Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Game 78 Thread / Orioles @ Cubs (2 of 3)

Game Chat | Press Pass | BR Preview

SP Matt Albers SP
*Ted Lilly
  3-2, 2.77, 25 K, 21 BB, 48.2 IP

7-5, 4.71, 91 K, 34 BB, 91.2 IP
       
2B
#Brian Roberts LF
*Eric Patterson
RF
*Nick Markakis
SS
Ryan Theriot
3B
Melvin Mora 1B
Derrek Lee
1B
*Aubrey Huff 3B
Aramis Ramirez
C
Ramon Hernandez
CF
*Jim Edmonds
LF
*Luke Scott
C
Geovany Soto
CF
Jay Payton
RF
Mark DeRosa
SS
#Alex Cintron
2B
*Mike Fontenot
P
*Matt Albers P
*Ted Lilly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Albers gets the emergency start in place of the scheduled O's starter, Brian Burres.

Comments

stupid regional blackout. here in mid-NC we're in a BAL/WAS blackout area. also...here in NC we get 1 of 3 "local" channels BAL games are shown on and none that WAS games are on. result: unless it's on WGN, FOX Saturday, or ESPN i don't see any of those games except the 50-60 BAL games on the 1 channel i get. gee, i'm glad i'm not a fan of my "regional" team. i'd never get to see them. way to go MLB-EI.

Hurt, apparently. BTW, Lou said in the pregame he will no longer PH for Edmonds vs. lefties and will save Murton for PH duties later in the game. We're not the only ones pissed at Cedeno..

Off the subject, but do you think we will be players in the Fuentes sweepstakes? It sure sounds like Lou fell out of love with Cotts and Eyre after the Tampa Bay series.

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

Wow, Shacon is a psycho I'm really amazed how stupid some of these pro athletes are. If your boss comes to you and wants to discuss something you should just go. Maybe Wade could have let him eat dinner and talked after that. And why would you throw a older man down to the ground (Pedro)? That's just tasteless and un-classy (Ron Burgundy). I'd DFA the bum tomorrow

Anybody know what's up with Ascanio? Is he hurt? Doesn't seem to be pitching at Iowa.

Marmol had it dialed in last night - couple that performance with the one a day earlier, and it looks like he's back in form. Lilly's living a charmed life so far - lots of rockets off him last night, but he still gets the W.

Fontenot played last night like he was still on the Orioles' payroll. Or owed someone money. Or lost a bet. Marmol didn't look like he was all the way back, but he's getting there. Can't imagine anyone wanting to face that guy. Wood made the three guys batting against him look like Ronny Cedeno, Corey Patterson and...Ronny Cedeno.

I don't think Fontenot has surprised anyone with his performance at the plate this year; after he turned back into a pumpkin mid - season last year, things have remained more or less the same. The question is why does Lou have such a fondness for the guy at this point? Can't imagine they don't have any other options from their farm system.

Submitted by Mitterwald on Wed, 06/25/2008 - 6:49pm.

Off the subject, but do you think we will be players in the Fuentes sweepstakes? It sure sounds like Lou fell out of love with Cotts and Eyre after the Tampa Bay series.

====================================

MITTERWALD: I wouldn't be surprised if the Cubs get either Brian Fuentes (COL) or Damaso Marte (PIT) by the 7/31 trade deadline as an 8th inning lefty set-up guy and alternate closer on days when Wood isn't available.

And also either Cristian Guzman (WAS) or David Eckstein (TOR) to replace Cedeno as the #1-A SS and late-inning bat off the bench.

I suspect Ronny Cedeno's PH K with the bases loaded in the bottom of the 9th Tuesday night might motivate Piniella to ask Hendry to replace Cedeno with a more-veteran type middle-infield option off the bench.

I believe Hendry would overpay and trade the entire farm system if he thinks it would give the Cubs a better chance to get to the WS in 2008.

Once the injured position players (Alfonso Soriano and Reed Johnson) return, I think it's entirely possible that Eric Patterson will take Mike Fontenot's roster slot, at least unless and until E-Pat is traded away in a deadline deal.

I dont know about the entire farm system, but I'm thinking that overpaying may not be such a bad idea at this point. We seem to have a pretty good shot this year.

What do you think the Cubs main needs are? I'd like to see them add 1 starter (someone to slot between Z and Dempster in a playoff series) and 1 reliever that they can count on in late innings. It seems that outside of Wood and Marmol Lou does not trust anyone to get big outs late in games.

[ ]

In reply to by Pat Kane

Agree about relief help. All of the AAA back ups (Roquet, Ascanio, Hart, Pig-man, Cotts) that I was counting on have not panned out for one reason or another. Wuertz has been very dissapointing. -and we have already seen a possible danger sign from Zeus. I also agree about a starter, -everyone in baseball would like a starter! -but you'd like C.C., not Trachsel. It looks like the Angels have a much better shot.

[ ]

In reply to by Pat Kane

I want one more starter, and I'm going to tell you why. While Jason Marquis has hit a nice little run here in his last few starts, we're approaching the All-Star Break. As we all remember from last year (ERA 2 runs higher in the 2nd half), and from 2006 as a Cardinal (ERA 1 run higher in the 2nd half) and from his entire career (ERA almost 3/4ths of a run higher in the 2nd half), that's when the Jason Marquis ERA Watch becomes America's favorite action-packed thrill ride. Maybe that's a bad analogy. The Jason Marquis ERA Watch after the All-Star Break would be like getting on a roller coaster, and then going up the big hill. Then the big hill keeps going. And going. And then you never go over the the top. Just keep going higher and higher until it's over. Worst. Ride. Ever.

Only problem with E-Pat taking Fontenot's spot is that there was a big deal made about Fontenot being able to play shortstop. I don't think Patterson can?

Submitted by Jeff_Pico on Thu, 06/26/2008 - 10:58am.

Only problem with E-Pat taking Fontenot's spot is that there was a big deal made about Fontenot being able to play shortstop. I don't think Patterson can?

==============================================

Jeff P: If it's a question of who would be 3rd on the depth chart at SS if Eric Patterson replaces Mike Fontenot on the 25-man roster, I would think Mark DeRosa could play SS in a pinch. Mike Fontenot was never considered anything more than an emergency SS anyway.

And of course Eric Patterson played both 2B and SS at Georgia Tech, so while he would be a definite liability there, E-Pat actually does have considerably more experience playing SS than does Fontenot, and Patterson also has better range and a stronger arm than Fontenot.

The problem with Michael Wuertz is that there is a certain "boom or bust" aspect to his performances, where either he is very good or he is very bad. And I suspect Piniella doesn't particularly like that. That said, unless the Cubs can get a reliable and proven right-handed set-up type guy to replace him (and acquiring a first-class rotation starter, a quality lefty reliever who can close in a pinch, and/or a veteran middle-infielder to replace Cedeno, are probably higher priorities), I don't think Wuertz will be replaced.

BTW, if Michael Wuertz is optioned to the minors for at least 20 days, the Cubs buy another year toward free-agency with him (right now he'a scheduled to be a FA after 2010, but it gets pushed to post-2011 if he is optioned out for at least 20 days). So that could be a secondary reason to send him out for three weeks (and replace him with somebody like Jose Ascanio, for instance) if he continues to have inconsistent performances out of the pen.

Submitted by Doug Dascenzo on Thu, 06/26/2008 - 12:25pm.

I thought Wuertz had to clear waivers in order to be sent down? Or is that just a formality?

=================================

DOUG D: Michael Wuertz only has to clear Optional Assignment Waivers (which are revocable) in order to be optioned to the minors. Optional Assignment Waivers are almost always just a formality, because there is usually no point in a GM blocking the move other than to irritate another GM.

The one time you might see it happen is in a scenario like this:

Let's say the Brewers and the Cardinals are getting ready to play in a big five-game weekend series in St. Louis which includes make-up DHs on Friday and Saturday. So the Brewers want to add a 13th pitcher, but they only have one position player with options left, and he has to clear Optional Assignment Waivers in order to get sent to the minors to make room for the 13th pitcher.

In this particular case, the Cards GM should make a waiver claim on the Brewers position player who is placed on Optional Assignment Waivers, because that would be a good tactical move (and not a nuisance claim) and would force the Brewers to either place some other more-valuable position player on Outright Assignment Waivers or Release Waivers (both of which are irrevocable), or else play the weekend series with just 12 pitchers.

Submitted by Charlie on Thu, 06/26/2008 - 1:51pm.

AZ Phil, With what you said about E-Patt last night, that he often has more trouble making the shorter throws because of his over-the-top throwing motion, why haven't the Cubs considered him as a SS?

He's got the range for it, so if he's got the arm, I'd think they would try it

====================================

CHARLIE: Eric Patterson probably wouldn't be any worse at SS than he is at 2B, but he just doesn't have the ball-handling skills to be a frontline middle-infielder whether you play him at 2B or SS.

Arm-wise and range-wise, he probably can play SS. But he also has the "yips," and there isn't as much time to recover if a "Shaky Jake" like E-Pat bobbles a ground ball at SS compared to bobbling a ground ball at 2B.

That said, if he HAS to play middle-infield, I'd probably play him at SS. But he's going to hurt you defensively long-term no matter where he plays in the infield.

He needs to play CF and really learn the position. Even then, he's never going to be a good defensive outfielder.,The idea is to make him passably-average, where he at least makes the routine plays.

Recent comments

  • Bill (view)

    A good rule of thumb is that if you trade a near-ready high ceiling prospect, you should get at least two far-away high ceiling prospects in return.  Like all rules-of-thumb, it depends upon the specific circumstances, but certainly, we weren't going to get Busch for either prospect alone.

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Right on schedule, just read an article in Baseball America entitled "10 MLB Prospects Outside The Top 100 Who Have Our Attention".  Zyhir Hope was one of the prospects featured. It stated that he's "one of the biggest arrow-up sleeper prospects in the lower levels right now."

     

    Not sharing to be negative about the trade, getting a top 100 prospect who is MLB ready should carry a heavy prospect cost.  But man, Dodger sure are good at identifying and developing young talent. Andrew Friedman seems to have successfully merged Ray's development with Yankees financial might to create a juggernaut of an organization.  

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    I suspect Brown will spend some time in the bullpen due to inning restrictions.  Pitched only 93 innings last year and career high is 104 innings in 2022.  I would expect them to be cautious with a young player with his injury history.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Teheran minor league deal is done, per MLB.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Based on Phil’s sound analysis it sounds like a no brainer for Almonte to be placed on waivers as today’s roster move. We shall see.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team.