Sale of Cubs May Be Completed Before End of Civilization

Some more news has trickled out on the impending sale of the Cubs and Sam Zell is hinting that the Ricketts may not be the new owner afterall (emphasis added).

"These are very difficult times. These are difficult
times to arrange financing," Zell said in an interview, adding that if
the Ricketts deal falls through, he is confident the media
company--which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in
December--will find another buyer for the ballclub.

"We’ve made it very public that the Cubs don’t fit into the long
term picture of the Tribune," he said. "So if the Ricketts deal doesn’t
get done, I’m sure there will be other ones.
"

Sure, a lot of people have $900M or so lying around to spend on the Cubs as evidenced by the three legitimate bids Zell actually received. Of those three bids, Ricketts was supposedly not the highest but offered the most money up front, so if financing is the issue, a deal that would require even more to be financed is probably not going to have much more luck than the Ricketts are having now.

Of course...financing really isn't the issue it appears. According to this story dated May 19th, the Ricketts already secured a little over $850M of that $900M original bid; $403M from the sale of stock in Ameritrade and another $450M secured in bank loans (Clarification: Technically $753M is secured with a $100M coming from a private placement by Barclays which we do not know the status of, although the Ricketts claim they can cover it if it falls through). There was that story of Ricketts looking for 10 or so investors at $25M a pop, including celebrities like John Cusack, Bill Murray and Jim Belushi, but that round of financing was supposedly not critical to get the deal done according to "sources". Crain's Chicago Business also echoes that the financing is already in place and explains the real delay.

Thomas Ricketts, who is leading his family’s bid for Tribune Co.’s Cubs, has lined up financing for the deal, but a dispute over price is delaying the transaction.


The Ricketts family, whose original bid was close to $900 million, now
believes the real price should be closer to $850 million, a source
said. The sides disagree over the value of the team’s multiyear
contract to broadcast games on Tribune’s WGN network.


At issue is about $40 million to $50 million — roughly 6% of the
original bid, which also includes Wrigley Field and a 25% stake in
regional cable channel Comcast Sports.

So the Ricketts are either short $50M in financing and trying to talk Zell down or they really are unhappy with the broadcast rights. I'm going with option B here. It appears the Tribune made sweetheart deals with WGN radio and television to broadcast the Cubs games at below fair market value for a contract up to 10 years sometime last fall. Ricketts isn't buying any stake of WGN, but is supposedly getting a 25% stake in the Comcast sports channel that already broadcasts about 80 games a year. So naturally, if he owns the cable company he'd like more games to go on there or be sure he's getting paid the appropriate amount in any licensing deal to WGN.

So don't believe the Zell lies, the money is there for Ricketts, Zell just isn't liking the terms.


Hat tip to waxpaperbeercup that has been all over the sale process, also check out Mark Cuban's blog on why he bowed out and wasn't going to pay anything near the $1 billion asking price at this time. End of the world coming Decemeber 21st, 2012...John Cusack (Cub fan) is starring. Coincidence? I think not.

 

Tags: 

Comments

according to SI, Z gets 6 games...hardly worth appealing, imo.

ESPN.com confirms 6 game suspension. Says Z won't appeal.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4213321

Z should shut his trap and appeal. Then when Lou wants him to serve his suspension, he can just drop the appeal.

I agree that's a soft penalty. Kind of makes sense, though, I mean he yelled and threw the ball, but the ump bumped z...

Any suspension for the ump? Didn't that guy who put his hand on Ordonez get suspended?

It looked to me like Z had blocked the plate and he was out, but was watching it at the bar. What's the official TCR opinion on the call?

Consensus seemed to have been that the ump made the right call.

He was safe.

Z blocked the plate nicely and sort of pushed Morgan back, but he did get his left hand in right before the tag or as the tag was being applied...tie going to the runner of course. I believe the Ordonez ump did not get suspended.

And the Soto slide later? I thought that was a makeup call for blowing the Z play.

Soto was safe, he definitely got his hand in before the tag.

Thanks. I was sure he was gonna be out. He needs to go back on that 2007 diet. He's hella slow.

Good Lord. Fuck you, Sam Zell.

It doesn't really bother me. It's not like the new owner is going to be throwing around cash after having dropped $.9 billion on the team. I actually expect payroll to go down over the next three years, unless the Cubs win a WS (hahahaha).

This is ridicules even by Cubs standards that is is taking this long to sell the team. 2.5 years? It would funny if it wasn't so sad. But I wouldn't ultimately care if it wasn't effecting the team and comments from Hendry seems like it is causing at least some problems. I just hope the sale goes through soon, so they don't continue to keep Hendry on for continuity sake.

hendry? really?

c'mon guy...you already got a hand full of straws, no need to grasp onto more to tie him into this as a problem.

huh?

"comments from Hendry seems like it is causing at least some problems"

c'mon...his comments on the situation were light at best...guy has a 140m team to handle.

i get where you're coming from, though.

Yeah, not blaming him in the slightest. I am sure it has been an uneasy few years in the front office with all the uncertainty.

i came down harsh vs. what i was trying to say anyway...sorry. i blame the government.

all things considered...especially considering the 140m payroll and how hands-off Zell has been...i'm pleased with his ownership so far.

Yeah, I think the team is already being run like a 'real owner' would run it. With the possible exception of making an allowance for one big contract at the deadline - but that hasn't been a problem for the last 6 years, so I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that it will be this year. The people at the Trib know they make money when the Cubs ratings and jersey sales go up.

Lineups posted...

CHC - Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire
LAD - Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire

I am sure there's a great joke in there, I just don't get it.

Baseball these days is all about the umpire.

i would question why soto was just watching zambrano explode
he should of got his pitcher outta there.

Ask Michael Barrett or the Gatorade machine why he didn't get in there.

(chortle)

good one!

I blame Michael Barrett for the Gatorade machine.

Recent comments

Subscribe to Recent comments
The first 600 characters of the last 16 comments, click "View" to see rest of comment.
  • The AZL team with the best record over the course of the full 2016 AZL season and the only AZL team to play .600 ball (the AZL Dodgers) did not qualify for the AZL playoffs, and the AZL East Division team with the best record over the course of the full season (the AZL Athletics) did not qualify for the AZL playoffs, either. 

    That's because of the ridiculous "split season" schedule most of the minor leagues now play, a stupid system that rewards mediocrity at the expense of the worthy. 

    Arizona Phil 3 min 22 sec ago view
  • LHP Clayton Richard (released by the Cubs earlier this month) is pitching very well as a starting pitcher for the San Diego Padres and could be a good candidate to get traded to a contender looking for a veteran SP before tomorrow night's post-season roster eligibility deadline.

    Because they released him, the Cubs are paying most of Richard's 2016 salary ($2M plus another $1M in performance bonuses).

    Arizona Phil 5 min 55 sec ago view
  • Despite good movement on his fastball, I think location kept him from getting Ks. Left some pitches up and away that got hammered up and away. Then of course Travis Wood gave up the 2-run double in the 7th, but both runs counted against Arrieta.

    Charlie 39 min 44 sec ago view
  • "i'm gonna make you my main squeeze one day, bro. save the date."

    This level of discourse is #charming.

    #baseballtalk

    Tito 40 min 15 sec ago view
  • I would be having this discussion with anyone who (a) blathered on ad nauseum about the topic. (See, "Olt, Mike, not given an opportunity") or (b) responded directly to what I posted (which you did).

    Have a nice day.

    #baseballtalk

    Tito 42 min 58 sec ago view
  • what would you do without me? aside from having your posting content here cut by 75%+?

    i'm gonna make you my main squeeze one day, bro. save the date.

    crunch 46 min 18 sec ago view
  • In this instance, yes, I care more about the result of this big thing that isn't really a big thing.

    #crunchsplaining

    #willlistentojeffsullivanmorethanyou

    #blessyourheart

    #hitler

    #tcrmartyr

    #billyhamiltonwar

    #baseballtalk

    Tito 46 min 46 sec ago view
  • Two things:

    Fangraphs WAR #s include baserunning and Hamilton is elite at that. He leads in SBs with the 54 and and has an 87% rate which is really good. I'm sure once he gets on base he's able to take the extra base quite often too. Both those things will up his overall WAR value.

    The differences between BR and FG WAR is pretty well documented online and thus If there are discrepancies it's fairly easy to figure out why. It's fairly well accepted that BR WAR is fine as a snapshot but FG is better at predicting future value.

    johann 50 min 58 sec ago view
  • i have no doubt at all you quit reading at that point. you're very enamored with outcomes without caring what it takes to get there.

    the fact it's exploitable, especially without someone to cover the running game for him, as well it's evolution in how people are testing possible exploits is interesting to some people...to me...i'm some people...hurrah.

    some people want to check the boxscore to see who won, some want to know how it went down.

    crunch 1 hour 3 min ago view
  • I read it as him saying it's not really that much of a concern and that the one time it really cost Lester, vs. K.C., was an anomaly.

    #baseballtalk

    Tito 1 hour 8 min ago view
  • if jeff says it, it's cool...when i say it, it's straight from the mouth of hitler.

    aside from the lack of jeff touching on the insane leads runners take and lester's inability to throw if he's fielding, this is a lot of what i've said about the issue.

    exploitable, needs his own personal catcher to control his shortcomings, relies on his ability to get outs along with his personal catcher keeping runners in check before things become further exploited...

    crunch 1 hour 11 min ago view
  • That would be Rice Krispy Treat

    The E-Man 2 hours 29 min ago view
  • "Crunch's cousin"

    Butterfinger or Baby Ruth?

    VirginiaPhil 2 hours 43 min ago view
  • I saw the first three innings and the last three, so I didn't see Arrieta get hit. His stuff looked nasty at first...what happened? Any insight from anyone who watched?

    #baseballtalk

    Tito 2 hours 55 min ago view
  • That question came from CRUNCH's cousin.

    The E-Man 2 hours 58 min ago view
  • He's definitely one of the best

    #baseballtalk

    Tito 2 hours 59 min ago view