Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Game 78 Thread / Orioles @ Cubs (2 of 3)

Game Chat | Press Pass | BR Preview

SP Matt Albers SP
*Ted Lilly
  3-2, 2.77, 25 K, 21 BB, 48.2 IP

7-5, 4.71, 91 K, 34 BB, 91.2 IP
       
2B
#Brian Roberts LF
*Eric Patterson
RF
*Nick Markakis
SS
Ryan Theriot
3B
Melvin Mora 1B
Derrek Lee
1B
*Aubrey Huff 3B
Aramis Ramirez
C
Ramon Hernandez
CF
*Jim Edmonds
LF
*Luke Scott
C
Geovany Soto
CF
Jay Payton
RF
Mark DeRosa
SS
#Alex Cintron
2B
*Mike Fontenot
P
*Matt Albers P
*Ted Lilly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Albers gets the emergency start in place of the scheduled O's starter, Brian Burres.

Comments

stupid regional blackout. here in mid-NC we're in a BAL/WAS blackout area. also...here in NC we get 1 of 3 "local" channels BAL games are shown on and none that WAS games are on. result: unless it's on WGN, FOX Saturday, or ESPN i don't see any of those games except the 50-60 BAL games on the 1 channel i get. gee, i'm glad i'm not a fan of my "regional" team. i'd never get to see them. way to go MLB-EI.

Hurt, apparently. BTW, Lou said in the pregame he will no longer PH for Edmonds vs. lefties and will save Murton for PH duties later in the game. We're not the only ones pissed at Cedeno..

Off the subject, but do you think we will be players in the Fuentes sweepstakes? It sure sounds like Lou fell out of love with Cotts and Eyre after the Tampa Bay series.

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

Wow, Shacon is a psycho I'm really amazed how stupid some of these pro athletes are. If your boss comes to you and wants to discuss something you should just go. Maybe Wade could have let him eat dinner and talked after that. And why would you throw a older man down to the ground (Pedro)? That's just tasteless and un-classy (Ron Burgundy). I'd DFA the bum tomorrow

Anybody know what's up with Ascanio? Is he hurt? Doesn't seem to be pitching at Iowa.

Marmol had it dialed in last night - couple that performance with the one a day earlier, and it looks like he's back in form. Lilly's living a charmed life so far - lots of rockets off him last night, but he still gets the W.

Fontenot played last night like he was still on the Orioles' payroll. Or owed someone money. Or lost a bet. Marmol didn't look like he was all the way back, but he's getting there. Can't imagine anyone wanting to face that guy. Wood made the three guys batting against him look like Ronny Cedeno, Corey Patterson and...Ronny Cedeno.

I don't think Fontenot has surprised anyone with his performance at the plate this year; after he turned back into a pumpkin mid - season last year, things have remained more or less the same. The question is why does Lou have such a fondness for the guy at this point? Can't imagine they don't have any other options from their farm system.

Submitted by Mitterwald on Wed, 06/25/2008 - 6:49pm.

Off the subject, but do you think we will be players in the Fuentes sweepstakes? It sure sounds like Lou fell out of love with Cotts and Eyre after the Tampa Bay series.

====================================

MITTERWALD: I wouldn't be surprised if the Cubs get either Brian Fuentes (COL) or Damaso Marte (PIT) by the 7/31 trade deadline as an 8th inning lefty set-up guy and alternate closer on days when Wood isn't available.

And also either Cristian Guzman (WAS) or David Eckstein (TOR) to replace Cedeno as the #1-A SS and late-inning bat off the bench.

I suspect Ronny Cedeno's PH K with the bases loaded in the bottom of the 9th Tuesday night might motivate Piniella to ask Hendry to replace Cedeno with a more-veteran type middle-infield option off the bench.

I believe Hendry would overpay and trade the entire farm system if he thinks it would give the Cubs a better chance to get to the WS in 2008.

Once the injured position players (Alfonso Soriano and Reed Johnson) return, I think it's entirely possible that Eric Patterson will take Mike Fontenot's roster slot, at least unless and until E-Pat is traded away in a deadline deal.

I dont know about the entire farm system, but I'm thinking that overpaying may not be such a bad idea at this point. We seem to have a pretty good shot this year.

What do you think the Cubs main needs are? I'd like to see them add 1 starter (someone to slot between Z and Dempster in a playoff series) and 1 reliever that they can count on in late innings. It seems that outside of Wood and Marmol Lou does not trust anyone to get big outs late in games.

[ ]

In reply to by Pat Kane

Agree about relief help. All of the AAA back ups (Roquet, Ascanio, Hart, Pig-man, Cotts) that I was counting on have not panned out for one reason or another. Wuertz has been very dissapointing. -and we have already seen a possible danger sign from Zeus. I also agree about a starter, -everyone in baseball would like a starter! -but you'd like C.C., not Trachsel. It looks like the Angels have a much better shot.

[ ]

In reply to by Pat Kane

I want one more starter, and I'm going to tell you why. While Jason Marquis has hit a nice little run here in his last few starts, we're approaching the All-Star Break. As we all remember from last year (ERA 2 runs higher in the 2nd half), and from 2006 as a Cardinal (ERA 1 run higher in the 2nd half) and from his entire career (ERA almost 3/4ths of a run higher in the 2nd half), that's when the Jason Marquis ERA Watch becomes America's favorite action-packed thrill ride. Maybe that's a bad analogy. The Jason Marquis ERA Watch after the All-Star Break would be like getting on a roller coaster, and then going up the big hill. Then the big hill keeps going. And going. And then you never go over the the top. Just keep going higher and higher until it's over. Worst. Ride. Ever.

Only problem with E-Pat taking Fontenot's spot is that there was a big deal made about Fontenot being able to play shortstop. I don't think Patterson can?

Submitted by Jeff_Pico on Thu, 06/26/2008 - 10:58am.

Only problem with E-Pat taking Fontenot's spot is that there was a big deal made about Fontenot being able to play shortstop. I don't think Patterson can?

==============================================

Jeff P: If it's a question of who would be 3rd on the depth chart at SS if Eric Patterson replaces Mike Fontenot on the 25-man roster, I would think Mark DeRosa could play SS in a pinch. Mike Fontenot was never considered anything more than an emergency SS anyway.

And of course Eric Patterson played both 2B and SS at Georgia Tech, so while he would be a definite liability there, E-Pat actually does have considerably more experience playing SS than does Fontenot, and Patterson also has better range and a stronger arm than Fontenot.

The problem with Michael Wuertz is that there is a certain "boom or bust" aspect to his performances, where either he is very good or he is very bad. And I suspect Piniella doesn't particularly like that. That said, unless the Cubs can get a reliable and proven right-handed set-up type guy to replace him (and acquiring a first-class rotation starter, a quality lefty reliever who can close in a pinch, and/or a veteran middle-infielder to replace Cedeno, are probably higher priorities), I don't think Wuertz will be replaced.

BTW, if Michael Wuertz is optioned to the minors for at least 20 days, the Cubs buy another year toward free-agency with him (right now he'a scheduled to be a FA after 2010, but it gets pushed to post-2011 if he is optioned out for at least 20 days). So that could be a secondary reason to send him out for three weeks (and replace him with somebody like Jose Ascanio, for instance) if he continues to have inconsistent performances out of the pen.

Submitted by Doug Dascenzo on Thu, 06/26/2008 - 12:25pm.

I thought Wuertz had to clear waivers in order to be sent down? Or is that just a formality?

=================================

DOUG D: Michael Wuertz only has to clear Optional Assignment Waivers (which are revocable) in order to be optioned to the minors. Optional Assignment Waivers are almost always just a formality, because there is usually no point in a GM blocking the move other than to irritate another GM.

The one time you might see it happen is in a scenario like this:

Let's say the Brewers and the Cardinals are getting ready to play in a big five-game weekend series in St. Louis which includes make-up DHs on Friday and Saturday. So the Brewers want to add a 13th pitcher, but they only have one position player with options left, and he has to clear Optional Assignment Waivers in order to get sent to the minors to make room for the 13th pitcher.

In this particular case, the Cards GM should make a waiver claim on the Brewers position player who is placed on Optional Assignment Waivers, because that would be a good tactical move (and not a nuisance claim) and would force the Brewers to either place some other more-valuable position player on Outright Assignment Waivers or Release Waivers (both of which are irrevocable), or else play the weekend series with just 12 pitchers.

Submitted by Charlie on Thu, 06/26/2008 - 1:51pm.

AZ Phil, With what you said about E-Patt last night, that he often has more trouble making the shorter throws because of his over-the-top throwing motion, why haven't the Cubs considered him as a SS?

He's got the range for it, so if he's got the arm, I'd think they would try it

====================================

CHARLIE: Eric Patterson probably wouldn't be any worse at SS than he is at 2B, but he just doesn't have the ball-handling skills to be a frontline middle-infielder whether you play him at 2B or SS.

Arm-wise and range-wise, he probably can play SS. But he also has the "yips," and there isn't as much time to recover if a "Shaky Jake" like E-Pat bobbles a ground ball at SS compared to bobbling a ground ball at 2B.

That said, if he HAS to play middle-infield, I'd probably play him at SS. But he's going to hurt you defensively long-term no matter where he plays in the infield.

He needs to play CF and really learn the position. Even then, he's never going to be a good defensive outfielder.,The idea is to make him passably-average, where he at least makes the routine plays.

Recent comments

  • crunch (view)

    happ, right hamstring tightness, day-to-day (hopefully 0 days).

    he will be reevaluated tomorrow.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I guess I'm not looking for that type of AB 

    Just a difference of opinion

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.