Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Getting to Know Your Obscure Cubs: Starlin Castro

As the top prospect on a lot of Cubs' prospect lists this offseason, Starlin Castro isn't all that obscure. But my idea for this little series of articles was to focus on some of the less obvious names that could impact the team in 2010 beyond the usual suspects. And it might not be right out of spring training, but somewhere potentially down the winding road. And even though Castro has been hyped up quite a bit lately, there aren't many of us that have gotten to see him on a regular basis, so let's dive a little deeper into the almost 20-year old phenom. Of course, I haven't seen him play myself besides a few video clips, but that won't stop me from pretending I KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT EVERYTHING, for it's not the Internet if you can't pass yourself off as a faux expert.

Castro was signed in 2006 out of the Dominican Republic at age 16 and played in the Dominican Summer League the following year with good results (299/371/371). At age 18, he found his way to Arizona and improved to 311/364/464 in the AZL and started to place on some of the prospect lists. The Cubs under scouting director Tim Wilken have obviously stressed the middle of the diamond and with Castro, Hak-Ju Lee, Darwin Barney, Logan Watkins, Junior Lake and Ryan Flaherty, they could afford a few risks with their promotions. Castro was the benefactor thanks to his coachability and got the bump to Hi-A Daytona to start off 2009. He managed it well and as a 19-year old earned a mid-season All-Star selection in the Florida State League and then a promotion to Double A Tennessee. He finished the year at 299/342/392 between the two levels, all before his 20th birthday. The Cubs then rewarded him with a nod to the Arizona Fall League where he put up a  376/398/475 slash line in the friendly hitting environmet and played in the "Rising Stars" game. This was enough to earn him a non-roster invite to the big league club and talk that he'll push Ryan Theriot out of a job.

The Cubs prospect hype machine has been at full throttle with Castro since last year and I've heard comparisions from Shawon Dunston to Edgar Renteria to Derek Jeter. Arizona Phil's comparision may have been my favorite:

Castro has been everything the Cubs hoped Ronny Cedeno would be, but never was.

Well if he can manage to not overslide second base to end a game on a walk, I can only envision great things.

The kid obviously has a great set of tools and his ability to not only hold his own, but even excel at times against older players is always a good sign for any prospect. Tim Wilken and some other reports rave about his wrist action and he's shown an ability to hit line drives all over the field while being able to handle breaking balls that are often the kryptonite to young hitters. Defensively, reports are that he has great range, soft hands, good instincts and a very strong throwing arm at shorstop, strong enough to probably play third base or even the outfield if necessary.

On the negative side, no one is sure how much power he'll be able to generate. He is 6-1" and allegedly just 160 pounds and in theory could fill out some and drive the ball out a little more often. Kevin Goldstein at BP - despite giving him a 5-star rating - worries that his approach and line-drive swing won't produce much power. And despite the excellent range he's shown at shorstop so far, he did commit 39 errors last year between the two levels. His speed and instincts on the basepaths seem to be merely average at best. He hasn't drawn a lot of walks,(6.76% BB/PA), but hasn't struck out much either(11.26% K/PA).

As for Castro's 2010 prospects, there's something to be said for hitting well relative to your age and then there's actually hitting well. Castro's career minor league numbers are 301/354/403 (757 OPS) and 299/342/392 (734 OPS) between two levels last season (not including the AFL of course). That's not much different than what Ryan Theriot did once he scrapped switch hitting in the minors(and although older, Theriot played more games in Double and Triple A) and the idea is to improve the position. Yeah, Castro's defense is suppose to be a plus over Theriot's, but once again let's actually see him do it over a sustained period in the upper minors than theorizing that he will. The kid will turn 20 in March, there's no reason to start his service time clock without a little more certainty that he can handle the major leagues. He sort of leaped up the prospect rankings last season, who is to say he won't fall right back down (anyone remember Brian Dopirak?). Let him work on his eye at the plate, let him see more quality pitching at either Double or Triple A, and if an opportunity arises where Theriot, Baker or Fontenot gets hurt or underperforms, give him a shot, but I'm not seeing how he'd help the team much in 2010 over what the Cubs have.

You can see some video clips of Castro over at Wiklifield if you're interested.

Comments

[ ]

In reply to by Cubster

Barney might have a better chance to make the roster out of spring training as a utility infielder and beat out Andres Blanco, but I don't see him getting much starting time. His offensive numbers are worse than Castro's (and Theriot for that matter) and he's been older for his leagues. I know Phil has talked up his defense, but he wouldn't be much more of a lateral move at best. Obviously if some injuries happen, Barney could get a chance. Castro has a lot more upside and if he continues to show progress this year and can impress Lou in spring training, I would expect him to get the nod. Barwin is more obscure, but I don't see him having much of an impact with the team. Castro could conceviably be the starting shortstop out of camp (longshot) or somewhere down the line in 2010, I don't see that path being open to Barney myself.

You've got his Dominican and AZL stats as the same. Vinny Castilla like coincidince or CTR-C ,CTR-V error? I'm pretty much in agreement that he's not likely to offer more than Theriot will at short. Just like Theriot's not likely to offer more than Blanco, maybe more than Barney. Barney out-hit Theriot at AA while being two years younger, and 23 is not old for AA or AAA.

there is a weird as hell amount of a.blanco love on TCR for a guy who hits like neifi perez without the doubles power. just because the guy is young-ish doesn't mean he's going to suddenly get better with his skillset. it's possible, but he's got a crappy swing and a bad eye to match it. it's a shame he can't at least pick a pitch/zone/etc. rather than flailing at everything for cruddy contact.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

But Blanco is a bonafide major league defensive shortstop, and Theriot is a patchwork fill-in, defensively. In the ideal situation, Theriot would either be a great utility guy or an inexpensive starting second baseman on a team with a power hitting SS. I would love to have Theriot available off the bench to PH, double switch, spot start a couple of times a year, etc. The real problem, for Theriot's future in the majors, is that now that he's approaching $3 mil per year, he's no longer cheap. And since he consistently hits 20-30 points lower the second half of every season, he isn't that appealing, since he doesn't do a whole heck of a lot other than hit singles the rest of the year. His walk rate dropped. He doesn't hit for enough extra bases. Forget trying to hit hr's, a .360ish slugging percentage is a joke. He's also not a good basestealer, at least for being a weak hitting middle infielder. Throw in the mediocre at best defense at SS and there are a lot of negatives. The only pluses for Theriot is he's a pesky contact guy, and there isn't a boatload of talented starting 2b or SS in the majors right now. Theriot's lucky he's playing now instead of at the peak of the steroid era. I could tolerate a guy like Theriot at a bargain basement price, but his lack of productivity/talent works against him now that he's about to get a big raise.

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

2009- Derek Jeter:.334/.406/.465, 18 HR, 66 RBI 2008- Jimmy Rollins:.277/.349/.437, 11 HR, 59 RBI 2007- Julio Lugo: .237/.294/.349, 8 HR, 73 RBI 2006- David Eckstein: .292/.350/.344, 2HR, 23 RBI 2005- Juan Uribe: .252/.301/.412, 16 HR, 71 RBI 2004- Orlando Cabrera: .294/.320/.465, 6 HR,31RBI 2003- Alex Gonzalez: .256/.313/.443, 18 HR, 77 RBI 2002- David Eckstein:.293/.363/.388, 8HR, 63RBI 2001- Tony Womack: .266/.307/.345, 3HR, 30 RBI 2000- Derek Jeter: .339/.416/.481, 15HR, 73 RBI 1999- Derek Jeter: .349/.438/.552, 24HR,102 RBI 1998- Derek Jeter: .324/.384/.481, 19HR, 84 RBI 1997- Edgar Renteria: .277/.327/.340, 4HR,52RBI 1996- Derek Jeter: .314/.370/.430, 10HR, 78RBI 1995- Jeff Blauser: .211/.319/.341, 12HR, 31RBI 1993- Tony Fernandez: .306/.361/.442, 4HR, 50RBI Ok...so not taking into account steals...defense..etc..I'm bored already...lol...but here's a few years worth..

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

Submitted by The E-Man on Fri, 02/19/2010 - 9:34am. I love Blanco. He is a "real" shortstop. But, he would be an asset on a team that is loaded in the other 7 spots in a lineup. We did not have that last year. And, this year remains to be seen. It would be interesting to see what the SS's on WS Champs over the last 20 years look like did at the plate. ============================================ E-MAN: Andres Blanco was a Royals Top 10 prospect 2003-04, played in the Futures Game in 2004, and made his MLB debut with KC at age 20. But then his career was sidetracked by injury in 2006 & 2007 (torn labrum in his left shoulder, torn hamstring, and knee surgery), such that the Royals outrighted him to minors post-2007. Blanco then became a Rule 55 minor league free-agent, and signed a minor league deal with the Cubs. He played OK at AAA Iowa in 2008, but really got his career back on track in 2009, hitting 304/353/474 at Iowa before gettting called-up by the Cubs. He hit as many home runs in 2009 as he had in his entire pro career pre-2009. Then he went down to Venezuela post-2009 and hit 291/353/453, while finishing tied for 4th in the VWL in stolen bases. So apparently his legs are OK. And he's developing some power. And he has always had a solid glove (he was compared to Omar Vizquel by Baseball America when he was coming up through the Royals system). And he's still only 25.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Ok. The average ERA for a pitcher in the PCL last season was 4.50, and the league average line was .272/.341/.418. In the International League, it was 3.91 ERA, and .262/.328/.395. The league HR average per team in the PCL was 124.19, in the Int'l League, 107.4. Aren't those numbers fairly significant? My point is this: Blanco hit .304/.353/.474 at Iowa last season. He has never, ever approached those numbers: .256/.318/.326 career minor league numbers. Even if he has improved, and is coming into his prime, is it reasonable to expect him to hit .290/.350/.400 in the majors? Heck...I'd be surprised at .270/.330/.350, which still stinks.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

I thought Blanco played for the Iowa Cubs last year? Anyway, who said he has to have a .750 OPS? Theriot has never had a .750 OPS (.712 OPS last year). A .700 OPS Blanco is a better player than Theriot was last year.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

There are all kinds of hyped up rookies that come up on other teams that do just fine under pressure. The Cubs have done a lousy job of bringing up position players because they bring up lousy position players. Castle even notes that Felix Pie burned up AAA and still blew up at Wrigley. That had more to do with the fact he couldn't hit than any pressure. It's not like he raked under less media scrutiny in Baltimore. What would Castle have done with Pie? Had him bake for six more years at AAA? I don't really buy the argument about not being able to play under a media spotlight. Baseball players don't devote their lives to the sport and then freak out because they're afraid of crowds and the media. They love the limelight, the girls, and the nice hotels, for gawd's sake.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

I agree strongly with your second sentence, Old, that the Cubs have needed better-quality prospects, which I think we're starting to see. I don't recall Pie burning up AAA or any minor-league level. His first year at Iowa his numbers in 623 PAs were .283/.341/.451/.792, and if I remember correctly he spent most of the season around .250 before he put together a good August. His gaudy numbers at Iowa the following season don't resemble his numbers at any level before or since, and are misleading, I think, because he had a couple of deep slumps that year (2007), but he was with Chicago when he had them. He was always going to need to marinate a long time as a hitter. I don't know how the Cubs could have handled him differently. There are a lot of rules (like Rule 5) that prevent a team from hanging on to slow-maturing players.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

FWIW, Soto said he only had success hitting in the minors when he stopped thinking about all the advice his was getting from coaches and just went to the plate with "see the ball, hit the ball" in his mind. Pie said he had trouble hitting after he came up with the Cubs because they had him trying new things and he lost his timing. And both coaches involved, Gerald Perry (who coached Pie in Winter Ball two years as well as being the Cubs hitting coach) and Von Joshua (AAA and Cubs 2009) were eventually fired--Von Joshua being offered his job back with Iowa. What I'm wondering is how a coach like Joshua fits in if Rudy Jaramillo is successful this year. If Rudy can help hitters hit then it follows that his method should help coaches coach. And if I'm the Cubs, then I want my minor leaguers getting schooled in the Jaramillo approach earlier rather than later.

http://baseballprospectus.com/chat/chat.php?chatId=707 Cubs info I found...
Yeong is very intriguing. Smooth easy arm with projection, already 90-92 mph as a teenager. Rhee really was one of the better arms in the Midwest League when healthy, so I'm looking forward to his return.
Dennis (LA): Does Andrew Cashner have the upside of Kerry Wood, either as a starter or a reliever?
Kevin Goldstein: Absolutely not. But that's not a knock on Cashner. I don't need more than two hands to count the numbers of pitcher since Wood who have equaled his upside.
Kyran (Boulder, CO): Who's your surprise team - in a good or bad way - in MLB this year?
Kevin Goldstein: Good: Washington. Not in a oh my god they won 85 games way or anything, just in that they won't be a joke.
Bad: Cubs -- I just think that window has closed, and it's a roster filled with players on the downswing.

Bruce Miles on Lilly:
Lefty Ted Lilly pitched from flat ground today and said he felt great. That was the good news for the Cubs. The possible bad news is that he's headed to the doc to have his right knee checked. An MRI is likely for Lilly, who reported the knee being "some" sore. Last season, Lilly had the left knee scoped while on the DL for shoulder inflammation. The shoulder ended up being scoped in November. "Today I ran on it," Ted said. "It's not something I'm going to make a big deal out of. What I'm going to do today is just have it looked at. (An MRI) might be a good idea." Lilly threw with some authority today, using a pitching motion and doing more than just playing catch.
http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/3475

More from Bruce Miles/Herald: Not sure what they'll do if Nady pulls a hamstring (in his elbow)? Some people don't have palmaris longus tendon's (congenitally absent) which is the most common source of graft in Tommy John UCL elbow ligament reconstructions. In these case, they have to use alternative source/sites for the graft. Hence achilles or hamstrings are options.
--Outfielder Xavier Nady is here, and he was hitting. Nady is coming off the second Tommy John surgery of his career. He said his days to throw are Monday, Wednesday and Friday, so we'll look for that tomorrow. He also said they used his Achilles' tendon for the first TJS, back in 2001. This time, they used the hamstring. So Nady is running out of parts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTzLVIc-O5E

Can someone remind me? If you get called up to the majors, then sent back down, do you get the MLB minimum for the rest of the year?

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Submitted by The Real Neal on Thu, 02/18/2010 - 4:05pm. Can someone remind me? If you get called up to the majors, then sent back down, do you get the MLB minimum for the rest of the year? ================================== REAL NEAL: A player who is sent to the minors on optional assignment gets whatever his minor league split salary is (at least $65K), presuming he has a split salary in his contract. And "auto-renewal" (pre-arbitration) players almost always have minor league split salaries included in the contracts. (Jeff Samardzija is pre-arbitration but he has no minor league split--he gets paid $2.5M in 2010 whether he is on an MLB 25-man roster or a minor league roster, but he is an exception because he signed a multi-year deal that included a "no trade" clause and no minor league "split" salary after the first season). In the case of Starlin Castro (for example), he is likely making about $15,000 this year (boosted to $18,000 if he gets promoted to AAA Iowa). If the Cubs select his contract and add him to the 25-man roster (and 40-man roster) at some point this season, Castro would get the MLB minimum salary ($400K, or $67,000 per month, for as long as he is in the big leagues) while he is on the 25-man roster, and then if he is subsequently optioned to the minors, he'd get the $65K split minimum ($10K+ per month) while on optional assignment, because he would have accrued MLB Service Time before he got optioned out. (Players with no MLB service time who are on a 40-man roster for the first time--like Adduci, W. Castillo, Dolis, Gaub, and Parker--get the minimum $32,500 minor league split while on optional assignment in 2010, as long as they don't accrue any MLB Service Time). Another thing to remember about Starlin Castro (and this is true for Andrew Cashner and Jay Jackson, too) is that if he is added to the Cubs 40-man roster during the 2010 season and then gets optioned to the minors later in the season, he would get four minor league options (as long as they are used prior to completing five "full seasons"), because Castro (like Cashner and J. Jackson, and Rafael Dolis, too) has completed only one "full season" through the 2009 season. So not wanting to have Castro accrue MLB Service Time might be a reason not to recall him in 2010, but any concern about starting his "option clock" ticking earlier than normal probably is a bit misplaced.

Are Dominican dates of birth generally suspect, or was that just a problem with a few players? If Castro were about to turn 22 instead almost 20 would that change anyone's opinion of his upside?

http://muskat.mlblogs.com/archives/2010/02/218_new_improved_geo.html
The young catcher, who lost about 40 pounds this offseason, hit eight or nine batting practice home runs. "The ball was jumping off his bat really well and he was getting through the ball really easy," Piniella said. "When you lose weight, especially in the middle like he has, it's much easier to get those hips through the ball."

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

...or he's a clubhouse diabetes? Is that a thing?

Go Marquette...#19 Pittsburgh in town tonight. Big game for our NCAA chances...

fwiw...MLB "Hot Stove" did their team previews tonight. they had the cubs 1-4 set in as z/dumpster/lilly/wells with a pool for the 5th slot being silva/ninja/gorz. looks like marshall might be solidly pen-bound if any research was done on these predicted rotations. still too early to tell...

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

Submitted by Charlie on Fri, 02/19/2010 - 8:10am. Does it annoy anyone else that Marshall has the best track record out of any of them, yet is the most frequently discounted player? I wouldn't have a problem with using any of Marshall, Gorzo, or Ninja (though I wonder if Ninja shouldn't start the year at AAA)--play the young guys, see what they got; forget about Silva. He's a long reliever until he proves otherwise or gets released/traded. ================================ CHARLIE: I agree. Sean Marshall would probably be the best option for the #5 starter slot until Lilly returns. But Piniella thinks Marshall is best-suited to work out of the bullpen as the #2 lefty, so for Marshall to get consideration for a starting gig, Jeff Samardzija, Mike Parisi, and Carlos Silva will have to struggle, AND either John Gaub or James Russell will have to have a strong camp and make the Opening Day 25-man roster, UNLESS Lou is willing to go with just one lefty in the pen until Lilly returns. (BTW, sfter a bad first outing, Russell was "lights out," easily the best lefty reliever in the AFL).

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

The Cubs didn't want Silva, Neal, as I'm sure you know. They just used him to get back some of the Bradley money. If he stinks, they'll pay him $1 million per inning, like they did Vizcaino last year, and release him after 16 innings.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

yet another reason there is no such thing as a 3+ million dollar manager. get a lineup jockey who can keep the locker room chill and spend the extra 2+ million on some who will actually touch a baseball.

***He is 6-1" and allegedly just 160 pounds and in theory could fill out some and drive the ball out a little more often.*** There's still hope... I believe Sammy and Barry were about the same size at 19 too.. and look how many bombs they creamed!

[ ]

In reply to by CincyKid

Submitted by CincyKid on Fri, 02/19/2010 - 9:35am. ***He is 6-1" and allegedly just 160 pounds and in theory could fill out some and drive the ball out a little more often.*** There's still hope... I believe Sammy and Barry were about the same size at 19 too.. and look how many bombs they creamed! ======================================== CINCY KID: Starlin Castro weighed 150 when he was signed as a 16-year old in 2006, but he was listed at 190 by the Cubs at the start of Spring Training last year. No question he has added some bulk since I first saw him at Fitch Park in March 2008.

was today, decision expected tomorrow.

fuck them. Trying to get tickets to Angels vs. Cubs and everytime I get through says it can't process request because of high volume.

Recent comments

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.