Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

39 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (one slot is open), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL and one player has been DESIGNATED FOR ASSIGNMENT (DFA)   

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, and nine players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, three players are on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-23-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
* Luke Little
Hector Neris 
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
* Matt Mervis
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 9 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL: 3
Kyle Hendricks, P 
* Drew Smyly, P 
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P

DFA: 1 
Garrett Cooper, 1B 
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

The Race

It pains me to include the St. Louis Ankiels in this table, but with Tony's Boys just three games behind the Cubs in the loss column, include them we must.
  Brewers Cubs Cards
Record 62-56 60-57 55-60
Pyth Record 59-59 62-55 50-65
Games Left 44 45 47
Home 22 23 24
Away 22 22 23
vs. Other Two 9 11 14
Over Last 75 36-39 40-35 39-36
Over Last 50 24-26 29-21 26-24
Over Last 25 9-16 12-13 13-12
Win Division* 53.7% 42.5% 3.5%
Win Wild Card* 2.6% 3.0% .2%
*From the Playoff Odds Report at Baseball Prospectus (subscription required), which involves running one million computer simulations of the rest of the season.

Comments

Saint Louis is 25-33 on the road. They had issues aganist Pit and Was on the their last trip going 1-6. I dont think this week boades well for them.

I had a free ticket to the meaningless battle-of-the-last-place teams (PIT vs SF) here tonight at PNC. It had been suspected for some time that Barry Bonds would take a pass on this rainout-makeup doubleheader and simply jet on ahead to Atlanta for tomorrow's game. But give him (or his agent) credit- he showed, and there was a little bit of classy behavior on both sides. Barry did 7 years here long ago, so a lot of the box seat season ticket holders remember him. He got a big and polite hand just for walking out of the dugout and taking his position in the first inning, which he acknowledged with a tip of his cap. That was nice. Most of the boo-birds were still in line for beer, apparently. When he came up to bat in the second, my section (southwest nosebleed) was resoundingly BOO-ing him, disapproval to the extent that a Cubscout pack leader behind me was explaining steroids to his troop. Jeez. Oh well. Let's just say that for his AB's tonight, Barry energized the crowd, which was about 75/25 split for applause vs booing (which of course makes more noise). During one AB, a mere flick of his outsized wrists sent an errant HR our way, just to the outside of the Fair Pole. Still, the guy (even from my vantage point) has excellent eye-hand coordinated with power on demand, and he drew a BB and had a 1B I think. Plus a couple of above-average fielding plays, admirable considering the state of his wheels, with spin-and-throw moves hitting his cutoff man or the third baseman on a couple of occasions. And this (by then) despite a chorus of hecking from the LF bleacher bums (the only section to sell out tonight on an otherwise sparse night). I clapped for Barry, because I clap for Baseball, and Baseball in its infinite wisdom decided to let Barry (and Mark, and Sammy) happen. Couple of other points: Check out the Rajai Davis sparkling fielding gem, sure to be featured on plays of the week: running full tilt from CF to the gap in left center, away from the ball, full-out airborne extension to make a catch, and skidding about 20 feet (not kidding) on the warning track. The crowd (having just suffered his trade from PIT to SF) gave him a resounding ovation and multiple scoreboard replays (not usual for a visiting team player.) Rajai Davis- remember the name. He is on a mission to cement his position as a starter. Funny: a PYT chick behind me, unable to pronounce "Guillermo Rodriguez" when presented as name and picture on the scoreboard, exclaimed incredulously to her boyfriend: "wow he must be Chinese or something". Boyfriend, unable to think of the right word ("Latino") said, "No, he's Mexican." To say that Latinos are underrepresented here in Pittsburgh is a vast, vast understatement.

Forgot one thing: In the first game, Paul Maholm with the complete game win, the first time in 12 years for back-to-back CG wins for the Pirates. My God, I thought as I looked up after 90 minutes, and we were in the 8th. 13 groundball outs. That's consistent efficiency. Total game time 1:51. Announcers looked up the record for shortest total elapsed time for a double header, and it happened back in the 20's. First game 1:12. Second game 0:51. I JUST DO NOT SEE HOW A MAJOR LEAGUE 9 INNING GAME COULD POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN FIFTY ONE MINUTES.

Ho hum. Another game, another 5 RBI for Geo. SOTO. He's got 91!! RBI now in 319 AB's, but the Cub brainrust is gonna wait til September to bring him back for a look. words escape me

It pains me to include the St. Louis I'll be surprised if they don't win the division.

You'll be SURPRISED if the Cards don't win the division? The third place team who is 5 games under .500? Even if they sweep Milwaukee they will be under .500 and in 3rd place. Can they win it? Yes. Will they? No. If firmly believe that the Cubs will win the Central and probably be the only team over .500.

If the Cards win, it'll be because the Brewers and Cubs have collapsed mightily and are many games under .500. That is of course possible, but if it does happen, we won't have deserved to win anything anyway. The other interesting thing here is a discussion we had at the beginning of the season: are the Cubs a .500 team or a playoff team. Well, in this division they could be both.

if all 3 of these clubs finish below .500, could bud the dud exercise his "best interests of the game" powers, and award the 2nd wild card team the playoff spot instead of the n.l. central chump er rather champ? let's hope aram returns, healthy, and that lou gives ward a start at 1b...lee is really in need of a day or 3 off. and, that if this offense gets harang on the ropes early, they don't go all woody williams/josh fogg on him.

It's starting to look like the Chc @ Mil series at the end of August will be pretty goddamn epic. Wonder what ticket availability is like. dc60124: and, that if this offense gets harang on the ropes early, they don’t go all woody williams/josh fogg on him. Guys like Harang don't worry me as much as guys like Lohse, oddly enough. Harang likes to throw a lot of strikes and the Cub's like to hack a lot of pitches. That's a good combination for our offense. What's bad for our offense is guys who don't throw as many strikes.

Only 18 more days until the Soto era begins! When FOnzie returns, presumably sore-legged, how about: Theriot 6 Kendall 2 Lee 3 Ram 5 Fonzie 7 Jones 9 DeRosa 4 Pie 8 Z et al 9 When Hill catches, switch put Derosa #2 and Hill #7.

Question regarding waivers (no relevant thread to put this): Does a no-trade clause effect the waiver process? If a no-trade clause player gets claimed, can he reject the trade? Can he reject an outright waiver straight to the new team?

well, to win the WC would require playing well enough to leap the braves, phils, rockies and pads, but NOT playing well enough to pass the brewers. lots of constraints there.

There's plenty of time for one of the teams to get on a roll and win 87-88 or so games. Hopefully, it will be the Cubs, but it could be the Brewers. I can't imagine the Cardinals doing it with the state of their pitching - they'd have to play almost .600 ball the rest of the way just to finish above .500. This is a big week - Cubs have to play well at home, as the Brewers are at home, too, and play well there.

bacon — August 14, 2007 @ 7:28 am Question regarding waivers (no relevant thread to put this): Does a no-trade clause effect the waiver process? If a no-trade clause player gets claimed, can he reject the trade? Can he reject an outright waiver straight to the new team? ========================= BACON: Players have quite a few options when it comes to accepting waiver claims. It doesn't totally rest with the clubs. For instance, if a player with "no trade" rights (either because it's written in the player's contract, because the player is a 10/5 man, or by virtue of being an Article XX FA with a NT through May 15th) is placed on Trade Waivers, Outright Waivers, Release Waivers, or Optional Waiivers, and is claimed by another club, the PLAYER (depending on the nature of the "no trade") could have the right to reject the waiver claim, in which case the claim is voided and the player's original club must retain or return the player to its 40-man roster... That the player's option. Likewise, if a player with at least three years of MLB service time is placed on Outright Waivers and clears the waivers without being claimed, the player has the option to either accept the outright assignment to the minors, or refuse the outright assignment to the minors (because he has three years of MLB service time) and be a free-agent either immediately (in which case his contract is immediately terminated) or defer the option to be a FA to the end of the season, or refuse the outright assignment to the minors and be returned to his club's 40-man roster... Again, that's the player's option. A slightly different option exists for players with less than three years of MLB service time who have been outrighted previously in their career... If a player with less than three years of MLB service time who has been outrighted previously in his career is placed on Outright Waivers and clears the waivers without being claimed, the player has the option to be a free-agent immediately (in which case his contract is immediately terminated) or defer the option to be a FA to the end of the season, but (unlike a player with at least three years of MLB service time) he does NOT have the option to refuse the outright assignment to the minors and be returned to his club's 40-man roster. Here's another one... If a player is placed on $1 Release Waivers and is claimed by another club, even if the player does not have "no trade" rights, the player has five days to decide whether to accept the waiver claim by the new team, or be a FA... So that's another player option involving waiver claims.

#12 rynox- Harang likes to throw a lot of strikes and the Cub’s like to hack a lot of pitches. That’s a good combination for our offense. i am inclined to agree with you; it sure did not work in the cubs' favor vs. oswalt last week. let's hope the home cooking is the difference this week.

Hey AZ Phil, weren't you saying something about the Cubs keeping Patterson up till yesterday and then sending him back to Iowa so as not to burn his option? Or am I wrong on the date?

Pains me to say this cwtp, but all your bickering won't change anything. Kendall's hitting very well (421/500/526) in the last week and Koyie isn't going anywhere as long as our batshit crazy ace thinks Koyie is the miraculous savior of his season.

Piggy! is a good hitter. Gives Lou another right handed bat off the bench. Go offense!

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Walker was a complimentary piece who was well past his prime. Edmonds, Holliday, Ozzie Smith and a few others were good trades. Notably, they have almost always been quiet in the free agent market. But the fundamental workings of the organization were always based primarily upon the constant output of a well oiled minor league organization. That organization has ground to a halt. And when did that hard stop start to happen? Right at the beginning of the Goldschmidt/Arenado era, perpetuated by the Contreras signing, followed by the rotation purchases during the last offseason. The timing is undeniable and, in my mind, not coincidental.

    Again, we are all saying that player development became deemphasized. I’m just linking it directly to the recent trades and involvement in the free agent market. I don’t see how the two concepts can be decoupled.

  • Charlie (view)

    The Cards also traded for both Jim Edmonds and Larry Walker. It's the developing part that has fallen off. Of course, it could also be the case that there are no more Matt Carpenters left to pull out of the hat. 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Cubs sign 28 yr old RHRP Daniel Missaki. He was in MiLB from his 17yr old to 19yr old years and did pretty well.
    He's been in Mexico and Japan the last four years and has done well also.
    He's supposedly Japanese and Brazilian.
    Interesting sign. We obviously need to RP in the system
    Injuries are mounting everywhere!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Sure, they made generally short term trades for established players to enhance what they already had or traded for players early enough in their careers that they were essentially Cardinals from the start. What they never did was to try to use the more established players as foundational cornerstones.

    Essentially we’re saying the same thing. They have given up on player development to the point that even their prospects that make it to the bigs flop so that they have to do things like buy most of their rotation and hope for the best.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    I don’t buy that. They had been doing that for years.

    They did it with Matt Holliday. They did it with John Lackey. They did it with Mark Mulder. They did it with Jason Heyward, who had a great year for them. I’m sure there’s more but those come to mind immediately.

    I attribute it more to a breakdown in what they’re doing in terms of development than a culture thing.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    They won those trades and sacrificed their culture. That’s exactly their problem.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    The other part that’s kind of crazy is they made two very high profile trades, one for Goldschmidt and one for Arenado, and they very clearly won those trades. They just haven’t been able to develop players the last handful of years the way they usually do.

    I guess the moral there is it’s hard to stay on top of your game and be good at what you do in perpetuity.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Marmol was extended at the beginning of the year. Two years I believe.

  • crunch (view)

    Jesse Rogers @JesseRogersESPN
    Craig Counsell doesn’t have a timetable for Cody Bellinger who technically has two cracked ribs on his right side. CT scan showed it today.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Thought it might have been David Peralta given the open 40 man spot and how PCA has played so far.