The Cubs have clinched the #2 spot in the 2013 draft. Congrats?
2013 Draft Pick Order
************************
Last updated 5-10-2013
Cubs Depth Chart
Cubs 40-Man Roster Info
MLB Rules Info
++++++++++++++
39 players are on 40-MAN ROSTER (roster is full)
Three players are on 60-DAY DL (do not count against 40-man roster)
One player is on 15-day DL
13 players have been optioned to the minors
* bats or throws left
# bats both
PITCHERS (12)
Michael Bowden
Shawn Camp
Scott Feldman
Kyuji Fujikawa
Kevin Gregg
Edwin Jackson
Carlos Marmol
Hector Rondon
* James Russell
Jeff Samardzija
Carlos Villanueva
* Travis Wood
=================
CATCHERS (2):
Welington Castillo
# Dioner Navarro
=================
INFIELDERS (5):
Darwin Barney
Starlin Castro
Cody Ransom
* Anthony Rizzo
* Luis Valbuena
==================
OUTFIELDERS (6):
* Julio Borbon
* David DeJesus
Scott Hairston
* Nate Schierholtz
Alfonso Soriano
* Ryan Sweeney
====================
15-DAY DL (1):
Matt Garza, P
60-DAY DL (3):
Scott Baker, P
* Steve Clevenger, C-IF
Arodys Vizcaino, P
OPTIONED (13):
Alberto Cabrera, P
Rafael Dolis, P
* Brett Jackson, OF
Junior Lake, IF-OF
Trey McNutt, P
* Brooks Raley, P
* Chris Rusin, P
Dave Sappelt, OF
Jorge Soler, OF
Matt Szczur, OF
Christian Villanueva, 3B
Josh Vitters, 3B-1B
* Logan Watkins, INF

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
In addition to those you mention, I'm sure the Cubs will aggressively market Soriano and Marmol including salary relief. Clearly they will not command the prospects of those you mentioned, although Soriano might if he heats up again. Marmol can hopefully be disposed of for insert fringe prospect here.
Great update Phil. It is appreciated. Great to see the hitting over the last ten games. Looks like some of these guys are coming around.
I see Feldman and DeJesus as the most tradeable assets, with Shierholtz somewhere behind them, and the asking price for Garza being more than teams want to give up by a pretty good margin. Garza would still be likely to bring back the best haul, though. I mean, even in a good year, what are you really willing to give up for a Feldman or DeJesus?
It appears that Albert Almora is on his way to Kane County.
r.vogelsong (SF) broke the hell out of his pitching hand getting HBP on a swing tonight. the trainer threw a towel over his hand as soon as he saw it...already scheduled for surgery tomorrow...expected to miss 6 weeks.
True.
just when you think the Cubs are starting to look like a major league team, they go and lose 2 of 3 at home to the Mets.
Scott Feldman though looking good as trade bait.
RIP St Rita alum and great musician
grant balfour + live TV...what the hell was the MLB Network thinking?
he only let 1 swear fly (not bleeped)...that's about 3-4 times less than i expected.
as an aside...the worst SS i've ever seen in my life is/was bj upton.
words cannot describe how awful he was...it blows my mind he actually made it to AAA playing the position...and that he wasn't moved earlier in his minor league or AAA career. even when he wasn't making plays that would count as errors he was playing really bad SS.
they gave him an enormous amount of leeway trying to get him to stick at the position.
True, but if he's at least decent defensively, and could put up a .270/.350/.390
he'd be worth at least a utility spot.
Come on Soler, Almora and Baez!!!
That is kind of damming with faint praise. :)
That may be true. But is he any less of a prospect than Darwin Barney was?
Barney: .288/.337/.378 in the minors, 35/45 steals 1724 PA's
Watkins:.281/.372/.389, 88/124 steals, 2205 PA's
http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/170...
It seems unlikely to me that Watkins will be able to keep up his walk totals in the majors, which kind of makes him a non-prospect.
Per the Baseball Cube (http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/profile.asp...), Derek played the part of two seasons in A ball. He had 56 erros in 128 games in 1993, and 9 errors in 11 games in 1992.
I remember a conversation at TCR years ago with reference to Starlin's propensity for errors, and it was brought up that Jeter once committed 59 in A ball. It was a mini-point of discussion because different sources were reporting the number as either 59 or 159, but it was determined to be 59. Edit: I guess it was 56, funny we both thought of the same thing.
©The Cub Reporter 2013. The Cub Reporter is in no way affiliated with the Chicago National League Ballclub.





Comments
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 1:22pm Permalink
As I mentioned in the last thread, I think theocorp is handling this really well. He was never much of a hitter, in my mind, but Soriano does seem like a class guy, very nice and all.
Letting him go through "injury", which I am assuming is happening, is good stuff.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 1:27pm Permalink
Sveum is also starting to impress me. I think he might actually mean it when he says results count. It is tough to stay on that philosophy when about 5 of your starters are Triple AAA caliber. But he is doing stuff I'd expect some of you guys to do.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 1:42pm Permalink
Okay, one more thing. The Cubs are actually looking like a good team. They may suck on many levels, but coaching is huge - in my opinion - and they are a team that I am now trying to watch, rather than avoid.
We have a triple A team competing with the rest of the league. May not last, but it may.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 1:51pm Permalink
Effing pollyanna...
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 1:42pm Permalink
Feel free to comment.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 2:21pm Permalink
Watch and learn.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:03pm Permalink
lol
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 2:16pm Permalink
hey look, an out on the basepaths
LaHair due up next.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 2:22pm Permalink
*bangs head on the desk* Wonder how many runs vs outs Castro's aggressive base running has given us.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 2:42pm Permalink
So what happened there? Gameday just said Castro out at home.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 2:48pm Permalink
slicer down right field line, Heyward dove and ball landed right on line and bounced into right field.
Castro certainly didn't leave the box at full speed seeing if it was fair and then thrown out at home. Heyward bounced the throw to Uggla and Uggla threw it up the third base line by about 5 feet and he was still out relatively easily.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 2:38pm Permalink
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball...
Kinzer says he won't talk long-term extension for Castro during season.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 2:41pm Permalink
Marshall trying to choke away a lead again.
leadoff HR to Braun.
2-1 Reds, 1 out after striking out Ramirez.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 2:56pm Permalink
and lifted after getting 2 outs, but 2 singles.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:16pm Permalink
Ondrusek gets the final out and Reds win 2-1. Cueto/Greinke with 8 shutout innings each. Axford strikes out the first 2 hitters in the 9th, has 2 strikes on Stubbs and then gives up a single, double to Votto that scores Stubbs and a single to Phillips that scored Votto.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 5:17pm Permalink
Careen win #1500 for Dusty, 20th All-time
presuming around 80 wins the next 2 years, should move up to #16 by end of next season.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:00pm Permalink
Malholm down to a 1.08 WHIP btw. He's been giving up too many HRs but overall he's been pitching better than his ERA. This is in opposition to James Russel who with a 1.32 WHIP is just begging for an ERA spike soon.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:05pm Permalink
fun fact: in an NL only roto league I dumped Maholm after the first week, but kept Volstad.
I am awesome.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:11pm Permalink
Not as awesome as me. I picked up LaHair during an off-season waivers period, then didn't hang on to him as a keeper prior to the draft.
FOR I AM COSTANZA, LORD OF THE IDIOTS
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:19pm Permalink
but you still have danks in your other league right?
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:38pm Permalink
nah, I dumped Danks before his start Tuesday when he finally pitched well, although he didn't get the win.
Starting pitching in our mixed league isn't particularly hard to find though.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 8:43pm Permalink
You should have dropped them both? :)
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:00pm Permalink
lahero strikes again...rbi single hit into the hole of the shift.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:03pm Permalink
and LaHair cashes in on the opportunity he didn't get with Castro thrown out, 2-out RBI single.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:11pm Permalink
LaHair, he of the "I can hit everything they throw at me" Lahair?
You guys are a bunch of nuts
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:10pm Permalink
The baseball knowledge is unique.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:12pm Permalink
Stewart with a half-ass defensive play giving up a 2-out double.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:13pm Permalink
followed by a BB.
Dolis up in the pen.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:15pm Permalink
gets Uggla to pop out to RF.
Be up to Dolis to finish it.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:17pm Permalink
is there a reason why s.maine is in AAA being their best reliever rather than in the bigs being the cubs best reliever? he's only getting out both lefties and righties...with control...
also, do lendy castillo and mike bowden exist?
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:19pm Permalink
Wood will probably go on DL after hurting his arm throwing his glove.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:28pm Permalink
that was boring, yet good...cubs win.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:29pm Permalink
1-2-3 inning for Dolis against Jones, Heyward and McCann.
Cubs take another series from a division leader.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:32pm Permalink
The only question left is whether this Cubs team is the best team in 2012, or best team ever?
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:57pm Permalink
Things certainly have changed for the better haven't they.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 9:17pm Permalink
best-est Cubs team ever?
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:37pm Permalink
Larry's last game at Wrigley
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:42pm Permalink
they gave him one of the "standings flags" for ATL from the outfield flag section. class.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:37pm Permalink
Cubs are 8-7 vs. Nationals, Cardinals, Dodgers and Braves
5-11 vs. Marlins, Brewers, Reds and Phillies
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:49pm Permalink
Interesting stat, but a lot of that has to do with timing. This team started bad.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:32pm Permalink
Last time Cubs won a game 1-0: Aug. 3, 2011, @ PIT (W Garza, S Marmol).
This team is a Top-60 reliever away from being a .500 club. Considering what we thought we had, and also who's contributing nothing, that's saying a lot.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:40pm Permalink
This team definitely has issues. Castro and LaHair will realistically both most likely see their stats drop a bit, as will Campana and Dempster. Yet on the other hand, I can also see Soto, Soriano and Stewart batting wise and Malholm and Volstad pitching wise seeing #s get better. We got a team right now pretty out of wack with player career #s both positive and negative, so will be interesting to see which way it goes.
Overall though if Rizzo shows an ability to cut down on strike outs and Castro learns to run the bases better it will be a pretty epic middle of the lineup we have with some excellent top of the rotation pitching.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:05pm Permalink
Castro and LaHair are both stars. The rest I just am waiting for the fall. But Sveum is pretty good to be able to get this crew to be competitive. His not your mother's Qball.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 9:30pm Permalink
Fredi Gonzalez has some Qball in him ...
“Huddy was outstanding. So much that if he would have come out of the seventh inning with no runs, I was thinking about letting him hit in the eighth, because he was that dominant.” ... “We swung the bats well. Even though we didn’t score any runs today, I can’t complain about our offense. They did a nice job defending us… It seems like we should have won two out of three, especially with Huddy’s performance today.”
On yesterday's win: “Good team effort. Danny battled to get that two-run single and get us over the top.” ... “Freeman’s going to go home 0-for-3, 0-for-4, and he hit three balls right on the nose. You can’t do anything about that. I thought we all had good at-bats against him. He just kept us off-balance. The old guy – I’m calling Dempster the old guy – he reached back one time and punched out Bourney with 93 [mph]. I think he pitched the whole night at about 88, 89.”
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:19pm Permalink
still a terrible offense and the pitching will only get worse.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:37pm Permalink
Except imo Malhom and Volstad will both get better, as will Wood and Marmol. That doesn't mean they are great pitchers (though I think Malhom has actually been pitching well) but that thing Ryno was talking about with reverting to the mean applies here. They are pitching much worse than career #s and that's just as likely to revert back to a better mean as the good will be to revert back to a worse mean.
/edit not to mention take a look at the career #s of Soto, Soriano and Ian Stewart. Both are way underperforming those #s. If we're going to make the claim our good starting pitching will come back down a bit (which is a realistic point) you also need to accept that way underperforming players will most likely move back to their career mean unless you have nagging injuries. Soriano maybe might see an age drop off, but I just don't see it being this drastic. None of those players most likely will ever be part of a future team, but if we can see an uptick in performance from them and our back 2 pitchers, it will help mask a drop off in performance for our overperforming players.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Fri, 05/11/2012 - 8:21am Permalink
You think Maholm will get better? He better start clearing off space on a shelf for his Cy Young award.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Fri, 05/11/2012 - 8:43am Permalink
He's overall pitching well and has a 1.080 WHIP but is giving up too many HRs and I do think he can bring that ERA down a bit. I don't think he's a star or anything but he seems to be a pretty good #4th pitcher.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Fri, 05/11/2012 - 11:51am Permalink
the new comments reminded me that I forgot to respond.
I believe all the players that may regress upwards will be tempered by all the players that will regress downwards. The team isn't winning these games easily and I don't think they have the pitching talent to keep winning 1-run games at anymore than a .500 clip.
I picked them to win 75 games and I'd be thrilled if they got there.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 8:00pm Permalink
Which is why I would like to see them make a 4-5 yr commitment to Garza, land a proven #2/#3 starter in the FA market (e.g. Hamels), and hope this Samardzija is the real deal. Having those three plus a Maholm is a good starting point. Would also like to see the obvious trade deadline dumps (Soto, Dempster, Baker) bring back some effective bullpen help for 2012-2013.
The offense (right now) is obviously going to be built around Castro, Rizzo, BJax, Castillo/Clevenger, and LaHair (for as long he continues to hit). Not sure what Theo's plan is for the offense (FA, trades, or wait for the farm system).
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 3:41pm Permalink
Cubs at Brewers: Battling to get OUT of last place...
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:08pm Permalink
This team definitely has issues.
Thank you Capt. Obvious :)
Campana is a bunting hit machine. There is no stopping him!
Last night the Braves corners were pulled in guarding against his bunting "magic." The little dude "crushed" a singe to left!
He actually does fuck up pitchers a bit. Its just, he has to have enough OBP accumen to make it worthwhile.
Overall, I am impressed with our starting pitching. I am unimpressed with the two costly bullpen veterans, who have cost the team 5 wins or more.
This team is looking like the 2010 Padres East! (except no "good" Heath Bell, or A. Gonzo)
It would be a hoot if the team can start sniffing .500 again.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:16pm Permalink
did today's game come with a crack cocaine and antidepressant smoothie or something?
there's a bit of glow coming off this game for some reason. 13 wins, 5 away from .500...still crap hitting...still iffy pen. stewart's recent (odd) misplays aside the D is a bit tighter lately.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:21pm Permalink
Just "boring, but good Cubs win."
Nothing more...
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:26pm Permalink
here and twitter are blowing up with hope. it's just an odd-ish coincidence after a pretty quick/uneventful game. not trying to poop in anyone's sandbox.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:45pm Permalink
not trying to poop in anyone's sandbox.
Dude, that is gross. Stop doing that!
I am liking the the starting pitching, actually. At least lately. Except for the "Big Funk" Volsted.
I'd like to see them sign Garza. We are going to have to wait until July to find out if its gonna happen.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:32pm Permalink
fun fact: Matt Bush was driving Brandon Guyer's truck when he crashed under the influence and Guyer is also being sued for $5M.
http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/rays/content/gu...
Guyer called up to replace Keppinger briefly as he was put on the restricted list for a personal matter.
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Thu, 05/10/2012 - 12:08pm Permalink
Ouch. On the other hand, why would you let Matt Bush borrow your truck?
Re: Game 31 Thread - Maholm vs. Hudson
on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 4:40pm Permalink
Colvin playing 1b for rockies at the moment.