Game 115 Thread / Astros @ Cubs (3 of 3)

Game Chat | Press Pass | BR Preview

SP Brandon Backe SP Jason Marquis

6-10, 4.72, 100 K, 56 BB, 129.2 IP

6-7. 4.68, 64 K, 45 BB, 117.1 IP
2B #Kaz Matsui LF Alfonso Soriano
RF Hunter Pence SS Ryan Theriot
1B #Lance Berkman 1B Derrek Lee
LF Carlos Lee 3B Aramis Ramirez
SS #Geoff Blum CF *Jim Edmonds
3B Ty Wigginton 2B Mark DeRosa
CF *Darin Erstad RF *Kosuke Fukudome
C Humberto Quintero C Geovany Soto
P Brandon Backe P *Jason Marquis


What a surprise!

I returned Tuesday night from a wonderful vacation on the East Coast, and based on the news mix I got from the all-sports radio station in Boston, I assumed all of MLB had gone on hiatus while the Red Sox negotiated their divorce arrangements with Manny Ramirez.

Turns out the Cubs had, in fact, stayed busy, eviscerating the Brewers and taking two-of-three from the Bayless Bucs while building a 5-game lead in the Central. This afternoon they try to even up their season mark against Houston—currently they're 5-6—while capturing yet another series win. In 18 series so far this year at Wrigley, the Cubs are 14-3-1.

Jason Marquis, winless in his last six starts (0-4, 5.25), goes for the home team. Brandon Backe, the losingest pitcher on Cecil Cooper's staff, has an ND and loss against the Cubs this season.

Hey, I see the Cubs are stumping for permission to play some of their home night games on Fridays and Saturdays. Why not? Then Erin Andrews could cover the games in a cocktail dress.


saturday night games in wrigley would be awesome

Sean Gallagher is expected to go on the disabled list with a sore shoulder. A source told the San Francisco Chronicle that Gallagher felt a "pop" in the shoulder in his July 25 start against Texas.

bet no one had Gallagher ahead of Harden in the pitcher death pool...

Jason Marquis, winless in his last six starts (0-4, 5.25)

That is not a really fair look at Marquis.

Four of his last five starts been solid or good, all being "quality starts," which should be more than enough to win on this team.

...then Erin Andrews could cover the games in a cocktail dress.

Hmm... and maybe Bruce Levine can wear a Tux or something.

Oh wait... we don't care what he wears, because he is a guy.

Poor parallel. What Andrews wore was unprofessional. If Levine wore cut-off jeans and flip flops, that, too, would be unprofessional and worthy of comment.

Umm... how is a dress at all comparable to cut off jeans and flip flops?

Poor parallel.

The parallel lies in their unsuitability in what is, for all of the other reporters and the players themselves, a place of business.

No... they are not.

Wearing a dress that makes a woman look sexy has no similarities to a man wearing cutoffs and flip flops.

Sorry... strongly disagree with you on that one.

You're wrong on this dave.

It's about what is appropriate and what is not. She was not dressed appropriately.

I've gotta disagree on this. Bruce Levine's job isn't to be on tv. Like it or not, Erin Andrews isn't a typical "journalist". She's like a host on E!, except she talks about sports instead of celebrities. Part of her job is to look good for the camera.

I have absolutely no problem with her dressing a little sexy. If she were a beat writer using her tits to get a scoop, then that's a problem. But she's not. She's a fucking sideline reporter who appears on camera 4-5 times per game and lobs the players/managers softball questions for our entertainment.

so what you are saying is that she is eye candy and is not to be respected as a real journalist.

That's a real stretch from what I said. You may have your own issues if you think you can't be both attractive and respected at the same time.

There's a reason you don't see very many ugly people on television. Part of her job is to look good. The other part is to ask a few questions that we (the viewer) might find interesting.

And let's drop the whole "respected journalist" garbage. It doesn't make me sexist or a mysogynist because I don't think she's breaking the next Watergate any time soon. And that has nothing to do with her gender or her looks. It's because she's a SIDELINE REPORTER. Woodward and Bernstein she is not, but she's good at what she does.

she wants to be thought of as a hot chick first and a reporter/journalist second.

the same does not go for other women reporters.

that's a stretch considering she doesn't take her work as a joke.

you aware that a great number of sports writers never wanted to be sports writers? it's just the job/beat that they were put on or assigned to for a lotta them.

it's like any specialization, though...once you work it enough it becomes a whole lot easier to go from place to place within your specialization.

besides, the pressure to wear what she wears may not even be her call.

the changing face and dolling up of jennie zolasco...who's a very legit baseball reporter...doesn't even remotely match her personality.

she wants to be thought of as a hot chick first and a reporter/journalist second.

She does? I didn't realize that you knew her.

Very few sports guys are "respected reporters". The entire genre is built first on entertainment with real journalism a very distant 10th or 11th. So Erin first going for the entertainment part of the job is absolutely no different from any male reporter first going for the entertainment story about a player, or reporting only ARod's infidelity.

I'd say Erin wearing a revealing dress is a lot better actually then all the drivel spouted by ESPN talking heads.

But god knows if you show some cleavage you must be a slut and have no real value as a human being, let alone a reporter.

just what she puts out there.

legit reporters don't pull that kind of stuff.

She could be both, not that I'd notice. She had me at hot chick.

What he meant to say was that she isn't a real journalist. She has no business being outside the kitchen. She should be barefoot and pregnant somewhere in the south.

Seriously... someone can't be attactive and a respected "real journalist?"

The two are not exclusive.

actually, yes. very attractive people don't do well in journalism. That is why news anchors were never very handsome guys. not ugly. just not 'hot'.

Huh? There are a ton of attractive/very attractive new anchors.

Chad... lets be honest - you have zero credibility on this issue. You believe that women have no place in men's sports, which leads to you having no credibility in issues related to women in men's sports.

There are no news anchors who would be considered "hot". Like the way George Clooney is considered hot.

Lauren Sanchez is the only 'hot' news anchor in Los Angeles of all places and no one takes her seriously.

I'm just saying that maybe you can find someone in America?

Just sayin'

Maybe I could, but why bother? She may be French, but she can surrender to me any time.

Connie Chung was considered pretty hot in her day.

Chad's fightin' hard for the title.

in Parachat for the Brewers/Cincy game while I wait for the Cubs one...

Another strong outing by Reds' Homer Bailey -- coming in to the game, teams were hitting .381 against him.

Today -- 5.1IP, 8H, 6ER.

In hindsight, perhaps Mr. & Mrs. Bailey shouldn't have named their son "Homer". Not the best name for a pitcher, unless your last name is "Howry", in which case it's perfect.

I am so done with Carlos Lee, just go away.

I'm done with him and Marquis. What kind of retard pitcher throws an inner half fastball on an 0-2 count? Especially to the one guy on the team who absolutely destroys the Cubs?

New rule for Marquis: No shaking off Soto. Ever.

Dave, can you try to go one day without an "Umm"? I challenge you!

Heh... I will try. :)

Amazing that they continue to throw CLee strikes.

Andrews, meanwhile, said she did nothing wrong.

"These players are not into me like that," said told the Minneapolis Star Tribune. "If anything, I think these guys look at me like a little sister or one of the guys."

Riiiiggght. One of the guys they want to nail.

Yep -- pro athletes are famous for a "hands off" approach to hot women in short skirts.

Give me a f*cking break.

I don't get our pitchers keep giving Lee opportunities to beat us. Intentionally walk him, throw him crap, or put the god damn ball in his flabby ribs, but don't throw him fast balls over the plate. Eeeesh.

I mean, really, this is not that complicated --- 2 outs, 2 on, a .228 hitting SS on deck...and you throw CLee (who is Pujols when he is in Wrigley) something to hit?


DeRosa's been putting a charge into the ball the last few days. After coming up 2 feet short of being the hero the other night, it looks like he had an extra bowl of Wheaties this morning.



Now, get Marquis the hell out of there.

I'll take this a step further...I don't even think Andrews is that good at what she does. She generally asks lousy questions along the lines of, "So, how do you feel right now?"

I can't think right now of a "good" sideline reporter, but I don't think she's one of the better ones.

She is, however, smoking hot.


1. Mark DeRosa, I think I like you a little.

2. Oh my.

I think the wheels have come off for Backe. Soriano just ANNIHILATED that pitch.

Bob Brenly: This is why you don't send Geovany Soto on what could have been a close play at home plate.

(less than 2 seconds later)


I might have to ask Brenly for the Mega Millions numbers this week.

Wow!!! Two outs, man on first, then -- BOOM! Eight big runs.

Really, really like having Fonzie back.

Marquis, you just got bailed out, don't piss off your teammates by ruining it now.

Speaking of incredibly attractive women who are respected in their professions, here's possibly the most beautiful woman in the world:

Well that was fun.

Imagine the last few minutes from the Brewers' perspective. They finish off the Reds and take one last look at the scoreboard, Cubs down 4-1.

By the time they get to the clubhouse and flip on ESPN it's 9-4 Cubs.

That's got to suck just a little bit.

Also, if Erin Andrews were my little sister I might have to rethink my position on incest.

Boy, Marquis barely got out of that one. I hope he isn't planning on throwing any strikes to Carlos Lee next inning.

Theriot out -- hurt, or just a rest? Odd, given that tomorrow is an off day.

fouled a pitch off his foot...hopefully just precautionary...

Cubs lead the NL in BOTH OBP and SLG, and thus lead the league in runs scored by a wide margin -- 604 runs vs. 558 for the 2nd place Phils. Today's game will likely improve all 3 metrics.

So, while no individual is having a killer year (maybe Fonzie on a pro-rated basis), the team certainly is.

Well done, Jim Hendry.

so you are saying there is upside?

Yup -- if Rammy, K-Fuk and Soto get crankin'.

And Lee.

This may go against the mainstream opinion, but I believe Marquis is an above average starting pitcher for the role he plays on the Cubs - 5th starter. Somewhere on this site there must be a sabermetrician, cruncher of numbers, (where are you Dave from the old site?), who could no doubt prove my point. If you take Marquis' GS, W/L, ERA, IP, SO to BB ratio, etc., and compare Marquis against every other 5th SP in the majors, I would be very surprised if he wasn't in the top 5 - maybe even top 2-3.

The frustration most Marquis-haters have is that they compare him to other teams #2 or #3 starters and that ISN'T the role he's been asked to play for the Cubs. Getting Harden solved that issue. Marquis' job on the Cubs is take the ball every 5th day, pitch 6+ innings, so Z, Harden, Dempster, Lilly aren't over-used and the bullpen isn't blown out every 4-5th game. In his first 20 starts he's logged 117 1/3 IP, 6-7 record, 4.68 ERA.

Marquis is doing everything the Cubs could have hoped from a #5 starter. Is he overpaid for most 5th starters? Hell, yes. But I don't think any of us need to hold a fund-raiser for a team that's going to draw 3.3 million fans this year and is going to be sold for north of $750 million.

The bitch of it is for Marquis is that he almost certainly won't make the playoff roster as they won't need 12 pitchers in the playoffs.

Also, the Cubs should walk Carlos Lee every other time he bats against them this season anytime the Cubs have less than a 6 run lead.

I agree, although I too would like to see the numbers to back it up. I have the impression his ERA and Quality Start stats have been pretty damned solid for a #5.

He pales in comparison to the other Cubs starters, but the Cubs have arguably three aces (Z, Dempster, Harden) and another guy (Lilly) who would be a #2 or #3 on most teams.

I support Marquis. He competes, he hits, he pinch runs, he's solid. He gets paid too much, but since it's not my wallet, I don't care. I just want to see the Cubs win.

FWIW, I'd also rather see Marquis than Howry on the postseason roster. :-)

EDIT - And apparently I failed to hit the reply button... argh.

I disagree.

Overpaid #5 starters ultimately hurt the team. The payroll is not infinite, and Marquis' performance could probably be duplicated by a much cheaper alternative (Marshall).

That may not matter this year, but, when the Cubs are looking to sign a FA OF next year, we will regret having an overpaid #5 starter.

That said, I do like the guy -- as has been said, he hits, runs, and hangs tough after the other team scores a few runs.

Well, it's sort of a tough question to answer without really digging into each team.

The first problem, is that Marquis was really the 4th starter, not the 5th, until Harden arrived. The second problem is that it is pretty rare for a 5th starter to get 32 starts. Typically the team thinks they can do better than that guy and he will be replaced peroidically or someone gets hurt on the staff and he moves up to #4 or #3, and you have a new 5th starter.

But if you look at all NL Pitchers with 100 IP's (57 of them), Marquis ranks:

44th in Quality Start Percentage
42in ERA

57/5 = 11.2 So you would expect your 4th starter to be rank between 34 and 45, and your 5th starter to be between 46 and 57.

By this simple analysis, Marquis is a bottom half 4th starter or a very good 5th starter.

I think he was brought in to be a 4th starter, so in that regard he's not doing well. However, with the current roster, he can be seen as a strength compared to other teams. He's probably not going to make the post-season roster barring injury.

While I have the page up, the list of guys who rank behind Marquis in ERA is pretty impressive:

43 Roy Oswalt HOU
44 Aaron Harang CIN
45 Johnny Cueto CIN
46 Joel Pineiro STL
47 Zach Duke PIT
48 Brett Myers PHI
49 Brandon Backe HOU
50 Barry Zito SFO
51 Bronson Arroyo CIN
52 Andrew Miller FLA
53 Jeff Francis COL
54 Mark Hendrickson FLA
55 Adam Eaton PHI
56 Micah Owings ARI
57 Ian Snell PIT

You've got a Cy Young winner, two Cy Young contenders, one more staff ace, a couple of #2 starters and a couple more ROY hopefuls (when the season started), and Cub killer Zach Duke who rolled into the season with a 2.10 career ERA against us.

The bigger issue to me is firmly believing other pitchers like Marshall could do as well or better while making far less money.

I am not convinced about that. I am especially not convinced that Marshall would be able to pitch every fifth day, and end up with 30 starts.

Nor am I convinced that the money Marquis is getting is limiting the Cubs in other areas.

give him a break hes just trying to support his family
times are tough for the marquis family

Well, he is a native New Yawker, so $10 million may only buy him a modest studio apartment.

Well said George Altman re: Marquis.

Also, it always gets lost in the mix that he makes all his starts. Would Marshall do that? One of the reasons I think Hendry got both Lilly and Marquis was durability. Each has made all their starts for the last 5 years now except one year for Lilly. After the year when the Cubs started either 16 or 17 different pitchers, Hendry got the concept of durability of starters having a trickle-down effect to the bullpen.

What I hated about Marquis yesterday was a 2-out walk to Hunter F'in Pence with Berkman and Lee to follow.

Agreed. I think Marquis just isn't a very smart pitcher, but he thinks he is. It seems like he's always shaking off the catcher, and there were rumors LaRussa hated him because he was so uncoachable.

While a guy like Maddux can shake off the catcher all he wants, Marquis just ends up making mistakes. You know, like throwing an inner-half fastball to Carlos Lee on an 0-2 count, which then got hit about 385 feet.

If my math from last week was correct, Marquis has now had 21 starts, and the Cubs are 12-9 in those games, despite his W-L record. Some of that is certainly due to the prolific run totals the team is putting up, but some of it is also because his starts have been competitive.

All that said, if the Cubs continue to win half of Marquis' starts the rest of the year, I'll have very little to complain about.

Watching the highlights -- interesting reaction from Backe after the ball left Soriano's bat. He threw his hands up in disgust -- either at himself, at his catcher, or at his manager for leaving him out there to absorb the pain of an 8-run inning -- perhaps a combination of all 3.

Recent comments

Subscribe to Recent comments
The first 600 characters of the last 16 comments, click "View" to see rest of comment.
  • I would rather have Ian Happ at second.

    Rob Richardson 11 min 23 sec ago view
  • that is a hell of a lot of talent to shift for a reliever who's gonna get paid top-scale "free agent" type money in 2017+ after a 1/2 year rental for the remainder of 2016.

    crunch 23 min 55 sec ago view
  • Cubs are going to need a 2nd baseman of the future. I'm still not convinced Baez can be that offensively on an everyday basis.

    johann 1 hour 6 min ago view
  • Updating: Per @Joelsherman1, #Cubs-#Yankees trade, if completed, would be Chapman for Torres, Warren and likely two others.

    Can only imagine they'd only give that much up if he's signing an extension. 

    Rob G. 1 hour 21 min ago view
  • The official police report on Chapman:

    You can draw your own conclusions.

    Old and Blue 3 hours 14 min ago view
  • Where is he going to play for the Cubs?

    Rob Richardson 3 hours 41 min ago view
  • That was, ummmm, you know. A joke?

    Old and Blue 3 hours 46 min ago view
  • Even from an on-field perspective, Torres is a 19-year-old beating up High-A pitching who also plays a great SS. Even if he never develops a legit MLB power stroke, he's still an obvious 4-tool guy with a very high floor. Sucks to trade away his next 6-8 years for a closer, albeit a great one.

    John Beasley 5 hours 15 min ago view
  • "Like the Chapman deal for Cubs from on-field POV, wish I didn't now have to feel lousy following an otherwise likable Cubs team." @jonahkeri

    pretty much sums up my feelings

    Rob G. 11 hours 24 min ago view
  • You mean Yankees?

    QuietMan 11 hours 28 min ago view
  • Cards lose!

    billybucks 11 hours 35 min ago view
  • You do have a point. The TheoJed certainly would need to address this in a transparent way. Milton Bradley was no help to the team.

    The E-Man 11 hours 47 min ago view
  • FWIW, the Cubs would get a compensation draft pick between the 1st & 2nd rounds (around #35) if they extend a Qualifying Offer to Chapman post-2016 (probably about $17M), Chapman declines, and then he signs with another MLB club before next year's draft. 

    Arizona Phil 11 hours 54 min ago view
  • This all assumes Chapman doesn't want to be a free agent and possibly sign a $20MM+/year deal. We all know free agents get overpaid, sometimes dramatically (Hello, JayHey!). Not sure why Chapman would agree to the extension. If i'm is agent, I would tell him I could get I'm a $100M deal as a FA.

    billybucks 12 hours 1 min ago view
  • I'll root for the uniform and imagine it's left-handed Rod Beck or Randy Myers out there I suppose.

    Rob G. 12 hours 24 min ago view
  • Amen to this. I guess it's gonna happen and I'm gonna have to suck it up but I really despise domestic abusers with every bone in my body and cannot stand them on any team I root for.

    johann 12 hours 33 min ago view