Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Cubs Beat Rockies in 11; Zambrano Getting Recast

Aramis Ramirez blasted a one-out, two-run homer in the bottom of the 11th to lead the Cubs to a 4-2 win over the Rockies Monday night at Wrigley. Lou Piniella's post-game press conference, the main topic of which was a player who never even appeared in the game, was at least as newsworthy as the main event.

First about the game:

The Cubs had leads of 1-0 and 2-1 courtesy of run-scoring singles by Aramis Ramirez and Koyie Hill, before the Rockies tied the game in the 8th inning on a single and three walks, two by John Grabow and one by Carlos Marmol. Marmol redeemed himself by inducing an inning-ending double play, nicely initiated by Starlin Castro, to preserve the tie. 

From the ninth through the eleventh, Marmol and Sean Marshall held the Rockies scoreless and hitless while fanning seven (!!!).

Castro led off the bottom of the 11th with a single, his third hit of the night. After Derrek Lee lined out to Troy Tulowitzki, Ramirez pounded the game-winning shot halfway up the bleachers in left-center field. It was Ramirez's first HR in 108 AB's, dating all the way back to April 15th in Milwaukee.

The failing of the Cub bullpen—primarily the failure of Grabow—cost Randy Wells a victory on a night when the righty threw a career-high 116 pitches and limited the visitors to 1 run on 7 hits over 6 2/3 innings. He also pitched himself out of a potentially disastrous fourth inning, striking out Ian Stewart and Clint Barmes to get out of a bases loaded, one out jam.

About the press conference and events leading up to it...

When Grabow took the mound to begin the eighth inning, Kasper and Brenly pointed out that only Carlos Marmol was warming up in the pen. Our 8th Inning Man, Carlos Zambrano, was nowhere to be seen...at least not until the tv cameras found him sitting in the dugout alongside Geovany Soto.

In his post-game meeting with the press, Piniella explained that Zambrano's role in the bullpen would be changing. Piniella, as quoted by Sullivan in the Tribune:

We thought the outcome (of moving Z to the bullpen) would be different. He's not as comfortable in the bullpen pitching short. So we're going to use him in a different role, give him some stamina, build up his arm.

Piniella said his lefties, Grabow and Marshall, would serve as setup men and in answer to a direction question, Lou finally said that Zambrano would rejoin the starting rotation "down the road, if need be."

I guess that means long relief for now. Thing is, Cub starters are averaging better than six innings per outing so it doesn't seem like there is much "long relief" duty to be had. Unless we're talking about mop-up duty in those lost cause games, in which case I'd say that having an $18MM-a-year Mop-Up Man seems a lot sillier than having an $18MM-a-year Setup Guy.

Like just about everything involving this team this year, the Zambrano situation should be fascinating, if not actually enjoyable, to watch.

Comments

Z stuff is weird, but before you give up on your $18M pitcher Cubs, take a look at Zito in San Fran. It does sound like he's just on his way back to the rotation as soon as they can make that happen. Marmol pitched on his 3rd straight day and went 1+. And Marshall has gone 2 straight. Wonder who would get the save opp Tuesday night if it comes to that?

reached base 3 times with 2 SB's out of the leadoff spot for the O's... here's to small miracles

from the Daily Herald...
"He told me today there may be a chance to go back to the rotation," Z said. "We'll see how everything works in the next outings for me. Tomorrow will be a big day in the bullpen for me. I may throw 40 or 45 pitches. Like I told one of my teammates in BP, Silva may come tomorrow dealing and throw 80 pitches and I might pitch tomorrow."
~snip~
"I'm happy," Z said. "As long as this team is happy, I'm happy for this team. Like I said before, guys, whatever this team wants me to do, I do. This is a business, and they're the boss. If the boss wants me to close games, I close games. If the boss wants me to start games, I will start games.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

props to Z for taking it in stride. i hope he gets a shot to prove he's the high pitch throwing front-rotation starter he's shown he can be. it's not like his last start before he got bumped down was some tragedy or his arm gave out after 80-90 pitches or something.

The other thing with Z is if Hendry turns a couple overachieving starters into prospects or a machine to teleport Grabow to North Korea, then Carlos is going to be rested and fresh for the stretch run.

has CZ been castrated [who's that procedure named after]? cashner wins again last night, tho only one k in 6...perfect inning for deep threat...jackson threw 2 scoreless night before...something is coming - what is it?

Maybe the Cubs should try piggy-backing their starters, like they do at Extended Spring Training (Mincone/Liria, F. Batista/Figueroa, Kirk/Mitchell, and M. Perez/Y. Wang, becomes Silva/Zambrano, Wells/Gorzelanny, Lilly/Cashner, and Dempster/Russell), with Marmol, Marshall, Caridad and Grabow the late-inning relievers. And if a pitcher is struggling or has thrown too many pitches in the inning, the manager just yells "Roll it!" and the inning is magically over (great way for getting out of bases loaded no out jams!). And a ten-man, two-DH batting order would be a good way to get Soriano off the field and Nady, Colvin, and/or Fontenot into the lineup at the same time.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=5197935 After all of the Ramirez benching stuff and the rift that seems to be developing between him and Fredi Gonzalez, who goes first? Ramirez or Gonzalez? Hanley Ramirez is arguably the most exciting player in the major leagues. If you are Jim Hendry and you need a ridiculously large shake-up like this team needs, do you consider dealing for Ramirez? I'm kinda torn on this. I feel like it would be a great move to acquire him and his defense and his bat, but at the expense of essentially completely cleaning out the farm system, as well as taking on a player with his attitude. Does the good outweigh the bad? I'm not interested in insults, just good baseball conversation

wasn't ramirez yanked for doing essentially what castro did last week? neither a rookie nor a star vet should have to be called out re: basic hustle, but times have changed...gonzalez maybe should have handled this in the dugout tunnel; if one has to go it won't be the star ss; managers are a dime a dozen - not so, batting champs... cub trivia: lee & soriano tied @ 297 homers; who gets to 300 first?

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

I think you're the only one here who is interpreting it like that. The ball wasn't that deep in the hole although I'm sure Theriot would have never thrown him out. After flubbing it, he takes a quick look back and then jogs lazily after it. Problem is Hanley never stopped running, slowing down slightly rounding the bag, so not sure what Castro saw when he looked back. Castro wasn't dogging it purposefully like Ramirez, but he let himself get frustrated with his third error. Of course Soriano wasn't really busting it either trying to get the ball behind him either.

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

hanley is a long-known issue/attitude problem. the guy makes sosa's "homer watching" tendencies look like sosa busted ass around the bases from the second he made contact. he's VIP and expects to be treated as such. got a problem...then trade him to someone who can deal with him. he's probably not "shaping up" any time soon.

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

if you watch the video, you'll see the CFer is over 100 feet from the play and that Hanley kicked the ball in the direction he was running and for a moment sprinted after it which is when the LFer figured Hanley had it, before Hanley went into shutdown mode.

thanks for the link...little i heard on car radio @ lunch sounded like simple failure to hustle after a booted ball @ short...definitely more to it than that...whatever the result, i'm w/ gonzo!

Recent comments

  • crunch (view)

    happ, right hamstring tightness, day-to-day (hopefully 0 days).

    he will be reevaluated tomorrow.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I guess I'm not looking for that type of AB 

    Just a difference of opinion

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.