Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

The Best News I've Heard All Day

New MLBPA union boss Michael Weiner during his introductory press conference.

“There is a lot of sentiment for a seven-game division series,” Weiner said. “I think a properly constructed postseason schedule could accommodate three seven-game series but still have it extend over a shorter period of time than what happened this year.”

There's nothing I hate more than the 5-game Division Series in baseball...besides the Cardinals...and Ed Lynch...Neifi!...Tony LaRussa too...anything related to the White Sox...Red Sox fans...Barry Bonds...players that tilt their cap to the side...flat-billed caps...okay, this could take awhile.

But I welcome the new union boss overlord. At the glacial pace that baseball responds to the times, I look forward to the fix by the 2020 season.

Tags

Comments

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

That is a mischaracterization of Jake Fox the third baseman. I know that .921 fielding percentage looks pretty awful, but it's a small sample size and from my observations I think he improved a lot in the short time he had there until Ramirez came back. If I recall correctly, he hadn't played much if any third base at Iowa or lower levels until Ramirez went down in Milwaukee in May. With continued work, I think he could be at least passable at third base. Unfortunately for Fox, Lee and Ramirez aren't the kind of guys for whom you pinch-hit late in the game. I wish him well and hope his boss is smart enough to fetch the Cubs something of value when he trades a long-term club control guy who can straight-up hit.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

he was clumbsy and caught too much off the hip rather than getting in front of the ball (aram used to have this problem BAAAAAD). he had a surprisingly decent arm, though. still, if lou is willing to march some of the dead-arm no-field guys out there to play RF/LF over the past many years i don't see why fox didn't get more time out there. he's far from slick, but the talent chosen over him last season to fill the roles was odd at times.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Goodbye, Aaron Miles. Here's to hoping your reign of terror on my nerves is over. It's bad enough you were a Cardinal for all those years, then to come to Chicago and blow like you did (and then go to Iowa and blow...)... bleh...

part-time playing and all, but just a .779 OPS, .332 wOBA (about league average) and struck out a ton(20%) with not a lot of walks (6% per PA). Hard to think that would be missed too much. When the Cubs figure out they can't unload all of Burrell's deal after making that trade, might as well have Burrell take Fox's bench spot.

[ ]

In reply to by Seamhead

Davis or Sweeney sure, Hairston I don't know about, but I don't think Hairston is really much of an answer for CF. The other 2 guys are nothing special. I know Davis is crazy fast, so would help the defense, but good chance he turns into the bad Taveras on an off season. I don't know enough about Sweeney, offense looks average at best, defensively his UZR suggest he can handle CF, but he did get moved to play RF, but probably because Davis is a better option there.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I think you're undervaluing Fox's defensive flexibility. He can, in theory, play five positions, and he lets an NL team use their second catcher to PH. I disagree with the basic premise that he won't hit better given regular at bats - just like I always do.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

the 2nd catcher is nice, Burrell can play 1b/LF/RF probably just as well as Fox, not that you were necessarily comparing them. But since Lou won't play him at 3B, LF or RF, what's the point of keeping him? Would he do better with regular at-bats? I'm sure, maybe he's an .850 OPS guy, great power...but he's not gonna get regular at-bats from most teams cause of his defense. And I don't think he'll ever get a regular DH job, not when there are easily 14 Vlad, Dye's, name your vet player that can't play the field anymore...

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Price expects his group and the people in Arizona will both put together similar offers. But he says the team wants the place offering a better family experience off the field. "I think it's quality of life. I think it's recreation - destination," he said.
Of course it is. It wouldn't be about a more comfortable experience for the players with short bus rides. That and Arizona Phil.

There's nothing I hate more than the 5-game Division Series in baseball...besides...flat-billed caps... Intrepid Reader: Troy Tulowitzki What, Rob? You might hate them, but you LOVE me!

Reworking the postseason would be awesome. Being able to watch the Cubs get swept in 4 games would greatly increase my enjoyment. Burrell for SS!

Jim Hendry was on WGN radio, David Kaplan's Sports Central show tonight. Not much was newsworthy and there were some incredibly long winded answers (note how he doesn't answer "what is the single most important thing you would like to accomplish at the meetings?"). GM Hendry did say that he's considering one more veteran to the bullpen to go with the "kids" and thinks he'll add one by Feb (counter to what the media has reported so far). Somewhere Bob Howry and Aaron Heilman are high fiving... I'm posting the interview on my public folder... http://public.me.com/Cubster use password: TheCubReporter only one file there to download. titled: Jim Hendry w David Kaplan, 12-2-09.mp3. It was recorded via Radioshark app and converted to mp3 format The interview is 12 minutes long (and it's just the interview without the rest of the show).

[ ]

In reply to by kmokeefe

Utley, Howard, Rollins, Hamels, Victorino (Rule 5 pickup I believe actually) homegrown talent is a beautiful thing, cause most of the times you can get them to resign for cheaper than there FA equivelant even when they hit free agency. Howard's not so cheap, but hey, they hit the lottery on their draft picks for a few years and did a good job keeping them on the cheap. $15M a year for Utley is one of the great bargains in baseball. Cubs came close in the early 2000's, but Patterson and Choi didn't work out like they should have and then there's Prior (sigh).

[ ]

In reply to by Cubster

that's just an odd move... bat him 8th, he's a slap hitter who doesn't walk or K much with little power, they must love his glove and flexibility. Guess when you have Rollins, Utley, Howard and Ibanez, you can sacrifice some power at 3b.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

If the Cubs were really interested in signing Betancourt (before he was offered arbitration), it would have likely cost them $2-3 million/year on a multi-year deal. That would seem to suggest that Hendry had the ability to then trade some of his young relief pitchers (Caridad, Berg, etc.) for an inexpensive player (presumably a position player- CF?) and still fit within his budget constraints.

[ ]

In reply to by Seamhead

Phil's estimate is $136M at the moment and the Cubs don't have to add anybody right now if they weren't so keen on moving Bradley. And that's estamating bringing everyone that's arb-eligible back, but some may get non-tendered, some may negotiate cheaper deals. That still leaves about $5-$6M left for a reliever and some scrap parts... if they move Bradley, they might save a tad there in 2009 and then depending on what they get back, have to find a CFer it seems the Cubs wants are a new CFer, one bullpen arm, maybe a new middle infielder and I would hope at least some guys to compete for the rotation...

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

If Hendry pulls off the Bradley-Burrell-Castillo shuffle and can do it within Bradley's contract parameters, he would then presumably non-tender Fontenot and have an additional estimated $1.0-$1.5 million to play with.

[ ]

In reply to by Cubster

The Polanco contract sounds crazy. He's 34, never been a power guy, he's getting old, there are a lot of 3b options out there, and he gets $18 mil over 3 years, PLUS an option? I love him as a 2nd baseman hitting 2nd, which the Cubs could have really used, but 3 years AND and option is too much imo. It sets the bar high for the other guys and probably means many of these guys will be sitting out there late again this offseason because I can't picture many other teams handing out deals like that when there are quite a few similar players at 2b/3b available. Does Beltre get a 3 year deal then? I was expecting many of these guys to have to take 1 year deals.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

According to Cot's Baseball Contracts, Kevin Gregg's $4.2 million contract last year with the Cubs included a number of incentives (Rolaids Relief Pitcher, MVP of WS or LCS etc.). Lastly, Gregg would have received a $25,000 bonus for winning the Silver Slugger Award. They really do need to keep the agents and GM's out of the bars when they negotiate these contracts.

w/o posting the article, anyone with a subscription wanna check out their Rule 5 preview? Any Cubs mentioned or anyone the Cubs might have interst in?

via Rotoworld... Gonzalez and Soriano really need to take them up on arbitration to fuck their payroll up...

[ ]

In reply to by Paul Noce

Actually a smart gamble on the Braves part. No way does Gonzales or Soriano accept arbitration to be 6th or 7th inning guys.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

definitely a calculated move by the Braves that should work for them, but Juan Cruz turned down arbitration last year and almost was left without a job... just wonder who wants to give up a draft pick for those guys and if they themselves want to risk waiting until Feb/March and being forced to accept a cheap contract. I mean Soriano made $6.5M last year, he'd do quite well in arbitration

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

besides Wagner as closer I think if you have Gonzalez, Saito and Soriano, you just let them compete and ride the hot-hand for 7th and 8th if you're Cox and play match-ups. unless Soriano and to a lesser degree Gonzalez get actual offers in the next week, I'd take the Braves arbitration offer if I were them. Although I guess the Braves can cut them in spring training and save money since the owners successfully manipulated that loophole.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

If he strikes out 110 guys in 75 innings next year, he'll probably do just fine for 2011. How'd he get a $6.5 million contract to begin with? That's Placido Palanco money we're talking.

Aaron Miles--buh-bye! But Jake Fox goes too. You gotta give someone up to take on that crappy Miles contract. Nice job yet again, Fat Jimbo. Fire this moron, please?

Radioshark works well...like tivo for radio Could use some editing software but there are other ways to take a smaller segment out of a recording like Ambrosia software's recording studio. EyeTV has excellent editing for the tv side of this but Radio shark is good to get am/fm local channels onto the computer. Hope that helps. For example, I record the sat am Bruce Levine radio show with their pre set record features...which do weekly, daily or even custom stuff.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.