Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Big Unit Signs With Giants, Remains Free to Continue Abusing Cubs

Despite a past association with current Cubs manager Lou Piniella and rumors that the Cubs had him in their sights, Walnut Creek, California native Randy Johnson has signed a one-year deal with the Giants for a reported $8 million plus bonuses,.

Particularly before Ryan Dempster was re-signed and then when the Jake Peavy deal fell through, Johnson was identified by fans and press alike as an affordable free agent option to bolster the Cubs staff.

Once Dempster was back in the fold, it was easy to get excited about the thought of Johnson replacing Jason Marquis as the Cubs' fifth starter. Also attractive was the thought that if Johnson came to the North Side, the Cubs would never have to face him: Johnson's career mark against the Cubs, spanning 14 starts, is 13-0, 1.84, with 142 K's in just 102 2/3 IP.

Comments

Darn. I was kind of liking the idea of Randy...at least as a fallback option. SF has got a pretty good rotation. Too bad their offense sucks.

Don't look now, but the Giants are a Dunn or Burrell away from being the class of a soft division. Right now they're at least in the same conversation as LA and Arizona.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

they got multiple scouts on the J-league (not counting the pacific rim coordination). it could get more interesting/intense if they start "stealing" younger players like theo in boston is trying to blaze a trail to do. that aside, the 2 guys theyre looking at would be lucky to get a guaranteed contract from any MLB team, much less the cubs. minor league/ST-invite or low-cost MLB contract (if it gets to that point) are the most likely options.

Question of the day: With the way the market has changed, if Dempster was still a free agent, could be still get 4/52? We'll probably know after Perez and Lowe signed, but I bet the Cubs might've gotten the fourth year on an option. Yay hindsight.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

From that story: "Since his rookie season in 2005, Taveras leads the Majors with 207 infield hits, accounting for 37 percent of his 558 career hits. A full third of his career hits never made it to the outfield grass. Is being the real life Willie Mays Hayes something to be proud of? I guess it has to be, because he sure can't be proud of that .308 OBP last year.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

Actually, I was thinking the opposite. If everything goes right, a roster of: Taveras Dickerson Phillips Votto Bruce Encarnacion Hernandez Gonzalez/Keppinger Harang/Volquez/Arroyo/Cueto/Bailey/Owings Cordero/Bray/Weathers/Burton/Rhodes ... could actually be a threat at least in the Wild Card race if not better. There's enough talent and experience there that I wouldn't dismiss this team by any means.

Off-topic and maybe previously mentioned, but Abreu's had eleven straight years of over 150 games played. Milton's high was 141 in 2004. Last year's 126 was his second highest games total and was obviously helped by DH duty. His third personal best falls all the way to 101. So unless you're content with your Fuku replacement possibly only replacing him half the time for large coin, I think I'd pass even if we can't get Abreu. He helped a couple of my fantasy teams last year but I don't see any reason the Cubs should be the team to pay him after a timely career year. Not to say we have an in-house option like them, but does anybody remember or have a record showing if Jerome Walton and Dwight Smith were highly touted prospects prior to the '89 campaign? I seem to recall them coming up from AA but I don't recall much beyond that.

[ ]

In reply to by mjmiller73

I'm not sure what they were in prospect rankings or anything like that, but here's what they did before joining the team in 1989. Jerome Walton - Taken 2nd Rd (36th overall) in 1986 June draft - 1986 Rookie League - .288-.376-.419 w. 21 SB in 62 games - 1987 A-Ball - .335-.452-.470 w. 49 SB in 128 games - 1988 AA-Ball - .331-.399-.425 w. 42 SB in 120 games Dwight Smith - Taken 3rd Rd (62nd overall) in 1984 June draft - 1984 Rookie League - .406 OBP w. 39 SB in 61 games - 1985 Low-A - .289-.374-.405 w. 30 SB in 73 games - 1986 A Ball - .310-.389-.473 w. 53 SB in 124 games - 1987 AA Ball - .337-.415-.542 w. 60 SB in 130 games - 1988 AAA Ball - .293-.367-.410 w. 25 SB in 129 games So as you can see, Walton was a high pick and moved rapidly through the system. Putting up a .452 OBP at any level is remarkable. It was clear by his average, OBP, and is SB success rate (42/55) in 1988 that he was probably ready for at least a big league shot. Smith was picked highly as well, but took longer to develop, but it should be noted he never repeated any levels. But he was more erratic than Walton. One year he was 60/78 in SB and the next 25/45. In 1987 he had 28 2B, 10 3B, and 18 HR, but in other years that power was non-existent. Still, he had some of the best raw speed of anyone in the system and was getting on base at a very high rate throughout his minor league career. So neither was completely off the radar, in fact Walton had put up better minor league numbers and was the same age as Pie is right now when he joined the majors. I don't think we have anyone like that in our system, besides Pie. And regardless, I would not want to sit around this off-season and just hope that someone from the minor leagues will become Rookie of the Year. It is far more likely that any minor leaguer called up will have a year more like Walton/Smith's 1990+ seasons and not their 1989 seasons.

[ ]

In reply to by mjmiller73

Walton was pretty highly touted, it wasn't a shock that he won the big league job. I remember reading an article where someone translated his Pittsfield (right?) stats and said he'd hit .300 in the bigs in '89. Smith was considered a solid hitting prospect - and his career bared that out. Walton, as I recall, got fat and stopped working hard.

Walton, as I recall, got fat and stopped working hard. ====== I'm no hitting coach but I remember some commentary on Walton's extremely open batting stance, which eventually became a problem. Expecially if one loses some bat speed or quickness. When he gained some weight (stopped working hard), he was never the same.

Thanks for the Walton and Smith info, Wiscgrad. I'm not necessarily advocating that waiting for a player to come out of the blue is the way to go (and I do believe Hendry signs a FA OF making this moot), but I do wonder if giving an in-house option the chance to play a larger role would be such a bad thing when weighed against Bradley's injury history. Knowing that both Walton and Smith didn't come without expectations hedges that thinking a bit. I'm prepared to see Abreu sign elsewhere though I think he'd be a great fit. If Hendry does get Bradley, I'll just be hoping for the best.

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

I was just thinking yesterday what a good job Angelo does drafting defensive players. We should find a team that has the reverse problem (can draft offensive players but not defensive ones) and have them draft a quarterback and WR for us and trade them a CB and OLB we draft.

If the Giants are to be considered contenders in the NL West, they had better plan on winning every game 2-1, because when Bengie Molina is your biggest threat, there are some serious holes in your lineup. Have they acquired anyone to play RF, 3B, 2B, 1B, or SS yet? OPS+ across the board: C-98 Not a bad season from the senior Molina 1B-83 Bowker hot and cold..., .300 OBP, .408 SLG not great 2B-109 Ray Durham....is still alive. 3B-74 Jose Castillo...meh....671 OPS...yikes. SS-45-goodbye Omar Vizquel, what a great career LF-105 Fred Lewis..showed some flashes, stole 21 bases, hit 11 triples CF-94 Aaron Rowand. A little different not hitting in Philly huh? RF-105 Randy Winn. .789 OPS. Will be 35 in June. 10HR 65 RBI. Fukudome had 10 HR, 58 RBI. Matt Cain was 8-14 despite a 3.76 ERA last year, Lincecum was outstanding, Zito can't pitch with a huge fork sticking out of his back. Jonathan Sanchez showed promise at 9-12, but still had a 5.01 ERA in 158 innings. Randy Johnson is 44, and who knows how he will pitch this season.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

They picked up Renteria to play SS. That should be a huge upgrade. They seem like a perfect fit for an Adam Dunn. He could play LF or 1st and add alot to that lineup. Hell, if they added Burrell and Dunn they win that division with their pitching. Shades of 2007 Cubbies.

Defensive players Angelo has drafted: Dan Bazuin Michael Okwo Leon Joe Jamar Williams Roosevelt Williams Michael Haynes Todd Johnson Claude Harriott Chris Harris...oh...hmm..so he's good? Crap...at least they go Manning jr? Dusty "IR" Dvoracek Mark Anderson-great 2006....then ugh. Karon Riley Bobby Gray The jury is still out on Zack Bowman, Craig Steltz, and Corey Graham and Marcus Harrison who have shown flashes. So Angelo hit on Kevin Payne kinda, Manning as a KR, Hester as a return man, decent #2 receiver, Tommie Harris...Tillman and Briggs, and even Ian Scott was decent. Alex Brown has been a solid player for years as well. A great drafter though?

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

Alot of that depends on where they were drafted. Anderson was a late 5th round pick and was a valuable member of a NFC championship team so it was a good pick. I think alot of his struggles in the 2 past season have come about by misuse. Anyone could have told you that as an every down player Alex Brown was a better choice than Anderson. He is a pass rush specalist and used primarliy in that role he will produce. Chris Harris was a 6th round pick who started every game in his Bears career and when he got traded only led the league in forced fumbles to go along with 101 tackels for Carolina in 07. I would say that was a good pick. When healthy Dvorceck has shown he can play and a valuable member of a DT rotion, so I would rate it as an OK pick so far. Johnson, Joe, and Williams were 4th rounders who are nice special teams players, yeah they were better picks out there, but atleast they were/are contributors to the team. You cant hold Gray, Harriott or Riley aganist Angelo, they were 5th round picks and what 33% of 5th rounders make it in the NFL? The only flatout busts he has had on defense are Bazuin, Haynes, Okwo and Williams. Outside of Parcells, Belicheck/Pioli, Newsome and whoever does the Steelers draft I dont think there is a better eye for defensive talent among GMs in the NFL.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

"Chris Harris was a 6th round pick who started every game in his Bears career..." This was a monumental, huge blunder - to let him go... As I said, "Fuck you Jerry Angelo"

Yes...If they add Dunn and Burrell. They may also have the worst defensive OF in baseball. If they trade for A-Rod and Grady Sizemore....if...if... Assuming they add Burrell and Dunn...fairly big ifs, they still have holes at 3B, SS, and 2B if Ray Durham declines at age 36.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

They traded Durham to Milwaukee last year. I hadn't seen if he has returned. But you are correct. The offense does indeed suck.

Sorry, Renteria will play SS. My apologies Dr.Aaron

Nathan Vasher...who has disappointed in the last two seasons as well. Sorry for the omission..

Submitted by The Real Neal on Sun, 12/28/2008 - 11:14am.

Walton was pretty highly touted, it wasn't a shock that he won the big league job. I remember reading an article where someone translated his Pittsfield (right?) stats and said he'd hit .300 in the bigs in '89. Smith was considered a solid hitting prospect - and his career bared that out. Walton, as I recall, got fat and stopped working hard.

============================

REAL NEAL: Jerome Walton got a ton of bunt hits in 1989, whereas Dwight Smith hit line-drive ropes all over the place and was the better "pure" hitter. But Walton was (by far) the superior defensive player of the two.

Walton had an outstanding rookie season in 1989, including a 30-game hitting streak (which I believe was the second-longest in Cubs history), but he was very upset that he didn't get a big payday after he won the Rookie of the Year Award (he didn't understand that the system doesn't work that way), and so he pouted the whole next season and allowed himself to get out of shape. Then he suffered a hamstring injury that caused him to lose a step and he never got it back. Also, his brother was shot & killed in an armed robbery around that time and that seemed to have a negative effect on him, too, and he just was never the same carefree player as he was in 1989.

Dwight Smith was a below-average defender who had difficuulty tracking fly balls and reading line drives. Any ball hit into the air in his direction was an adventure. And he was a brain-dead baserunner, too, always trying to take one base too many (The Bridge Too Far).

Walton and Smith were the last of the Dallas Green-Gordon Goldsberry products that came through the Cubs farm system in the 1980's, following the likes of Shawon Dunston, Rafael Palmeiro, Greg Maddux, Mark Grace, Jamie Moyer, Dave Martinez, Mike Harkey, Damon Berryhill, Les Lancaster, Derrick May, Shawn Boskie, Gary Varsho, Joe Girardi, et al to The Show. 

There are plenty of players still available who can help the Cubs in 2009 (because right now they are a lesser team than last season: plus Gregg, minus Wood). They need a lefty reliever or two, and there are several out there. They need a left handed hitter and there are a few in the field. My only hope is that Hendry is not pulling a MacPhail and waiting for some of them to "cheap down" (like Moises Alou did), while running the risk that he will emerge with no help at all. Weighing in on Walton, the Cubs thought a lot of him back in '89 when he made the team and they weren't disappointed. He basically ate himself out of baseball; he reported to camp on '90 almost 20 pounds heavier, lost bat and running speed, and suffered a succession of nagging injuries that hampered him the rest of his career. He wasn't even good enough to be a spare part after that soph season.

Dr. Aaron...wht's what I get for not paying attention.. I forgot Durham was traded. I blame the holidays!!! Or something..

Nice Muskrat retrospective on Gracey: http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081125&content_id=36… Technically, his last game at Wrigley was in August (?) 03. It was a great, rain-soaked day. Cubs won, Clement outdueled Brandon Webb and the cheering for Gracey was so loud it might've knocked some concrete off of the upper deck. Sadly, my photos didn't turn out. No chance at the HoF, nor should he get in. But what a fun player to cheer for.

I don't know if some of you caught it, or if its 3/44, but Bruce Levine mentioned Saturday that the impending sale/non-sale is really throwing a big-ass wrench in allowing Hendry to do his thing to the best of his ability. BL did state that Bradley is still being courted, but the money thing with the Cubs at this current moment is just a quagmire. And, of course, here it is status quo as I am dusting off my checkbook once again, getting ready to plunk down for another season ticket package.

Recent comments

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    I suspect Brown will spend some time in the bullpen due to inning restrictions.  Pitched only 93 innings last year and career high is 104 innings in 2022.  I would expect them to be cautious with a young player with his injury history.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Teheran minor league deal is done, per MLB.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Based on Phil’s sound analysis it sounds like a no brainer for Almonte to be placed on waivers as today’s roster move. We shall see.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: I think there was an issue with Luke Little coming into a game with men on base. He seems to need a "clean" inning to be dominant. So he is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AAA. Same goes for Michael Arias. He needs to come into a "clean" inning, and is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AA. Porter Hodge is a more versatile pitcher, a better version of Keegan Thompson (multi-inning RP). But Little, Arias, and Hodge (probably in that order) are the Cubs top three RP prospects (all three are Cubs Top 15 prospects).

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    So, let’s do a little war gaming. Taillon is back for tonight’s game. He pitched two rehab games, just a few innings each, and not especially sharp. Let’s face it, he hasn’t been lights out since the Cubs gave him the big contract. In other words, as flat out bad as Hendricks has been, the chances of Taillon being the savior don’t look exactly promising.

    If Taillon is equally ineffective or perhaps even worse, what’s the next move? Winning teams can often find a way to work around a dud fifth starter - kinda. Two dud starters make things much more difficult.

    I believe the biggest reason for the recent bullpen moves was dissatisfaction with the recent blowing of big leads and the recognition that the bullpen wasn’t all it was thought to be. In other words, they are exploring alternate options and configurations. If similar juggling becomes necessary (even more so than it already is), what kind of reasonable maneuvering do we think could be explored?