Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

I did the bulk of the research for this article with the idea this would be a preview on whom the Cubs should prefer as their new right fielder. Then the signing became imminent and eventually a reality, so I decided to turn this into an analysis of the newest Cub outfielder, Milton Bradley. You've probably already seen a lot of these numbers in one way or another, but why let the work go to waste?

Let's start with a look at their offensive numbers...in beautiful table form. Their ages are their 2009 baseball ages, in other words using the July 1st cutoff for their birthday. The 3-year WARP averages are a simple average, just taking the last three seasons and dividing by three, rather than weighting it by games played or anything like that. Considering it's a cumulative stat, I actually believe that's kosher.  I went with 2009 Bill James projections, but you can find MARCEL or CHONE on their fangraphs pages. Bold indicates the leader in that category.

Player
Age
2008 WARP1
3-Year WARP1
2008 OPS 3-Year OPS 2009 Bill James OPS Projection
A. Dunn 29 6.3 4.77 .899 .897 .913
M. Bradley 31 7.0 4.57 .999 .9231 .879
B. Abreu 35 5.2 6.1 .842 .847 .844
R. Ibanez 37 7.4 5.93 .846  .846 .791
N. Swisher 28 3.5 6.03 .742 .8172 .810
J. Hermida 25 3.0 2.67 .729 .771 .822
G. Anderson 37 3.5 3.27 .758 .776 .753

There's also the 39-year old Ken Griffey Jr. still out there and the right-handed Pat Burrell was out there, but there didn't seem to be the remotest of rumors on either of them with the Cubs. 

Bobby Abreu looks promising when you see the best 3-year WARP1 average, but then you see that starting from 2006 it was 7.3, 5.8 and then 5.2 last year and you have what the experts like to call a downward trend. You sell that stock, you don't buy, especially at age 353. Dunn looks to be the safest with the bat going forward, but then you look at his WARP1 scores and you can see how much his defense kills his overall value.

Defense

UZR, or Ultimate Zone Rating is now on Fangraphs and was created by Mitchell Lichtman5. RAA is Clay Davenport's system that can be found on Baseball Prospectus, which I hear will come out with a major revision this spring in the new Baseball Prospectus book. Plus/Minus system from ACTA Sports was taken from this BP article, if anyone has the Bill James Handbook, I can fill in the gaps.

Player
Age
UZR
UZR/150 3-Year UZR average RAA
3-Year RAA Average
 +/-
A. Dunn (LF) 29 -10.1  -16.3 -14 -1 -12  -23
M. Bradley 31 1.2 7.0  3.83 3 -0.3 1.2
B. Abreu 35 -25.2 -25.9 -15 -14 -8 -24
R. Ibanez 37 -12.6 -11.0 -13 1  -7.33 -18
N. Swisher 28 -1.3 -2.4 1.63 -3 2.33 Missing
J. Hermida 25 -2.6 -3 -3.77 -3 -4.67 Missing

Bradley has only played 172 games in the outfield over the last three years, but he's the only one that is a positive with the glove.   You can see just how poor Abreu's become defensively and rumors swirled that Abreu was scared of the wall at Yankee Stadium, which would only be exasperated with Wrigley's brick facade.  I think Swisher's defensive numbers get roughed up by being misplaced as a center fielder and 
Adam Dunn needs to accept his life as a DH. It worked just fine for Frank Thomas and David Ortiz (not that Dunn is quite that good a hitter).

Temperament

Much has been made of Bradley's volatile past, and for good reason, it's part of the package the Cubs are getting for the next 2-3 years. From the ESPN highlights and blurbs we're all exposed to, I'm sure a
lot of fans think Bradley is ready to go berserk on them if you just
look at him the wrong way. But this isn't a guy picking fights with
everyone he crosses paths with, rather a guy with serious anger
management issues. 
And for all the people ready to condemn him for his past, there always seems to be someone there to let us know there's more to Bradley than the "Angry Black Man". And as that ESPN.com article states, "He just thinks it's time people understand the three-dimensional person living behind the one-dimensional image."

Now the Cubs are pretty dumb at times6, but I think it's safe to assume they did their due diligence checking in with past managers, players and other acquaintences of Bradley and know exactly what they're getting themselves into. Don't forget that Dusty made a special trip back in 2005 to visit Bradley and see if the Cubs might be interested, so he's been on the Cubs radar for quite awhile. By all accounts, he gets along just fine with his teammates7 and no one seems to have ever questioned his effort between the lines. It's that effort and talent that has given him a second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and now seventh chance...this time with the Cubs. That is not to condone his past actions, for he has crossed lines that shouldn't have been passed, but it is to forgive and move forward. Yes, when you're talking tens of millions of dollars and your favorite ballclub, it's understandable to be wary, but people do grow up and they can change and well, there are players that have probably done far worse things on the Cubs or in the league that just aren't as public.

"Judge not, that ye be not judged" 


Projections

As for the ballplayer the Cubs are getting, I think it's obvious that they went out and got the best talent available for the perceived need they had, that of a left-handed hitting right fielder. The talent that culminated in an AL leading .999 OPS last year. And before we write that off as just a passing fad on a career year, take a look at the history of players to lead the league in OPS over the year.

Go ahead and give it a scan...I'll wait a minute.

Pretty impressive list isn't it? There's not a player on there that a team wouldn't want to have in their lineup, not a fluke to be seen. It's not to say he'll ever repeat it, but it is to say that he's a pretty damn good hitter in pretty good historical company.

Of course, he's not quite that good. His projections on his fangraphs page all point to him having an OPS south of .900. There's a few good reasons for that. First, last year's .999 OPS was by far a career high and much of it was aided by a league-leading and completely unstainable .396 BABIP. How unsustainable you ask? Well, if you look at three-year averages the top three are Jeter(.367), Holliday(.365) and Chipper Jones (.361), so at the very least you're talking a 30 point drop in his average stats and it's far more likely to drop even further. Also, when he hit a flyball, 21.2% of the time it went out of the park last year. That's another career high and well above his career mark of 15.4%. It was also good for 8th in the league, mixed in with names like Ryan Howard, Alex Rodriguez, Adam Dunn, Manny Ramirez and Jim Thome and I don't think anyone is going to confuse Bradley for that type of power hitter. 

There's also of course the Ballpark effect, often cited as the Coors of the American League. It is quite kind to left-handed hitters over the years, but so has Wrigley Field. The chart below using Baseball Reference Multi-Year Park Factors seems to indicate Bradley will actually get a boost this year.

 Year Wrigley
The Ballpark
2008 106 100
2007 104 100
2006 103 101
2005 104 106
2004 103 108
2003 101 111
2002 98 106
2001 95 104
2000 97 102

 

Of course, park factors aren't all that reliable and it's best to break them up for left-handed and right-handed hitters. I believe the Bill James Handbook does that, of which I do not own a copy, but my understanding is that The Ballpark or whatever they call it these days has always been quite friendly to left-handed hitters, particularly in aiding home runs and might be a reason for that career 21.2% HR/FB rate. But Wrigley isn't too bad itself and the switch of where he plays the majority of his games won't make as much a difference as sheer rebalancing of the luck he enjoyed last season.

So yes, his numbers will most likely drop from 2008, it's actually pretty much a guarantee. But an OPS around the .900 mark would still be good for the best on the Cubs last year - Ramirez led with .898 -  and did I mention we're adding this to the best scoring offense in the NL last year?

Injury History

Moreso than his past anger issues and altercations, his past injuries should be of greatest concern. This is a player with only 500 plus plate appearances twice in his career (2004 and 2008). Leg, knee, back and I believe even a ribcage injury have all sidelined Bradley over his career. Now the Cubs of course checked his medical records and did all the appropriate tests, even so far as stating his injured right knee is stronger than his left knee.That doesn't mean it will hold up playing the field on a regular basis or another body part will fail him. But what is interesting is that even if Bradley misses half the season, he'll be worth his contract this year that pays him $7M. 

Oh, how you ask?

Well it's a bit of a leap, but the fine folks at Fangraphs have been putting together something called Value Wins and assigning a dollar value to a players performance. Here is what Milton Bradley's page looks like:

Year
GP
Dollar Value in Millions
2003 101  $12.5
2004 141 $11.0
2005 75 $6.8
2006 96  $10.3
2007 61 $10.0
2008 126 $19.4

 

The dude is so good that even when hurt he's worth more than most of the major league hitters. Let's add an extra column with a mystery players value.

Year
GP
Dollar Value in Millions
Mystery Player Value
2003 101 $12.5 $17.0
2004 141 $11.0 $17.8
2005 75 $6.8 $14.1
2006 96 $10.3 $12.5
2007 61 $10.0 $11.5
2008 126 $19.4 $5.7

Well that mystery player is the guy that I think a lot of Cubs fans felt was the safe bet, one Bobby Abreu. Once again, we clearly see the decline is skills and when you're 35 - compared to Bradley's 31 years of age - there's little hope it will improve.

So I'll give the Cubs credit on this one, for once they went with a baseball decision instead of a public relations one. They added a potential impact bat to a lineup that was already the best at scoring runs rather than a fading star or one-dimensional slugger. And while there will be a million people coiled to spring an "I told you so" the moment he hits the disabled list or a reporter, I think the Cubs are in the precarious 100-year-drought position of having to take some chances. 

Footnotes

1 -.880 OPS from the left side, 1.023 from the right side,

2 - .799 from the left side, .864 from the right side 

3 - If you play in the stock market, heed the words of one of the richest men in the world, Warren Buffet. "Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful" 4

4 - Myself, nor TCR are responsible for losing your life savings.

5 - I believe you can find the beginnings of UZR from these BBTF links.

6 - Neifi Perez, Jose Macias, Tony Womack, Freddie Bynum, Glendon Rusch, Jeromy Burnitz, Juan Pierre, Jacque Jones, Wade Miller, César Izturis, Tom Goodwin, Lenny Harris, Shawn Estes, Todd Hundley, Julian Tavarez, Willie Greene, Ismael Valdez, Ty Griffin, Earl Cunningham, etc, etc, etc.

7 - Except that racist Jeff Kent (let's see how Kent's HOF chances fare after that phrase gets a few Google hits).

8 -  Reading between the lines, it just means his left knee is in bad shape. The line for over/under on a left knee injury is officialy set at 04/12/09.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Good stuff, Rob.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Well thought out discussion Rob.

Milton Bradley for 90 games vs. Abreu for 150 games, discuss.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

I've gotta take Bradley for 90

On top of being the more talented player as of right now, he's also the better investment for the team. If we sign Abreu and he has a poor year, he will be written off as washed up and have no value. If the same happens with Bradley, teams will still be willing to take a chance on him.

Also, I sort of like the idea of Bradley not playing 100 games. Planned off days will give Fukudome more at bats, and as awful as he was post June last year, I think he will turn it around this year. Maybe he won't be as influential as we thought he could be, but if he throws up a .275 next year, he'll no longer be looked at as a bust.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Totally agree.

I just assume that Bradley only plays 90 games. Then we know he will be fresh come October when the Cubs are sitting at home watching the playoffs.

Plus we need to free up the at bats to get "grinders" in there like Aaron Miles and Doug Deeds. Maybe even find some Rf at bats for Paul Bako. He is lefthanded and all.

Abreu is older. So his perennial 300 average and 400 Obp really don't count. He could start to suck at any moment. We need a fiery part time player who is younger.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Man, are you dark about everything.

why do you follow the team at all?

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Not being dark. But I'm not a kool-aid drinker either.

I'm just disapointed that we have been on the cusp, and we've taken a step back.

We just signed Cliff Floyd to a 3 year deal.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Wait - you are equating Cliff Floyd to Milton Bradley?

brilliant.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Just out of curiosity, did you read the article?

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

" if he throws up a .275 next year, he'll no longer be looked at as a bust."

You may be surprised to learn that Fukudome only managed to hit .279 the first half last year when he was "hot." I think it will be a miracle if he can hit .275 this year.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

no he was "hot" the first month and a half, where his average flirts with .300

regardless, he sucked. i think he can pull off .275 though

Re: regardless, he sucked. i think he can pull off .275 though

based on what? The excuse for last year was he got tired. But clearly that's just wishful thinking if he already "sucked" after just six weeks.

Re: regardless, he sucked. i think he can pull off .275 though

I had never heard that he was tired

What I heard was pitchers found the hole in his swing and exploited it

The Cubs spent a lot of money on him, I'm sure they are concentrating on getting more out of him

Re: regardless, he sucked. i think he can pull off .275 though

"I think Fukudome is going to bounce back and have a good year for us," Cubs manager Lou Piniella said. "This is what I think -- I think he got tired last year. He didn't play a full season the year before in Japan. -- Lou Piniella

found here (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090130&c...)and scores of other sources

Re: regardless, he sucked. i think he can pull off .275 though

Lou is sort of stupid.

Re: regardless, he sucked. i think he can pull off .275 though

sooo that would make that lou's excuse
fukudome denied repeatedly being tired or fatigued

Re: regardless, he sucked. i think he can pull off .275 though

Never trust a guy who had a bad season to come out and tell you, "You know, I wasn't prepared. My bad."

Not saying that fatigue is definitely the problem (that swing is pretty funky), just saying that you don't necessarily trust the athlete to admit what the problem is--or to know what the problem is, for that matter.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

How about Abreu to back up Bradley and Soriano? Maybe come February 28 he'll still be looking for a job.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Very nice analysis! I am a fan personally of the Bradley signing; it's a gamble, but what you really do is articulate that the "safe" choice, Abreu, is probably the riskiest.

Maybe GM's know this too, which is why he is still out there 2 weeks before ST.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

"the "safe" choice, Abreu, is probably the riskiest."

I think the safe choice would have been pulling the trigger on the Felix Pie+ for Ibanez trade last July.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

Perhaps Abreu is still out there because, as the most accomplished, durable, and consistent RF out there, he commands the biggest salary?

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

While it is possible DB, I just can't imagine Abreu getting anything near the 3/30 we gave to Bradley.

I think Bradley over Abreu is a huge mistake. Especially when considering

A) our apparent finances will prevent us from procuring a suitable replacement if Bradley goes down with injury ( a VERY real possiblility)

B) We have exacly ZERO legitimate MLB ready prospects to plug into RF in the event that Bradley goes down with injury ( a VERY real possibility)

Conversely I think the Abreu/Bradley age debate is a bunk issue. Bradley has the mileage on his body of a 38 year old. Abreu is still 20 SB fast and athletic enough that he was the smarter/safer play. IMHO

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

You're preaching to the choir here Dr. Aaron...I absolutely agree.

I hope MB proves me wrong, and he has a good, healthy season in RF.
I am skeptical.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

You were skeptical about Mark DeRosa, too, right?

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

And Fukudome

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

As a matter of fact...yes, I was skeptical of DeRosa. He was a utility guy for 4 seasons at ATL, then suddenly, at age 31, he breaks out in Texas.

Generally, age 31 is not usually when a player breaks out into previously unheard of performance.
DeRo put together 3 nice seasons in a row, and I wish him luck in Cleveland.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

it wasn't sudden if you look beyond the numbers to the human. there were legit and real reasons his hitting turned around and it wasn't casual lockerroom credit or 1-year-magic.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

I'm sorry Crunch, was that comment on Bradley or DeRosa?
DeRosa credited working with Texas hitting coach to his turnaround, chnging his timing mechanism and his stance slightly.

Whatever he did, it worked, as his power numbers improved tremendously since 2006.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

dero.

him in ATL vs. him in the box in TEX is/was night and day and that don't show up in the numbers...well, eventually it shows a little bit, but it don't tell you what happened.

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

he isn't now, because no one wants him

he was supposedly asking for 4/60 or something along that range, then happy with something in the Bradley/Burrell range and still no one wants him. He's a terrible defender cleary on the downside of his career.

He's not going to suddenly get better.

 

Re: Did Cubs Make the Right (Field) Choice?

"A) our apparent finances will prevent us from procuring a suitable replacement if Bradley goes down with injury ( a VERY real possiblility)"

our financial situation is much better than it would have been if we signed abreu

Return to Homepage

Syndicate content