Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Game Thread / Cubs @ Mets

Cubs Mets
Theriot, SS #Reyes, SS
Baker, 3B #Castillo, 2B
Lee, 1B Wright, 3B
Byrd. CF Bay, LF
Nady, RF Francouer, RF
Soriano, LF *Davis, 1B
Soto, C Barajas, C
*Fontenot, 2B #Pagan, CF
*Gorzelanny, P Santana, P

Good news is the Cubs can split the series with the win tonight, bad news is they're still the Cubs. AmIrite? Okay, the actual bad news is that it's Johan vs. Gorzelanny.

Comments

So apparently the new lineup against southpaws lasted all of one game. Lou is nothing but consistent in his inconsistency.

two more hits tonight for Starlin Castro including a dooble, single, a walk and two runs scored Josh Vitters went 3 for 4 including two HR's, 3 runs scored and 4 rbi's

[ ]

In reply to by Cubster

Nice to see Vitters wake up a bit. I am starting to think he is just a streaky hitter and scouts' impression of him are based entirely on whether he is on a hot or a cold streak when they see him. He first gained prominence by dominating some HS exhibition tournament, as I recall - 4 years later, it looks like he just happened to be hot that week.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

I googled "streak hitter" and came up with a lot of all-stars, from current Mets Reyes, Wright and Beltran to Ichiro, A-Rod and Willie Mays. It may depend on what you do when you're hot. Vitters had a streak last May where he hit 8 home runs in 10 games (without any two-homer games) and 12 for the month. If he's waking up, that's good for Daytona, a team that is below .500 and lagging way behind Tennessee (12-2, 6 wins in a row) and Peoria (10-5, 7 in a row). Burke may be waking up also, and Ridling is due back from Mesa rehab any day. Even asleep, Vitters is hitting .283.

Actually, the Smokies swept a double-header and Castro went a combined 4 for 7 with 2 doubles and a walk. He now has 2 hits in eight out of his last nine games. He's now hitting .404 and slugging ~.650. Robinson Chirinos is also just plain raking in Tennessee (.351/.381/.676). He's 25, so somewhat elderly for the level, but as a catcher who has really caught fire the past year plus, his stock might rise enough to be prime trade bait.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

Absolutely Charlie. You made a great point with respect to Chirinos's ability to play multiple infield positions as well as catch. If he continues to hit and does so after promotion to Iowa, he's the type of player who really adds flexibility to a major league roster. I gather he's a pretty decent defensive infielder and has made good strides behind the plate.

[ ]

In reply to by Ross_Barnes

I was thinking that a former ROY would be prime trade bait. The Cubs don't seem to like Soto's defense or his handling of pitchers, and that situation isn't going to improve. The better he hits, the more tradeable he gets. (I know that last sentence confuses many people, who tend to think that playing poorly makes you tradeable.) Not for Chirinos's sake necessarily. I've thought that the catcher of the future for the Cubs is Castillo, ever since I saw him use that cannon in spring training when he picked a runner off second. Never mind how Castillo hits, it's a defensive position. Koyie Hill can't hit and he started 69 games last year for Piniella. I really have no idea what kind of catcher Chirinos is, although the reports have been good. Same with Robinson.

Was reading over at Desipio and this kinda sums up my feelings on the Zambrano situation...
He was good enough to be their opening day starter, and then after three good starts in a row they told him to go sit on a stool in the dugout and help Jeff Samuldjian braid his hair or whatever they do down there while the real players are playing in the game. I can tell you what. If my foreman came to me and told me that four people who aren’t as good at my job as I am are going to do it so I can go do something less important, I’d have shown plenty of maturity. I would have maturely told him to go fuck himself.

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

"He is what he is... very high potential but not nearly consistent enough to hang with the top aces." He is NOT an ace. Pure and simple. He has moments when he pitches very well. So do other #3 starting pitchers in the league. Just because he was our opening day pitcher does not make him an ace. At the beginning of the year, Lou thought he was the best of what was available to start. In my opinion, with Lilly back, he is the club's #3 starter, behind Lilly and Dempster.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Call me Real Neal when any Cubs starter has 8 consecutive seasons of pitching with an ERA under 4.00 and has a 60%+ winning % as a starter. Your idiocy of mentioning his ERA two weeks into the season, as if it means anything, is the best you can come up with? Like i said why aren't you dry humping the shit out of Aramis Ramirez and screaming for his removal from the lineup? At least be consistent with your stupidity.

[ ]

In reply to by MikeC

Yes, and Sammy Sosa is going to hit 60 HR's this year. Quit living in the past. Zambrano is a primadonna with back-up dancer prodcutivity. He is about 10 times as likely to be a dominant setup man than his is likely to be a starter worth $18 million. The Cubs #1 pitching need right now is a setup man. They're putting their biggest 'name' in that role, because they think he can do it and the other guys have out pitched him (and don't walk 4 batters per 9 trying to impress everyone with their breaking pitches). You get so fixated on these players, wishcasting that they're going to return to their form of 7 years ago. That happens about as often as a guy comes bak from shoulder surgery to become an effective starter, or one is moved from closer to become a teams #1 starter. P.S. Aramis got benched yesterday.

whatever the 'real' reason[s] for zombie's reassignment, the fact is that he can now impact several games a week, for better or worse, instead of one every five days...I'm surprised @ the level of support for his lackluster record as a starter, let alone a contracted 'ace'...he is an immature & undependable, albeit pysically talented, overpaid veteran who has either plateaued or regressed @ a stage where he should be in his prime - instead of a team leader he is, at best, an enigma...

Meanwhile, down on the farm; from the Smokies website... 'The two wins improve Tennessee's record to 12-2 this season, the best in all of minor league baseball and the fewest losses in any level of baseball.'

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Me: "See what he did, kids? That's kind of an unwritten rule in baseball, you shouldn't do that." Kid: "But isn't that the guy that did steroids?" Me: "Yeah, that's okay, though, you do your suspension and collect your paycheck. Just don't walk across the mound."

I look at this situation with Zambrano differently than a lot of people. I don't look at it as a demotion or a punishment. The bullpen is way underperforming and the Cubs feel that Zambrano can help by taking on the 8th inning duties. I don't think he's going to the pen because he can't handle it as starter. He hasn't had a good start to the year, but regardless, he has the stuff to help in the pen. As far as I'm concerned, the only thing important about the move is, does it help the Cubs win. I think it does. I also think that Zambrano can be moved out of the rotation, at least in the short term, and not hurt the rotation much. I also think the move will significantly improve the bullpen.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob Richardson

Not really. Z pitched in a high leverage situation for all six of his innings on Tuesday night. Pitching well is pitching well. If you have a 3 ERA, it doesn't really make much difference how you get that 3 ERA - unless you're being brought in in the middle of the inning with runners on. I'd rather have Z walk in a guy than Silva give up a grand slam with the bases loaded after they try to cleanup a Grabow mess. You want your best relievers to pitch with 1 and 2 run leads. How many guys they walk to become a best reliever, shouldn't really play a big role in it.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob Richardson

No, I am just explaining that thinking that there are certain components of allowing runs (like walks) that are more damaging in later innings than other components (hits and home runs) is incorrect. We need a setup man, we have no setup man. Do you really think that Silva or Gorzellany is going to be a better setup man than Zambrano?

[ ]

In reply to by Rob Richardson

I don't think Gorzelanny makes sense because he's left handed. The bullpen is kind of left handed heavy already with Marshall, Russell, and Grabow. Silva doesn't make sense because he's throwing really well in a starting role right now. True, he could fall apart at any minute, but then is that the guy you want in the set-up role. Zambrano has not had a good start to the year, but there's a good chance he'll at least be decent. Finally, I don't think it makes sense to move either Gorz or Silva to the bullpen because they are currently being used as trade bait. You want to keep showcasing them in the hopes of finding a trade partner willing to part with a good set-up man. At least I think that's the plan.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

That already has been answered. You move Gorzelanny to the pen, send Russell to the minors, activate Lilly, send Sharkface to the minors and call up a RH reliever, or now just sign Juan Cruz since he won't cost much. Either Gorz can get big league hitters out or he can't. He seems to do fine in innings 1-5, which includes getting right handed hitters out. But he seems to run out of gas, which makes him a perfect relief candidate. Z can throw 120 pitches. And he's the opening day starter, supposed ace of the staff, making $18 mil per year. He's not truly an ace, but he does eat innings. You don't move your opening day starter to the pen as as a setup guy, period, especially after only two weeks. And when Z struggles, it's generally early, which makes putting him in the pen not a genius move. It's poor managing.

Curious about the no-fly on Cruz's personality issue comment, because he seems like a fit. Though would we even get first crack? Would the O's get first crack? What a nightmare. Wuertz would be a fit. Maybe Hendry will send Vitters for him.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Submitted by Rob G. on Sun, 04/25/2010 - 2:20pm. he'd have to go through the AL first and then the NL by reverse standings. =============================================== ROB G: In the case of Release Waivers and Outright Waivers, the waiver procedure does not require teams in the player's own league to pass on the player before a team in the other league can be awarded a claim. Getting "waived out of your own league" before clubs in the other league can win a claim only applies to Trade Waivers (August-September). Also, through the first 30 days of the MLB regular season, the previous season's standings are used to determine waiver claimm priority. After that, the standings as they are the morning the player clears waivers apply. And in the case of Release Waivers, if a club makes a claim it is responsible for 100% of the players remaining salary. But if a club waits until the player clears waivers before signing the player, the player's former club is responsible for most of the player's remaining salary, while the new club USUALLY only has to pay the MLB pro-rated mininum salary (the exception being if the player gets a new contract that exceeds the value of his termination pay, as happened with Reed Johnson in 2008). And in the case of Release Waivers, a player can refuse a waiver claim and become a free-agent, and if he does that, his former team still owes him 100% of his remaining salary. So there really is no point in claiming a player off Release Waivers. You just wait until he becomes a FA, and then sign him (as the Cubs did with Reed Johnson and Jim Edmonds in 2008). The only problem is that you might have to compete with other clubs for the released player's services, and if that is the case, you might have to offer the released player a contract extention. But that is pretty rare.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.