Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Of Mice and Mesa

For some, it's Christmas. For others, it's Thanksgiving or the 4th of July. Or Arbor Day, maybe. But for a certain "special" few, it's the home opener for the AFL's Mesa Solar Sox. And for us, tonight was the night. Like the other six AFL teams, the Solar Sox are an amalgam of six MLB clubs. The six teams vary from year-to-year (last year the Solar Sox consisted of players from the CUBS, HOU, LAD, MIN, and NYM), but the Cubs are always the "host" team, because the Solar Sox play at HoHoKam Park, Spring Training home of your Chicago Cubs. This year, the Solar Sox consist of 35 players, seven players each from the CUBS, BOS, HOU, MIL, and STL. The seven Cubs players who are assigned to the Solar Sox are RHPs Matt Avery, Justin Berg, Sean Gallagher, and Rocky Roquet, SS Joe Simokaitis, 3B Josh Lansford, and OF Sam Fuld. And tonight was one of those rare AFL games where ALL SEVEN Cubs players got into the game! Facing the Phoenix Desert Dogs (CHW, BAL, MIN, OAK, and PIT), Sam Fuld led off for the Solar Sox and played RF. He drew a walk on a 3-2 pitch in his first AB in the bottom of the 1st, but was thrown out trying to steal. In his 2nd AB, he bounced out to the first-baseman (unassisted) on a 3-1 pitch. He also made a nice running catch into the RF corner, before being replaced by a PH in the 6th inning. Josh Lansford started at 3B and hit 3rd in the order. In his two ABs before being replaced, he swung at the first pitch and grounded into an inning-ending 6-4-3 DP the first time, and then grounded out 6-3 with a runner at 2nd base and one out in his second AB. Joe Simokaitis hit 8th and played SS. He played the entire game and went 0-3, including a strikeout (swinging) on a 2-2 pitch, a bounce-out to third, and swinging bunt dribbler where he was thrown out 2-3. He also made several nice plays at short (a leaping catch, a backhanded stop and 6-4 FC throw from deep in the hole, and a strong throw to catch a batter running to first on a slow dribbler 6-3). Sean Gallagher entered the game in the top of the 4th and worked one inning (10 pitches). He got the first batter he faced (Nyjer Morgan of PIT) on a line drive to Simokaitis (that was the nice leaping catch), and then struck out the last two hitters (Nolan Reimold of BAL and Chris Getz of CHW) in the inning on just seven pitches. His curve looked great (he threw it five times, and it was a strike each time), and his fastball topped out at 94. An impressive (albeit short) performance for Gallagher. The MLB scouts behind home plate were VERY impressed with Gallagher. Matt Avery entered the game in th top of the 5th, and was equally impressive. Throwing just eight pitches (including SEVEN sweeping curve balls), Avery retired the side on two 6-3 groundouts to Simokaitis and a strikeout (that woild be Jeff Fiorentino of BAL). Justin Berg worked two innings, the 6th and 7th, and he struggled with his command in the 6th. Not anywhere near as sharp as Gallagher or Avery, Berg gave up a lead-off line drive double to Matt Macri (MIN) into the LF corner, followed by a 5-3 bounce out (runner held at 2nd). Berg then walked the next hitter (Cliff Pennington of OAK) on four pitches, before Nyjer Morgan hit a hard ground ball single to right that scored Macri from second with the game's only run. Berg then retired the next two hitters (Reimold and Getz) on a strikeout and a 4-3 ground out, stranding runners at 2nd and 3rd. Berg had a much easier second inning of work, retiring the Desert Dogs 1-2-3 (6-3, 2-3, F-8) on just seven pitches in the 7th. Rocky Roquet entered the game in the top of the 8th, and worked a 1-2-3 inning (16 pitches). Effectively mixing a 95 MPH fastball and a 84 MPH slider, he struck out the first two hitters he faced (Matt Macri and Donny Lucy, both on 3-2 pitches), before walking Cliff Pennington on a 3-1 pitch. But then Rocky immediately picked Pennington off first with a quick, nifty move that froze the runner.

Comments

I am having a little trouble getting excited about the AFL, just because I only think three of those guys are legitimate prospects (Gallagher, Roquet and Fuld though I don't think he's going to be an every day regular in MLB). Any idea why Colvin, for example, has shown up for the instructional league instead of the AFL? Any idea which of the American ballplayers are expected to play in the winter leagues?

Colvin is actually on Team USA. I believe AZ Phil said he was at instructs as he prepped for a week of Team USA vs. AFL teams. Mexican Winter League started yesterday - I see 2 Mexican-native Cubs on some of the rosters (IF Issmael Salas and RHP Marco Carrillo) along with Mexican Pacific League vet in Casey McGehee. AZ Phil probably has a better idea, though.

yeah, Colvin is with Team USA, getting a few swings in at Instructs and AZ Phi mentioned that Team USA will play some AFL teams.

Do any of our Cub pitching prospects in Arizona have good changeups in their arsenal yet, as in a changeup that is a strikeout pitch (it seems we're stong on fastball/slider combos)?

AZ Phil, What do you estimate the ratio of scouts to fans at AFL games to be? When I went they all sat near the wall between the two batting circles - stop watches in their right hand, radar gun in their left.

George Altman — October 11, 2007 @ 7:48 am AZ Phil, What do you estimate the ratio of scouts to fans at AFL games to be? When I went they all sat near the wall between the two batting circles - stop watches in their right hand, radar gun in their left. =============================== GEORGE A: At a typical AFL game, it's about one scout for every two fans. BTW, they played the recording of Harry Caray singing "Take Me Out to the Ball Game" for the 7th inning stretch. And In case you were wondering.. no, the scouts do not sing along with Harry.

cubster — October 11, 2007 @ 5:22 am Do any of our Cub pitching prospects in Arizona have good changeups in their arsenal yet, as in a changeup that is a strikeout pitch (it seems we’re stong on fastball/slider combos)? =============================== CUBSTER: The kids at instructs are all trying to master a change. RHP Dumas Garcia (ex-South Georgia Penauts) already has a change that's a strikeout pitch, and 18-year old Korean RHP Dae-Eun Rhee has a splitter that acts like a change, and it's defintely a strikeout pitch. LHPs Mark Pawelek and Chris Siegfried throw change-ups, and RHPs Chris Huseby and Ryan Acosta are close to mastering one.

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!