Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Predictions

UPDATE: Fowler's homecoming and Desmond going to the Rangers means we have a tie for first place: billybucks and Robert Marciano. How's that for maximum late inning drama!

Everyone but Desmond is off the board, so congrats to billybucks for his win in the Free Agents Predictions Contest. It turns out that the predictions business is something of a blood sport and not exactly easy (see Y. Berra).

While billy is doing his victory lap, the rest of you can start your prognostication engines for the 2016 Season Predictions ContestThanks to WISCGRAD for his kind assistance in putting this together. 

We'll run it the same way--with the Google doc, which makes my life that much easier. Let's say that it closes at 12pmCST on Opening Day, April 3.

And good luck! You're going to need it.

Comments

Well, first of all, I'd like to thank the players, because without them this wouldn't be possible. And, of course, the GMs and owners, who are so important in the process. Oh, and the agents! Can't forget the agents... ~~orchestra music slowly builds~~...and, and the media!, they are a big part of this, too ~~music steadily builds, rendering the rest of my acceptance speech inaudible as I am led offstage~~...

Heyward signing Being a Cardinal fan for many, many years I watch many of their games, and, of course the Cubs rivalry. I want to thank the Cubs for getting Hayward because he was more of a let down for us offensively. His offensive stats were not as good as Dexter Fowler's, and struck out to much, many with the bat on his shoulder. P Good luck with him, but if you would have resigned Fowler you would have may more $$$$$$'s still in your pocket!

[ ]

In reply to by Real redbird

Fowler was better. Fowler .250/.346/.411... Heyward .291/.359/.439 Heyward is much better defensively, struck out less, got on base more..and is younger. Okay. Thanks for the effort though Troll. Heyward is overpaid, but He's a better player.

[ ]

In reply to by Real redbird

Well, let's fact check this: OBP: JH .357, DF .346. Advantage Heyward OPS: JH .798, DF .757. Advantage Heyward SB: JH 23/26, DF 20/27. Advantage Heyward. WAR: JH 6.5, DF 2.2. Huge advantage Heyward. K: JH 90, DF 154. Advantage Heyward. I like Dexter, but to say Heyward's stats weren't as good as Fowler's is truly moranic.

[ ]

In reply to by Real redbird

The Cardinals beat up on the Cubs for years. You can take your beatings now for a change. Regarding Heyward- I dreaded him coming up to bat last year, he was such a tough out with a disciplined strike zone. He would just foul off pitch after pitch until he got one he liked or got walked.

Wonder what they see in Aaron Brooks? I guess it's more AAA depth and clears a roster spot for someone else (CF backup with defensive chops). Also, Cogs was due $4.8M this year so it's "cash in our pockets" (as the cardinal dude says the cubs should have done with Fowler/Heyward) per mlbtr...Maybe Brooks can be flipped for Zobrist again (unpossible says Ralphie Wiggums)
Brooks, 25, was acquired by the A’s late last season in the Ben Zobrist trade. He made nine starts for the A’s in 11 appearances with forgettable results. His 6.71 ERA was a sight worse than his 6.18 K/9 and 2.47 BB/9.
Now Arismendy Alcantara and Matt Szczur are the top backup outfielders on the depth chart. Of course, that also overlooks Javier Baez who is expected to be used in a super utility role.

[ ]

In reply to by Cubster

"Wonder what they see in Aaron Brooks?" Ryan Williams type? Strikeouts on the low side of respectable, but walks are very low: 1.9 BB/9 in five seasons in the minors. Brooks, that is. No one can come near Williams's 2 walks in 53.2 innings (18.50 SO/W) at South Bend last year. Kyle Hendricks also relevant here.

Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal 31s31 seconds ago Dexter Fowler has re-signed with the #Cubs, per @MDGonzales. One year deal with mutual option.

If Soler gets traded, I refuse to return my FA Picker championship trophy (I already sold it on ebay).

i knew something weird happened when i checked TCR to see 20 new comments since i last checked not too long ago... ...wasn't expecting fowler...especially after it was reported on tuesday he had signed with the O's. ...so there's either a $13m 4th OF'r...or soler's about to go...or something. *shrug*

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

I just heard the Theo interview and while obviously he's not committed to anything he says is a great trade were to open up he was very clear and firm in saying there would be no more trades. I sort of believe him. Also Soler will be playing some LF and Heyward will be playing a lot more RF.

Another player leaving money on the table in order to play with the Cubs. If/when Fowler starts, does he lead off, Heyward 2 and Zobrist bats 6/7 taking either Soler's or Montero's spots. My brain is having a hard time wrapping around playing time and batting orders. Assuming no injuries or trades, I could see starting the game with an offense first line up and then moving to a defense first as the game dictates. Amazing depth, this team could absorb multiple position player injuries and keep starting a great line up.

[ ]

In reply to by johann

Oh Lord, I already forgot about Murton. The depth of this team is almost staggering. If they don't pull a Golden State Warriors I'll be disappointed. I did actually have a dream where the Cubs were something like, 53-17. I don't have any idea why my dream cloud came up with that number.

"MASN's Roch Kubatko reported Tuesday evening that Fowler had agreed to terms on a three-year contract with the Orioles, but that deal apparently fell apart when the 29-year-old requested an opt-out after the 2016 season."

per mlbtr (pre-Fowler news):
It’s possible the Cubs are narrowing on a free agent outfield acquisition. Top available names include Austin Jackson, David DeJesus, and Shane Victorino. Ian Desmond could also be viewed as an option.
someone here must be really happy to see Austin Jackson speculation get crushed like an empty beer cup

Front office supposedly claiming there's no trade in mind following the Fowler signing, but there's a serious OF surplus unless Schwarber gets a lot of C time and Baez gets a ton of infield time. While Soler seems most likely to be on the block, that does make the lineup (the OF in particular) very left-handed. Kind of don't understand how Fowler fits, but the contract seems too reasonable to pass up given that the two-year cost is so close now to the qualifying offer they made way back when.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

using soler as a part-time player would be both a hell of a great luxury and a hell of a waste. i would be willing to bet soler was good as gone if they didn't get rid of coghlan so quickly. heyward isn't very good vs lefties (as well as sapped of power) and soler in LF would be a good time to rest schwarb vs lefties (really bad, but small sample size, etc)...so there's that to consider from the team's POV, too. i'm kinda leaning toward the team actually going with this setup. hopefully soler isn't going to throw a fit about it.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

Didn't they just trade Coughlan? I assume this is the trade that corresponds to the Fowler signing and Soler gets relegated to the Coughlan role as 4th outfielder, Baez as the backup middle infielder. Fowler easily slots in as the leadoff hitter: Fowler CF, Zobrist 2B, Heyward RF, Rizzo 1B, Bryant 3B, Schwarber LF, Montero C, Russell SS, Pitcher Crazy.

WIN TOTALS: The E-Man is going 93-69 for 2016 Put 'em up, bitches.

Lost in the Fowler stuff are some rule changes. Managers will only get 30 seconds on the mound, rolling double play break up attempts are banned and neighborhood plays are reviewable.

Sad to see Coghlan go. I really liked the guy and his versatility. Maddon said Coghlan was very upset with the news. I feel for the guy. Brooks is a AAA pitcher who is stretched out as a starter and has some options left, so he can bounce up and down if needed. He hasn't had much success at the big league level yet, but did OK at AAA and keeps his walks down. That trade mainly saves some payroll. Overall, these moves definitley make the team stronger. And it also seems like Fowler brings some intangible clubhouse benefits, the players really seem to like him and the story of his surprise return today was fun to read. 

[ ]

In reply to by WISCGRAD

brooks has a fastball, change, and a slider...nice control...but he has been hit rather strongly on every level he's played from rookie level on. i don't recall how he looks pitching, just going by the numbers over here. that said, i'm a little surprised cog wasn't worth more or another target searched out even though brooks technically has some upside (and club control) to match his tools.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Had to be a tough day to be Chris Coghlan yesterday. While you are packing your bags to leave town, there is a love-fest Dexter reunion going on outside. Nobody really said anything about the guy, who was a solid contributor last year and played some decent 2B when asked.

We now have a natural leadoff man and 4 strong outfielders allowing for a platoon if Schwarber doesn't figure out how to hit Lefties. Also dramatically improves our defense in Right Field. I see zero downside to this.

The Cubs won't pick until the end of the 3rd round, plus they are restricted on the international front. It's safe to say 2016 will not be a banner year for young talent acquisition. Still loving the move for Fowler. It's just the gray lining.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

Ar present, Jorge Soler is signed to a nine-year contract that runs through 2020 and that will pay him $3M in both 2016 and 2017, and $4M per season in 2018, 2019, and 2020, However, Soler is eligible to opt-out of the contract if he is eligible for salary arbitration, and (at present) he is on target to be eligible for salary arbitration post-2017.

However, opting-out when he is eligible for salary arbitration will NOT make Soler a free-agent. Rather, opting-out will only terminate his present contract, but he will remain under club control and be eligible for salary arbitration until the conclusion of the season in which he accrues at least six years of MLB Service Time. 

So (as things stand right now), Soler will be eligible for salary arbitration (making him eligible to opt-out of his current contract) post-2017, and he will be eligible to be a free-agent post-2020. 

Soler has used three minor league options, but he is eligible for a 4th minor league option that can be used in either 2016 or 2017 (but not both seasons), and if he spends at least 45 days on optional assignment to the minors in either 2016 or 2017, he would remain under club control through the 2021 season instead of through 2020, although he would still be eligible for salary arbitration post-2017 (as a "Super Two"). Therefore, the Cubs could buy an extra year of club control over Jorge Soler (without changing his eligibility for salary arbitration and the right to opt-out of his contract post-2017) if he is optioned to the minors for at least 45 days in either 2016 or 2017. 

While the Cubs cannot overtly send Soler to the minors just to buy another year of club control (Soler and his agent would certainly file a grievance if it was presented that way), if there is a plausible reason to option Soler to the minors in 2016 (let's say), it wouldn't be the worst thing to happen (at least from the Cubs POV) if it buys another year of club control. 

For example, Matt Szczur is out of minor league options, and the Cubs could option Soler to the minors at the end of Spring Training and keep Szczur on the MLB 25-man roster at the start of the 2016 season somply because Szczur is out of minor league options (a perfectly plausible reason to keep Szczur over Soler, something that has been done by MLB clubs at the end of Spring Training many, many times over many, many decades), and then recall Soler from the minors sometime after he spends at least 45 days on optional assignment. 

Again, optioning Soler to the minors cannot be done overtly just to gain an extra year of club control, just like the Cubs could not come out and say publicly that the reason Kris Bryant and Addison Russell were sent to Iowa to start the 2015 season was to make sure that they would not get credit for a full season of MLB Service Time in 2015 (thus delaying free-agency for both players to post-2021 rather than post-2020), even though that was clearly the real reason.

But if it is presented in a way that is not a matter of sending Soler to the minors just to gain an extra year of club control, but rather because he needs to get regular playing time and because of roster pressure related to wanting to keep players who are out of minor league options (like Neil Ramirez, Matt Szczur, and Christian Villanueva) on the MLB 25-man roster rather than risk losing the player to another club off waivers, then it could be done (for a minimum of 45 days), if the Cubs were so inclined to do so. 

As I see it after a day of surprises, the Cubs have traded Coghlan for Fowler as a spare outfielder. I like the move. Fowler can actually play center field. He hits lefties better than righties, and the Cubs have two outfielders (Heyward and Schwarber) who hit less well against lefties. I see a lot of guys playing 135 games (there are hints on FanGraphs that this is the New Thing), a lot of lineups based on matchups, a lot of pulling Schwarber and Soler after the sixth inning, and a lot of Baez playing second base and Zobrist (who lately has also been hitting lefties well) as the supersub. Of course, Soler could get traded tomorrow, but I think this is unlikely. I think today's events have improved the Cubs' prospects, and I am digging the new wave of thinking from the front office.

Great move in signing Fowler back. He had a great 2015. Sad news trading Coughlin he also contributed very well in 2015, and filled in every time he was called upon I sure would have loved to see him with my Cardinals. I believe Soler and Baez won't last the season with the Cubs. GO REDBIRDS'

AZ Phil: Do you recall any Cubs team that had two switch hitters at the top of their lineup (assuming Fowler, Zobrist bat 1-2)? The last major league team to have this?

[ ]

In reply to by jacos

It's actually not as uncommon as you might think. There have been a number of key top of the order switch hitters and at some point in their careers they have been paired with another switch hitter at the top. Pete Rose and Tim Raines did 1-2 for a while for the Expos, Jose Reyes paired with Angel Pagan and Luis Castillo for the Mets, Devon White and Roberto Alomar for the Blue Jays, etc.

On a separate note, I hope the Pirates can find a way to keep McCutchen. He's my favorite ballplayer not wearing blue, and I like the Pirates and their ability to grow the team from the inside. It's bad for baseball if he leaves Pittsburgh.

So the old Saints QB took some Sammy Sosa cream and came out of retirement and switch sports to try to play baseball??

Shane Victorino is the third post-2015 Article XX-B MLB free-agent signed by the Cubs to a 2016 minor league contract (LHRP Manny Parra and INF Munenori Kawasaki are the other two). 

If an Article XX-B MLB free-agent signs a minor league contract at least ten days prior to MLB Opening Day, and then is either not released by 12 PM (Eastern) on the 5th day prior to MLB Opening Day or added to an MLB Active List (25-man roster) or MLB Disabled List by 3 PM (Eastern) on MLB Opening Day, the player automatically receives a $100,000 retention bonus, and the player can unilaterally opt-out of the minor league contract on June 1st if he has not been added to an MLB Active List (25-man roster) or an MLB Disabled List by that date.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: I think there was an issue with Luke Little coming into a game with men on base. He seems to need a "clean" inning to be dominant. So he is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AAA. Same goes for Michael Arias. He needs to come into a "clean" inning, and is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AA. Porter Hodge is a more versatile pitcher, a better version of Keegan Thompson (multi-inning RP). But Little, Arias, and Hodge (probably in that order) are the Cubs top three RP prospects (all three are Cubs Top 15 prospects).

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    So, let’s do a little war gaming. Taillon is back for tonight’s game. He pitched two rehab games, just a few innings each, and not especially sharp. Let’s face it, he hasn’t been lights out since the Cubs gave him the big contract. In other words, as flat out bad as Hendricks has been, the chances of Taillon being the savior don’t look exactly promising.

    If Taillon is equally ineffective or perhaps even worse, what’s the next move? Winning teams can often find a way to work around a dud fifth starter - kinda. Two dud starters make things much more difficult.

    I believe the biggest reason for the recent bullpen moves was dissatisfaction with the recent blowing of big leads and the recognition that the bullpen wasn’t all it was thought to be. In other words, they are exploring alternate options and configurations. If similar juggling becomes necessary (even more so than it already is), what kind of reasonable maneuvering do we think could be explored?

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Cubdom needs to prepare themselves for Wicks to be sent to Iowa for Taillon to come up.
    Ben Brown has 4 appearances. Wicks has 4 appearances.
    Ben has 16.1 IP.  Wicks has 17 IP
    Ben was a 1.1 WHIP.  Wicks has a 1.7 WHIP. Wicks does have significantly more SOs. 
    Ben has been better, though.
    I love Wicks. I think he's a fighter and his stuff has improved.
    But, Jed isn't ditching Hendricks just yet. He should. But he won't.
    Hendricks should go to the IL and Taillon-Imanaga-Assad-Wicks-Brown should be the rotation.
    Wont' happen though.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil,
    Did you agree with the demotion of Luke Little? He'd been pretty good up until the AZ/wild pitch appearance. I know that can't jettison Smyly (just yet) so they didn't need another LHRP. Especially with Leiter effectively being a LHRP. I still thought he deserved to stay. It's not permanent. He'll be back. Lots of moves to come with Taillon, Steele and other guys coming and going.

    Also, do you see Hodge being able to "control/command" his stuff to get a chance this year?
    Is Arias better than Hodge?   Thanks

  • crunch (view)

    just waiting to hear patrick wisdom and masterboney are spotted at the airport going in opposite directions...

    aj puk going for the marlins (lefty)...gotta imagine we'll see wisdom in the lineup.

    someone has to make room for taillon, too.

  • crunch (view)

    he's a low-level cubs star in the modern history of the cubs (c.zambrano, k.wood, r.dempster, etc), but that star has dimmed...and has been dimming since 2021.

    2024 has been ugly the whole way and we're only in mid-april.  homers aside (even though there's been 7 in 17ip) he gave up 29 hits in 20 spring innings and 31 in 17 regular season innings.

    he's pretty much only got 2 pitches at this point in his career and the mix isn't fooling anyone.  he threw a noticable amount more curves in his last start to add to the mix and it didn't help his issues.  he don't have many moves left to break out.

  • Eric S (view)

    Definitely needs a 10 day stint for the hangnail - have to nip those things in the bud or suffer the consequences (ie, more opponent home run derby, etc)