Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

17 Cubs on WBC Rosters

MLB has released the 45-man provisional rosters of the national teams that will be playing in the 2009 World Baseball Classic (WBC).

Rosters will need to be cut-down to 28 (with at least 13 pitchers) by February 24th. 

There are presently a total of 17 Cubs major leaguers and minor leaguers on the provisional rosters of the WBC teams:  

AUSTRALIA:
Ryan Searle, RHP

CANADA:
Rich Harden, RHP 
Vince Perkins, RHP
Chris Robinson, C

CHINESE TAIPEI:
Hung-Wen Chen, RHP

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC:
Carlos Marmol, RHP
Aramis Ramirez, 3B 
Alfonso Soriano, OF 

ITALY:
Alessandro Maestri, RHP

JAPAN:
Kosuke Fukudome, OF

NETHERLANDS:
Dwayne Kemp, 2B

PUERTO PICO:
Geovany Soto, C

USA:
Derrek Lee, 1B
Ted Lilly, LHP

VENEZUELA:
Jose Ascanio, RHP 
Angel Guzman, RHP 
Carlos Zambrano, RHP 

Comments

[ ]

In reply to by OakLawnGuy

So what you're saying is that Kenney works for the Trib while Hendry works for the Cubs. That would seem to make Hendry the highest ranking Cub employee. It's a little unclear, because I would have thought the highest ranking Cub was the president, not the GM.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Well, I guess what I should have said is that he was hired by the Trib. In fact, like Grenesko and Madigan before him, I think he had a role at the Trib and then moved over to or was interviewed and hired for the Cub job. I mean he gets paid "Cub dollars" but it was the Trib's call.

[ ]

In reply to by OakLawnGuy

Just to recap boys and girls, Andy McPhail was the president of the Cubs and formerly the highest ranking in the organization. He of course, took the Baltimore job and was replaced by McDonough. John then stepped down from that post to take a job with the Blackhawks. Instead of hiring someone new (since the ownership is going to change) Kenney just took on the role of interim president until such time that a new ownership takes over. So basically, Kenney is just a pinch-hitter until a new "starter" is signed.

[ ]

In reply to by OakLawnGuy

Unless the guy is getting fired, and Kenney has done nothing to merit that, even if he's replaced, odds are that they'll keep him around for some transition period. He could well be offered another job in the organization. It's not a forgone conclusion he even will be replaced, though it's probably likely. He's the defacto operating owner.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Oh yeah, I think whoever the new owner wants to replace in upper business management will hang around for a transition period. Kenney certainly has done nothing get to fired over, I just figure the new owner will want his man/woman in charge.

pitchers are on strict pitch counts aren't they? to mimic the work they would be getting with their actual teams... I believe some teams are more worried about the pitchers not getting enough work that don't get in the WBC games.

What are the dates that WBC players will be out of camp? I'd like to make sure my plans for some Mesa ST Cubs games don't involve a gutted Cubs lineup. Not terribly interested in seeing a lineup that would feature Koyie Hill, Micah Hoffpauir, Ronny Cedeno and Joey Gathright et al. as starters.

[ ]

In reply to by Jim Hickmans Bat

"Not terribly interested in seeing a lineup that would feature Koyie Hill, Micah Hoffpauir, Ronny Cedeno and Joey Gathright et al. as starters." Lets hope we don't see a lineup like this at Wrigley until late September when the division and homefield throughout are locked up...

That's what I'd like to see. This is a 3 week exhibition season involving teams that aren't really teams and someone is likely to get hurt, either seriously or a nagging injury. I guess MLB has to buckle under to Uncle Bud and send the players who are invited and want to play, but if I was a GM (or a player for that matter), I'd say thanks but no thanks. There isn't any upside to this tournament aside from meaningless bragging rights.....for some.

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

Yep, and it's not an easy existence. This is Sox Country, although you see a few Cub fans and a few Cub flags. I live close to a bar owned by Dave Wills' family, he is the voice of the Tampa Bay Rays and used to do pre- and post-game for the Sox on AM1000. His pictures along with Rob Mackowiak's (and Mackowiak's # 10 Sox jersey) hang in the lobby of my kids' high school (Oak Lawn); they both went there. It was especially difficult, and noisy, in 2005. Not to mention the day after Game 3 last season.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

To me, there is NO upside besides the bragging rights. I don't care and it seems to me not many in this country do not either. Once the thing is done, and the regular season begins, it will be all but forgotten. The championship season of MLB is what counts to the vast majority of fans in the United States. The World Cup is ingrained in European/Latino culture. It's been around for, what, 110-120 years? It's an honor to be part of the national teams in the Cup, and they work out/play an exhibition schedule for a considerable amount of time before the FIFA competition. Not just a few weeks spent in new uniforms then back to business like the WBC will be. There is real national interest and pride that has developed in the World Cup that you must admit does not exist in the WBC series. I don't think Cubs/Sox/Brewers/Mets etc. fans take a lot of interest or pride in the outcome. The bragging rights are held in higher esteem in Latin American countries, places that take more interest in their individual countrymen's performance than we do in the US. If a Cub gets hurt, you'll see, not only will no Cub fan care what country won, they'll be pissed that one of their own got hurt in a game that has no bearing on the season they consider more important.

[ ]

In reply to by OakLawnGuy

You're contradicting yourself "The championship season of MLB is what counts to the vast majority of fans in the United States. The World Cup is ingrained in European/Latino culture. It's been around for, what, 110-120 years? It's an honor to be part of the national teams in the Cup..." It's been around since the 40's as I recall. And the logic that 'Well it's more popular because it has been around longer' isn't really logic. There would never be an NFL or an NBA if those potential owners had the same attitude. Yes it will take time to grow in popularity, but saying 'Well it's not the FIFA World Cup, therefore it never will be' is like saying that the Super Bowl will never have more viewers than the World Series or a heavy weight title fight. Read the quote from Harden and or any Olympian and discern whether they think it's going to be considered an honor. Or check the ratings on what was the most watched single olympic event in this last Summer Olympics in the States if you think Americans won't watch it. But the point is, and this is hard to understand as an American, that we are not the target audience. The 90% of the World's population outside of the US is the target audience. If you want to make baseball the world's most popular sport - you need a global stage to do it. Selig has the vision to see that, condemning him for that is ridiculous.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Pretty much dead on... It's all about increasing the visibility of the sport internationally...and money. To me the biggest disadvantage of a player going to the WBC (besides random injury possibility which could happen any time) is the player isn't training with the team he'll eventually break camp with. The biggest advantage is you get players hitting the ground in April without as much rust. ...but yeah, the point of the whole thing is international visibility in an attempt to make the sport legit outside of it's traditional areas (and that includes Japan/Korea in traditional areas as well as the common Hispanic countries).

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

I didn't condemn Selig for the WBC. If he truly wants to make it global, then God bless him, but he better do more than a 3 week exhibition series. A "World Cup" football championship has been around in some form since the late 19th century, leading up to the organization of FIFA. The first World Cup under FIFA was played in 1930, its precursors involved a couple Euro teams, England and a couple South American teams. If you read my statement as "it's more popular because it's been around longer", you miss the point. The Cup as an entity is ingrained in the culture of football which is ingrained in the societies of the countries that have participated for nearly 80 years. I'ts part of the soccer fabric outside the US as much as MLB is stitched into ours. And pro leagues stop in order to send the best players to the Cup. (If Bud is serious about global baseball, then maybe he ought to try doing that?) And I didn't make any reference to whether the players felt it was a larger calling. The fans as a whole in the US don't care. There are plenty of players who turned down invites but I don't hold them in any lesser light than Rich Harden.

[ ]

In reply to by OakLawnGuy

"And I didn't make any reference to whether the players felt it was a larger calling. " after having said: "It's an honor to play on teams playing for the World Cup" "The fans as a whole in the US don't care." Once again, forgetting the fact that the tournanment is not about Americans. "There are plenty of players who turned down invites but I don't hold them in any lesser light than Rich Harden." And now, you're speaking for all the citizens of of the 16 countries - I can only assume godhood is coming up for you next. You're missing your own point. How did the FIFA World Cup become "ingrained in the culture of football"? By being around for a long time. Something cannot be around for a long time if it never starts. The World Cup tournament lasts about 18 months, by the way - and plenty of players miss time from their club seasons to participate or because of injury.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Great, so in 50 years the WBC will be a wonderful tourney. RIGHT NOW, as I said, it's not. US baseball fans in general couldn't care less about it. And what's Harden supposed to say, "My turn with the Cubs is more important than representing Canada"? Which is probably closer to the truth? And piss off his fans who wave the red and white? I couldn't possibly achieve "godhood" (nice term) as long as you are around to rediagram all my sentences. Is this Real Neal, or Dan McNeil?

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

Intriguing - but, I think about this, too. I forget who mentioned this yesterday, but Peavey could be identified as "we are fucked", if he goes down: "It's anyone's guess whether Peavy will get hurt, but an arm ailment could make it nearly impossible to move his $63 million contract, which the Padres have shopped since October. Entering 2008, Peavy was healthy enough that the Padres guaranteed him a $52 million extension. At that time, a clean MRI exam led to an insurance policy for Peavy without exemptions for any body part. But by last May 20, Peavy's right elbow and upper forearm were swollen, leading to a month on the disabled list." The staff injury potential list then COULD become: Peavy Harden Dempster (TJ three years ago) Zambrano (shoulder problems, 2008)

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

People make it sound like Peavy never pitched again after this minor problem with his arm. He came back and in 14 of his 18 starts to finish out the season he gave up 3 earned runs or less. Posted a 3.30 ERA in the second half to boot also. Not bad for a guy whose arm is shattered beyond repair.

[ ]

In reply to by MikeC

You understand the meaning of the word, "could", right? This word, which is used freely on this blog is: could |koŏd| modal verb past of can 1 . • used to indicate possibility : they could be right | I would go if I could afford it. And, as you infer out equally well, Peavy (and the others on the staff) could remain healthy the entire season. Which I hope is the case!

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

Just stating that people make Peavy's injury out to be wayyyyyyyy worse than it is and I really don't think people know he pitched and he pitched pretty damn good after coming back. But if you want to go on the "COULD" arguement. The entire staff/roster "COULD" be injury risks. Not just the ones you mentioned. In fact your entire post is pointless on the "COULD" arguement. But I wasn't addressing that, just the worries about his arm. But thanks for the definition. It really didn't help your arguement in the slightest bit, lol.

[ ]

In reply to by MikeC

Exactly. If Hendry came out and said he was not going to pursue Peavy because of the potential that he would get hurt, can you imagine the backlash? Peavy is going to be a small gamble because he has had arm issues recently, but to not want him because of that is running scared. If you say you'd like the Cubs to get a pitcher with a better history of health, I'd agree. Pitchers of the quality of Jake Peavy with clean bills of health are not (apparently) available. I wouldn't run away from Peavy, especially considering the way he pitched from June till the end of 2008.

[ ]

In reply to by OakLawnGuy

Good point. The thing about injuries is that there is no reliable way of predicting who will and will not be injured. If were going to go with paranoia (that's what it sounds like to me), every single rotation in all of the major league clubs have question marks. In fact, I would dare anyone to name one that doesn't have "could" happen concerns.

The staff injury potential list then COULD become: don't worry, if this happens we'll have a pitching staff of: Ted Lilly Ted Lilly Ted Lilly Ted Lilly Sean Marshall and the TLSC predicts at least 80 wins for TL

Or the starting staff COULD look like: Ted Lilly Derek Botelho Steve Engel Johnny Abrego Jay Baller With Reggie Patterson ready to step in if Lilly hurts himself slamming his glove to the mound...

OMG.....The 1985 Cub Rotation post injury spree...WHAT A MOTLEY CRUEW OF PITCHERS THEY ROLLED OUT...UGH

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

I didn't even mention how luminaries like Dave Beard, Jon Perlman and Dave Gumpert were needed to fill out the bullpen that year...

Let me try this one more time. Does anyone know what are the dates that WBC players will out of ST camp? I'm trying to plan for some Phoenix games, but I don't want to go to ones where half a dozen Cubs regulars are missing. Thx.

there's also a few exhibition games before the official WBC ones start, a few days before

Official rosters are out Feb. 24th...Cubs start Mesa games on the 25th.

[ ]

In reply to by T-Dubs

Yeah, I've done spring training three times, sometimes earlier and sometimes later, but I have yet to see 7 projected starters in a lineup. Little nicks and dings, split squad games, trying to figure out your 24th and 25th man etc. If you want to see the starters you're best luck is going to New York - suggest you bring a coat.

Recent comments

  • Bill (view)

    A good rule of thumb is that if you trade a near-ready high ceiling prospect, you should get at least two far-away high ceiling prospects in return.  Like all rules-of-thumb, it depends upon the specific circumstances, but certainly, we weren't going to get Busch for either prospect alone.

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Right on schedule, just read an article in Baseball America entitled "10 MLB Prospects Outside The Top 100 Who Have Our Attention".  Zyhir Hope was one of the prospects featured. It stated that he's "one of the biggest arrow-up sleeper prospects in the lower levels right now."

     

    Not sharing to be negative about the trade, getting a top 100 prospect who is MLB ready should carry a heavy prospect cost.  But man, Dodger sure are good at identifying and developing young talent. Andrew Friedman seems to have successfully merged Ray's development with Yankees financial might to create a juggernaut of an organization.  

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    I suspect Brown will spend some time in the bullpen due to inning restrictions.  Pitched only 93 innings last year and career high is 104 innings in 2022.  I would expect them to be cautious with a young player with his injury history.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Teheran minor league deal is done, per MLB.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Based on Phil’s sound analysis it sounds like a no brainer for Almonte to be placed on waivers as today’s roster move. We shall see.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team.