A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
Reader Real Neal breaks down the first round of the draft in a variety of ways to see if there's an optimal strategy and how have the Cubs done relative to their drafting position.
Two topics are always
in hot debate this time of the year, when it comes to the MLB draft.
How have the Cubs done, and who should they pick?
With that in mind, I am
taking a look at 10 years worth of first round picks to try and help
answer those questions. I am only looking at the top 30 picks each
year (yeah I know the Cubs draft 31st), just to simplify
things. The 10 year range I used was ’96 to ’05. It’s just
too early to tell what is going to happen with highschoolers only
drafted three years ago. I used WARP3, even though Baseball
Prospectus has got something a bit wonky going on with their WARP3
scores for 2009, which seem exaggerated. I figured since the
majority of these players are still playing, though, that the slight
wobble could sort of build in a little projection.
To start off with, here
is some general charts, which should be self explanatory.
|
Draftees |
||
|
Level |
Pos |
Total |
|
C |
1B |
9 |
|
|
2B |
2 |
|
|
3B |
7 |
|
|
C |
6 |
|
|
IF |
5 |
|
|
OF |
21 |
|
|
P |
94 |
|
|
SS |
13 |
|
C |
|
157 |
|
H |
1B |
6 |
|
|
3B |
9 |
|
|
C |
7 |
|
|
IF |
7 |
|
|
OF |
35 |
|
|
P |
64 |
|
|
SS |
15 |
|
H |
|
143 |
|
Grand |
|
300 |
Nearly even on the HS
vs. College players, but there’s a lot more college pitchers taken
(60% of college players) than there are HS pitchers (45%). Maybe
TINSTAAPP is starting to take hold around major league scouting
departments.
|
ML |
|
Total |
||
|
Year |
Total |
|
Year |
Total |
|
1996 |
21 |
|
1996 |
172.3 |
|
1997 |
22 |
|
1997 |
263.1 |
|
1998 |
22 |
|
1998 |
246.8 |
|
1999 |
14 |
|
1999 |
152.4 |
|
2000 |
16 |
|
2000 |
82.1 |
|
2001 |
19 |
|
2001 |
151.3 |
|
2002 |
22 |
|
2002 |
213.7 |
|
2003 |
21 |
|
2003 |
127.3 |
|
2004 |
20 |
|
2004 |
42.4 |
|
2005 |
21 |
|
2005 |
99.2 |
|
Grand |
198 |
|
Grand |
1550.6 |
|
|
66.0% |
|
|
|
Two out of every 3
first round picks get to the majors. That doesn’t always mean
they’re useful major leaguers, though.
|
MLB's |
|
WARP3 |
||
|
Level |
Total |
|
Level |
Total |
|
C |
120 |
|
C |
911 |
|
H |
78 |
|
H |
639.6 |
|
Grand |
198 |
|
Grand |
1550.6 |
About what you may
expect, if you’ve been following things over the last 13 years.
When these charts are
combined, you can start to see some suggestions about where drafting
has been successful over that decade:
|
Draftees |
|
|
||
|
Level |
Pos |
Total |
Success |
Avg |
|
C |
1B |
9 |
67% |
11.1 |
|
|
2B |
2 |
100% |
5.8 |
|
|
3B |
7 |
86% |
17.9 |
|
|
C |
6 |
67% |
0.0 |
|
|
IF |
5 |
60% |
10.8 |
|
|
OF |
21 |
86% |
8.8 |
|
|
P |
94 |
72% |
3.8 |
|
|
SS |
13 |
100% |
6.3 |
|
C |
|
157 |
76% |
5.8 |
|
H |
1B |
6 |
83% |
8.8 |
|
|
3B |
9 |
67% |
7.6 |
|
|
C |
7 |
43% |
8.3 |
|
|
IF |
7 |
43% |
1.1 |
|
|
OF |
35 |
60% |
4.2 |
|
|
P |
64 |
50% |
4.2 |
|
|
SS |
15 |
53% |
2.3 |
|
H |
|
143 |
55% |
4.5 |
|
Grand |
|
300 |
66% |
5.2 |
College hitters,
particularly infielders, but not catchers really stand out. HS
corner men, and catchers have done well. Surprisingly HS pitchers
have done better than college pitchers when it comes to WARP3, though
only 50% of them make it to the bigs.
So, all other things
equal, based on those 10 drafts, in the first round you should look
for College infielders, College outfielders HS corner infielders and
HS catchers in the first round. If you’re desperate for a pitcher,
then the upside seems to be with the HS’s, but if you just want to
get a guy to the majors, then go with a college arm (72% chance).
So, how have the Cubs,
and other teams done?The first thing I did was looked at who should
have been drafted where. These are the guys that should have been
the #1’s by year. Determined solely by who has the most WARP3.
|
Year |
Player |
Position |
Team |
Level |
WARP3 |
|
1996 |
Eric |
3B |
OAK |
H |
49.6 |
|
1997 |
Lance |
1B |
HOU |
C |
54.1 |
|
1998 |
C.C. |
P |
CLE |
H |
46.7 |
|
1999 |
Barry |
P |
OAK |
C |
39.8 |
|
2000 |
Chase |
IF |
PHI |
C |
44.2 |
|
2001 |
Mark |
3B |
TEX |
C |
39.9 |
|
2002 |
Matt |
P |
SF |
H |
25.7 |
|
2003 |
Nick |
OF |
BAL |
C |
22.7 |
|
2004 |
Jered |
P |
ANA |
C |
18.9 |
|
2005 |
Ryan |
3B |
WAN |
H |
19.8 |
Two things that grabbed
my attention here. There’s only one HS hitter, and one College
Pitcher. There’s also no #1 overalls on the list, though Adrian
Gonzales has a chance, I think to eventually rectify that.
I followed that up by
asking, ‘Did a team make the optimum choice?”. Very simply if no
one behind you did any better than you did, based on WARP3 of the
player, then you made the correct decision. It doesn’t happen very
often.
|
Team |
Total |
|
ANA |
1 |
|
ARI |
2 |
|
ATL |
2 |
|
BAL |
3 |
|
BOS |
1 |
|
CHC |
|
|
CHW |
|
|
CIN |
|
|
CLE |
1 |
|
COL |
1 |
|
DET |
|
|
FLA |
|
|
HOU |
1 |
|
KC |
1 |
|
LA |
3 |
|
MIL |
2 |
|
MIN |
2 |
|
NYM |
|
|
NYY |
|
|
OAK |
2 |
|
PHI |
1 |
|
PIT |
1 |
|
SD |
|
|
SEA |
2 |
|
SF |
2 |
|
STL |
3 |
|
TB |
|
|
TEX |
1 |
|
TOR |
1 |
|
WAN |
1 |
|
(blank) |
|
|
Grand |
34 |
Most teams did it (not
the Cubs, of course), but no team was able to do it more than 3
times. That certainly lends evidence to the ‘draft is a crapshoot’
theory.
I went to take a little
deeper look. How successful were teams at getting their first round
picks to the Majors? How many wins did those players earn? And
what’s the ‘value’ of those wins.
|
Picks |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Team |
Total |
MLB/Pick |
WARP3/Pick |
Value/Pick |
|
ANA |
8 |
88% |
9.88 |
$ |
|
ARI |
9 |
78% |
2.56 |
$ |
|
ATL |
8 |
75% |
2.86 |
$ |
|
BAL |
14 |
50% |
3.46 |
$ |
|
BOS |
8 |
63% |
2.93 |
$ |
|
CHC |
9 |
44% |
4.84 |
$ |
|
CHW |
11 |
82% |
0.40 |
$ |
|
CIN |
10 |
60% |
2.25 |
$ |
|
CLE |
11 |
55% |
5.56 |
$ |
|
COL |
9 |
67% |
5.70 |
$ |
|
DET |
10 |
70% |
2.78 |
$ |
|
FLA |
11 |
64% |
8.47 |
$ |
|
HOU |
7 |
57% |
9.49 |
$ |
|
KC |
14 |
64% |
2.01 |
$ |
|
LA |
8 |
88% |
3.83 |
$ |
|
MIL |
10 |
60% |
6.29 |
$ |
|
MIN |
12 |
58% |
7.28 |
$ |
|
NYM |
9 |
78% |
3.11 |
$ |
|
NYY |
9 |
44% |
1.86 |
$ |
|
OAK |
16 |
63% |
8.87 |
$ |
|
PHI |
8 |
100% |
17.96 |
$ |
|
PIT |
10 |
60% |
2.49 |
$ |
|
SD |
12 |
33% |
1.38 |
$ |
|
SEA |
6 |
50% |
4.70 |
$ |
|
SF |
11 |
91% |
4.69 |
$ |
|
STL |
11 |
64% |
8.54 |
$ |
|
TB |
8 |
75% |
4.49 |
$ |
|
TEX |
10 |
80% |
7.19 |
$ |
|
TOR |
11 |
91% |
7.89 |
$ |
|
WAN |
10 |
50% |
3.44 |
$ |
|
Grand |
300 |
66% |
5.17 |
$ |
This may need some
explanation. The picks per team is the # of first round picks over
the period, from 6 (Seattle) to 16 (Oakland). The MLB/Pick is the %
of those picks who made the big leagues. The White Sox got a very
good 82% of their picks to the Majors. The next is WARP3/Pick.
Which is how many wins the average first round pick netted the team.
The White Sox players were pretty crappy, you can see. It seems like
if you’re a bad #1 pick but want a cup of coffee in the majors, the
South Side of Chicago is where you want to go. Philly dominates this
category by virtue of having drafted J.D. Drew, who they failed to
sign, along with Utley, Burrell and Hamels. The final is just taking
BP’s 2009 win value and multiplying it by the WARP3. This isn’t
marginal value, for that you’d need to take out the player’s
salaries, signing bonuses and other developmental costs.
The final thing I did
was added in some weighting of the draft picks. If you’re always
picking at the top, you should do better than perrenial
playoff contenders. This to me is the best evaluation of how these
first round picks have done over the time frame.
|
Weighted |
|||
|
Team |
Draft |
Wgt |
W3/P*Wgt |
|
HOU |
20 |
131% |
12.4 |
|
PHI |
10 |
67% |
12.0 |
|
OAK |
20 |
130% |
11.5 |
|
STL |
21 |
134% |
11.4 |
|
ANA |
14 |
90% |
8.8 |
|
FLA |
16 |
101% |
8.5 |
|
TEX |
16 |
103% |
7.4 |
|
CLE |
20 |
127% |
7.1 |
|
SF |
21 |
133% |
6.2 |
|
TOR |
12 |
79% |
6.2 |
|
MIN |
13 |
85% |
6.2 |
|
LA |
22 |
142% |
5.4 |
|
SEA |
18 |
113% |
5.3 |
|
COL |
14 |
90% |
5.1 |
|
ATL |
27 |
176% |
5.0 |
|
BOS |
20 |
129% |
3.8 |
|
CHC |
12 |
77% |
3.8 |
|
BAL |
16 |
102% |
3.5 |
|
MIL |
9 |
55% |
3.5 |
|
ARI |
20 |
127% |
3.2 |
|
NYY |
24 |
153% |
2.8 |
|
NYM |
13 |
81% |
2.5 |
|
WAN |
10 |
63% |
2.2 |
|
CIN |
14 |
90% |
2.0 |
|
TB |
7 |
44% |
2.0 |
|
KC |
13 |
86% |
1.7 |
|
PIT |
9 |
58% |
1.4 |
|
SD |
16 |
101% |
1.4 |
|
DET |
7 |
43% |
1.2 |
|
CHW |
16 |
102% |
0.4 |
|
|
|
Average |
5.1 |
Here we can see that
Houston, who was in the playoff hunt for most of these years and
Philly, who wasn’t did the best. The Cubs are pratically in a
deadlock with the Red Sox, and are just about middle of the pack,
though more than a win less than the average.
- Log in to post comments






Comments
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 12:20pm Permalink
Soriano, Theriot, Fukudome, Lee, Hoffpauir, Fontenot, Hill, Blanco, Dempster
vs.
Bourn, Tejada, Pence, Lee, Berkman, Blum, Rodriguez, Keppinger, Ortiz
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 12:58pm Permalink
So, Bradley is day2day again? What did he pull yesterday?
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:01pm Permalink
He faked running into the wall in right, and then he faked landing awkwardly on first trying to avoid a DP.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:07pm Permalink
faked?
I thought maybe he pulled something making one of those hopeless swings at the plate.
Re: Bradley
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:13pm Permalink
they seem to be resting him during day games after a night game...he did grimace and stretch on a swing yesterday but stayed in the game.
Haven't seen anything myself....
Re: Bradley
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 2:18pm Permalink
Len and Bob say that Bradley just had a leg cramp yesterday, that's all, and it is completely unrelated to his getting a day off today. Sounds like Lou just wanted to rest him today.
Re: Bradley
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:03pm Permalink
If by "just" you mean "Sounds like Lou [got sick of Bradley sucking and] wanted to rest him today".
Ken Williams
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 12:56pm Permalink
drafted his son in Round 43 for the White Sox...bet he decides he's worth a $2m bonus.
Re: Ken Williams
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:08pm Permalink
then Harold Baines kid in Round 45
Re: LE MAHIEU
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:09pm Permalink
posted today,
LeMahieu's Best Still Yet to Come
by Steve Holley
http://louisianastate.scout.com/a.z?s=107&p=2&c=87...
Re: LE MAHIEU
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:16pm Permalink
Is there anything he can do?
Re: LE MAHIEU
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:21pm Permalink
He kinda' sounds like a Matt Murton that can play the infield.
Re: LE MAHIEU
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:23pm Permalink
And anyone else find it odd that Hendry told LeMahieu's coach that LeMahieu just needed a better coach?
Re: LE MAHIEU
on Sat, 06/13/2009 - 8:12am Permalink
Batting in college is different from in the Pros.
What I think is odd is that a team notorious for not being able to develop hitting prospects selects two guys who are going to have to have their swings reworked with their first two picks of the draft.
Re: LE MAHIEU
on Sat, 06/13/2009 - 11:00am Permalink
Batting in college is different from in the Pros.
Really? I wasn't aware. Thanks for the brilliant insight.
Re: LE MAHIEU
on Tue, 06/16/2009 - 1:48pm Permalink
Obviously you weren't aware since you compared being productive in college to being productive in the pros. There are things you can get away with, primarily 'fisting' the ball for hits, that you can't get away with in wooden bat leagues.
Always glad to be of help.
Nepotism continues..
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:29pm Permalink
Cubs drafted Walt Jocketty's kid...3b out of high school with their 47th round pick.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 1:40pm Permalink
Cards take lead in 8th from Florida. Scored 3 runs, up 6-5.
The draft is over...
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 2:01pm Permalink
The Cubs 2009 draft featured 22 pitchers(16 right-handed, 6 left-handed), 16 infielders (5 shortstops, 2 second basemen, 4 third basemen, 4 first basemen), 7 outfielders (5 center fielders), and 5 catchers. They drafted 28 players out of college, 8 out of junior and community colleges and another 14 out of high school.
http://wiklifield.thecubreporter.com/Cubs_2009_Jun...
Must have been a long road trip for Lou
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 2:12pm Permalink
http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/spor...
Zambrano was diplomatic about the decisions, saying it was the right move because Piniella would've been blamed had he gone out and given up the winning run in the ninth. Informed of Zambrano's comment, Piniella said: "I don't care about the blame. I thought he had done his job, I thought he had pitched enough. Remember, he's only two starts removed from the DL, and we've got another 3 1/2 months of baseball here."
Actually, Zambrano was making his fourth start since being removed from the disabled list on May 22, and he threw 114 pitches in his second game back against Pittsburgh.
Rumoring from Rotoworld...
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 2:32pm Permalink
Cards with interest in Miguel Tejada, WSox could look to move Dye, Jenks or Dotel if things don't turn around quickly.
maybe they'll take Neal Cotts back for one of the relievers...
Re: Rumoring from Rotoworld...
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 2:46pm Permalink
Can the Cubs get Tejada and move Theriot to 2b?
Re: Rumoring from Rotoworld...
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:11pm Permalink
since Tejada does not bat from the left side...the answer is no
Re: Rumoring from Rotoworld...
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:15pm Permalink
damn. stupid leftists.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:05pm Permalink
First and Third, Nobody Out = 0 Runs
Lovely
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:05pm Permalink
Am I to believe Russ Ortiz is awesome, too? Russ Ortiz, Wandy Rodriguez... the cream of the NL.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:09pm Permalink
I can't fucking believe this fucking team and the offense!
Fucking Russ Ortiz shuts them down too?
I don't think I've ever seen anything like it.
The pitching is fantastic and we can't score runs? Unbelievable.
I'm not optimistic they can pull this one out but you never know.
1 run since blanco's rbi double tuesday. And that was Soto's homer.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:16pm Permalink
Apparently freak-outs like this are unamerican and we're supposed to believe everything will be fine because the division sucks.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 6:49pm Permalink
Well, Ortiz actually was pretty good today, but I think it's time that Hendry gets off his ass and does something other than waiting for Ramirez to return. Garciaparra and an A baller for Fox sounds good right about now.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 7:05pm Permalink
garciaparra is having a MRI on his constantly injured calf, fwiw.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 7:46pm Permalink
It's worth the risk.
~ducks~
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:22pm Permalink
I don't think there's ever been a more retarded stadium than this one in Houston. 436 ft to CF with a fucking hill? Eat shit, Michael Bourn.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:34pm Permalink
Did Lou really decide to have Aaron Miles pinch hit rather than Bradley, Johnson, or Soto?
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:39pm Permalink
Yeah, that's the real problem. Who PH's.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:41pm Permalink
Yea, because I said that it was the "real problem."
Asking about a bad decision doesn't mean that I think that is the "real problem."
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:34pm Permalink
Mitch Williams was right, Cubs need pitchng.
Dumb ass.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:48pm Permalink
Maybe he's lobbying for a job. Think he can still close?
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:49pm Permalink
Well Cooper must have money on the Cubs, because Hawkins is in.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 3:53pm Permalink
God bless you, Cecil Cooper for taking pity on our team.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 4:37pm Permalink
LaTroy: The Gift That Keeps on Giving.
Re: A Look at a Decade of the MLB First Year Draft
on Thu, 06/11/2009 - 9:13pm Permalink
let me modify the trade:
Garciaparra and a 1.5T MRI unit for Fox sounds good right about now.
...we'll need the MRI more than the single A player the way this season is going.