Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

'P' Stands for Pitching?

The first hint that it was not a normal night at Principal Park came when the national anthem was whistled.

Then a thing uncommon in the PCL, where there are typically lots of bombs bursting in air, broke out - a pitchers' duel! The scoreboard practically had the night off as Nashville, behind undefeated Mike Fiers, nipped the I-Cubs, 1-0.

All was not lost for the home team - hardly. The enigmatic Jay Jackson recorded his 6th consecutive quality start and matched a career high with 11 whiffs in his six inning stint. He was succeeded by Bobby [there's no Roberts in baseball!] Coello who continued his sparkling work out of the bullpen with three more scoreless frames. Since moving exclusively to relief duty Coello has worked 34 innings, allowing a mere 18 hits while walking 13 and fanning 46. The non-starter ERA is 1.04; the BAA .158! Significantly, he's been touched for no home runs after serving up 11 in 60 innings as a starter. If he keeps this up, call him Robert-0.

Watch out for Fiers in the NL Central. He's 7-0 since promotion from Double A and his cumulative body of work for the summer shows only 80 hits permitted in 120 innings. He never exceeded 90 on the scoreboard radar last night but complete game shutouts in this league are about as rare as whistled anthems.

As for record-breaking slugger Bryan LaHair, he was in the lineup after shoving Joe Hicks even deeper into franchise trivia with his 38th homer of the season the night before. He flew to the warning tracks in both left and right while playing 1B after a recent run in left. On my way to the park I heard him interviewed on the pre-game radio show where he strongly hinted that he has reason to believe any playing time he gets upon call-up to Chicago will be in the outfield. He also mentioned that, thanks to lots of vacancy in the right-field bleachers Tuesday night, it was his wife that was able to fetch his record-setting long ball. Ah, the charms of the minor leagues.

Andrew Cashner is on hand and slated to work an inning tonight after manning a post as bullpen sentry last night while Coello loosened.

Comments

Did the Cubs previously have teams playing simultaneously in Pringles Park and Principal Park? Too bad they didn't change the name to PK Wrigley Field. How hard was Jackson throwing in his last couple of innings?

still registering 91-92 on a speedometer thought to be a couple mph slow; just as fast as earlier but he was starting to seem out of rhythm despite only 96 pitches...

question i'm embarrassed to admit i cannot answer: in top of 4th w/ runner on 1st & less than 2 out, chris robinson made a nice grab on a foul pop near the i-cub dugout railing - the home plate ump then immediately waved the runner to 2nd - what gives?

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=14912 Reggie Golden, OF, Cubs (Short-season Boise): 2-for-4, HR (6), R, 3 RBI. Toolsy 2010 draftee has gone deep in three straight games; .236/.328/.409 overall. Matt Szczur, OF, Cubs (High-A Daytona): 2-for-3, HR (5), R, 3 RBI; 2-for-3, RBI. Was dropped from leadoff spot and has ripped off three straight multi-hit games; .251/.275/.404 line since promotion has taken some bloom off the rose.

http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/39971/mlb-insider-keith-law Re: Theo Epstein I don't see why they wouldn't just hire his assistant GM, Ben Cherington. I would guess, without talking to anyone involved, that Theo's motivation if approached would be to use the interest from the Cubs to negotiate a better deal with Boston - he's from the area, after all. Plus it will cost the Cubs a mint in compensation to Theo and perhaps to Boston as well. Re: McNutt Difference is he's 100% now - had some blister issues, went on the DL with bruised ribs in June. Also scheduled to come to the AFL. Re: Brett Jackson He's also striking out at a really high rate, and he didn't hit well at all in AA. I'd probably still call him up if I were running the team, but just be aware there are red flags.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Jackson AA 2011: April: 100 PA's .317/.420/.537 May: 47 PA's .189/.362/.378 June:97 PA's .217/.309/.349 July: 51 PA .286/.412/.524 So he had 151 PA's of good hitting....144 PA's of crap hitting, with a hand injury in there to boot. Cool. Totals in AA 2010-2011 565 PA's, 92 R, 23 2B, 9 3B, 16 HR, 60 RBI, 33/43SB's, .266/.370/.454

[ ]

In reply to by mrcoach00

Scales is a damned good hitter. After LaHair's 1.070, Scales's .959 OPS was the highest in the Cub organization this year. (Jackson's OPS is .955 at Iowa but of course much lower at Tennessee.) What prevented Scales from being a major leaguer was that he didn't give you speed or defense.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Bobby Scales' .743 career OPS is better than our current second baseman's OPS. He had an incredibly successful season in AAA Iowa in 2011 with a .959 OPS and, as mentioned above, is doing very well in Japan. So, I don't really get the Bobby Scales animosity. I never have. My hunch is fans are just too god damn worried about batting average. ...Which is unfortunate because batting average won't get you wins. And the data are not a fluke... he's been successful because he has a great approach at the plate and a nice, balanced swing. The hole in his game was never offense, it was that he only played second base.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

I agree, the Cubs have made a tradition of playing all kinds of AAAA and even AAA guys on the Chicago Cubs in recent years... so why is Scales the unlucky one that doesn't get the call up? It's a double-standard. If I have to watch shitty baseball, I should at least get to see the shitty players I want to see.

in good news, Royals and A's win today O's lose though and Pirates already losing 3-0 in 2nd.

Cashner in the 8th for Iowa vs. Brewers affiliate M. Gamel strike looking, ball, foul, foul, foul, GO 4-3 M. Rivera strike looking, strike looking, K looking B. Boggs GO 1-3 10 pitches, 9 strikes

[ ]

In reply to by QuietMan

I think last time AramRam had to climb over eight guys, now it's only six. Pena's is 4 from none, so I guess he has to keep playing, assuming the new GM wants to take the risk of offering him Arb for a 2nd round pick... That feels like a decision that will bite the Cubs in the ass. If no one wanted him at the trade deadline, no one is going to want him for better than a year and $10 million. Edi* Here's the stats that you use to come up with Placido Polanco being a way better player than AramRam. http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/10/stats-used-for.html Have to figure at some point they'll just use a WAR like stat. I love the way they consider center fielders and designated hitters to be equal defensively.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

I would think the new GM would be able to discuss arbitration with Pena as to whether or not he would be inclined to accept. Boras is his agent, so that might not be worth anything. I believe that Pena (and Boras) will insist on a multi-year deal, but who knows. Ramirez should definitely be offered Arb. Demp isn't likely to opt out based on recent comments, but I would certainly offer him arb if he did.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

the cure to all this is signing Pujols or Fielder. So even if they do offer Pena arbitration and numbnuts accepts it, they'll have no problem showing that they have a better option in camp and cut him. Most likely he declines though... I assume Boras is smart enough to know that a team that doesn't want one of his players and being cut in camp means less options and less money. On the other hand, if Cubs don't get Pujols or Fielder, they may want Pena back.

[ ]

In reply to by Jumbo

I'd be shocked if Dempster didn't opt out. 2012 is his age 35 season. So the choice for him is probably 4/48 on the open market or 1/14 from the Cubs. Especially when it's probably his last shot at a long term deal. Not to mention he's probably the 2nd best SP on the market after CJ Wilson.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

if Dempster declines his option, he's obviously expecting a multi-year deal. No risk of him accepting it. For Ramirez, if Cubs buy him out for $2M, then offer arbitration, he could presumably change his mind and accept it. It's not like he'd get much more than $16M and a risk the Cubs might want to take. Ramirez is also one of the few power bats on the FA market. If Cubs pick up his option, and he then opts out, obviously he's seeking a multi-year deal and he won't accept.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I absolutely think both of those are worth the gamble. The worst case scenarios are that you get Dempster, Pena, and Aramis back on one year deals that are not significantly higher than what the Cubs have already been willing to pay them. Best case scenario is that the Cubs free up a bunch of payroll and get draft picks in return. It certainly wouldn't be terrible to have Dempster next year, too. Not like there are a line of pitching prospects ready to take his place. McNutt, Whitenack, etc.--nobody's ready to step into the rotation yet.

Lahair gets the Sept. callup.

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

Yeah he told a reporter this a day or two ago, also said he expected to play mostly outfield. Not in the lineup against a rookie lefty. 1. Castro, SS 2. Johnson, RF 3. Ramirez, 3B 4. Pena, 1B 5. Soriano, LF 6. Byrd, CF 7. Soto, C 8. Barney, 2B 9. Dempster, P

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

jeebus, sorry that I dared to question your awesome brain, I know it has yet to make an error...ever. compare away, and since this is an ongoing discussion on the Internet, I will continue to comment where I see fit. It's kind of how it works. here's some other comps for Bryan LaHair...Hoffpauir, Dubois, McClain, Paul McAnulty.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Played that silly card one too many times is all. I could have pointed out that Corey Patterson wasn't the 3rd best prospect in baseball. Being on BA's list, or having a nice season in Low A while someone else is in college shouldn't prevent you from being compared to another player.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

well let me clarify my skepticism then... the list of old minor leaguers that suddenly become even average major leaguers is very short and usually were at the very least, pretty good prospects when they were young and either were hurt or had some development hiccups along the way. LaHair seems to be neither. Per usual, I hope I'm wrong.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

My point is that if you do very well at AAA (BABIP stuff aside) you're likely to do passably well at the minors. There's a strong degree of descrimination against guys who weren't higly regarded as they worked their way up, and to me that has at least as much to explain about their lack of success in the major leagues as their inability to do so. Who do you think is more likely to be a better major league hitter, LaHair or Andy Marte? Marte has had parts of five seasons at AAA and hit .267 .332 .470, and has been given 924 PA's. LaHair has 136 PAs (better OPS+ than Marte), and hit .297 .368 .528 in AAA (mostly PCL). Why has one guy got six times as many chances as the other? Because of scouts. But who did better at MLB and AAA? I don't take "he didn't get called up" as proof that he wouldn't do well.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

I was talking about old minor leaguers, putting up great numbers in AAA. You're talking about something completely different. If Andy Marte was hitting like Bryan LaHair in AAA, then we'd be talking about the same thing and I'd be putting my money on Marte being the better major league player. But he's not and the comp is pointless. This isn't some scouts vs. stats argument I was trying to make. Although good prospecting is of course the combination of both. It's the skepticism of a 29-year old that's been in AAA for 6 years putting up big numbers and why is he still stuck there? Is there some discrimination? maybe... maybe the Cubs and 29 other teams have see something in his swing or bat speed or something else that is apparent that he won't be much in the majors.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

The same thing they saw in Cust, right? This isn't some scouts vs. stats argument I was trying to make. Then why are you using BA prospect rankings? Because until maybe 3 years ago, that info is 95% fed by what scouts say. Regardless, you're still using a negative as proof, and it isn't and it will never be, no matter how often you stick your fingers in your ears and "nah nah nah nah nah".

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

The same thing they saw in Cust, right? Cust went through 5 organizations, teams saw something, just not enough to stick with him. Then why are you using BA prospect rankings? Because until maybe 3 years ago, that info is 95% fed by what scouts say. because ...good prospecting is of course the combination of both. We've got his numbers, I know they're good. Need to get some picture on the other side of the equation. Regardless, you're still using a negative as proof, and it isn't and it will never be, no matter how often you stick your fingers in your ears and "nah nah nah nah nah". I have no proof, I have skepticism and a feeling that I personally don't think he'll amount to much in the majors. I could be wrong.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

talk about anyone you want, I just don't think Jack Cust is a good comp to LaHair. You're using hindsight scouting. a bit, be nice if I heard something about LaHair changing his swing or something, but I have not. a lot of scouting is projecting, doesn't mean they always nail the timetable. I certainly believe in late developers, but they probably flashed some tools early on. I don't quite believe in 29 year old AAA's that no one seems interested in giving a shot in the majors.

[ ]

In reply to by 10man

yes, and rob told us to stop it :( it was epic and pointless at the same time...actually, it was just pointless. we're also not allowed to break formatting by doing really stupid stuff that has nothing to do with baseball. this place is no fun. when i turn 18 i'm moving out of this fascist prison.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

lahair is pointless. numbers are pointless for causing most of this. the only good thing anyone has had to say about lahair's "i can't even break with SEA as a 1st or 1st/LF/RF bench" self is that he could be a 20-25HR .275 hitter in the bigs. his swing isn't that pretty. hell, he can throw...he's got a decent enough OF arm...still can't find work. it'll be fun to see him get his 30-50+abs this month...maybe he'll end up seeing bench work with the cubs or another pro team in 2012. it probably wont be fun to see him fight against 15-30Ks doing it, though. he's got his sudden power surge this season...willy mo pena would be proud.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Only 3 kinds of players I want this organization to focus on. 1. Relievers with one pitch that we can stretch out into starters and teach 3 more pitches to 2. Guys who look like ballplayers who start swinging from the dugout. 3. Guys who could have been Arena league football players. Hopefully we can turn these guys into #2's

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

"I would guess the plan is to platoon [LaHair] with Soriano" I'm thinking he would take starts away from Byrd and play right field while Colvin plays center. Why? Because the Cubs would love to see Soriano with an HR number close to 30 when they push hard to get rid of him this winter. Byrd's cumulative stats (HRs, runs, RBI) can't be salvaged and his BA is okay the way it is. The Cubs are indifferent about trading Byrd, anyway.

Don't know if this has already come up, but Muskat says that Josh Vitters is going to replace Brett Jackson in the AFL. Jackson has another obligation, which she says will be announced at a later time... (WTF?)

I don't see why Pena would get a multi year deal since he didn't get one last year and he didn't have a significantly better year. If he is offered arbitration, he would be crazy not to accept. Maybe if there are enough losers in the Pujols/Fielder derby Pena could drum up some interest, but I think we will be the only ones interested.

[ ]

In reply to by TJ

I don't see him getting a multi-year deal either, but he's a good DH/1B option for a power-starved team. But at his age, more in the $5-$7M range. My feeling is, most players decline arbitration, especially if it's clear you really don't want them, you can always release a player in spring training even if they accept and ultimately the Cubs may want him back. There's risks, sure, but there's something to gain there as well.

Zambrano off suspension next week. Cubs will pay him, but tell him to stay away. According to WSCR

I went to Parachat to see what we did to McClutchen... Doesn't Dempster get the point of the season is to keep them ahead of us?

how the Cubs ever let Josh Harrison get away? 3 BB's in 151 PA's he better make Ron Santo look like Bobby Scales at 3b. Levine tweets that Byrd nailed two fans with a liner behind the dugout

Cubs Aflac trivia question - How may times have Cubs been in first or within 4 games of first on Sept 1 in last fifty years? I guessed 5

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I am going to watch our 2012 first basemen club the Astros like baby seals tonight. I'll have to get a picture and post it. So far this week actual attendence has been about 1/5th of paid. It would be really depressing if I was an Astros fan. Hard to imagine the Cubs doing as well in season tickets without making a splash in FA this off-season.

no Brett Jackson tonight for Iowa... L. Montanez batting leadoff and playing CF, seems like a late scratch type move

C. Archer with 2 starts, 13 IP, 1 ER, 6 BB, 12 K Lee in AA; 200/267/333 4/6 SB in 101 PA's Guyer in AAA: 312/384/521 14 HR, 29 2B, 5 3B, 35 BB, 79 K in 443 PA Chirinos in AAA: 268/350/390 in 307 PA's, 6 HR (nice July and August in limited PA's though) imagine Guyer and Chirinos get call-ups once the playoffs end

Don't look now but Samninja is knocking on the door of a sub 3.00 ERA. What say you BABIPITES? Is he just lucky or what?

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

tom glavine agrees...wait... imo, they make SIERA too powerful in favor of defenders...you get a slew of good defenders on a team it almost negates any SIERA effect regardless of the talent of the pitcher. SIERA is better at obviously-good/bad pitchers, imo...guys in the middle or middle-top of good can get muddy.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

The thing that none of the aggregate systems do is take into account pitchers who get flyballs when they want flyballs and get groundballs when they want groundballs. Glavine and Maddux were pretty good examples of that, but they're exceptions rather than rules. Talking about a guy like Smmaradasjza, who is just trying to get any pitch near the strike zone, with little regard for what happens if they connect, it may not be as accurate as xFIP. It's the guys who always get groundballs or fly balls where it really does a good job.

no mention on TCR about castro caught napping in the IF today giving mccutch 2nd base? i missed the game...catching highlights now.

Horrible dogging by Aramis Ramirez going 1st to 3rd on what should have been a triple by Carlos Pena. ARam should have scored easily.

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

I doubt that Randy Bush has any authority to do much of anything. He's a "caretaker" GM. Any decision to extend Oneri Fleita four years had to come from Ricketts, and it's very strange that this happened now considering the Cubs have not hired a new GM yet, and usually the new GM is allowed to bring his own people on-board. It almost sounds like Ricketts is looking more for an MLB Player Personnel Director (primary responsibility would be making trades & signing free-agents) rather than an all-powerful Dallas Green-type Baseball Operations Boss. If that is indeed the case, then some of the names mentioned (Cashman, Epstein, Beane, et al) would probably not be interested in the job, meaning Ricketts is probably targeting a less-established young guy who would be satisfied with more limited responsibilities (at least for now) and with sharing power with Fleita (Player Development & International Scouting) and Wilken (Professional & Rule 4 Amateur Scouting).

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Rosenbloom has a column up on the Trib's website that really lays out Ricketts for F-ng up the GM search with this hire. You really have to ask yourself about the short and long term direction of the Cubs if this is how he's approaching his most important decision since buying the team. I'm not a fan of this decision, Ricketts, or the direction this is going. Hope I'm wrong, but I don't think so.

[ ]

In reply to by George Altman

that's a retarded as hell statement about a guy who's well regarded by many clubs for everything but his short, yet harmless, temper. fleita is a great baseball man and it's got nothing to do with being "hendry's buddy at Chreiton" if he was let go there's more than 1 team that would love to have him. he's got more than pencil pushing skills and he's far from afraid to get his shoes on the field and work with kids when he's not busy trying to watch 40+ of them play/practice at once.

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

Though Ricketts has said the new general manager will have authority to hire a manager and other operatonal personnel, he felt strongly enough about keeping Fleita to extend a new contract in the face of overtures by the Detroit Tigers to seek permission to try to lure him away for a similiar position with them.

[ ]

In reply to by QuietMan

Like Fleita, Wilken will have a number of teams interested in his services. If the Cubs decide to make a further commitment to Wilken, the next general manager will have two vital positions in place when he takes over. There will, however, be some flexibility for Ricketts and his next general manager to make changes to those spots in the near future. Fleita’s deal (and a possible one for Wilkens) will be structured creatively with buyouts and options to benefit both the team and the executives. Everyone feel better now?

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

If there is buyouts and latitude for the next guy to make his own choices. Then I don't feel quite so bad about any extensions given to Wilken and Fleita. I do think the praise they get is completely unfounded at this point however. Neither guy has drafted or developed anything resembling a star player.

Google is putting up a warning to visitors about the Daily Herald web site: //Warning: Something's Not Right Here! www.dailyherald.com contains content from flash7.co.in, a site known to distribute malware. Your computer might catch a virus if you visit this site.//

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

one of lahair's hits was a bloop single to LF. it would be nice to see him actually putting a ball in LF if it wasn't for the fact he was trying to pull it toward RF and got jammed. i'd like to see the guy see some time in RF to see if he can handle it and brought in to PH off the bench to see if he can handle being a bench guy in 2012. colvin has the power, but he's had such a horrible 2011 trying to make contact. the cubs need a power option off the bench.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

probably...i truly would like to see the guy get 30-50ab's before the season is over, though. he probably won't pry too many games from pena at 1st, so he'll have to get OF time somewhere. they know whether his arm is good enough for RF, but i'd like to see it or have that info shared. when he was still with SEA in their minors his arm was still decent enough, supposedly.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

whatever's going on with c.pena and the cubs weirded that up...they can't sit a guy like that for an extended period of time that's performing to expectations and playing for a contract next year. in the OF they have to find time for colvin and to a lesser extent, campy. campy shouldn't steal too much time (hopefully), but colvin deserves some starts, too.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

The kid is clearly having problems this year, but he showed enough last year to still be intriguing. And he's still got drastically more upside than LaHair because he can play RF and CF and more upside than Campana because he showed 20+ HR power. I wonder whether they will ask him to play winter ball or just send him home at the end of the season to break from whatever bad habits he's learned this year.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

I think Colvin's "upside" is really that of a 4th outfielder at this point. He isn't more than a passable defensive Center Fielder. His bat isn't good enough for a corner. At least LaHair has a bat that COULD be passable in a corner spot. Campana is probably a 5th outfielder, Pinch Runner, Sam Fuld type of late inning defensive replacement.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

Submitted by Dr. aaron b on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 11:47am. I think Colvin's "upside" is really that of a 4th outfielder at this point. He isn't more than a passable defensive Center Fielder. His bat isn't good enough for a corner. At least LaHair has a bat that COULD be passable in a corner spot. Campana is probably a 5th outfielder, Pinch Runner, Sam Fuld type of late inning defensive replacement. ================================= DR AARON B: As things stand right now, I think it will probably be LaHair vs Colvin for one roster spot in 2012, with the edge going to LaHair mainly because Colvin will have one minor league option left in 2012, while LaHair is out of options.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

I think I can agree with that roster situation. I honestly think Colvin would benefit from a full year of being left alone in AAA. In typical Cubs fashion they really rushed him up to the bigs the first chance they had. He's never really ever gotten the full AAA consolidation season that most guys require. 500 at bats in Des Moines without the Chicago/Des Moines shuttle pass might be just what the doctor ordered.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

The kid is clearly having problems this year, but he showed enough last year to still be intriguing. It's not like it was hard to predict the epic flop of 2011 for Tyler Colvin. He has never dominated at any level in the minors and has a hole in his swing large than the hole in the Titanic. Once the league adjusted it was the end of Colvins career, as he has yet to adjust. His 2011 minor league stint is comically bad. .256 BA, .270 OBP, 5 BB, 55 SO's in 212 AB's. That goes along with a career .275/.315 in the minors which adds up to just a really shitty player. But atleast we got the soon to be 29 year old LaHair to save the day.....yeeeesh the minors are god awful.

[ ]

In reply to by MikeC

"a hole in his swing large[r] than the hole in the Titanic." First time I've heard of a hole in Colvin's swing. I think his swing is magnificent, and produces such anomalies as a .205 BA in August, where 10 of his 16 hits were for extra bases including 4 homers and 2 triples. The flaw is in Colvin's approach. He thinks his job is to swing at every pitch in the strike zone. Smarter hitters are quite comfortable taking strikes if they don't like the bend of the pitch or the location. I don't know how Wilken could have drafted a better tool-set in the first round. Colvin has everything except a brain, and they don't give IQ tests to hitters, because it's usually not necessary. It's not rocket science, or even NFL quarterbacking. I do like the idea (above) of using all of Colvin's options, buying time, hoping he gets a clue before the Cubs have to give him up.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Submitted by crunch on Mon, 09/05/2011 - 7:24am. probably...i truly would like to see the guy get 30-50ab's before the season is over, though. he probably won't pry too many games from pena at 1st, so he'll have to get OF time somewhere. they know whether his arm is good enough for RF, but i'd like to see it or have that info shared. when he was still with SEA in their minors his arm was still decent enough, supposedly. ========================================= CRUNCH: Bryan LaHair played more games in LF than at 1B in both 2009 (with Tacoma) and 2010 (with Iowa), so he's certainly not a stranger to the position. But if he had the arm to play RF, I suspect he would have played more than 23 career games there. Also, LaHair is at best an average defensive 1B, so while he could play 1B for the Cubs if necessary (as a default), LF is probably the best place for him in MLB. It's just that the Cubs already have a LF who is locked-in through 2014 (or through 2013 if the Cubs decide to cut bait after the 2013 season).

The Cubs must win all the rest of their games to finish above .5OO (the mark by which all great Cub teams are judged since pennants are out of the question)

"it would be nice to see him actually putting a ball in LF if it wasn't for the fact he was trying to pull it toward RF and got jammed." For the record, LaHair stroked a single to left on a 1-2, outside-corner breaking ball in the 3rd inning. "I didn't see them but saw one was an infield single?" He hit a ball that the pitcher deflected to Cedeno, who could have fielded the ball and stepped on second for a force, but booted it. Later on, the scorer changed his initial ruling of a base hit to an E-6.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

yes, but he was trying to pull it and he was a little late with his swing...that's what jammed him a bit. he still made good contact, though. if he can pull that off with a pitch lower in the zone as well as that high in the zone then that's a special talent...rarely works out that way. you could make and argument that he was just really quick getting his hands inside after starting late, but even then that's an awkward approach to a fastball in the zone. found a video...slow mo around the 25 second mark http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=18828181

Recent comments

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?