Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Cubs News from Arizona

I believe today is the first official workout and we're starting to get some much needed Cubs news in our morphine drips.

- Muskat says Ted Lilly was playing catch yesterday and says his shoulder feels strong. Lilly thinks he can be ready by Opening Day. The quotes from Paul Sullivan though are a bit more tempered.

"I expect to be ahead of schedule," Lilly said. "I think the real test, first, is when you get on a mound and start throwing downhill off a slope, and then when you get into a game situation and really try to dial it up. That's when you find out how healthy you really are."

- Some of the early birds among the position players include Marlon Byrd, Tyler Colvin and Andres Blanco.

- Greg Maddux is in camp. Don't get too excited that he'll ever take over pitching coach duties from Larry Rothschild though.

Now entering his ninth season with the Cubs, Rothschild has coached under three managers and will be around as long as Hendry is here.

Rumors have also been that Maddux would want a higher profile gig than pitching coach when he does decide to return full time to the game.

- Z was taking grounders at shortstop today. As one Cubs blogger noted, Z has out OPS'd Theriot over the last two years. Watch your back little man.

- Word is that the bill to keep the Cubs in Arizona has passed by a vote of 6-2. The car tax is an extra $1 on car rentals and 8% on spring training tickets. Using some fuzzy math, one representative said it's going to cost about $2.80 a person .

- Hendry is flying to St. Petersburg at the end of the week to most likely be present at Ryan Theriot's arbitration case, although he won't be doing the arguing for the Cubs. They're keeping the exact date and time a secret for whatever reason (UPDATE: flying out tomorrow with the hearing on either Friday or Saturday).

- Early contender for 2010 quote of the year by Geovany Soto responding to steroid allegations.

"I wasn't strong. I was just fat."

Comments

"Z has out OPS'd Theriot over the last two years. Watch your back little man." i always loved it when Z would swing away with less than 2 outs with his wild-ass bat when we had our power hitting, low ob%, leadoff man waiting on deck. fun times.

Opening day for Lilly? I thought he would be out until June? Someone is lying. Or do we no longer care when people in the media make things up out of thin air?

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

Lilly was back pitching 21 days after his scope (6 shutout innings, no decision), Angel Guzman's on death's doorstep from his scope:
Angel Guzman injured a knee during a workout in Venezuela and had arthroscopic surgery to repair a torn meniscus two weeks ago. The procedure was done in Arizona. He was expected to be ready by Opening Day.
...depending on how much mensicus cartilage get trimmed it takes 2-6 weeks to recover. Last season Lilly had his knee scoped on 7-27-09.
The Associated Press reports Chicago Cubs SP Ted Lilly allowed four singles, a walk and struck out four in six shutout innings in his return from the disabled list Monday, Aug. 17.
He returned in the game Kevin Gregg blew in the 9th with a 3 run HR to Kyle Blanks. http://mlb.mlb.com/news/boxscore.jsp?gid=2009_08_17_chnmlb_sdnmlb_1 Lacking Grey Matter:
Jeff Gray, whom the Cubs acquired from Oakland, has a moderate groin strain, injured during drills in Mesa. The right-hander will take it easy over the first few weeks of camp.

I've read that Hendry has brought in Milton Bradley on a one day contract to argue the case against Theriot. It was some Phil Rogers piece if I recall correctly.

I suspect losing Gray and Guzman for the first half of spring training just drove up the price for Jason Frasor or Luke Gregerson

Is it me or does 2010 already feel like a 2nd-place season. I'm having trouble getting excited. Yeah, sure I'm excited about spring and warmer weather. And I'm excited about getting to watch baseball again, but I'm just not feeling it from the Cubs this year. Who knows, maybe the lowered expectations will help. Or is it just me with the lowered expectations?

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

3+ good starters, a crew of 3 sluggers with a possible 4th in soto...pen looks better than last season even without a lights-out pen stud. fuku is overpaid, but he still does a good job playing the game all-around, imo. byrd...meh... the middle IF situation should be interesting...hopefully theriot can turn in 1 more season like the last few at the very least. bench doesn't look too bad, imo...even with a weak-bat SS backup (stay healthy riot...hell, stay healthy everyone)

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

I agree on Fontenot....he's got something to prove..
Yeah, maybe he'll show up to spring training 6 inches taller and making more contact with the bat. Then he could be considered for the 25-man roster.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

Fontenot had something to prove last year. The only thing he did prove was that he doesn't belong in the major leagues. Instead Hendry keeps him and pays him $1 million.

[ ]

In reply to by Paul Noce

damn. sometimes i feel like im the last guy that believes he can turn in a 15hr, .350-ish ob% season. i like his swing. he needs to actually put the bat on the ball to make the swing work, though. he's an average/+ 2nd, but not far from average. not like it'd be shocking to see him fall off the face of the earth over the next few years, but i think the midget has the skills.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

well, to be fair, fontenot isn't a 6'2 black dude from another country. i seriously do like his form while swinging a bat...which is a decent enough thing if you're going to swing at everything. it's not like he's gonna be an ob% machine or produce a decent ob% via suddenly learning to take 80+ walks a year. he's not much for swinging at absolute trash, but it's not like when he was missing last season he was fouling stuff off...he was straight up missing the pitch. at this point all i have in fontenot is a fan of his form, his improved work on his D, and i'm impressed at the amount of power he can produce out of his swing for such a little guy.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Pie proved what? that he needed playing time? 83 at bats? Not much to prove either way. Last year Pie's .267/.326/.437 in a part time role wasn't exactly stellar, but at least he got some time to play. He was a more than capable fill-in in LF and CF, and he's still only 25.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

Andres Blanco should start at SS and bat 8th, Theriot to the bench, and Fontenot to Iowa. That's what a real team would do. It ain't pretty, but Theriot's bat over Blanco's bat is not going to add more to the team than Blanco's defense over Theriot's defense... it's not even close.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

actually I believe they said he'd get to compete against Bruney... also read that Cubs never actually made an offer...too pricey and too much a luxury at the time he signed.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Aaron Heilman is not on the team and Kevin Gregg figured he can hide in the shadows of some Canucks. By the way Kevin, the beer is not all that it is cracked up to be.

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

last year has nothing to do with this year...plus some health would help...esp. with the starting staff. i think you can march out the same team as last year and get more wins. the amount of underachieving and "bad luck" was astounding at points. this is a 140m club. it's rarely sunk before the game starts.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

And the opposite side of the coin... Z has struggled and never become the consistent pitcher we expected. Dempster is a middle of the road starter. Lilly misses the start of the season. Wells looks like a good 4, is he more than that? Gorz/Marshall/Shark Boy/Silva nothing to get excited about. Bullpen features an inconsistent walk-machine closing, with mostly unproven kids at the other spots. Lineup is full of low contact, high k hitters. Almost every hitter is slow footed and plays mediocre to bad defense. 2nd base is a gaping hole. And the idea of moving Theriot to 2b when/if Castro is ready to man SS is idiotic. A team can't have both middle infielders without power. I'm thinking a 3rd place finish, well out of playoff contention. There are way too many guys who need to have a big rebound year to feel comfortable thinking this team is going to contend.

It was just reported on local NPR in Chicago, that Bud Selig is fighting the proposed "Cub Tax". He is such a tool anyway, but this whole thing will get changed around.

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

the same Selig that allegedly pushed the Cubs to stay in Arizona. Obviously, his owner buddies have called up and bitched about it and he has no choice but to side with the guys that got him elected. If it was the city of Arizona or the people of Arizona doing the bitching (and I'm sure some are), I would understand and support it. I'm not a big fan publicly funding stadiums myself. But when the bitching is coming from owners that already have their hands in the piggybank, it's a bit much.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Keep in mind that none of the hypocritical owners are against taxpayer funding. The part of the legislation that places a surcharge/tax on rental cars is perfectly fine with them. They just don't want a tax/surcharge on their Spring Training game tickets. I really hope that Ricketts has the nads to stand up to these scum bags (Selig included in this case). I know Ricketts is new, but why should he play nice? Reinsdorf didn't waste any time trying to stab him in the back. If Ricketts takes his team to Naples, Reinsdorf and the White Sox will be the ones in Arizona hurt most.

http://jimripley.freedomblogging.com/2010/02/17/major-league-baseball-t…
Arizona Diamondbacks representative Tom Dorn chided Mesa and the Cubs for its ballgame ticket surcharge and car rental tax solution. He proudly pointed out the Diamondbacks’ had avoided being a burden on others by getting the Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community to build a Cactus League stadium for them and the Colorado Rockies. Now that’s chutzpah or worse—from a team whose downtown Phoenix stadium was 71 percent publicly financed, including a quarter cent sales tax levied on taxpayers throughout the county, not just in Phoenix. We got ours. The heck with Mesa and the Cubs. Lawmakers were unimpressed as they noted that by playing on Indian community land, fan purchases would not be subject to sales taxes.
burn!

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

"Big League, Big Time" is a kick ass (imo) book on the subject. It starts out pretty dry going through the business of getting a team in Phoenix, but it picks up and pulls everything together once it finds it's pace. There's some great parts about how they built their initial team and the thought process behind it.

I am not really sure what to expect from this team coming into Spring Training and frankly I think that is a good thing. It is always nice to be the headline favorite to win the division or the NL, but in all seriousness, this team needs less attention from the national media as hard as that may come. I was listening to a local St. Louis radio station today and the radio personalities were bragging about being the favorites to win the NL Central. I thought about last year and what the "experts" were deeming the favorites. It is all relative to who stays healthy. I think talent for talent the Cubs and the Cardinals are fairly even, within reason, but it all really comes down to execution and health. Obviously the Cubs were a different team missing Ramirez for the majority of the season or at least at full production. I can go through each category and unbaisedly provide who is the favorite in each area. Here it goes: 1. Starting Pitching- This is a tough one because overall, I think that that Cubs have more depth, but I think that when Carpenter and Wainwright are healthy, they are as effective 1-2 punch as any in baseball. Edge = Cardinals. 2. 1st Base-Derrek Lee is excellent and a fan favorite, but Pujols is the best in the game and has really suprised me with his effort on the defensive side of the game. Edge = Cardinals. 3. 2nd Base-This appears to be a revolving door for both teams with Fontenot and Baker fighting for playing time with maybe Andres Blanco providing relief when needed and the Cardinals having Julio Lugo and Skip Schumaker while being linked to aquiring Felipe Lopez. Edge: Even. 4. Shortstop-Brendon Ryan is anticipated to be missing all of the spring after having surgery on a bum wrist. This kid is not afraid to get dirty and his a grinder. He is plus defensively and will put on a clinic for Theriot, but I am still siding with Theriot offensively. Overall, Theriot has been more consistent and has proven himself to be an everyday player, regardless ofthe controversy. Edge: Cubs. 5. 3rd Base-Aramis should be able to come back from the shoulder injury that plauged him for the better part of 2009. The Cardinals are looking at utilizing David Freese and Joe Mather has appearently been preparing to get a look this spring. Overall, this is the one area that may be the achilles heal for the Cardinals this year. Edge: Cubs. 6. Left Field-This position should be interesting for the Cubs. Soriano is coming off one of the worst years in his career (if not the worst). He will be coming into spring training with a repaired knee (hopefully healthy) and knowing that he will be a middle of the order guy. Holliday will be still recovering from the postseason hangover. Both guys have the potential to put up the numbers, but Holliday in my opinion is the better hitter and a slight edge defensively. Edge: Cardinals. 7. Center Field-Maryln Bryd is an interesting pickup for the Cubs. There is a lot of skeptisism regarding the splits from last year. He is not an above average fielder, but an average to slightly above average hitter that will provide some power and I think show some similar power at Wrigley as he did at Arlington. I also think this guy will tear it up at Busch Staduim. Rasmus enjoyed a fantastic year for the Cardinals in 2009 and I think this kid will grow into a solid defensive player. Edge: Even. 8. Right Field-Ryan Ludwick will only benefit from hitting behind Holliday and Pujols. I look for this guy to really produce in 2010, but I still think he is limited with the glove. I have predicted that Fukudome will have his best year of his career with the Cubs this year. He will have a defined role, hopefully splitting time with a healthy Xavier Nady, and providing a high on-base year in the two hole consistantly. However, the power potential of Ludwick is hard to overcome. Edge: Cardinals. 9. Catcher- Yadier Molina is probably the least talked about best catchers in the league. This guy continues to just make Dave Duncan look good. He knows how to handle a pitching staff and is one of the hardest hitters to strike out in all of baseball. He is exceptional at throwing runners on base and is a leader on the field. This is a big year for Soto and could really make or break the Cubs lineup in so many ways. The Cubs are in desperate need of an additional RBI guy and Soto can provide that, but he will need to stay healthy and be more selective. Edge: Cardinals. 10. Bullpen-The Cardinals have a nice healthy balance of lefty/righty combinations with Miller and Reyes and being veterans, these guys are a nice to have, but the Cubs have more depth and more lights out type of pitchers. In the end it comes down to getting guys out and the Cubs bullpen is probably more erratic, but in the end, I think in 2010, the Cubs will be more effective. Edge: Cubs. 11. Bench-This is one area that will be more or less determined in Spring for both teams. The Cubs have some interesting non-roster invitees and some guys that will get a look this spring. The Cubs have a deeper, more talented farm system than St. Louis and this will provide more options for them in the event they want to make a move. Edge: Cubs.

[ ]

In reply to by thedirtbag

cards are definitely the team to watch. i agree on your 2nd base assessment, but i'm sure that's one that would divide people. cubs have a great core of pitching to choose from (depth), while the cards have 2 guys better than any of the 3-4 above-average guys the cubs have. i hope the pen can keep from leading the league in walks, but at least it seems they have a decent shot of being near the top in Ks.

[ ]

In reply to by thedirtbag

Ok...but 1)Schumaker, in his first year of ever playing 2B, hit .303/.364/.393, scoring 85 runs, hit 34 doubles, and wasn't a butcher in the field. Fontenot and Blanco aren't going to do that...and Baker, who I like, hit a little above his station last season. 2)Franklin, in a season and a half as the Cards' closer, has 55 saves, and was lights out last season. That's got to be an edge to the Cardinals, yeah?

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

What are Fountainout/Baker's career splits in a platoon? I bet they're better than .364/.393. Theriot can do that and everyone else here is agreed that it's not good enough to be a second basemen anymore.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

TRN-Agreed on the platoon. If I thought the Cubs would platoon those two, I'd have brought that up as well. I just don't think they are that smart. I went by last season, and Theriot did not do better than .364/.393 last season. Fontenot:.272/.348/.435 Baker:.285/.346/.543

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

1) Agreed that Schumaker was simply better than our second base options last year, but Baker may have hit .288 last year, but also had 15 doubles in 226 ABs. Schumaker had over 500 ABs. If Baker can get a full time ABs, he will be pretty close in the power numbers to Schumaker. I think Schumaker will be more selective and have a higher OBP. 2) Let's not forget Franklin blew 8 saves in 25 oportunities in 2008. Franklin will not be as effective this year as he was last year. I feel that the Cubs have more depth in the starting pitching area and long relief. I think that their set-up men are pretty even. Franklin had a solid year last year, but Marmol had an even better year in '08. All things considered, if both are at their best, Marmol is the better option here.

gets $5M instead of $7M... Player Wins: C. Ross, C. Hart Owner Wins: W. Rodriguez, B. Bruney Theriot is at a disadvantage by not being named Cody, although maybe 4-letter first names are an advantage. interesting fact, according to Maury Brown at Biz of Baseball arb players that sign multi-year deals can't be used as comps.

From Bruce Miles: "Z also revealed that he's scrapped the cutter and will concentrate on the sinker, slider and "high fastball." The sinker is his best pitch, as it comes in heavy, like a cannonball. He also said most of his mistakes last year came on the cutter." http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/3473

Good to see Lilly recovering quickly, if the Cubs want to be at all relevant this year they need him.

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.