Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Morelli Hit Streak at 18, But A's Edge Cubs

Cody Shields had three hits, an RBI, and an outfield assist, Wes Darvill reached base three times on two singles and a walk, and Jesus Morelli extended his hitting streak to 18 games, but Eduardo Figueroa and Jose Rosario were tagged to the tune of seven runs on ten hits (including two doubles and a HR) and four walks in five combined innings, as the EXST A’s edged the EXST Cubs 7-6 in Cactus League Extended Spring Training action at Papago Park Field #2 in Phoenix this morning. The game was pre-planned as a ten-inning affair, to allow more pitchers to get work.

RHP Chris Huseby started the game for the Cubs and threw one inning (24 pitches – 12 strikes). He walked the first man he faced on four pitches, and the next batter on six pitches, and then the third hitter grounded a single to RF on a 2-0 pitch to load the bases. But then just like he did two days ago, Huseby somehow wiggled out of the jam, striking out the next two hitters on eight pitches, before getting the final out on a broken bat pop up to short on an 0-2 pitch, leaving the bases loaded.

Huseby still has trouble throwing his fastball for strikes (most all of them end up high & outside), but he is able to get his curve ball over the plate virtually at will, and so when he can get ahead of a hitter with his breaking ball, he can use his ultra-wild head-high fastball as a strikeout pitch (or at least that’s how he’s been doing it the last two times out).

The Cubs continue to have a problem with runners making the first or third out of an inning (especially the third out) at 3rd base. Today speedster Cody Shields ripped a two-out line-drive into the LF corner, but was thrown out trying to stretch the double into a triple, getting nailed at 3rd base just a split second after the slower Richard Jones scored. In previous games, the Cubs have actually had runs disallowed because a faster runner made a third out at 3rd base before the runner ahead had a chance to cross the plate.

While I realize that the Cubs have a lot of fast players at Extended Spring Training who like to be aggressive running the bases, there’s aggressive, and then there is stupid. This habit must be broken.

Here is today’s abridged box score (Cubs players only):

LINEUP:
1. Kyung-Min Na, CF: 1-4 (5-3, F-8, F-8, 1B, BB, R)
2. Arismendy Alcantara, SS: 1-5 (1B, E-4, K, E-4, 4-U FC, 2 R, CS)
3. Jesus Morelli, DH #1: 1-5 (F-8, 4-3, 5-3, 6-3, 1B, RBI, R)
4. Xavier Batista, RF: 1-4 (K, K, L-5, F-9 SF, 2B, 2 RBI)
5. Richard Jones, 1B: 2-4 (K, 1B, 1-3, 1B, F-9 SF, RBI, R)
6a. Sergio Burruel, C: 1-2 (1B, F-7)
6b. Jose Guevara, C: 0-2 (K, L-8)
7. Cody Shields, LF: 3-4 (1B, 2B, K, 1B, RBI)
8. George Matheus, 3B: 1-4 (K, K, E-6, 1B)
9. Blair Springfield, DH #2: 0-3 (K, HBP, K, 6-4-3 GIDP)
10. Wes Darvill, SS: 2-3 (BB, 1B, 1B, F-7, R)

PITCHERS:
1. Chris Huseby – 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 2 BB, 2 K, 1/0 GO/FO, 24 pitches (12 strikes)
2. Eduardo Figueroa – 3.0 IP, 8 H, 5 R (5 ER), 2 BB, 2 K, 1 WP, 1/5 GO/FO, 68 pitches (38 strikes)
3. Jose Rosario – 2.0 IP, 2 H, 2 R (2 ER), 2 BB, 1 K, 1 HR, 2/3 GO/FO, 37 pitches (18 strikes)
4. Rogelio Carmona - 2.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 2 K, 1 WP, 3/1 GO/FO, 32 pitches (16 strikes)
5. Drew Rundle - 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 1 K, 0/1 GO/FO, 17 pitches (11 strikes)
6. Corey Martin - 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 1 K, 1 WP, 1/1 GO/FO, 15 strikes (9 strikes)

ERRORS: NONE

CATCHERS DEFENSE:
1. Sergio Burruel: 0-2 CS
2. Jose Guevara: 1-2 CS

OUTFIELD ASSIST:
Cody Shields threw out runner 7-5 trying advance from 1st to 3rd on a single to LF

ATTENDANCE: 7

WEATHER: Sunny, breezy, and hot, with temperatures in the 90’s

Comments

Az Phil , can you explain the significants of the July 2 International signing day? I see the Cubs have signed about 26 new players for the two DSL teams. Is there a differant group of players eligible at that time? Thanks.

[ ]

In reply to by Hagsag

Submitted by Hagsag on Wed, 06/02/2010 - 4:45pm. Az Phil , can you explain the significants of the July 2 International signing day? I see the Cubs have signed about 26 new players for the two DSL teams. Is there a differant group of players eligible at that time? Thanks. =================================== HAGSAG: The International Signing Period that begins on July 2 ONLY applies to International players (essentially Latin players from countries where compulsory education ends at age 16) who turn 16 during the period extending from the end of the previous International Signing Period up through August 31st. Players who turn 16 during the period extending from the end of the previous International Signing Period (August 31st) and July 2nd can sign beginning on July 2nd, and players who turn 16 after July 2nd can be signed starting on their birthday. All other International players can be signed at any time. Also, a player who turned 16 after the end of the previous International Signing Period can be signed prior to July 2nd IF the player turns 17 prior to the completion of his first minor league season. In other words, an MLB club can sign a 16-year old if the player is placed on the Reserve List of a minor league club whose regular season ends after the player turns 17, even if that date is after August 31st. Note that on the DSL Cubs #1 roster there is a player named Gabriel Jimenez, whose listed birthday is 9-26-93, which means he turned 16 AFTER the end of the last International Signing Period, and won't turn 17 until after all of the Cubs minor league teams have completed their 2010 regular season schedules, such that he can't be signed until July 2, 2010. The ONLY way the Cubs could have signed such a player prior to the start of the 2010 International Signing Period (July 2nd) is if Jimenez was signed to a Major League contract and was placed on the Cubs 40-man roster (which we know did not happen). Which means either the DOB listed for Jimenez is incorrect, or the rule was changed without any public announcement being made. As to why the Cubs signed so many Latin players over the past three months, the Cubs Dominican Academy at Boca Chica operates tryouts and Spring Training during that time (March through May), so that's when new players are most-likely to be signed (and when older Latin players are most-likely to get released).

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

AZ Phil, I just read in a Baseball America Update about a Dom. Rep. signing that Dominicans don't have to wait for MLB approval to start playing for any DSL team. If that's true, Jimenez would be able to play for us in the DR, but nowhere else for us. BTW: I hate to say it, but the Cubs need to breakup the roster if any clubs are willing to give back money and prospects. People might say it's too early, but our North-Siders are playing with no enthusiam at all. Rami and DLee are near their end, Lilly was throwing 78 MPH Fastballs last night (and I did not mistake those pitches for changeups), Grabow strained his "Lou", Samardzija is a rich I-Cub, Fukudome is beginning his normal summer snide, Theriot's pissed he lost his Arb case, Big Z is Big Z and Soto was possiby another Cub Rookie flash in the pan (Jerome Walton). Ricketts has to be thinking dump salary. These guys just aren't good to watch. No Life!!! All of this is a result of the sale of the team. We drove up the payroll in an attempt to raise interest and playoff possibilities. Now that that is all over, I think we'll see the Cubs tail-off a little. These guys had their run, and honestly we fans have been spoiled here of late. We have had five winning seasons in seven years. It sounds as though Ricketts is serious is about producing talent from within. That would be a drastic change from past years. We already had a game this year where we started four position players from our system and had three pitches play as well. I know I haven't seen that before. The perennially solid teams (NYY, STL, BOS, LAD, LAA, MIN) always have talent playing that have always worn the same cap. Anyway, go Cubs.

[ ]

In reply to by Childersb3

Submitted by Childersb3 on Wed, 06/02/2010 - 6:29pm. AZ Phil, I just read in a Baseball America Update about a Dom. Rep. signing that Dominicans don't have to wait for MLB approval to start playing for any DSL team. If that's true, Jimenez would be able to play for us in the DR, but nowhere else for us. ====================================== CHILDERS: But if Gabriel Jimenez's birthday really is indeed 9-26-93, the Cubs wouldn't be able to sign him until July 2, 2010, because he turns 17 AFTER all of the Cubs minor league teams have completed their 2010 regular season schedule. The only team in the organization still playing regular season games on September 26 is the Chicago Cubs, and Jimenez was not signed to a Major League Contract and he was not added to the Cubs 40-man roster.

[ ]

In reply to by Sweet Lou

Submitted by Sweet Lou on Wed, 06/02/2010 - 5:46pm. Phil -- Are you hearing anything new about Arizona's efforts to keep the Cubs in Mesa/Arizona? ======================================== SWEET LOU: Only that the Mesa mayor is talking to the other Maricopa County mayors with Spring Training clubs to try to find a way to get funding that by-passes the state legislature, which is dead in the water right now. Probably the only way the Cubs stay in Arizona (Mesa) is if the Cubs don't use the July 12th opt-out date to make a new deal with Naples. Mesa is going to need more time, and the Cubs might be smart to push this whole thing down the road, even if it means going year-to-year with Mesa beyond 2011. But if the Cubs decide in July that they want to go to Naples, they should be able to do so. Mesa is not presently in a position to do anything about it.

http://espn.go.com/blog/chicagocubs/post/_/id/1091/piniella-defends-dec…
"We were looking for two outs [from Lilly] then I was going to get [Carlos] Marmol in," Piniella said of Lilly, who had retired Walker in three previous at-bats on Tuesday. "I don't want to get in the habit of throwing Marmol 35 or 40 pitches to save a baseball game. I just don't."
~snip~
"I never dreamed home run," Piniella said. "Never gave it a thought."

I'm sure I'm the minority here, but I actually root against no-hitters unless it's a Cub pitching or some other pitcher I really like. The less there are in the game, the more special they are when do happen. apparently Joyce feels the same way...as did Froemming when he made that call against Pappas back in the day.

joyce quotes are starting to roll in... “I just cost that kid a perfect game,” Joyce said. “I thought he beat the throw. I was convinced he beat the throw, until I saw the replay.” “It was the biggest call of my career,” said Joyce, who became a full-time major league umpire in 1989. ----- “I don’t blame them a bit or anything that was said,” Joyce said. “I would’ve said it myself if I had been Galarraga. I would’ve been the first person in my face, and he never said a word to me.”

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20100602&content_id=10… The storm, which included a brief tornado warning and excessive lightning for nearly two hours, had stopped by the time the game was called. However, there was so much water gathered on the warning track that both teams agreed the field was not suitable for play. There was more rain expected to arrive in Pittsburgh later in the evening, too. The Pirates' grounds crew spent over an hour trying to squeegee the water off the warning track before the final call was made. By that time, members of both organizations -- including managers John Russell and Lou Piniella -- had huddled together in center field after evaluating the outfield conditions. The call to postpone the game officially came at 10:17 p.m. ET. No makeup date has been announced yet.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.