Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
About a month or so back, a discussion arose in the comments about the Cubs futility at the center field position. Faithful reader "WISCGRAD" took it upon himself to take a look at the situation.
After hitting just .178 with one homerun in 90 at-bats to start the season, the 38-year old Jim Edmonds was released by the Padres on May 9th. He was signed just five days later by Jim Hendry and the Cubs and started the following day against his former team, going 1-4 in 4-0 win. In 100 at-bats since in Cubbie Blue, Edmonds sports a .290 batting average, .374 on-base percentage, and a .580 slugging percentage, having already blasted six doubles, a triple, and seven home runs. His on-base + slugging percentage is a robust .954, which would place him seventh in the National League (just ahead of Matt Holliday) if only his Chicago stats were counted and he had enough at-bats to qualify. (Ed Note: Numbers were for games played before Tuesday, July 1st)
Edmonds’ performance has been a pleasant surprise in the first half of the season, and is most certainly an upgrade offensively over the Felix Pie-Johnson combination that began the season. But how does Edmonds stack up to the production the Cubs normally get from the centerfield position? I decided to find out.
Baseball Reference records the number of games played at each position for each player on every team. A primary player is designated for each position, which is normally the player who has played the most games at that position during the season. In rare cases it may be the player with the second most if the player with the most played more games (and the most on the team) at another position. Below is a list of the primary centerfielders for the Chicago Cubs for each season from 1956-2007 (prior to 1956 the LF-CF-RF designation was not made). The statistics – batting average, on base percentage, slugging percentage, and on base plus slugging – are for the entire season, not just those games played in centerfield. Many fans have lamented the lack of a true centerfielder in a great while for the Cubs. The findings below are striking.
Leon Durham’s amazing 1982 season, in which he split time between right and center (71 games started at each), stands out as by far the best season put up by a centerfielder for the Cubs. In all four statistical categories this represents the best performance in a half-century. Remarkably, it also represents the ONLY season in which a centerfielder had a BA over .300. The best overall stretch was Rick Monday’s reign from 1972-1976. He owns four of the top seven on-base-percentages on the list. Monday is also one of only three players, along with Durham and Corey Patterson (2003 short season), to slug over .500. In only ten seasons has the centerfielder achieved an OPS over .800 – Durham, Monday (four times), Patterson, Adolfo Phillips (twice), Mel Hall, and Bobby Thomson.
On the other side of the spectrum, Cleo James (1970), Corey Patterson (2005), Gary Mathews Jr. (2001), and Jerome Walton (1991) all hit below .220 for the season. Patterson’s OBP of .254 in 2005 also brings up the rear, in fact a full .14 below the second lowest. Doug Dascenzo, better known for his defense than his hitting, slugged just .311 in 1992. Bob Dernier holds two of the four worst slugging seasons, with .316 and .312 marks in 1985 and 1986. Dernier’s 1986 season is perhaps the worst overall, having the lowest OPS at only .587. Although Patterson’s 2005 season (.602), Walton’s 1991 season (.605), and Dascenzo’s 1992 season (.615) have to also be mentioned as being particularly terrible.
Edmonds current line would place him seventh in BA, fourth in OBP, first in SLG (by a wide margin), and first in OPS (by a wide margin). He may not keep up this pace for the remainder of the season – he is after all 38 and banged-up physically – but it is time to recognize that this type of production is quite uncharacteristic for a Cubs centerfielder.
| Year | Player | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Jacque Jones | 285 | 335 | 400 | 735 |
| 2006 | Juan Pierre | 292 | 330 | 388 | 718 |
| 2005 | Corey Patterson | 215 | 254 | 348 | 602 |
| 2004 | Corey Patterson | 266 | 320 | 452 | 772 |
| 2003 | Corey Patterson | 298 | 329 | 511 | 840 |
| 2002 | Corey Patterson | 253 | 284 | 392 | 676 |
| 2001 | Gary Mathews Jr. | 217 | 320 | 364 | 684 |
| 2000 | Damon Buford | 251 | 324 | 390 | 714 |
| 1999 | Lance Johnson | 260 | 332 | 337 | 669 |
| 1998 | Lance Johnson | 280 | 335 | 352 | 687 |
| 1997 | Brian McRae | 240 | 329 | 372 | 701 |
| 1996 | Brian McRae | 276 | 360 | 425 | 785 |
| 1995 | Brian McRae | 288 | 348 | 440 | 788 |
| 1994 | Tuffy Rhodes | 234 | 318 | 387 | 705 |
| 1993 | Sammy Sosa | 261 | 309 | 485 | 794 |
| 1992 | Doug Dascenzo | 255 | 304 | 311 | 615 |
| 1991 | Jerome Walton | 219 | 275 | 330 | 605 |
| 1990 | Jerome Walton | 263 | 350 | 329 | 679 |
| 1989 | Jerome Walton | 293 | 335 | 385 | 720 |
| 1988 | Dave Martinez | 254 | 311 | 348 | 659 |
| 1987 | Dave Martinez | 292 | 372 | 418 | 790 |
| 1986 | Bob Dernier | 225 | 275 | 312 | 587 |
| 1985 | Bob Dernier | 254 | 315 | 316 | 631 |
| 1984 | Bob Dernier | 278 | 356 | 362 | 718 |
| 1983 | Mel Hall | 283 | 352 | 488 | 840 |
| 1982 | Leon Durham | 312 | 388 | 521 | 909 |
| 1981 | Jerry Morales | 286 | 343 | 339 | 682 |
| 1980 | Jerry Martin | 227 | 281 | 419 | 700 |
| 1979 | Jerry Martin | 272 | 321 | 453 | 774 |
| 1978 | Greg Gross | 265 | 323 | 349 | 672 |
| 1977 | Jerry Morales | 290 | 348 | 447 | 795 |
| 1976 | Rick Monday | 272 | 346 | 507 | 853 |
| 1975 | Rick Monday | 267 | 373 | 446 | 819 |
| 1974 | Rick Monday | 294 | 375 | 467 | 842 |
| 1973 | Rick Monday | 267 | 372 | 469 | 841 |
| 1972 | Rick Monday | 249 | 362 | 399 | 761 |
| 1971 | Brock Davis | 256 | 335 | 312 | 647 |
| 1970 | Cleo James | 210 | 298 | 324 | 622 |
| 1969 | Don Young | 239 | 343 | 371 | 714 |
| 1968 | Adolfo Phillips | 241 | 320 | 399 | 719 |
| 1967 | Adolfo Phillips | 268 | 384 | 458 | 842 |
| 1966 | Adolfo Phillips | 262 | 348 | 452 | 800 |
| 1965 | Don Landrum | 226 | 300 | 334 | 634 |
| 1964 | Billy Cowan | 241 | 268 | 404 | 672 |
| 1963 | Ellis Burton | 230 | 311 | 398 | 709 |
| 1962 | Lou Brock | 263 | 319 | 412 | 731 |
| 1961 | Al Heist | 255 | 337 | 383 | 720 |
| 1960 | Al Heist | 275 | 339 | 412 | 751 |
| 1959 | George Altman | 245 | 312 | 383 | 695 |
| 1958 | Bobby Thomson | 283 | 351 | 466 | 817 |
| 1957 | Bob Speake | 232 | 299 | 404 | 703 |
| 1956 | Pete Whisenant | 239 | 292 | 414 | 706 |
- Log in to post comments






Comments
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 12:56pm Permalink
FWIW, Jimmy's numbers with the Cubs this year are right inline with his career averages.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 1:23pm Permalink
I am still amazed he doesn't suck. I though Hendry was nuts for signing him, but I was wrong. Let's hope he keeps up a good pace, and doesn't crash to earth.
I will feel better though with Reed Johnson back healthy, as a fall-back option.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 1:25pm Permalink
Well, from 1973 on they were looking for a new third baseman.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 1:29pm Permalink
for the win....
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 1:52pm Permalink
maybe he will get a rest today
so he is ready for 3 in a row
in st louis.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 2:23pm Permalink
Was there not a time, under the Hendry/McFail regime, when Edmonds was a FA? And, they let him fall to the Cards while instead signing Kenny Lofton, Ben Grieve, Todd Walker, Jerry Hairston, or "Holly".
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 2:56pm Permalink
The cards traded for him and never let him get away.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 2:25pm Permalink
Thanks for the analysis, WISCGRAD. I always thought of Rick Monday as a misfit leadoff man given how often he struck out, but looking at those OBP numbers, it is hard to reach that conclusion. The thing is, his power was also excellent which leads one to wonder if the team wouldn't have ultimately benefited from his hitting further down in the order (the Soriano question).
I'll forgive the disparaging remarks about Cleo James.
Thanks again.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 2:30pm Permalink
My bad. After further investigation, apparently Edmonds signed as a FA originally in 2000 with the Cards. Under the McFail regime at the time, we sported a terrific OF of Henry Rodriguez, LF, Damon Buford in Center, and Sammy as RF.
This complimented the team's fearsome starters other than Gracie, including: Eric Young, Girardi, Willie Greene, and Ricky Gutierrez. And of course, Augie, Rosie Brown, Glenallen Hill, and "OH NOOO! HE DROPPED THE BALL!!!!!!!!", Brant Brown
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 2:46pm Permalink
Edmonds was never a free agent, traded to the Cards in the infamous Kent Bottenfield deal and then re-upped a few times over the years. I don't believe he ever hit the open market until he was cut by the Padres earlier this year.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 3:30pm Permalink
Have to give mucho credit to Hendry for this addition - I thought it was another Jimbo special off the scrap heap, glad to be quite wrong in my assumptions.
"I always thought of Rick Monday as a misfit leadoff man given how often he struck out..."
Monday was also a good defensive CF, the best one the Cub's had during that awful decade. I still remember Larry Bittner manning that post for awhile - especially when he lost a flyball in his hat. Good times.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 3:51pm Permalink
Why did you have to dredge up Cleo James??? One of the nice things of getting a little older is that I tend to forget things. But no. You gotta bring up Cleo James. The 1970 team was the very definition of Cubs baseball. Mediocrity in its purest form.
Re: The 1970 team was the very definition of Cubs baseball
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 4:47pm Permalink
Your memory is out of whack. We're talking the Durocher years here. The Cubs Renaissance. The 1970 team finished in 2nd place.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 3:58pm Permalink
We should also give Hendry credit for not signing Andruw Jones, who was having a terrible 1st half, and now he's injured. Less is more in some cases, and that salary would be looking like a black hole right about now.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 4:34pm Permalink
Brewers up 5-0 already. The D-Backs have absolutely tanked lately (as has my fantasy team, for which I stupidly only have their pitching staff).
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 5:43pm Permalink
Brewers blow the 5-0 lead by giving up 6 in the ninth without recordnng an out!
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 4:40pm Permalink
A center fielder that doesn't suck and cubbieland has an orgasm. How about this... a lot of teams have a center fielder that doesn't suck, the Cubs just thought it would be amusing to experiment with guys like Juan Pierre and Felix Pie. Is Felix still swinging the bat like he's chopping down tall weeds in the Dominican, btw? I'll say this... it was a BAD plan to expect Pie to perform and Hendry LUCKED out that Edmonds still has something left in the tank.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 4:48pm Permalink
I would have tried to trade for David Dejesus. BTW, before the season started I bet someone around here some virtual bucks that Dejesus would outperform Matt Murton, that is... and I'm quoting myself, "if Murton even gets big league at-bats this year"... lol
Let's get an update on that...
Murton (Only 16 AB) - 257/297/314/0 HR
DeJesus (260 AB) - 323/382/496/9 HR
Btw... DeJesus's career high in home runs for a season is 9. DeJesus... bet on it.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 5:37pm Permalink
Well that really doesn't demonstrate a whole lot.
DeJesus, career line: .287 .361 .424
Murton, career line: .295 .362 .450
It just means that DeJesus plays for the crappy Royals and Murton plays for a team in first place, and thus gets no playing time. If Murton had been put in LF for the Royals since opening day, was getting paid $2 million, and had no fears of losing his job, he'd probably be putting up similar stats offensively.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 5:40pm Permalink
But the Padres could have kept him and then 28 other GMs could have tried to pick him up. He had to take the chance to even have the chance to luck out.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Fri, 07/04/2008 - 11:28am Permalink
You should have gone back to the 40s and 50s. Andy Pafko hit for average and for power, was the Cubs' cleanup hitter, and was an excellent center fielder.
Everybody talks about the 30 year gap between Santo and Ramirez at 3b. It's been nearly 60 years since the Cubs have had a cf'er as good as Pafko.
Re: Edmonds Redefining Centerfield for Cubs
on Fri, 07/04/2008 - 12:50pm Permalink
I would have gone all the way back but I couldn't find position breakdowns (LF-CF-RF) for any years prior. Everyone is just listed as OF. I would have had to do some more secondary research to figure that out, and I just didn't have the time. But I agree, 3B has been pretty bad for a while, but CF I think is worse.