother? Cubnut: Santo just mentioned that Webb has given up just 12 homers in 236 innings, which is damn impressive on two counts: one, that equates to one homer allowed every 20 innings or so; two, I had no idea Santo could read a stat sheet. Cubnut: I would like to delete the word "damn" from my previous comment. Transmission: You would like to delete the word damn? Why the hell would you want to do that? Cubnut: Why have Marmol warming now with Z under 80 pitches, just having batted in the top of the inning and pitching quite well? Rob G: I guess Lou won't be shy about the hook with Z set to go in Game 4. Maybe Derrek should think about running instead of sulking about his strikeout next time. Cubnut: I think we lead the league in batter's box tantrums. Transmission: Marmol in. Good call here, IMO. Save Z a bit for coming back on short rest, it's (presumably) hot in AZ, Z gets cramps a lot, and it's not like we're running a greater risk of Marmol screwing up than we are with Z losing some steam. Rob G: I agree good call too. (As Reynolds homers to left). Dumbest. Move. Ever. Transmission: Nevermind. Christian: Who the f*ck is Mark Reynolds??? Cubnut: Brandon Lyon warming up in the Arizona bullpen. Lyon is the guy Ramirez tagged for a three-run homer when we beat Webb back in July. Christian: By the way, it's pretty weird to be sitting here feeling both that Lou left Z in too long (why let him bat with the bases loaded when you're going to pull him an inning later?) and also pulled him too quickly (why pull him after 85 pitches?) Cubnut: Hate to say it, but this shapes up beautifully for Arizona. Webb comes out with the lead and having thrown only 89 pitches. They could easily bring him back on Sunday if the situation calls for it. Rob G: 2 warning track shots off Lyon. This reminds me of something....can't quite put my finger on it....oh yeah the 2007 Cubs regular season. Cubnut: Santo & Hughes just pointed out the Cubs are 1-for-10 with RISP. I believe we've all seen that movie before also. Cubnut: During this break in the action, I wanted to mention that my 11-year predicted the Cubs will take this series 3-1, beat the Phillies 4-3 in the NLCS, then beat the Yanks in the Series, 4-1. I am hoping this balances my buzz-killing prediction that the Cubs would get knocked out in the first round. Christian: And that's it, as the Cubs find themselves unable to take advantage of Webb's uncharacteristic wildness. The Diamondbacks win a game they had to win; from now on the pitching matchups favor the Cubs pretty clearly. Much will be written about Piniella's decision to not only pull Z after 85 pitches (I suppose this means he's a lock to pitch game 4), but to bring in Marmol in that high-leverage situation. I suffered through too much Dusty Baker to get too upset about taking Z out there, though, and the only way for Marmol to prove he can pitch in tough situations is to pitch in tough situations. Rob G: At the time it didn't seem too terrible of an idea with Z going on short rest for Game 4. But then again if you win Game 1 you might not need Game 4 and if you lose Game 1 you might not get to Game 4? I think he should have stayed in for another inning myself, of course I also think Marmol should have tried to get some hitters out. The other move that bugged me was Lou letting Z hit with Theriot on second and 0 outs after Z's his first at-bat double. I thought it was foolish at the time and it seemed more so after he lined out and then Soriano flied to center which would have scored a hypothetical run from third if Z laid down a successful bunt. For all the love of Z's hitting, he's still no better than a .250 hitter and we know the Dbacks play a lot of close games. So bad Lou! Bad Lou! Go sit in the corner and think about what you did wrong. Cubnut: Bummer to lose any playoff game. (I say that like we have a lot of experience at this.) But Webb is a stud, we knew it going in and we just need to beat Doug Davis Thursday night. And if we can't do that, we don't deserve to advance. On the plus side, Good Carlos is back--hope that he chooses to stick around for however long our post-season lasts--and the top of our lineup can't possibly be as impotent the rest of the way as it was tonight. If we come home tied 1-1, I don't see us having to return to the BOB. Oops, I mean The Chase. Transmission: Yeah, having had a night to sleep on it, I'm not too bummed about the lost. We knew that at some point, we'd have to steal a game in AZ, and it never was most likely that we'd steal that game against Webb. Davis, tonight, is the guy to steal it from. About as close to "must win" as you can get without it actually being "must win."

Comments

Brilliant editing job, Rob. It makes us all sound positively lucid. Kudos to you also for asking the Zambrano pitch-count question early on.

I think Lou should have had Z bunt Theriot over in the 5th. I think it might have rattled (pun not intened) AZ to give up the lead because of an error a half inning after taking it. This was the only really bad tactical move by Lou yesterday. In the 6th inning atbat you could argue Z had tthe same or a better chance of getting a hit than anyone on the bench other than Ward. The other moves were a matter of semetics really.

After thinking about it some more, I've decided that not pinch-hitting for Z in the 6th if your not gonna let get to 100 pitches or whatever bothers me more than pulling him after the 6th. If you're gonna let him go till he's done then by all means let him hit there, but if you're gonna pull him early then pinch hit for him. Anyways Go Cubs!

No way you bunt Z over. They guy accounted for the only extra base hit off Webb. Z damn near tied the game if not for a very nice defensive play by Drew. It's not like Z struck out. Next... NEW RULE!!! You don't play for a game that you may not get to!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Don't play for game 4 in the middle of game one. To quote Tracy Jordan, "Live every week like it's shark week"!!!!!

He's a .250 hitting pitcher this year(worse for his career), no matter what he did his first AB, there wasn't much of a shot of a hit the next time. of course you bunt him over there.

Tracy Jordan? What team does he manage? JJ - I agree with you if Z is only going to 85 or less pitch count and you obviously have faith in the bullpen, they should have pinch hit for Z in the 6th inning. A hit there would have been the difference. The other thought would have been to pinch hit Theriot in the 6th - though he got us our only RBI.

I agree with RobG, you bunt him over its automatic. Do you really depend on a pitcher, regardless of what he did previoulsy at the plate to get a hit in that situation. Thats bad baseball.

I made it to stage 5 of Kubler-Ross model of grief relatively quickly on this game. Denial. No [censored] way did Mark Reynolds and Augie do this to us! Who is Mark Reynolds? 1 am to 7 am. Anger. Damn you, Lou, for keeping Z in too long and lifting him early, all in the same game! 7 am to 9 am. Bargaining. Why couldn't the strange orange light behind the catcher in the 9th inning be something that "lifted" the curses? Just don't let us get swept. 9 am to 10 am. Depression. There's no point, I've wasted my summer following this team. 10 am to 10:15 am. Acceptance. Doug Davis is pitching today. He has a 4.75 ERA at home this year. Both Derek Lee and ARam have 2 HRs each off of him in 22 career at-bats. It's going to be OK. 10:16 am.

Rob, I think the odds of Soriano getting the runner home from third while making an out were slim and none. So either he gets a hit which would probably score Theriot, who would score on most basehits or makes an non run scoring out. Man on first and no outs, I say bunt. But man on second, right there. Not for me.

I usually agree, Chad but against Webb last night in that situation they needed to get Theriot over for sac fly or wild pitch to score.

except that Soriano hit a deep fly to CF and has a tendency to hit lots of flyballs. He also has a tendency to strike out a lot which wouldn't have mattered where Theriot was standing. So I'd rather have him standing on third. Banking on Z getting a hit there is just bad baseball. He's not that good of a hitter.

That's what I'm saying Jacos. Those things weren't going to happen. Webb is the ultimate ground ball pitcher. Soriano was not going to hit a sac fly. If Webb left a pitch up, it was going to be a homer making the bunt moot.

It's not often that I agree with Chad, but I agree here. Soriano was lost at the plate last night, he was swinging at everything. You let Z swing away because a single scores a run and if he makes an out, a single still scores a run. Soriano did manage to fly out but going into that at-bat the most likely result was a hit or a strikeout. He is NOT a contact hitter by any stretch of the imagination. Now, had Theriot or Kendall been batting #1, I'd say bunt him over because Theriot/Kendall usually make contact and would probably at the very least make a run-scoring out.

except that he left a pitch up and Soriano flied to center. I'm not exactly sure what you're arguing at this point Chad.

Rob, It's not counting on Z to get a hit. It's counting on the odds of us scoring with....waaaaaaaaaiiiiiiittttttt....... what's going on here? You guys are trying to bait me into using Sabremetrics....damn you!

Z's a .250 hitter this year (worse for his career), on what planet do you think he'd manage another hit off Brandon Webb? Yeah Drew made a nice play on his liner and I usually hate bunting but putting a guy on third with less than 2 outs DOES increase your scoring chances.

the odds of scoring are higher with Theriot on 3rd and 1 out than Theriot on 2nd and 1 out. Thinking Z could muster another hit there isn't really wise.

Another thing to take note about letting Z hit, is if Z actually did get a hit, with 0 out and the top of the lineup coming up, Quade would have been very safe with sending Theriot.

All you poor souls stuck on Stage 2 of Kubler-Ross. Anyway...I'm with Chad on this one and I'll even show it with numbers. Z is a .247 hitter, so there's a 1-in-4 (25%) chance of Theriot scoring if Z hits and, oh, let's say a 1-in-5 (20%) chance of Soriano getting him in last night if Z makes an out (normally higher, but Sori looked Sorry last night) and let's say a 1-in-4 (25%) chance of JJ getting him in if both Z and Soriano fail. So that's an 70% (25+20+25) chance of that run scoring last night if you do what Lou did. And that's being overly pessimistic about Alfonso and JJ. You bunt him over and now you are down to relying on Soriano and JJ exclusively. You've opened up the sacrifice fly for Soriano, so lets move his odds to 1-in-3 (33%) from 1-in-5. JJ would still need a hit if Soriano fails, so he is still 1-in-4 (25%). That's a 58% chance of the run scoring if you bunt. And that's just one run. Bunting greatly decreases the chances of putting a crooked number up there. And I firmly believe that if Z had gotten a hit there, we could have put up 3 and possibly knocked Webb out of the game. Yes, these are simple and arbitrary numbers. But that's because I'm beyond Anger and into Acceptance and it's easier to stay in the Acceptance phase by using loosey-goosey numbers.

Kubler-Ross my ass. Give me a hot karl every day of the week and I'll avoid anger, depression and denial.

DC Tom.. you don't add those percentages like that.. That's not how it works. Aside from that, I have no argument. I refuse to second guess anything from last night. What's the point?

You are completely right, Jace. Over here in Stage 5 we sometimes forget what we learned in Junior High. (It's one of the benefits of Stage 5.) 55% if you let Z hit with my simplified chances. 49.75% if Z bunts. Same basic point.

there are so many thing wrong with those percentages and assumptions DC Tom, I'm not sure where to begin. You take Z's 2007 BA but arbitrarily use .200 for Soriano getting a hit. Aw forget it, I think it was a bad call, others don't. I'm at peace with it.

Also again a single by Z was not necessarily going to score Theriot with 0 outs. Also Theriot could have scored a bunch of ways from 3rd base with out a hit from Alf. Like Rob said I think it was a bad call, but it didn't cost us the game, just made it a little more difficult.

I still think in this case the difference between Theriot scoring with or without a bunt is negligble, however, the chance of multiple runs is greatly decreased with a bunt. Even if Theriot comes in it only ties the game.

it's one run in a close game against one of the best pitchers in the league. Chances of scoring a bunch of runs with your pitcher up isn't a good play. Score that run and the following innings could have played out completely differently for all we know.

With comments as literate and cogent as this, why not lobby for a move for the blog from MVN to, say, The New Yorker? Surely they must host web sports blogs, no? Hmmm?

Also the equation isn't as plain as Z gets a hit or Z gets out either. If Z swings away and hits a grounder or a deep fly ball, it does the same thing as a bunt.

What time to we change the subject to Game 2? The Cubs are going to so win....woah yeah!!! Lineup guesses? I've got Soriano, Theriot, Lee, Ramirez, Murt, DeRo, Kendall, JJ, Lilly

Dave - oddly enough, we just turned down an offer to join the New Yorker last week. We were only a couple hundred grand apart on the negotiations, but would up walking away from the table. And don't call me Shirley.

And by would, I mean wound. It's amateur mistakes like that, that kept the New Yorker from sweetening the pot.

MVN's Baseball front page coverage right now highlights the Rockies win AND a story about Bedard remaining an Oriole or something. Way to stay topical.....

What time to we change the subject to Game 2? I think you just did. What is the probability of Sori leading off with a HR? If this doesn't happen and Theriot ends up on 2nd with 1 one out sometime in the game, does Lilly throw a curve ball with the first pitch of the 4th inning? Discuss

You're right, Rob, I don't know why we would ever debate a small part of a game over and over long after the topic was dead. That is so unlike us. I can totally let that one go. I am still pissed that we pulled Z, though.

RobG, it really doesn't matter if I had picked .200 for Soriano or .400 of getting a hit, it would have increased the result for both options. The only real difference here is the increased chance of Theriot scoring from third with one out v. from second with zero outs. It's just not that much, not enough to outweigh the chance that Z gets a hit. Even if Z's hit does not score Theriot, it would get Theriot to 3rd just like the bunt but saves the out. So you are still better off. In short, as long as Z is not a total waste at the plate--which he isn't--the numbers will say no bunt. And we've not even talked about the likelihood of the bunt being successful. Only 3 wild pitches for Webb this year and 9 passed balls for Snyder this year. So the odds of that happening are nontrivial but not huge either.

Rocks/Phillies about to start. Game chat open although I can't join today.

I’ve got Soriano, Theriot, Lee, Ramirez, Murt, DeRo, Kendall, JJ, Lilly Didn't I read somewhere Soto would get most of the time against lefties? Or just wishful thinking on my part?

I'll drop it the fifth inning. Thinking about it is disturbing my chi.

about two minutes into Rockies game, Back to back HR. *sigh*

oh yeah, probably Soto tonight. Kendall will probably start either Game 3 or 4 since it'll be a day game after a night game.

So, let's see... against a lefty... Soriano, Theriot, Lee, Ramirez, DeRosa, Murton, Jones, Kendall, Lilly

Slugfest in Philly today, it looks like. Stupid me took Kendrick in my Playoff Pitcher Dead pool, so the Phils better tie it up somehow. Go Home Run bats! I want the Rockies to win, but in 5, not in 3.

Let Lou be Lou. Apart from Lou's not liking to bunt in that game situation, Soriano is not productive with runners on third. This year, in 43 PAs with a runner on third he had 3 SFs. (No, I don't know how many outs there were, BR doesn't say.) 34 of those PAs ended up as ABs. Six hits in 34 ABs = .176 BA.

i cant believe how many supporters of letting Z swing away with a guy on 2nd, 0 outs, and soriano due up next in a 1 run game. yeah, he hit .247 this year with a .247 ob%. if it was neifi, who's a worse hitter, doing this we wouldnt hear the end of it. hey, Z is a decent hitter for a pitcher, but that's like saying you'd rather eat a teaspoon of arsenic rather than a teaspoon of anthrax. suck is suck and what happened there was foolish in a 1 run game. long story short...take away the mystique of Z...replace him with a similar hitter (there are none, people that hit like Z dont keep a job as hitters) and where that leave ya? pathetic gamble.

"if it was neifi, who’s a worse hitter" who's not a worse hitter, that is... bad example cuz he was a worse hitter this year. point is...take away this mystique of protectionism of either lou or Z (some of which is defended in posts) and replace him with a macias/neifi-type hitter and have him swing away...no one would tollerate that. but Z or lou or whoever gets a free pass doing something like that. nah...whatever.

Okay, last night's loss still feels bad, but it could be worse; we could be Phillies fans. Lohse gives up the slam to Kaz Matsui...ouch.

Now there's some managing to debate! Top of fourth inning. Phillies leading 3-2. Two outs, runner at second, No. 8 hitter up, pitcher next. Phillies intentionally walk the No. 8 hitter to face pitcher. Clint Hurdle calls the bluff and pinch hits his starting pitcher (Morales, who had given up 3 runs in 3 innings). Pinch hitter gets a single, Matsui hits grand slam. Wow. I assume Charlie Manuel assumed that the Rockies would sent Morales up to hit? Gotta give a lot of props to Hurdle on that.

If it were Doug Davis hitting (.070/.087/088) we'd have something to talk about, but the math or the risk is never going to be on the bunt side with a .200 OBP in the fifth inning regardless of what position the hitter in question plays. Fewer runs = bad. Now let's get Davis.

It should be noted that the intentional walk was only after a 3-1 count, sort of like the Cabrera situation last week. That was a gutsy move by Hurdle, I'm not sure I would have done that. Not too familiar with the specifics of their roster, but I guess it was pretty slick if Fogg's not scheduled to do anything. I'm sure MLB is salivating at the prospect of a week of Rockies-Diamondbacks.

Hey, I woulda bunted, but I get made fun of around here because I would call for the bunt a lot more than anybody else does. *shrug* Not sure that one specific instance was the difference between us winning and losing. Maybe we get a run there. Maybe we don't. Can't just say "well Soriano hit one deep enough to get him in." Pitcher approaches that situation entirely different with Riot at third instead of second. Maybe Melvin brings the infield in. Maybe they walk Soriano. You just don't know.

Gameday recap did not show 3-1 before intentional walk, thanks for clarifying Ron. Just shows that when things are "going right", a move like Hurdle's works out. Yorvit Torreabla is not Miguel Cabrera....No wait, maybe he is (he just doubled in two runs). Boo birds out in Philly now--what a difference 100 hours makes!

I would liked have seen Zambrano try to lay down the bunt with a runner on 2nd and no outs. I understand why they had him swinging away but I just like the odds of guy on 3rd with only one out. With as many balls that got away from the dbacks catcher, and the prospect of a drawn in infield...I just like those odds better.

Home field advantage for the Cubs in NLCS if the Rox and Cubs win, that's why we all should be rooting for the Rockies.

yeah I like the Rockies for the most part, no real reason. Homefield advantage would be nice, sure. I also scored 2 tickets for their first NLCS home game so at the very worse I can sell them if we don't make it or figure out a way to make my first trip to Denver if we do. (or still sell them)

Sorry about the aside...but MVN censored y'all the other day and yet they're happy to run ads of some chick shakin' her backside for all to see? And she's got thunderthighs.

I don't even look at the ads long enough to notice a chick shakin' her ass!? Where are my priorities? Vulgarity is only ok if someone is getting paid apparently.

I'm for the Rockies too, for home field advantage and also because that even with all the destruction the Rockies are doing to Philly right now...I don't want to face Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Cole Hamels, and Jimmy Rollins in the playoffs. I want them home and watching it on TV. I would like this series to go 5 games, however. Right now it looks like a sweep, four games at the most.

My suspicions were more along the lines of DC Tom's answer - that the Phigtins are a dangerous bunch while the Rox are a good team who got HOT. Didn't think about home field, but that would be nice. Of course, first there's this little matter of Arizona.

So I often lurk (banned so I can't post) a certain Brewer website. They sentiment is GO DBACKS! I ask why? While I certainly wouldn't be rooting for the Brewers had they gone to the playoffs, I wouldn't have been rooting against them out of spite. Would you?

The only team I will always root against in the playoffs is the frigging Yankees. So, chad, no, I would not have been rooting against the Brewers if they had made the playoffs. The Brewers are the Cubs' little brother, and will probably remain that way now that they have been unreasonably stuck into the same division (even though it creates a MASSIVE imbalance between leagues and divisions). I am not surprised to hear about brewers fans rooting against the Cubs...

3 comments: 1. National media needs to lay off of Lou for pulling Zambrano...Marmol has been our best pitcher all year. I just hope his arm is not tired and over worked this time of year. For 162 games I would have been glad to have Marmol on the mound in the 7th. Putting Z and his bag of emotions out there for another inning is just as big as a gamble than if you go to your bull pen 2. The reason we lost was the 1 for 20 out of the our 1 through 5 hitters. I am praying for a little more patience at the plate in game two!!!! 3. Should Lou have bunted Theriot to 3rd?? I don't know. The cubs did come in last place this year sac bunts and sac flies...

I am glad the brewers are not in the playoffs...I am still trying to park at Miller Park from the Cubs' last series up there. People complain about parking at Wrigley...Parking up there takes forever

Wow I totally totally agree with crunch and others. Z should have been bunting with Soriano on deck. No brainer (possible argument is that Z is a bad bunter? I am ignorant on Z's bunting skills). As far as letting Z bat with bases loaded and then pulling him. Complete brain fart on both accounts with Lou. Again Lou fell in love with Z batting for some reason . . . but then pulling him gave Arizona a complete emotional lift. It amazes me that Lou would be so naive and incapable of gauging the FEEL of the game and also gauging momentum. I believe the Dbacks were really starting to resign themselves to the fact that Z had them lulled into a helpless state. In a way it was also unfair to Marmol as it put undue pressure on him. A major mistake. I like Lou but he is capable of overmanaging and this was a glaring example. That said I believe the Cubs do have them outmanned in the talent department and if they can wrestle back some momentum they still have a chance. One more plus that hopefully this whole deal has Lou evaluating his aproach and perhaps the team sill scratch and claw at runs and momentum. Any complacency or arrogance should be effectively gone and maybe that could be a plus from here out.

As far as letting Z bat with bases loaded and then pulling him. Complete brain fart on both accounts with Lou. Again Lou fell in love with Z batting for some reason . . . but then pulling him gave Arizona a complete emotional lift. Once again, the Cubs loaded the bases in the top of the sixth and Z hit. Z came out and pitched the bottom of the sixth and allowed one hit on 15 pitches. It was the top of the order who went 1-2-3 in the top of the 7th on 10 Webb pitches before Marmol came out to pitch the bottom of the seventh. If you're going to criticize Lou for that, at least get your damn facts right.

oops. an uninformed blogger. oh my. call the intelligencia. AND. i prefer if you call it "DARN" facts.

DJH — October 4, 2007 @ 5:23 pm I am glad the brewers are not in the playoffs…I am still trying to park at Miller Park from the Cubs’ last series up there. People complain about parking at Wrigley…Parking up there takes forever Are you kidding? When I was there last year, I pulled in the lot, drove to where the attendant pointed, put car in park, opened trunk, cracked a miller lite. Getting out on the other hand......censorship, etc.

Recent comments

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Things I've been wrong about:

    -Tauchman is fine as a 4th OF. I knew that. I just want a better LH DH option and he was really the DH for us until Seiya got hurt. I'm glad Mervis is getting a chance at it. Caissie is coming for that job for sure. But Tauchman continues to be highly useful as a 4th OF with Seiya being hurt

    -I wanted Yency to go to get guys at Iowa a chance. Guys like Palencia and Sanders or RileyT. Maybe even Hodge! But Yency has been better the last two plus weeks. He did hit 96 the other day. He was 93 in Texas to open the season.

    -Leiter has his split working enough. It just needs to stay there

    -I was surprised Jed picked Wisdom over Cooper. I wonder if this happens if Seiya wasn't hurt. Wisdom has more power. Cooper is the better hitter. Jed picked Wisdom and Wisdom had an option left as well.

    -Palencia just doesn't miss enough bats. Similar to ManRod, just two yrs younger. ManRod is killing AAA for TB right now!

    Things I got right so far:

    -Hendricks. Sorry Kyle. You got paid though!

    Jed, you missed there.

    -Smyly. If Jed could've traded him before or during ST, then he should have and saved some cash.

    -Mastro.  Not a LH DH. Pinch runner. Defensive utility. Maybe he's better than Madrigal but didn't get a legit chance to prove it.

    -Luke Little is good. He's had one bad outing. That's it. Needs to get better entering with guys on base. But he needs to stay in MLB.

    -Oh yeah....Morel is doing fine at 3B! He'll get better as well!!

  • crunch (view)

    bellinger "right rib contusion"

  • Childersb3 (view)

    South Bend just lost the lead in the bottom of the 9th on the weirdest scenario, ever.

    It's absolutely pouring rain....men on 1st and 2nd, 1out....JPatterson asks for a new ball, but no time out was called....he throws the old ball toward the dugout (not sure if it rolled out of play).....the ump declares the runners get two bases each so one run scores. Then a single up the middle ties the game.

    The rain was coming down in buckets at this point.

    Just weird

  • crunch (view)

    ...and bellinger is gone in the 7th because of that 2nd blown chance and the wall he bounced off of...

    hopefully his rib cage/shoulder feels better tomorrow, we just got happ back.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Phil,

    Any thoughts on Y. Rojas' stuff and Y. Melendez's game (I believe I've asked about him before, sorry)?

  • crunch (view)

    wow, things are moving fast.  hopefully it continues.

  • crunch (view)

    morel with 4 clean plays in 4 innings...showed off his 100000000mph arm a couple times.

    cody bellinger not having a good 4th, though...5 run leads are handy when your CF is making your pitcher have a 5-out inning.  2nd blown chance was ruled a hit even though it went in/out of his glove...1st was lost in the lights, also ruled a hit.

  • crunch (view)

    welcome back happ!  double off the wall 1st PA back.

  • crunch (view)

    oh yeah, totally, i was just chiming about why i fan like i fan.

    i would like nothing more than hendricks to keep on hendricks'ing.  guys with his stuff can throw for a long, long time as long as it works.

    he velocity is actually up a minor amount this year.  it's really "damn" when a guy like him not only has gas in the tank, but it's looking like it was years ago.  he added a curve a few years ago and it helped a little bit, but he's throwing it less and less while the fb/change combo are less effective.

  • Alexander Dimm (view)

    CRUNCH—There is no one person in this community I’m talking about.  My remarks were not directed at you or anyone, but at a tone I’ve noticed lately. 

    You have a great, dry sense of humor and there is thought behind your comments.   You and I don’t always agree but I always understand your position.  

    Lastly, and I’ll be quiet, I agree with you on Hendricks.  We can dislike the recent performance but still love the guy.  Lots of questions about his future.