Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Mike Quade Just Ran Circles Around Tony LaRussa.

More after the jump...

Well, he did if you just watched the Cardinal's effort.

Even Pat Hughes last night said he'd never seen such a lethargic Cardinal team play the Cubs.

Not good for Tony LaRussa.

Pretty awesome for Mike Quade.

So the Cubs sweep the Cardinals in St. Louis for the first time since 1988? (Did I hear that right?) 
Young Tyler Colvin drives the stake in the heart with the 3 run homer (his 20th!) off of Cardinal Ace Chris Carpenter. 

Carlos Zambrano wins yet another game, and he's so excited he decides to talk about retiring! 

AWESOME CARLOS!

Can you please do that kind of reflection when you're home this winter so we'll all have something to talk about rather than how the Bears could possibly be 1 and 7?

And Mike Quade as the new Cubs manager.

He's seriously doing some kind of job, and surely his performance has to give Jim Hendry pause.

Yes, Hendy's gonna travel around and do all the interviews, but... how to put this?

When you're fishing you always take the boat to the other side of the lake because you're positive that's where that Big Bass is.

But sometimes, he's right off the pier.


You can view Tim Souers work on a daily basis at Cubby Blue.

Comments

Soriano in a new Cubs.com article, blaming his below-average BA on not being a first-place team... If he hit better, they might be a little higher in the standings... I know that he is not the sole, or even the biggest reason that the Cubs have failed this year. Doesn't good hitting typically help a team to be good? I'm pretty sure that teams that are in first place at the beginning of the year don't stay there just because they're in first place, so all their hitters will tend to hit better...

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

So why wasn't he on the Cubs radar? They took a 136 mill chance on Soriano but couldn't take a 50 grand risk on Hamilton???? Actually it probably would have been a $25000 chance because he would probably have been reclaimed for that amount had the Cubs decided not to keep him. We're talking chicken feed by MLB standards here.

j.heyman on MLB network being pretty nonchalant about sandberg most likely being the next cubs manager. no lip service given to any other candidate by him while mentioning sandy 3 times in the convo at various points.

http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2010/09/ricketts-manager-must-unde…
Ricketts also said the team has to have a manager who's "still engaged in being a coach" and is willing to teach fundamentals. "We're going to have a younger team going forward," Ricketts said. Ricketts also said he's looking for someone who will be committed to the organization for a long time, possibly ruling out older candidates who may be looking for their last managerial job before they retire. "I think that we're going to bring in someone who has in their mind that this is their job and their position forever," Rickett said.
and says new manager must understand Cubs history
"We have to have a manager who really understands what it is to be the Cubs manager, the pressure, the scrutiny you get and be able to handle those periods in June when you lose three games in a row and people start talking about Year 103 of the curse. We have to someone who understands what they're getting into," Ricketts said.

joe "what, this isn't a 120+ million team anymore?" torre almost out in LA (probably by his choosing)... The Los Angeles Times reports that the Dodgers will have Don Mattingly replace Joe Torre as their manager at the conclusion of the season.

The Los Angeles Times reports that the Dodgers will have Don Mattingly replace Joe Torre as their manager at the conclusion of the season. --- Isn't Mattingly going to replace Girardi as Yankee skipper?

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Crunch -- It will be interesting. My wife's family is friends with Girardi's family (Dad & brothers) and what I've heard (third hand) is that Girardi is legitimately interested in the Cubs job. However, that doesn't mean that he'll turn his back on the Yankees money to take it (assuming it's offered). Now that word has leaked out that Torre is out in LA, might the Yanks be interested in bringing him back? It was my understanding that the Steinbrenner kids didn't want Torre to leave, but George wanted to play hard ball with him on his contract. If the Yanks botch the post season under Girardi, might the Yanks want to bring Torre back? My personal feeling is that Girardi will re-up with the Yankees, but you never know.

phew...living with castro's growing pains is hard. good thing this season don't matter. aside from his credited error (26) he just turned a double play into a fielder's choice in the 8th. fun stuff...

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

my current theory is castro has no business in the bigs with that glove, but since the 2010 cubs gave up before the weather got too hot it doesn't matter anyway. he's got 26 errors, but we've all seen him do some dumb stuff that would probably tack another 10-ish onto his total if not for official scoring...not to mention his "the entire field is mine" thing he does cutting off CF/LF from making plays that become singles because 100mph of castro is making a line for a ball he can't catch. that said, the kid is so f'n young he's learning on the job and it's not like a trip to AAA will suddenly have him fluidly handling his position. guy this young and this raw is going to be like this, but he's got all the tools to be so much better. he probably will be, too.

The Cubs will be holding their annual Organizational Meetings next month in Mesa, and I suspect one of the outcomes of the conclave will be a decision to target both a LH power-hitting 1B and an established RHP 8th inning set-up man who can close on days Marmol isn't available. While free-agents Adam Dunn and Aubrey Huff (or Adam LaRoche, who could be traded by AZ in lieu of getting bought-out) might be at the top of the Cubs list for the 1B gig, one relief pitcher who might come onto the Cubs radar once the season is over is Pirates set-up guy Joel Hanrahan. Hanrahan was throwing a mid-90's four-seam fastball and a mid-80's power-slider last night versus the D'backs, and he has had a consistently good year working out of the Bucs bullpen. He had some closer experience in Washington and pitching for Team USA in the WBC earlier in his career, but not enough to where he would be likely to whine or complain if he isn't used as a closer. Hanrahan will be eligible for arbitration for the first time after this season, and thus will instantly become a salary albatross to the Pirates, plus the Bucs have a couple of other RHP in their bullpen right now (Evan Meek and Chris Resop) who can fill any hole caused by moving Hanrahan in a trade. Meanwhile, the Pirates have a gaping hole behind the plate, where they have the worst CS % among all catching staffs in MLB. 23-year old Welington Castillo (255/317/498 at Iowa in 2010) is a 40% CS guy who has the power to hit 20 HR and slug .500 in MLB (albeit with a low BA and OBP), and would be a perfect long-term backstop fix for Pittsburgh, a young, raw catcher who can grow with the team. The Cubs also have a deep inventory of ready or near-ready young pitchers, both relievers and starters, lefties and righties, so that losing Hanrahan could be offset by the Pirates acquiring a young starter (like Casey Coleman) and/or a young reliever (like Blake Parker, Jeff Stevens, or Marcos Mateo) from the Cubs as part of the deal.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

Submitted by Charlie on Sat, 09/18/2010 - 8:51am. Do you think a deal for Hanrahan would involve the Cubs sending Castillo and a young pitcher to the Pirates and receiving only Hanrahan in return? That seems like overpaying to me, but I have to admit I don't really know how to evaluate the value of a player to the organization (I just tend to not care much about relief pitchers). ============================================== CHARLIE: I think Hendry tried something in 2010 that he had not done before, and that was try to build a bullpen from within the organization instead of signing established FA middle relievers (like Remlinger, Howry, Eyre, et al) to multi-year contracts as had been his practice in the past. Hendry could opt to go back to his old habits and sign an established FA RHRP (somebody like Jason Frasor, Jesse Crain, or Grant Balfour) to a 3Y $11M contract this off-season, but the middle-ground would be to acquire an established arbitration-eligible set-up guy/Plan "B" closer (like Hanrahan) who the Cubs can go with year-to-year (maybe $2M in 2011) without spending twice that per year on a multi-year FA contract, especially since the Cubs have plenty of depth at the top end of the farm system to be able to make a trade like that. And over-paying with young talent has never been a problem for Hendry, as long as the club gets the guy they want, and the players they are trading are expendable. As Hendry & crew like to say, "We're not playing fantasy baseball." As for whether the Cubs would settle for just Hanrahan, I guess if the Cubs wanted a second player (like maybe Ryan Doumit), I would think the Pirates would be fine with that, especially if the Bucs are getting a young front-line catcher back from the Cubs (thus making Doumit expendable). With the Cubs, Doumit would be just a back-up C-1B-LF-RF-SWPH, and that might be a payroll problem since he's making $5.1M in 2011, plus a combined $15.5M in non-guaranteed club options in 2012-13. And the Pirates are also probably looking to move 3B Andy LaRoche (who, like Hanrahan, will be eligible for salary arbitration for the first time post-2010), in case the Cubs want to round up multiple candidates to consider as the eventual replacement for Aramis Ranmirez in 2012, except LaRoche is out of minor league options, such that the Cubs would probably have to carry him on their 25-man roster all next season just to have him available to be a candidate to replace Ramirez in 2012. (LaRoche will probably be non-tendered by the Pirates on 12/12 if the Bucs can't find a taker before that). So I would think the Cubs would be willing to offer W. Castillo, Coleman, and either Parker, Stevens, or Mateo (for example) for Hanrahan (only), even though it might be an over-pay, because they would be getting exactly the guy they want back in the deal without having to give up any of their best pitching prospects (Archer, McNutt, J. Jackson, Carpenter, or Rusin) in return.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Thanks Phil! For some reason I was thinking you meant one of our more valued pitching prospects. I also wonder if a Wellington Castillo and Jeff Samardzija for Hanrahan and Doumit deal might make sense. That would help to even out some of the money, but the Cubs would have be looking at Samninja as someone they want to dump, the Pirates would have to want him, and Jeff would have to wave his NTC. Andy Laroche seems like an upgrade over Jeff Baker to me, but I may still be thinking of him as the highly ranked Dodgers prospect he was a few years ago. If the Cubs decide to go with a LH platoon guy at first (a Hoffpauir type), Laroche could be the right-handed side of that platoon, while also serving as backup to 3B and 2B in an emergency. That doesn't necessarily mean the Cubs should want to trade for him, if he might become available after being non-tendered. I might be overvaluing Castillo, too. He's got tools, but I guess it wouldn't be realistic to call him a safe bet.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

Submitted by Charlie on Sat, 09/18/2010 - 6:08pm. Phil, sorry to ask endless questions, but I wonder if you would mind sharing any thoughts you have on Marwin Gonzalez? (I'd basically forgotten he existed until I started looking at AA playoff box scores.) Thanks! ================================================== CHARLIE: Marwin Gonzalez arrived at Fitch Park as an 18-year old 3B in 2007, but he has gradually morphed into a utility guy. He suffered a broken hand one year at Fitch Park EXST (either 2007 or 2008) that impeded his progress a bit. He began the 2010 season as the primary utility infielder at Daytona before getting promoted to AA Tennessee, where he has played mostly SS. (There was a gap in the Cubs pipeline at SS between Junior Lake at Daytona and Darwin Barney at Iowa after Starlin Castro was promoted from Tennessee to Chicago in May). But Gonzo's future is as a supersub IF-OF utility player. Gonzalez runs OK but isn't overly fast, he is just a so-so hitter but with occasional XBH power, and he is a switch-hitter who possesses the versatility needed to play several different positions (1B-2B-3B-SS-LF-CF). It's great that he has been able to progress to AA at age 21, but I'm not sure he will ever hit enough to play in MLB. He got as far as he did this year only because there was an organizational need for a player of his type at Tennessee after Castro was called-up to Chicago, and Gonzalez just happened to be in the right place at the right time. (In other words, he is not another Starlin Castro). The most-comparable MLB player (in terms of type) to Gonzo is probably somebody like Geoff Blum.

Here's my two cents on Castro: The Cubs need to move him to centerfield. They need to play Darwin Barney at short-he may be less athletic but he's got a much higher baseball IQ. Move Castro to center, Barney to short.

Chris Hatcher with a walk-off game-winning HR in the bottom of the 9th off Luke Sommer to give Jacksonville (Marlins AA affiliate) a 1-0 victory over Tennessee and the 2010 Southern League Championship. Craig Muschko threw seven inings of one-hit shutout ball for the Smokies, but the offense took the night off.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Submitted by The Real Neal on Sun, 09/19/2010 - 7:14am. Assuming the status quo stays as it is - would Quade and Sandberg both be part of those meetings regardless? ================================================ REAL NEAL: As long as they are still employed by the Cubs at that point, they would be. But of course being The Manager means you actually get some (sometimes considerable) input into the make-up of the next-year's team and (presumably) the general direction the club will be headed into the future. From what I've been told, Lou Piniella apparently had significant influence on the make-up of the team throughout his career with the Cubs (beginning immediately right after he was hired), as did Dusty Baker. Conversely, a Mike Quade or a Ryne Sandberg might have a lot less influence and input (like, for example, "Here's the team... now you manage it..."). The way it sounds, I suspect we won't be seeing a new Cubs manager who will have a whole lot of control (or shall we say "influence") over Player Personnel matters quite the way Piniella and Baker did, or especially like Leo Durocher did back in the 1960's when he was Cubs manager and de facto Player Personnel Director. That's why Ricketts (and Hendry) are probably going to want more of an "organizational"-type manager, somebody who will be satisfied playing the hand he's dealt (which will involve playing and developing the young guys who come up through the system over the next couple or three years), and won't complain if the Cubs don't sign a premier free-agent. That should give Sandberg an advantage, especially if Ricketts is looking for a manager who can also be sold to the fans as "The Face of the Franchise." But while Ricketts is said to want Sandberg, I don't think Hendry is sold on Sandberg as a manager (ergo Hendry's apparent interest in Fredi Gonzalez, Joe Girardi, Eric Wedge, et al). If the fix is in and Sandberg essentially has the job, I suspect one aspect of the managerial interviews could be to find out if Brenly, Melvin, or Wedge would be interested in being Sandberg's bench coach. Brenly actually might be a good complement to Sandberg, because Ryno knows the Cubs farm system very well, while Brenly probably knows the National League (and the current tendencies of the N. L.'s managers) as well as anybody in baseball. As for Mike Quade, I think his performance as interim manager of the Cubs puts him squarely in line for an MLB manager's job somewhere in 2011 (maybe Milwaukee?), but probably not with the Cubs.

Xavier Nady collected a $125K performance bonus last night as he reached 300 PA. If he starts seven more games he gets $100K more, and if he can accrue another 48 PA before the end of the season he gets another $250K.

AZ Phil- Any idea when the players for instructs will report? I'm looking forward to your coverage on it and getting your opinions of the overseas players who will be making their initial debuts. Also, did you ever find out what was going on with Dong-yub Kim? I was looking through some of the archives from last years instructs and realized we really hadn't heard anything from him this summer and you mentioned that he might have been hurt. Thanks as always.

[ ]

In reply to by W Flag

Submitted by W Flag on Sun, 09/19/2010 - 10:34pm. AZ Phil- Any idea when the players for instructs will report? I'm looking forward to your coverage on it and getting your opinions of the overseas players who will be making their initial debuts. Also, did you ever find out what was going on with Dong-yub Kim? I was looking through some of the archives from last years instructs and realized we really hadn't heard anything from him this summer and you mentioned that he might have been hurt. Thanks as always. ========================================= W FLAG: Players reported to Fitch Park last Wednesday and I believe the first game is this coming Thursday. Dong-Yub Kim had some type of season-ending surgery (I think it might have been TJS) in March and he hasn't played since, although I suppose he might surface in Instructs if he's cleared to play, at least as a DH.

With season-ending injuries to Geovany Soto and Tyler Colvin,. I would expect the Cubs to call-up Robinson Chirinos and possibly Brandon Guyer from Tennessee, since the Smokies season ended on Saturday and both players are still in game shape. (Iowa OF James Adduci is already on the 40-man roster and ordinarily would have been the most-likely candidate to get recalled to replace an injured player... and he still might be, but the I-Cubs last game was on Labor Day and so Adduci hasn't played for two weeks). Chirinos and Guyer were both virtual locks to get added to the Cubs 40-man roster post-2010 anyway, so it would just be a matter of adding them to the 40 a few weeks earlier than planned. Also, RHP Esmailin Caridad's 30-day minor league rehab assignment expired on Saturday, so he will likely get reactivated today or tomorrow. Caridad has been on the DL since May with a right forearm/elbow strain, but he has been pitching regularly out of the Tennessee bullpen (ten games, including three SL playoff games) over the past month (3.86 ERA and 1.69 WHIP, allowing 14 hits in 11.2 IP, with 3/12 BB/K). Although his overall numbers at AA weren't great, he pitched much better in September than he did in August, and he was reportedly throwing in the mid-90's as recently as last Wednesday. The Cubs can make room for at least two players on the 40-man roster simply by placing Colvin and Soto on the 60-day DL, and if they need a third slot they can either place Carlos Silva (sore elbow) on the 60-day DL, or if he is going to return to action sometime over the last two weeks, the Cubs could outright somebody who was going to get outrighted in October anyway (probably Jeff Gray). A player on the 60-day DL must be reactivated no later than the 16th day after the conclusion of the World Series (which coincides with the end of the 15-day Free-Agency Filing Period), even if he has been on the 60-day DL less than 60 days. In fact, a player could be placed on the 60-day DL the last day of the regular season and then get reactivated the next day (but that only would apply to clubs not active in the post-season). That's why it's technically called the "Emergency Disabled List" (or "EDL"), because a player might not actually be on the EDL for 60 days if the MLB regular season (or post-season, if the player's club is active in the post-season) ends prior to the player spending 60 days on the DL.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

Submitted by Dr. aaron b on Mon, 09/20/2010 - 8:46am. Good stuff Phil, Any chance the Cubs can find a taker for Carlos Silva this off-season? Any chance without the Cubs paying more than the 5.5 Million the Mariners sent over? ============================================= DR AARON B: I think the Cubs might be able to find a taker for Carlos Silva, but only if he proves himself healthy in Spring Training. And even then the Cubs probably would have to pick-up at least some of what they owe Silva ($6M in 2011 salary and the $2M 2012 buy-out) or take back a similar salary. So I wouldn't expect any movement on the Silva front until maybe the end of Spring Training. Most-likely scenario is Silva begins the 2011 season on the Disabled List (exact injury and/or illness TBD).

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.