Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Dodgers Win the NL Pennant

Thanks for playing, everyone. Were it not for the bullpen, the offense, and the inconsistent starting pitching, things might have been different.

Be on the lookout for our Free Agents Predictions Contest. And we'll see you at the Winter Meetings.

Go Cubs! 

Comments

Thanks to you, CTSteve! TCR is a blast and really makes the season much more enjoyable. All the best to you until our paths cross again! Fun season, and Game 5 vs. the Nats is one for the memory books! Amazing -- Cubs scored 8 runs in the NLCS on 6 solo HRs and one 2-run shot. Never really had a true rally in 5 games. So much to think about for Theo and group -- assuming Jake and Davis go, those will be tough holes to fill. Maybe Schwarber to the AL for a closer, a la Soler for Davis last year? Happ and Almora need to play, and Hayward and Zobrist aren't going anywhere. I don't see a better alternative to Jake in the FA starter's market, but somebody (Dodgers? Angels?) will pay him crazy money, and he's been pretty focused on getting paid. But, they literally have no in-house options other than Monty, who's star has dimmed quite a bit. So -- raise a toast to another trip to the NLCS, and thanks to Jake for elevating this team in 2015. I really think it all started with him.

[ ]

In reply to by Hagsag

I would not be shocked to see them take a run at Jake. They have another 3-4 years in this window to win before everybody has to get paid, and who's available who's better than Jake for that period? They have traded all of their stud kids, so unless some AL team is drooling over Schwarber, I don't see a deal for a SP happening. Or, perhaps more likely, they will try to find another Jake/Hammell that they can fix. Sometimes that works, sometimes not (Brett Anderson). Sign Jake for 6 years, Lester's contract is up after 3 more, then you have Jake as an expensive #4/#5 starter in years 5-6 at the ages of 36-37. Looking at money coming of the books -- Leonys Martin made $5 million last year? Whaaa? Lackey, Jake, Wade, Jay, Rondon, Martin = $60 million of the annualized year-end payroll. They have some money to work with.

I think the Cubs will be fine. I do wonder how much longer they'll be better than the White Sox.

Thanks to CTSteve, AZ Phil and everyone at The Cub Reporter. Three years in a row getting to the NLCS is impressive. There's always last year.

WAS wont be bringing back dusty, but without a long postseason streak that writing was on the wall anyway. dusty's management rage-quit negotiations for an extension mid-season and WAS is really notorious for both not wanting to do hard negotiations (including draft picks) and having revolving-door coaches/management. also, ron gardenhire is the new tigers manager.

[ ]

In reply to by blockhead25

it's an easy scapegoat, though. you don't have to hire a $20-30m hitter/pitcher when you can shake up your management staff making a minimal investment (or sometimes saving money) that the fans approve of as if you're hired someone really important. in the case of dusty, jayson werth and jonathan papelbon are gone so there's 2/3rd of the worst toxic attitude issues (bryce harper, wussup) that dusty excels in keeping from killing each other while maintaining the will to play in the clubhouse. matt williams nearly destroyed the clubhouse and dusty cleaned that up. they probably don't need dusty anymore, anyway.

Hendricks and Quintana can be Cubs through 2020. Bryant, Rizzo, Russell, Schwarber, Lester and Baez go through 2021 Contreras through 2022 They're in perfect position to sign Bryce to a 3/10 year deal that is all the ragewith an opt-out after 2021. We'll have to wait a year for that and you know Nationals are going to try hard to get an extension done this season. They're no dummies. As for this offseason, Darvish or Arrieta are around the same age, I think Darvish is a little better but either one would work. But I doubt they go the 5-7 years it would take to get either ofthem. Maybe they go after Otani or Tanaka opts out, but more likely a lower-risk guy like Tillman or Cobb. Actually, I'm guessing Montgomery is in the rotation next year and the usual 3-5 guys signed to 1-year deals and minor league deals that compete and wait for the mid-season trade market to show itself. I really think Quintana trade was the Arrieta replacement if you look at what they started this season with (Lester, Arrieta, Hendricks, Lackey and throw a dart for a 5th starter). An improved bullpen will certainly be a focus, I think a run at Wade Davis makes sense. I can't imagine a lot of drop in his game, but we'll see. J. Mcgee as mentioned, B. Shaw, J. Gomez, G. Holland to name a few potential target and of course the trade market. They're still in great shape and they still have the right guys steering the ship. We have at least 4 years of this run to enjoy in my opinion.

I am thnking a fair deal trades Schwarber. They also will be looking to deal Mr. 4-3, and depending on how much salary they eat, he's gone. As I mentioned, somehow Friedman found a way to add cheap-ish starters with one or two plus pitches, amd stick them in the pen. With the game getting shorter and shorter, look for the Cubs to emulate this. Rick Honeycutt is damn good, also as their pitching coach. Brandon Morrow, Cigrani, Maeta...

"Cubs president of baseball operations Theo Epstein said Friday that he told Albert Almora he'd have "more" of a role in 2018." neat.

We're pretty much all in for Houston at this point, amirite? Other than Milo Hamilton and Lance Berkman, I'm having a hard time thinking of anything wrt the Astros that gives a Cub fan heartburn. And Altuve is awesome. Just think if that dude was at 2B for the Cubs.

[ ]

In reply to by Jim Hickmans Bat

My best anti-Astro memory was more related to Durocher's hate of the long departed Astrodome. per Bruce Miles... http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120910/sports/709109631/
In June 1966, when the Cubs were headed to a record of 59-103, Durocher yanked a phone out of the dugout. He did so again in August. "Oh, he did," (Billy) Williams said. "I think it was a bad call down in the Astrodome that made Leo take the phones out. I think there used to be four phones, and Leo snatched them all off the wall." Reports said the Astros sent Durocher a bill for the phones and installed a pink phone in the visitors dugout so Durocher could rip it out and not disrupt communications. When the installation of AstroTurf was completed during the '66 season, Astros publicity director Bill Giles sent Durocher the last piece of sod.

[ ]

In reply to by Eric S

Chris Bosio was one of Dale Sveum's guys who was kept on the coaching staff after Sveum got fired, but Bosio was never one of Maddon's posse. 

Coincidentally (or not), Chicago-native Jim Hickey (Maddon's long-time pitching coach at Tampa Bay) and the Rays "parted ways" a couple of weeks ago, and so I wouldn't be too surprised if Hickey becomes the new Cubs pitching coach.

link

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Further, as I've been saying here for a while, I fully expect the Cubs to make Rays RHSP Alex Cobb their #1 target in free-agency, and I would also not be surprised if the Cubs pursue Rays closer Alex Colome (first-time eligible for salary arbitration post-2017 and under control through 2020) and maybe even RHSP Chris Archer (under control through 2021) in a trade. The Rays need young MLB-ready position players with upside and so they certainly would have use for the likes of Ian Happ, Kyle Schwarber, and/or Victor Caratini. If the Cubs were to trade two or three of their young position players for pitching, they could go after a FA OF like J. D. Martinez. Even factoring in likely arbitration raises, the Cubs should have at least $50M to spend in 2018 payroll on salaries, making it possible to sign both a FA SP and a FA OF as well as a couple of veteran reliable FA relievers. I do think the NLCS debacle might cause the Cubs to reconsider the configuration of their lineup in 2018 as well as their bullpen, something they might not have otherwise considered before the start of the post-season.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

I couldn't agree more Phil, spot-on. Pitching needs are obvious, but the lineup itself is clearly no-bueno. If there is a creative way to get Heyward out of town while not eating all (half?) of his contract, that will be a high priority. And despite how much the front office clearly likes him, there's just no way they go with Schwarber again next year. The home runs aren't worth all the negatives. Tampa as a trade partner, I like it.

[ ]

In reply to by Jim Hickmans Bat

JHB: The problem with trading Jason Heyward this coming off-season or during the 2018 regular season is that he has a full "no trade" through the 2018 season, and I don't know what anyone could offer him to make him waive it. He's already making a - LOT - of money and it's all guaranteed, so unless the Cubs suddenly become a last-place team, I don't see Heyward waiving the "no trade" anytime soon. He has a partial "no trade" (where he can block a trade to 12 clubs - TBD) beginning with the post-2018 off-season and extending through the 2020 MLB regular season, after-which he gets full "no trade" rights again after the conclusion of the 2020 season as a "10/5 player." He also has a player opt-out post-2018 and post-2019, but again, unless the Cubs suddenly become a losing team -- and I would expect them to remain a strong contending club at least through the 2020 season if not through 2021 -- I don't see him opting out of a contract with a salary he would not possibly hope to get if he becomes a free-agent again post-2018 or post-2019.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

NTC simply means the player gets veto rights on any deal, all you need do is convince him it's in his best interest to move on. So Theo tells him from here on out, if you stay in Chicago, you're a part-time player and defensive specialist. 300 PAs/year max. Does a competitive, 28 year old guy want to accept that? I bet the answer is no. So swap him for another bad contract, someone like Cueto comes to mind, or maybe Jordan Zimmermann. If Theo could move Carl Crawford, surely he can find a way to move Heyward.

[ ]

In reply to by Jim Hickmans Bat

JHB: I think what you're saying would be more-likely to happen after the 2018 season, once his full NTC becomes a partial NTC (and when he can block a trade to no more than 12 clubs).

I doubt that there is anything Theo can say to Heyward right now to convince him that he will be miserable if remains with the Cubs and does not waive his NTC immediately. As you said, Heyward is a proud guy, and he probably sincerely believes he will have a sensational season in 2018 even if the Cubs don't think so.

However, if he continues to struggle offensively next year, I can see the Cubs maybe trading Heyward sometime after the conclusion of the 2018 season (up until he gets "10/5 rights" at the end of the 2020 season), either for somebody else's "bad contract," or if the Cubs eat a substantial portion of Heyward's remaining salary.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Maybe you can trade a bad contract but I'm not sure you can trade a contract that's historically bad, like Heyward's. Every team has a right fielder who hits more doubles and home runs than Heyward, so who would want him? The Giants have an RF who hits like Heyward, and they'll have to pay Hunter Pence around $18 million for one more year. But Pence is 34, and next year will be his last as a player. Heyward is 28, entering the third year of what will stretch out to eight years. Didn't the Cubs just go through this with someone else? Isn't that how we know how long eight years is? I thought this bunch knew what it was doing. Soriano couldn't be dumped until the middle of year seven, when the Yankees put him in pinstripes in exchange for a small percentage of his salary ($5 million) plus Corey Black. In 2022, maybe the Cubs will be able to work out something similar with Atlanta.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

He's blocking anyone who can hit (and also catch and throw decently). Wouldn't you rather have Happ in the lineup? They did a brief experiment with Happ at third in September, and it was a bit eye-opening (at least it opened mine). Theo referred to Happ's brief trial at third in his presser the other day, during a generally rave review of Happ's rookie season. They must have had something in mind, maybe Bryant moving to right field, which he could play pretty comfortably, I would guess.

I wouldn't call Eddie Butler a failure, Brett Anderson oh hell yes. Butler had a 3.95 ERA which was better than both Lester and Lackey, less hits/ip than Lester and Lackey, the best hr/ip than the entire starting staff, and a 4-3 record. It takes a pitcher a long time to earn Maddon's trust and Butler only got 50 IP, so Maddon treated him with kid gloves. The other offseason "reclamation project" addition Alec Mills (traded for Donnie Dewees) spent the vast majority on the DL at Iowa so no verdict there. The bullpen yes was brutal, even Davis at the end of the season despite only blowing one save during the season every game he put runners on it seemed.

[ ]

In reply to by cubbies.4ever

butler doesn't miss a lot of bats for a guy that throws mid-90s with 3 off-speed pitches...that's always been a big issue for him along with his inability to actually pitch a decent workload. i dunno how much more time he has before he's working the pen considering he's going to be 27 next spring. it's not like he's junk...he's got "stuff" and and variety of pitches he's got a feel for (even though he crutches on his fastball), but he's having a heck of a time finding a good mix of pitches to work with.

I realize Contreras has areas to improve as a catcher, such as pitch-framing, but, having seen several of the ALCS games -- Gary Sanchez is an absolute butcher on throws to the plate. I have seen 3 throws to the plate in the series, and he has badly botched each one. My goodness -- just terrible. Plays at the plate are one of Wilson's strengths, I think -- despite the occasional leg block.

ASTROS! woo. cubs/astros are on a similar "long rebuild and look what we have now" co-streak. plus, screw the yanks.

I agree with Phil, the Rays are a logical trading partner for the Cubs and maybe the Marlins too.

Recent comments

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?