Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Barry Rozner Plays With the Hearts of Cubs Fans

The Padres called, the Cubs said they're interested, and it's a possibility.

According to a West Coast source, the Cubs are the Padres' best option for a trade partner if for no other reason than they're not the Dodgers, who are Peavy's first choice, and they're not the Braves, who at this point are saying they won't deal their best prospects.

That's the latest from Barry Rozner of The Daily Herald and I'd probably put a lot more stock into it if it was from Bruce Miles, but it should make the offseason rather interesting. Rozner doesn't believe the Cubs have the pitching prospects that the Padres are looking for, and if you consider Jeff Samardzija and Carlos Marmol as untouchable, I'd have to agree. He then goes batshit crazy by suggesting Sean Marshall and Felix Pie to the Padres and then dumping Jason Marquis and another prospect or two to a third team that would land the Padres the elite pitching prospect that they so crave.

While I agree that dumping the bulk of Jason Marquis' contract for next year would be crucial in trying to acquire Peavy and resigning Ryan Dempster, there will be no good player being exchanged for Jason Marquis and the near $10M he's owed.

Comments

When I first heard this a few weeks ago, I was quite stoked. The more I think about Peavy on the Cubs, the more I question the wisdom. - big money commitment for several years - coughing up top prospects for the privilege - not realistically being able to expect anything better than a SP with an ERA in the mid 3s, which is good but not elite - another damn NTC and possibly demands for an extension - losing the luxury of having one of my best fantasy keeper league pitchers leaving Petco Once you consider all the factors, is he worth all the money? My vote comes down to, "Depends on the prospects we have to give."

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

Well, allow me to retort: Although the Pads keep saying nothing's for sure, it seems pretty likely Peavy's gonna get traded, to the Dodgers if nothing else. So you're gonna lose the fantasy edge, I'm afraid. I understand it's big money, a NTC, but this is Jake Peavy we're talking about. He had a down year last year, but he's entering his prime (okay, entered) and he's relatively cheap for what he could bring. A low-to-mid 3.00s ERA these days is Cy-Young-discussion-worthy. And I don't know about you but I haven't seen any studs in our minor leagues in a while. Unless we're trading Soto, Marmol, and Ceda, this is a guy you sell the farm for.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/2008/10/23/2008-10-23_no_swe… Piniella, 65, said he's watching this World Series, but his primary focus remains the Cubs, whom he has taken to the postseason in each of his first two seasons, only to get knocked out in the first round both times. While the Cubs had the National League's best record this season, their flaws - not enough lefthanded hitters, Alfonso Soriano's inconsistency out of the leadoff spot, shaky middle relief - all showed up in the playoffs. Piniella said the Cubs' main agenda these next few weeks will be to re-sign pending free agents Ryan Dempster and Kerry Wood and explore trade options for lefthanded hitting and bullpen help. He also said he plans to move Kosuke Fukudome, the Cubs' $48 million Japanese import whose second-half slump exasperated the manager, to center field as part of a platoon with Reed Johnson. "We don't know if the team is going to get sold this winter," Piniella said, "and I don't see us getting into any big spending in the free agent market. We need to get more athletic and younger and we're probably going to have to fill our needs through trades." doesn't sound like the Cubs like much of the FA crop, does it?

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

how in the hell does one "move" k-fuk? it seems pretty much impossible unless the team takes on some other team's payroll crap...and if the cubs are taking on someone's payroll crap what's to be done about RF and what payroll is gonna cover it? there's no RF in the system that's starter quality unless they want dero in RF. i mean, it can be done...but the logistics of it seem like a nightmare. i couldn't imagine trying to "sell" k-fuk's 2 years left to anyone after looking so damn lost with his flunky swing on the inside and doing nothing much with the stuff over the outside. ...and when did lou clue into soriano not being a consistant leadoff hitter? buy the guy a pack of bubblegum cards.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

ah, that was the reporter musing. oh well...as long as the #7/8 hitters are .300 hitters it shouldn't hurt too much. it's nice to have a true power hitter in the #1 slot and it's a luxury you can have with 3-4 guys in the middle with 20+HR power (and doubles), but damn he's a hell of a power hitter who's best speed game took a back seat to his power hitting a few leg injuries ago.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

soriano had 12 sb's over the last 61 games when he came back from his broken wrist and finally did look healed from his leg injuries.

that would be about 32 SB's over a full season...

if they get furcal or roberts, great, plus a new RFer...I'd love to see.

Furcal, Lee, Soriano, Ramirez, Hermida, Soto, DeRosa, Fukudome

the only guy on the roster currently who could belong there is Theriot and well I have my doubts on his continued success.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

soriano is just a lot more timid and he doesn't take the leads he used to. that said, theriot's lead shunk a ton, too, as the year went on. coaching philosophy or personal...i dunno. im not saying soriano isn't capable of 20-30sb, but i'm not really impressed by that compared to what he can do with his bat power. he'll still get a chance to steal...and some rbis to go with the doubles/homers. -edit- btw, soriano batting 1st really doesn't bug me that much, though it'd be one of the first changes i'd make on the team as-given on the crunch-is-in-charge-fantasy-planet-o-coolness. as long as there's 4 guys in the middle who can hit 20-30+ homers with some doubles i don't consider it a huge issue no matter how much i hate it.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

"We need to get more athletic" Fuck that! That's shit we didn't take from Dusty why should we take from Lou. Soriano is athletic, Fukudome is athletic, get some goddamn ball players with a brain between their ears would be better. Pitchers getting 0-2 counts and working it full because they nibble, clowns sliding into first base, not getting sure and no situation hitting. Having a bad day, but cut that shit and get some baseball players.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I like the option of moving Fukudome to center and keeping Reed Johnson. Since we need a lefthanded hitter it's best that we are not limited to center but have both center and right open. (Not to mention short and second.) Also, I want to go on record of being 100% against resigning Dempster and 100% for resigning Wood.

[ ]

In reply to by RowdyYates

Moving Fukudome to CF is probably necessary, but then we need to get someone with power to replace him in right. This year, Edmonds was probably one of the most valuable players on the team because he provided the pop that should have been coming from RF. Without that power in the lineup next year, we're basically doing what we did in 2005 by replacing DLee with Neifi (although on a smaller scale).

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

really, I thought Lou ran everything. thanks for the clarification...

they just had organizational meetings and that interview was just done during the World Series. Lou and Jim are usually on the same page, especially with the offseason moves.

so if Lou says the plans are to get younger, more athletic and find some lefty bats and bullpen arms, I'm guessing that's the organizational plans as well.

Doesn't mean they'll nail them all, but that's probably what they're looking for...

i can't believe they're playing for this long in these conditions. that's some miserable stuff with a pathetic playing field condition. wonder who's calling the shots for delays...it sure as hell isn't the umps.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

They just went into rain delay. Radar is just saying bascially no baseball the rest of tonight and likely tomorrow according to the forecast.

Heh... line of the day, from BCB: [DeRosa's] increased HR and BB totals account for the difference in OBA and SLG. That, my friends, is called brilliant analysis. Who would have thought that an increase in HR and BB would increase OBA and SLUG?

http://www.cubshub.com/?p=982 Very interesting article on the idea of stretching out Marmol to be a starter. Similiar approach to what the Yanks did with Chamberlain. Point being that his cheap years of being under club control are being burned while he is a set up guy, better bang for your buck if he is a front end starter. Most relievers became releivers because they could not cut it as a starter....Marmol has never been given a fair chance. Look at his numbers.

[ ]

In reply to by Pat Kane

I basically agree with this. I'm firmly in the camp that the Cubs should use their good prospects as relievers early in their careers rather than spending millions of dollars on guys like Howry, Eyre, Remlinger, Hawkins, etc. Once the prospects cut their teeth in the bullpen, gradually stretch them out and put them in the rotation. Here's why: 1) You probably end up with a better bullpen since you're using good pitchers rather than guys who just couldn't cut it as starters 2) Your best prospects get to face major league hitters instead of minor league chumps 3) You might end up saving your best prospects' arms because theyre pitching fewer innings while still facing good hitters. Once they move up to the starting rotation they have less milage on their arms than if they were throwing 200 innings a year in the minors.

[ ]

In reply to by Chifan

Actually, I think one of the biggest differences between Joba and Marmol is that one has been involved in a highly-publicized debate over whether he should be a starter or not, and the other has succeeded almost exclusively as a reliever and that role has been relatively unquestioned. As a starter, Marmol threw a changeup and a curve in addition to his fastball and slider. The quality of these pitches can be debated, and, basically, I can't say how good they were. As a starter, Marmol's fastball and slider weren't nearly as good as they are now. Is that because of the limited workload or is it because he's had more time pitching? I don't know. Probably Marmol would not have nearly as much success as he's had as a reliever. His tendency to throw a lot of pitches and to throw the ball out of the zone quite a bit would probably hurt him. I was very much in favor of giving Marmol a real chance as a starter at this time last year. I don't know what exactly has changed now, but I'm a little less optimistic, though I guess I wouldn't object a whole lot to him getting a shot. Then again, maybe it's his importance to our bullpen that makes me wonder whether the off chance that he turns into a top 3 starter is worth the sacrifice.

[ ]

In reply to by 10man

"He is eventually going to be this team's closer and he's going to be damn good at it." I won't argue with you on that. The niche part I'm not sure about, though it's possible. I'm not sure Marmol needs a "niche," but I do think he'll continue to be damn good as a reliever, and I really have very little idea what kind of starter he would be. One more thing to add to the Joba-Marmol comparison. The Yanks need Joba to start more than the Cubs need Marmol to--the yanks have a pretty rough rotation. The Cubs have a good one and a few starter candidates who won't even have a spot in it.

[ ]

In reply to by garsky

Defensively, Furcal is way better defensively at SS than Theriot. Comparing DeRosa to Fukudome's defense is a little misleading, since Fukudome absolutely won't be the starting day RFer. But you meant a better-hitting team. The Cubs don't need to be a better-hitting team in that they need to score more runs per se. They need to be better-hitting in that the lineup needs more balance with left-handers and preferably needs more guys whose loopy swings aren't affected by the long layoffs that now come with playoff baseball. Furcal does on a regular basis what Fukudome did for the Cubs' lineup early last year - except Rafael hits from both sides of the plate. For the record, I'm not advocating Furcal simply on a cost-return basis, unless the payroll is going to $160 million or something like that. A starter, a pair of relievers and left-handed power in right field are much more pressing, IMO. If the money is there after all that, then yeah, go get him. Theriot becomes the utility guy he can aptly be and fills in when Furcal or DeRo goes down, so fills in for DeRo at 2B when Soriano, Ramirez or the right fielder goes down. (Sounds to me like quite a few ABs, actually.)

[ ]

In reply to by garsky

Well... basically it would be replacing Fukudome with Furcal. You gain defense at SS, probably stay about the same at 2b, and lose defense in RF.

[ ]

In reply to by big_lowitzki

Actually you probably gain a bit at 2B as well; the knock on Theriot has always been more about his arm, which would be a non-issue throwing from closer to 1st. And, thinking a bit more on this, if you consider the number of balls hit to SS/2B versus those hit to RF, it may not be a wash at all. A Furcal/Theriot 1-2 punch at the top of the order would be an OBP machine, but can you imagine the number of DPs Lee hits into then?

[ ]

In reply to by garsky

Fukudome's career OBP is higher than Furcal's. In Furcal's last full year he had an OBP of .333 and an OPS+ of 76, may as well bring back Juan Pierre. Also, Theriot hits into a ton of double plays.

The Cubs projected Carlos Marmol as a reliever a year or two before they moved him from the starting rotation to the bullpen.

The Cubs discovered that when Marmol works out of the pen, he adds 3 MPH to his fastball when he doesn't have to pace himself, he can junk his below-average secondary stuff and use his slider more often, and he has much better control of his fastball and slider.

As long as he remains a Cub, Marmol will absolutely, positively NOT be moved to the starting rotation. His eventual future will be as the Cubs closer, although there is no rush unless the Cubs do not re-sign Kerry Wood. Marmol excels as a set-up guy because he's so good at stranding runners when he comes into a game with men on base.

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!