Sonnanstine Don't Shine under Overcast Arizona Skies

Jordan Danks smacked a solo HR over the RF fence to break a 5-5 tie in the top of the 10th, and the White Sox scored another unearned run later in the inning, en route to a 7-5 extra inning victory over a Cubs split-squad in Cactus League action at Dwight Patterson Field at HoHoKam Park in cold, blustery, and rainy Mesa, AZ, this afternoon.


It rained most of the night and again for about a half-hour just after noon (including a short burst of hail around 12:45), resulting in a 30-minute delay to the start of the game.


Once underway, Casey Coleman threw probably his best outing of the spring. The 24-year old third-generation MLB hurler tossed three shutout innings at the ChiSox (40 pitches – 28 strikes, 2/4 GO/FO), allowing two hits and no walks, while striking out three. (After he left the game, Coleman threw another 15 pitches in the bullpen).


RHP Gavin Floyd was the scheduled White Sox starter but was scratched just prior to game-time, probably because the Sox wanted Floyd to throw a certain number of pitches (perhaps 60), without having to worry about getting interrupted by a rain delay (which was a distinct possibility).


As a result, RHP Zach Stewart (who was probably going to “piggy-back " with Floyd anyway) took the ball and pitched the first three innings, allowing the Cubs two runs on six hits.


The Cubs opened their scoring in the bottom of the 2nd, as Jeff Baker and Josh Vitters lined singles to right. Alfredo Amezaga sliced an opposite-field double into the LF corner to score Baker and Vitters, and then Tony Campana followed with a line single to left to move Amezaga to 3rd (Campana’s first hit of the Spring). But David DeJesus popped out and (after Campana stole 2nd) Marlon Byrd grounded out, as the Cubs left runners stranded at 2nd & 3rd. The Cubs scored another run in 4th off ex-Cub LHRP Will Ohman, as Josh Vitters led-off with a ringing double into the left-center alley, and moved up to 3rd on a fly out. Tony Campana then executed a safety squeeze bunt single to score Vitters.


Kerry Wood worked an 11-pitch 4th for the Cubs, allowing back-to-back one-out singles that put Sox runners on 1st & 3rd. But Woody was able to get Alexei Ramirez to roll into a 6-4-3 DP to end the inning. Wood has not looked particularly sharp so far (he reminds me a bit of Bob Howry at the end of his career), although he has managed to dodge a few scoring threats by getting a DP grounder here or a pop up there when he really needed one (like today). I just don’t know how much KW has left in the tank.


Carlos Marmol worked a 13-pitch 5th, walking one, but allowing no hits or runs. Marmol didn’t seem to fool anybody, but at least this time he was able to retire the side without incident.


Up 3-0 after five, the Cubs saw their lead evaporate in the top of the 6th, as RHP Andy Sonnanstine got hammered. To say the ex-Tampa Bay RHP was worse than the box score might indicate would certainly be true today.


Sonnanstine allowed five runs in the 6th inning, including a two-run HR by Dan Johnson, a Tyler Flowers RBI double, and a two-run single by Gordon Beckham, and he wasn’t really much more effective in the top of the 7th, either, as the Sox loaded the bases with no outs on a single and two walks. But Cubs rookie 1B Anthony Rizzo made a leaping catch of a Jordan Danks screaming line-drive that was headed for the RF corner (where it would have almost certainly cleared the bases), then doubled-up the runner at 1st, and giving Sonnanstine an opportunity to get out of the inning unscathed with an inning-ending ground out.


Sonnanstine has had a horrible Spring, and I don’t know how many more chances he will get before the Cubs either outright him to the minors or release him.


The Cubs came back to tie the score in the bottom of the 8th, loading the bases with no outs on an E-3, a walk, and an infield single. Brett Jackson and Josh Vitters both walked with the bases loaded to tie the score, but Matt Szczur popped out, Alfredo Amezaga struck out, and Tony Campana grounded out to end the threat and leave the bases loaded.


Marcos Mateo (out of minor league options and battling for a job in the Cub bullpen) walked two in the top of the 9th, but induced Jim Gallagher to bounce into an inning-ending 4-6-3 DP to get out of the jam. And then after the Cubs went down 1-2-3 in the bottom of the 9th, Mateo surrendered what proved to be the game-winning HR to Jordan Danks (6’4 “little” brother of White Sox LHP John Danks) leading off the 10th.


Mateo also allowed a couple of singles later in the inning (one bounding off his left shin) that led to the Sox scoring an unearned “insurance run” on a Logan Watkins two-out throwing error. All-in-all, Mateo was not impressive, with command issues in both innings. He just could not throw strikes consistently, and when he did throw strikes, too often Sox hitters (mostly minor leaguers, BTW) were sitting on his fastball.


The Cubs defensive plays of the day certainly would have to include the Rizzo runs-saving leaping catch in the 7th, but there was also a sliding catch of a line-drive by LF Jeff Baker in the left-center alley that would have made Reed Johnson proud.


While one squad of Cubs was losing to the White Sox in Mesa, the other squad defeated the Texas Rangers 3-2 in Las Vegas, thanks to a Joe Mather 9th inning solo HR. I was not at that game, but it appears that Chris Volstad had another fine outing, allowing one run on four hits and no walks in four innings of work, with three strikeouts, and a 6/3 GO/FO.


The Cubs travel to Peoria tomorrow, where they will face the Seattle Mariners.

Return to Homepage

Comments

The more these guys like Mateo et al. struggle, the more likely it looks that Lendy Castillo really WILL get the chance to stick with the team. I guess that's OK, but I sure don't want a repeat of that whole David Patton nightmare, that was just plain......dumb.

Dale Sveum is not Lou Piniella. TheoJed is not Jim Hendry.

I imagine the Cubs will first see if they can work out a deal with Philly to keep Lendy, because Mateo is out of options. I think the preferable course would be to work out a deal for Lendy, send him to AA, and keep Marcus, but yeah, if they can't, I imagine Castillo may get the slight edge right now over Mateo for the last spot (assuming, of course, that they keep two lefties). Blake Parker has quietly had a good spring, but he's probably on the outside looking in.

While I am a strong believer in getting value for what you have, Mateo isn't representing a big leaguer. He rarely has. While TheoJed will be in discussions for Castillo, unless Mateo represents soon, let him go. He might come back to play in Iowa, or sign on with another team and uner-produce there. I doubt Mateo will ever be a solid reliever if he keeps getting pounded this spring.

eh, I know the general sentiment is to bag on Marcos Mateo, but he

a) is one of the few power arms in the pen.
b) Has a legitimate swing and miss out pitch ... i mean, how many guys in the pen legitimately have that go to pitch right now that we can depend on.
c) has posted very respectable xFIP's the last two years
d) showed that the home run blip of 2 years ago was just that ... a statistical ... blip considering his minor league record
e) Has maintained a fairly consistent walk rate that is fine for the pen.

In saying all that, he's a middle reliever, and it wouldn't bother me that much if the Cubs let him go (although I still have my doubts that, component wise, Rafael Dolis in 2012 would outperform what Mateo has done over the last two years). But I think it's a bit harsh to say that he "isn't representing a big leaguer. He rarely has." A reliever needs innings to be able to prove themselves against statistical blips, and he hasn't been afforded the time, but he has shown flashes of ability in his limited time (and has justified the Buck Coats trade).

Toonster - you put the jinx on Parker (1IP today, 4H, 1HR, 1bb, 3ER) ... oh well, better now than April.

the pen picture sure is muddled coming down the stretch ... Castillo probably had a chance to separate a bit, but he didn't. Going to be interesting what they decide.

David Patton NIGHTMARE? He was the 25th man on a mediocre team, and pitched 14 innings with passable results.

I hope none of MY nightmares are worse than that.

If Casey McGhee was let go to make room for that bum, then yes a NIGHTMARE.

You are partial to him b/c he has the same initials as you?

I'm not partial to him. He was never much good. But losing McGhee was a NIGHTMARE? The odds of his ever getting a chance with the Cubs was extremely small with Ramirez at third and Lee at first and Soto behind the plate.

Wood being hurt was a nightmare. Prior getting hurt was a nightmare. But losing McGhee? Not so much.

Disagree. A smarter GM would have stashed him and as AZ Phil pointed out previously to your visiting here, he was unprotected needlessly.

And, any team that has Aramis Ramirez needs a qualified backup to come in for his yearly injury. Ala Mark DeRosa, or Casey McGhee, even.

It was more than an indictment of the Hendry regime when McGhee came back to bite the Cubs in the ass right after being let go. And, of course, Ramirez got injured. You've seen "Bake" and "Witty" play third, right?

Hendry needed to go. Done.

McGehee, meh. Are we still complaining about him? I sure didn't miss his .626 OPS last year. Jeff Baker and Ian Stewart are both on his top 10 comps at BR, which should tell you something about where he is. If he puts together a couple more 2010 seasons and 2011 becomes the aberration, then maybe we talk about the one that got away, but right now there is just as much a likelihood that he'll be a flash in the pan.

I don't think his 2011 has much bearing on the issue though or anything he does from this point on.

They lost him on a goofy roster move and he seemingly would have been very useful in 2009 and 2010 to the Cubs.

Equating his loss to Rule 5 pick-up David Patton I'm not getting, but it certainly deserves a little hand-wringing just for the complete unnecessary way it happened.

They wanted to sneak him through waivers to send him back down. It almost worked.

It didn't.

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2008/10/30/brew...

It's not exactly clear why the Cubs felt the need to place McGehee (or Petrick) on Outright Waivers at this time, because the Cubs already had one opening on their 40-man roster (LHP Carmen Pignatiello was outrighted to the minors earlier ths month), and six additional slots on the 40 will open up once the eight players eligible to be free-agents under Article XX of the CBA file for FA during the Free-Agency Filing Period that commences today (two of the players eligible to be MLB Article XX free-agents are still on the 60-day DL, so they will not create openings on the 40 when they file, but the other six will).

Because McGehee was brought up to the big leagues after August 15th, the Cubs had until four days after the conclusion of the World Series to make the outright assignment, or else they would have had to wait until 25 days prior to the start of the 2009 regular season to do it. But the Cubs really didn't have to outright McGehee in order to remove him from the 40 and keep him in the organization for 2009.

They could have waited until December 12th to drop McGehee from the 40-man roster, simply by non-tendering him and then re-signing him to a 2009 minor league contract (with an NRI to Spring Training) for the MLB split contract minor league minimum ($65,000), the same salary he would have received if he was on optional assignment to the minors. Of course McGehee could have refused the offer, but it was probably the best way to try and keep him in the organization for 2009 if they felt they needed his slot on the 40 for somebody else.

There were also plenty of other outright options at the time if you read through the comments of that article. Hendry and Co. whiffed badly on the player evaluation and roster management on that one.

"Thu, 10/30/2008 - 9:01pm — crunch

and someone claimed dirk "i'm not supposed to be here" hayhurst! his legend continues."

lulz.

didn't know he'd end up writing 2 funny/insightful books, though.

If he puts up 10 all-star years going forward, or sucks and becomes a bench player or is out of baseball in a couple, then yeah, I think that will have bearing on how people will look back on this issue. Maybe not how you want to technically evaluate it, but that will frame the issue for most people.

And he put up good numbers in 2009-2010 because he was given playing time, etc. Of course no guarantee at all he would have performed well in a limited role, and been useful to the Cubs.

No. That's not how people will have looked at it. Maybe you will. Ramirez was/is an injury waiting to happen. To let McGhee go in an inexplicible move - an assinine move - as has been alluded to, just did not make sense when the player could have been very helpful and an upgrade to the guy they signed for much more money at least in the first year he played for the Brewers.

I remember that when they lost McGehee, I figured, eh, he was a guy who couldn't do much with the bat in an extreme hitters league (the PCL), had no speed, was so-so defensively at best, and they were trying to teach him to catch, which often seems to be the last-ditch effort to salvage a fringe player's value. But, I was missing the point. The point wasn't his value; it was that they didn't need to lose him and that they could have been better at managing the 40-man. That's still the complaint. It's not really about who they lost. Hopefully, the JedStein regime will handle the 40-man with more finesse and planning. Seems like when we're talking about a ball club that spends well over $100 million every year just on player payroll, it might make sense to employ one guy who is just good at 40-man stuff and whose job is to keep track of that, if it's something that the rest of the front office doesn't have time to do really well.

Ok...you might be right as far as McGehee...last year. But his OPS+ of 126 in 2009, and 114 in 2010 were pretty damn solid.

Personally I am not a fan of giving away players with some value for absolutely nothing. McGehee clearly would've helped us during injuries in 2009-10. More importantly, if we didn't want him, he would have had better than zero value in a trade.

By your analysis, it is ok to release any player in the minors who doesn't become a consistently good major league player. I am quite certain I don't agree with that thought.

How do we know that the Cubs didn't try to trade him, and failed?

Did anyone not see this coming?!?

http://espn.go.com/mlb/spring2012/story/_/id/...

Volstad looked pretty good, I thought. I don't know much about him, but the Rangers announcers (I have no idea who they are - wasn't paying attention enough) seemed to really actually like the guy, saying he actually has pretty good stuff and that, being only 25, all his experience, even though his stats are not very impressive, should help him. It's kind of like that whole learning how NOT to pitch thing, which, after going over his stats just now, he seems to have mastered pretty well.

One of them even claimed he thought he had good enough stuff to be a top of the line starter rather than an innings eater, that he just needs to put it all together. I assume that guy was the mandatory ex player/color guy. Naturally, the Cubs cynic in me just assumes he was using a bit of hyperbole because he was getting people out, although it did seem like he was keeping guys off balance pretty well.

I'd be happy with an innings eater that doesn't give up 11 runs in the first inning, so I'm rooting for him over Wells. Anything plus that is just gravy to me.

Garza, Volstad, Samardzija, Dempster

it's like
Halladay, Lee, Hamels except not anywhere fucking close

LMAO!!!! EXcellent insight Rob...and yeah.....agreed.

I'm predicting career years out of all those guys. Especially Volstad and Samardzija. There. I said it.

ROB G: One of the best quotable lines in several years. Ha!

some people are paying more attention to volstad's numbers rather than what's coming out of his arm during a transition period of his pitching.

if he can keep the ball in the park i'm expecting big things out of him...solid 2/3/4 type, with 4-type being rather pessimistic.

i expect good things out of Z based on what he showed his winter with velocity...and so far this spring, but i like this move for the cubs based on what they're trying to do in 2012+.

Great caption to a photo of K. Wood in the Trib:

"Kerry Wood, who appears to be a lock to make the Cubs' roster, pitches against the White Sox on Sunday in Mesa, Ariz."

Hey, it's more refreshing than the years that he was a lock to make the 60-day and Uncle Larry's Towel Drill workshop.

2 IP, 7 H, 7 ER, 2 BB, 2 K, 3 HR

I hope Travis enjoys his spring/early summer in Des Moines this year. When is Torreyes projected to reach the majors again................??

Ridiculously good best case? Perhaps this year (lights up Daytona, quick bump to Tennessee, sees an Altuve-ian late season call-up).

Positive case - 2013. Lights up Daytona, lights up Tennessee, gets a shot in 2013.

A more likely, still positive, just slower, scenario would be late 2013/2014.

Dayumn. I'm hoping that the thicker air of the midwest helps him get things back on track eventually. The Marshall trade looks pretty crappy unless T Wood at least turns out to be a passable #4 or #5.

I never understood why some folks went gaga over Travis Wood. A decent end of the rotation option that could, in a good year, perhaps be a Maholm-esque 3 (particularly on a weak rotation), but while those don't grow on trees, they aren't exactly that hard to find either. His most valuable asset was his cost-controlled years, but it wouldn't surprise me if he ended up as ... Sean Marshall (lefty pen arm that is).

it wouldnt surprise me to see s.marshall closing games on the cheap for the reds after this season.

i didn't like the trade too much, but i didn't think it stunk. i thought they could have gotten a bit more (or different), though some feel a lot more optimistic about torreyes than others.

I gotta say - I personally thought T. Wood would bounce back from 2011, but Man oh Man is he bad. Whew. How do you consistently get THAT pounded? Something's wrong with the dude. In addition to sucking ass, I mean . . .

4 scoreless innings after T. Wood (1 BB, 1 K, 4 H), J. Russell with a scoreless inning as well

jackson's lack of missing bats is disappointing even though his numbers look pretty good doing it.

i'm still holding out for him to be some kind of contributor at some point, though.

I've lost a lot of love for Jay Jackson through the years, but the improved control since he went to AAA seems to bode well as a sign that he can perhaps be an end of the rotation type option if the scenario worked in his favor. Wish he could find the breaking ball that was somewhat raved about in the lower levels.

wow...cj wilson keeps being a jerk...gave out m.napoli's cell phone number over twitter to a few hundred K people as a "joke" after napoli said he couldn't wait to take wilson deep recently this offseason. cute.

napoli wasn't pleased.

From Oct. 30, 2008:

Virgina Phil: "McGehee has crappy numbers."

Rob G.: "Neither [McGehee nor Jake Fox] will do anything in the majors."

The Real Neal: "I couldn't even summon up the gumption to argue the relative merit of McGehee..."

People questioned McGehee's situation vis a vis Hendry's roster management, but no one ever suggested that it was anything worse than a perplexing move.

Four years ago, anyone could have had Jose Bautista for a plane ticket. You never know what some players might do.

well I was half right

/story of my life

X
  • Sign in with Twitter