We Have a Winner
In a close vote to decide the Official1 TCR Nickname for our Middle Infielders, we can now announce that with 100% of the 66 votes counted, the winner is....
The Scrap Pack.
The Scrap Pack beat The Tiger Cubs2 for the honor, and congratulations to all the other worthy suggestions as well.
Among the many virtues of The Scrap Pack are:
It rhymesok, fine, it doesn't. Me flunk 2nd grad Inglish.- Ok, it has "internal rhyme." I never got that far in English.
- It's short
- It has assonance
- It has a sharp, staccato sort of meter to it
- It alludes to a bunch of iconic womanizing singing drunkards with ties to the Las Vegas Mafia from the 1960s, who later went on to star in all-time classic movies like The Cannonball Run II.
- It is expandable: if necessary it could incorporate Reed Johnson, Aaron Miles and others.
- Its origin is shrouded in TCR mystery and lore. CT_Steve mentioned that he recalled seering someone use the nickname in Parachat, but we don't know who.
And most importantly....
- If they wind up stinking up the field, we can always claim that the "S" is silent.
1 "Official" in the sense that part of my contract to begin writing for Ruz, years ago, included several legal prerogatives, including but not limited to the right to print Letters of Marque and to be keeper of The Official Seal of TCR. I'm inferring from those prerogatives that I also have the right to declare things "official."
2 Yes, I just made an animal abuse pun. I'm sorry.
- Log in to post comments






Comments
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:31am Permalink
Scrap Pack
For all its many virtues, I don't think it rhymes.
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:42am Permalink
Heh. I presently am designing final exams for college kids, and I don't remember what it means to rhyme. What do the kids say these days? Oh yeah, FAIL.
Thanks for the catch there, I've updated the post.
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:57am Permalink
I am still trying to figure out how Love & Rockets rhymed 'you' with 'you-ooh-ooh'.
Each person seems to have a different threshold for what 'rhymes' . The average rapper, for instance, wouldn't have any problem with rhyming those two words.
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 11:00am Permalink
Yeah, I'm calling it a "rhyme," again. When me, Real Neal and "the average rapper" all agree, you know it must be correct.
And that's four consecutive comments by me relating to what counts as a rhyme. I'll stop, now. But god, I'd love to see a flame-war break out over poetry.... Come on, guys...
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 11:49am Permalink
Trans, you ignorant slut, stand by your call! If it sounds like a rhyme to you, it's a rhyme! At the very least that is a slant rhyme; both words have the same short "A" sound on a stressed syllable and end with hard, aspirated consonants. Grow some balls.
And, fuck man, how did you miss the opportunity to note the consonance in "sCrap paCK"? Combine the consonance with the repeated short "A" sound and the fact that "Scrap Pack" contains only two syllables, both with heavy stresses—a spondee (sorry, didn't mean to patronize you all)—and you've got a very punchy nickname. Too bad you don't have any punch, Trans, or none of this would be necessary—you would've just verbally bitch slapped Navigator.
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 11:57am Permalink
Oh, I wouldn't say it rhymes.
I was playing a drinking game Saturday, where you had to 'bust a rhyme' - rhyme a word with one that someone else had said or drink. I was bothered when someone rhymed 'time' with 'line'.
I am probably wrong, but it feels to me like just another symptom of the dumbing down of America and the English language.
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 12:11pm Permalink
It depends on your purposes, I think. For the purposes of modern English language poetry, full rhyme has limited use, since English is a rhyme poor language and the tradition of rhyming is really borrowed from Italian and other, older poetic traditions that, while they have their own merits, have a different word bank and syntactic system to work with than do English poets. For the purposes of a drinking game, I wouldn't consider participants' definition of rhyme the primary symptom of the dumbing down of America.
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 12:37pm Permalink
Charlies post # 14 is my candidate for Post Of The Year.
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 12:42pm Permalink
I can't decide which is more embarrassing: that you were playing a drinking game in which you had to rhyme words, or that you were playing a drinking game.
Re: it rhymes
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:23pm Permalink
Yeah it was an afternoon of 'man, being a frat daddy was cool, let's try that again'.
However, drinking games can be fun. Canned drinking games make me feel like I am borrowing someone else's life.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:37am Permalink
Ha ha. It has assonance.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:42am Permalink
A rather pronouced, impressive assonance....
Re: A rather pronouced, impressive assonance....
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 11:46am Permalink
Another way of saying it has assonance is "it gets the rhyme wrong."
Or, rap is crap rhyming. And hip-hop is not tip-top two-timing.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 4:33pm Permalink
It's got junk in the trunk?
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:43am Permalink
In a prosodic, poetic, and very real, sense it does rhyme - internally rather than at the end is all.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:47am Permalink
Ok, that's it, we're saying it rhymes. Phew, I'm out of my league here.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:59am Permalink
I like it. But then, what is the penalty if someone were to use, say, The Oui Men instead of The Scrap Pack?
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 11:01am Permalink
The original post said the penalty was "pain of death" or season-tickets to the Pirates.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 11:08am Permalink
I think I'll go with Pepper Spray and Theriot. Pseudo-rhyming is cool and all that, but anytime you can work four puns into one nickname, that gets my vote. Do I have to pay for the season tickets?
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 11:44am Permalink
Y'all'll be sorry when I'm a thousandaire from selling t-shirts of Font and Riot-lookalike tiger cubs saying "grr" in a text bubble to drunk white girls in Lakeview. The way I figure, I'll make enough money to either go to a game at Wrigley or buy a house near the Cell.
Congrats to Scrap Packers.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 12:23pm Permalink
i'm calling the nickname and the players "The Crap Pack"
yeah, i went there.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:04pm Permalink
Chad, don't badmouth those young Cubbies. You must be one of those Cubs fan who don't actually like anything about the team....DAMN YOU!!!!
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:17pm Permalink
Manny, you know I'm the TCR rebel blacksheep and you know I calls them likes i sees them.
I refuse to drink the RobG. kook aid!
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:23pm Permalink
There's RobG kool aid? What does it taste like?
(this should be entertaining)
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:28pm Permalink
i don't know as i already stated that i refuse to drink it.
But since you went to maine east and then marquette, i would assume it takes like MGD mixed with Drakkar Noir. With a slight hint of sausage.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 4:30pm Permalink
"it takes like MGD mixed with Drakkar Noir. With a slight hint of sausage."
Nicely done.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 12:42pm Permalink
This is exactly why Democracy is a failure. Never let people vote for things. Scrap Pack is pretty stupid. Its not really even funny. It doesnt even pass the "hey, thats not a dumb cliche" test. I think that the writers here could have come up with something better and come to a consensus over a couple of beers and a Vienna Beef dog at Murphy's.
Sigh.
At least there is parachat.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 12:45pm Permalink
communist.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:26pm Permalink
Communists get to vote.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:00pm Permalink
Ha! Yeah, that's stupid. At least there's parachat. "In my pants" humor anyone?
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:06pm Permalink
I propose the Cubs trade Jake Fox for this guy.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:17pm Permalink
It was me who came up with that, for the record. Any criticism of my hilarious creation will refuted with insults of your sexual preference. Proceed with caution.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:26pm Permalink
Yeah, well I don't like it at all.
What are you going to do about it? hmmm....call me gay?
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:29pm Permalink
Yes. You're gay.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:27pm Permalink
The other problem with it, is that it will be too easy for other teams' fans to make fun of the T-Shirt. "what is that, 'crap pack'? Is that like a colostomy bag?".
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:29pm Permalink
term has already been coined by me.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:32pm Permalink
nice try, Trans already noted it in the post...
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:40pm Permalink
don't see it.
mine
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:43pm Permalink
Focus on the most important part. It may come to you.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 1:52pm Permalink
work your way from the bottom up, look for the bullet point.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 2:06pm Permalink
don't see it don't care
mine
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 2:13pm Permalink
You can have colostomy bag.
Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 3:09pm Permalink
Levine says that Lee's neck and back issues a bigger culprit in his decline, along with his refusal to sit.
Although most people point to the broken wrist Lee suffered in 2006 as the reason he doesn't hit with as much power, the real reasons are his back and neck woes from a home-plate collision after the wrist injury.
http://espn.go.com/chicago/columns/blog?post=41054...
Re: Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 3:14pm Permalink
Interesting in that pitch selection has nothing to do with Lee's problems with grounding to short.
Also, Levine is happy to take another needless shot at Bradley. So far, Bradley is winning the 'media is out to get me' debate.
Re: Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 3:48pm Permalink
Well partially it does, but those pitches that he now hits weakly to second for double plays used to be doubles in the right-center power alley. He can't quite extend with power to the outer part of the plate like he used to.
I see your argument, though. If you can't do hit that pitch anymore, quit fucking swinging at it.
Re: Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 3:59pm Permalink
Yes, or move closer to the plate, or go back to your old hitting stance if this one, which seems to contort the back more is giving you problems.
Re: Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 6:23pm Permalink
Personally, AZ PHIL has mentioned that HOFF is "Gold Glove Caliber" at 1st B, and hits for power - something DLEE is just not doing well right now.
It would not be so bad if The Hoff gets a few more starts at 1B.
Re: Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 6:30pm Permalink
I would be all for a straight platoon. Some time during the offseason I predicted that they'd be platooning by the end of the year.
Re: Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:21pm Permalink
I just don't feel, that in his 60's, Lou will put a career minor leaguer (even though performing well) in a platoon situation with a former MVP and All Star.
Re: Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:25pm Permalink
hoff's lack of K'ing is getting increasingly interesting as far as what kind of player he can be.
sure, he's not exactly picking his pitches even though he's got some walks...he's hacking...he's just not missing as much.
that said...yeah, it's probably dlee's job to lose and it's probably not going to happen in early May unless he goes on a hell of a down-turn.
Re: Levine on Lee
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:30pm Permalink
former MVP?
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 4:03pm Permalink
"Unfortunately for Lee there's no remedy for a bulging disc and upper-neck and back pain. The only thing Lee can do is ask out of the lineup and wait for it to subside, which he refuses to do. [ ] That type of philosophy has hurt Lee as he's not the offensive player he was prior to the injury."
[ ]
"And although I don't know the extent of the injury to Bradley (strained right groin), he should probably pay attention to Lee's work ethic."
I am confused. Is he saying Bradley should play even through his doing so would make him a poorer player, or does he think that Bradley should stay on the bench until he is fully healed?
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 4:08pm Permalink
I think he was saying, I wanted to take a shot at Bradley in some way.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 4:15pm Permalink
He's saying that he likes cake and he likes to eat it, too.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 4:43pm Permalink
In the meantime, Ramirez and Soto, get free passes.
Gaudin called up
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 5:00pm Permalink
will start tomorrow for Padres...
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 5:08pm Permalink
Fail.
DFA
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 5:28pm Permalink
When do we learn the DFA/Vizcaino aftermath? Will we get anything back for this move? (besides an empty roster spot?)
Re: DFA
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 5:46pm Permalink
10 days from last Thursday, so I think by this coming Saturday they have to make a decision.
Re: DFA
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 6:56pm Permalink
Thanks, Rob. Have any guesses about what comes back? (just for fun)
Re: DFA
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:05pm Permalink
an empty roster spot....
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 6:12pm Permalink
...stupid 10pm EST games....well, 9:40, but whatever...
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 6:28pm Permalink
Has Wittenmyer "tweeted" the line-up for the game tonight?
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:07pm Permalink
cst_cubs: Lineup: sori, riot, fuky, rejo, hoff, soto, font, miles, lilly.
2-man bench tonight, Z is on Lou's card as an extra hitter.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:19pm Permalink
reed johnson hitting 4th and soriano leads off...okay. okay...
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:28pm Permalink
Awesome. I feel like Rejo's going DEEP tonight, fellas. DEEP!
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:43pm Permalink
Reed Johnson batting 4th? Oh brother...
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 10:31pm Permalink
no no no no no
YOU of all people don't get to complain about batting order. you are the one who loves to site James' and his dis-belief that liineup order matters.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Tue, 04/28/2009 - 8:38am Permalink
HA HA
I think even Bill James would laugh at that lineup last night. If the Cubs can't field anyone better than Reed Johnson in the #4 hole, they are in deep trouble.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:07pm Permalink
Marmol available Tuesday according to Wittenmyer...
Re: We Have a Winner
on Mon, 04/27/2009 - 7:23pm Permalink
Geez - why not Soto 8th? Or, a start for Hill. He is in an outrageous slump.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Tue, 04/28/2009 - 5:21pm Permalink
"Scrap Pack" is the Jose Vizcaino of nicknames. Serviceable but bland.
"Scrappy Deux" (without the extra "-ot" mind you) is easily superior, working on more levels with surprising effect--the Doug Dascenzo of nicknames.
Wither "Tiger Cubs," the clear champion of the three, full of promise but potentially diminishing with increased exposure, no doubt the Gary Scott of nicknames.
Re: We Have a Winner
on Tue, 04/28/2009 - 6:25pm Permalink
this is by far the Kevin Orie of posts.