Recap | Box Score | Play-by-play | Game Chart
W: Mark Prior (4-1) L: Luis Vizcaino (2-2)
After yesterday, not to mention his own last few outings, Mark Prior came to the realisation that he simply can't trust his bullpen. So he went the distance himself and averted a potentially very embarrassing sweep by the White Sox in our own backyard. In the end, thanks to Jason Dubois and the return of the much-missed three-run shot, Mark Prior didn't quite need to throw that perfect game I was speaking of earlier, though he did retire the first ten hitters he faced with ease, effectiveness and efficiency, four of them by strikeout. A solo home run by Tadahito Iguchi though tied the game at one (Henry Blanco had put us ahead!), and Mark Prior, as is becoming slightly unnervingly common, fell apart a little. Aaron Rowand doubled, Paul Konerko followed with a walk as Prior started to pull his fastball down and away from right-handers as he does, and AJ Pierzynski hit a line drive. Derrek Lee saved the day and the tie by leaping to snare the ball and then throwing to second for the double play. That at least made up for his horrendous earlier error that cost the Cubs a run. Lee, who had been at first, paused at second on a Burnitz double upon the say-so of Juan Uribe, who alledged the ball had gone foul. By the time Lee realised he'd been duped, he could only make it to third, where Ramirez stranded him by lining out to left. Ramirez made some good contact today, two lineouts, a warning track shot and a walk, and his .233 batting average on balls in play won't last, so don't worry about him too much. The tie didn't last though. Jermaine Dye put a good swing on a fastball to lead off the fifth, and Prior didn't truly settle down again until he managed to strike out impressive debut pitcher Brandon McCarthy on a full count. A 1-2-3 sixth for Prior followed, the pitch that got Podsednik on strikes (again) being particularly nasty. Podsednik reached just once, and his speed had no influence on the game as a result. You can't steal first base. Well, not today at least. The Cubs last year were supposedly a team overly reliant on the home run, far too inconsistent in their run-scoring, a dozen one day but not very many the next. That's changed so far this year, or at least of late, with the Cubs instead being very consistent, just scoring not very many runs at all every time out. Jason Dubois was obviously a bit fed up with that, so he launched a Luis Vizcaino offering to deep right-center, his natural power alley, and for the first time in what seems an age, the Cubs had a lead of more than a run. Prior kept it that way by pitching his way out of jams in the seventh and eighth, getting a pair of critical pop-ups and a big double play respectively. By the time Konerko hit the third home run of the day off Prior in the ninth to halve the deficit, it was too little too late. Cubs win, Cubs win! The Cubs have a critical seven days coming up. Three against the Astros and four with the Rockies, all at Wrigley. 5-2 would put them back at .500. Let's do it!


Um, you may want to change the graphic to a "W," seeing as how the Cubbies won this one. I know that it just feels natural to hit load the "L" graphic, but hey, lets revel in our victories, no?

That "L" is for Long and far between.

Maybe it's for Latroy didn't get a chance to blow it.

How about Lotsa pitches?

Perhaps it's just short for Lovable Losers.

Oops, thanks for the heads up Eric. Force of habit or just forgetfulness?

I know Mr. John Hill is writing when I read "...Dye put a good swing on a fastball." Just not a phrase anyone has ever uttered in the colonies. Don't mean it as a dis. Love your stuff. It's just sort of... charming, mate.

Anyway, I was at the game. Thank God we won one. There were a hell of a lot of Sox fans there and they were making a lot more noise than the Cub fans.

I would have written something more enlightening, tbone, but I actually missed the home run since I was late getting back to my computer after the inning break! All I caught was the side on slow-motion replay of Dye's swing and it was only the people in the chat that told me of the home run (well, that and the scoreline).

It was good to nab at least one game from the Sox. The Sox scored 6 of their 13 runs on HRs in the series, a little surprising, at least for me.

I'm getting concerned about our dependence upon outings like Prior's for our victories. 14 of the Cubs's 19 wins this year have had the starting pitcher pitch 6 or more innings; 5 of our 6 wins in May (the bobble-fest in DC on Friday the 13th is the only win where we have not had a dominant starting pitching performance). It seems that the answer to the bullpen problems has not been to try and improve it, but to stretch our starters -- a move that may keep us hovering around .500 through the All-Star break but is not a long-term solution.

I'd like to see the Cubs dispatch Remlinger with haste and try to pick up one of the following relievers, who are all having good years on a bad Indian team (listed in order of my preference):

David Riske (0.93 ERA, 14 K in 18.1 innings)
Rafael Betancourt (1.33 ERA, 16 K in 20.1 innings)
Bob Howry (2.55 ERA, 12 K in 17.2 innings)

Betancourt makes the minimum, Riske and Howry make somewhere from $1.5-$2.0 M, arb-eligible dollars. (Cleveland will, of course, rather trade us Arthur Rhodes or Bob Wickman!)

If the Cubs look to pick up a raltively high-priced middle reliever, Shigetoshi Hasegawa (2.61 ERA, 11 K in 20.2 innings) may be available from the Mariners. It is not clear to me that he figures into their long-term plans, which seems to be to load up on expensive offensive talent, pitch Jamie Moyer and Aaron Sele until well-past their expiration date, and wait for Felix Hernandez.

I love the Cleveland bullpen too! In addition to Riske, Betancourt and Howry, and Arthur Rhodes who's throwing great, they also have Matt Miller and Scott Sauerbeck, and in Triple-A they have young Fernando Cabrera who owns this line...

1.17 ERA, 23 IP, 18 H, 1 HR, 3 BB, 28 K

And, of course, they have closer Bob Wickman, who's their worst reliever.

The Indians should be looking to dump the salaries of Howry, Rhodes and Wickman now, while their value is still high. The only one of these that I would like to see as a Cub is Howry, who can be more-effective than Remlinger. Rhodes, Wickman and all Matt Miller scare me.

This Sporting News article has an interesting tidbit -- apparently, the Brewers would have traded Kolb to the Cubs for Hawkins and Wuertz, and indicates that the Brewers think Hawkins is a bargain. How about Hawkins to Milwaukee for Mike Maddux and Jorge de la Rosa?

DC Tom--
"apparently, the Brewers would have traded Kolb to the Cubs for Hawkins and Wuertz"

I'm staggered. You're saying the Brewers would have traded an okay closer for a premium setup man and an excellent young relief arm? Are they crazy or something!

Hawkins is a bargain if the Cubs are stupid enough to sell him now.

Here are Hawkins' numbers from the beginning of the 2002 season through June 4th 2004 (in which time he was used entirely as a setup man)...

1.91 ERA, 188.1 IP, 149 H, 12 HR, 36 BB, 162 K

Allow me to list for you the number of pitchers for the same time frame who posted a lower ERA (minimum of 140 innings, or 60 per season)...

Eric Gagne
Mariano Rivera

That is all.

His numbers from June 4th 2004 through today...

3.42 ERA, 68.1 IP, 11 HR, 14 BB, 57 K

Awful. A 3.42 ERA. A K/BB ratio over 4. God, he's awful. Trade him!

The only real difference is the leap in his home run rate, which is a bit of a problem. But he's still an extremely effective reliever. Which makes it all the more ironic that those that whinge and cry about the ineptitude of the bullpen want him traded. Just get off his back and let him pitch as a setup man and watch him prosper.

Recent comments

The first 600 characters of the last 16 comments, click "View" to see rest of comment.
  • based on what SF has been doing every other year lately, getting access to the postseason playoffs seems to be what's important. bring on dat short series!

    that said, skipping the sudden death 1-game WC would be nice from here on out.

  • I know what you are saying, but I feel compelled to point out that there's no such thing as luck, curses, etc. The Cubs this year have as good as a chance as the Pirates to move on to the next round. If the Cubs proceed to the next round or not tomorrow, it will not be because of luck, but because one team outlasted the other. When/if the Cubs are lucky enough to make it to the league series, that's where they may find their biggest challenge. The Dodgers have a good, deep pitching staff.

  • debuting the new format 1 game "sudden death" WC matchup at yankee stadium does a perfect job of showing the intense emotion and drama this game can be.

    that said, i'm ready to not see yankee stadium or hear fans at yankee stadium for another 5 and 1/2 months. at least i don't have to sit through the braves with their "tommy hawk chawp" this postseason.

  • i'd like to know why the mlb.tv internet radio feed of the game (which is always delayed by a few seconds at best) is almost a minute faster than the ESPN cable TV coverage. wtf?

  • i dont know what order they'll be in, but i pretty much expect fowler/schwarb/rizzo/bryant/montero/castro/lastella/arrieta. any change at all (aside from the first 4 guys) wouldn't shock me, though. coghlan is still a wildcard in the lineup equation...plus joe could always march d.ross out there with very slow arrieta pitching.

  • Yup. Have to agree. Baseball, like golf, certainly has that psych component for the player. There is no real reason why a fielding position should affect a batting average. The Cubs are 106 years over due for a little luck. Don't you guys think so? Maybe the rookies can bring some dumb luck on.

  • probably stacking capable lefties vs cole while keeping the "hot" castro in the game. fwiw, he's 1-6 lifetime with 0 bb/k vs cole (double).

    i chalk bryant's issues at the plate while playing OF up to coincidence so far.

  • I will call your dead horse, "Trigger".

    In one game, when anything is possble, I am glad that Joe Maddon is our Manager.

    He knows the stats better than all of us. It would seem, IF La Stella gets the start at 3B, it will be only up to the point that they were to get the lead (crosses fingers). From everything I have read, the game will be managed like a hoops game: offense/defense. So expect La Stella to be out of the game by the 5th. This team is incredibly deep which is so surprising. We never woulda thunk it.

  • i don't know what their roster plans are, but j.herrera is out there practicing with the team.

    i can't imagine him making any roster, though. dude had 4 PA the entire month of sept. him being a good dude to be around while keeping the clubhouse loose seems to be his main role at this point.

  • I know it's my own personal dead horse to beat --but Bryant has been a lousy hitter when playing the OF this year. Given that it's his first playoff game, I really hope they keep him in his natural position and don't mess with his routine.

    Lousy as in 8-for-45 with one XBH and no HR. Small sample and all that -- but why take the chance?

  • hard to tell what's up given they'll probably want to stack as many good lefties into the lineup as possible.

    castro being a bit hot doesn't help things. if he was still cool they'd probably stick la stella at 2nd and call it a day.

  • Madden won't announce lineups but Stella is practicing at 3rd and Bryant in LF today. I'd rather see Bryant at 3rd but I guess Stella has been hotter than Coghlan.

    /edit. Though I guess they could be practicing this with the idea Stella would come in as a PH then double switch him to 3rd base and Bryant to LF. Hope that's the plan instead

  • I really like the sound of that idea about expanding the AFL to ten teams. Each org. gets to field more players.
    They should do that anyway, regardless of Adv. Instructs.

  • Dallas Beeler, Corey Black, David Garner, Pierce Johnson, Steve Perakslis, James Pugliese, Duane Underwood Jr, and Rob Zastryzny threw early-morning bullpen side-sessions at Riverview yesterday.  

    Underwood threw last, and received specific one-on-one instruction from pitching coach Mike Mason. 

  • HAGSAG: There are only five advanced instructs squads left, and presently the only "co-op" team operating is the Angels/Cubs.

    The league was originally established as a "parallel" league to the AFL (a sort of "junior AFL"), for players too advanced for traditional ("basic") instructs but who were unable to get placed on AFL rosters due to AFL player-limits.

  • He is but I would think it'd be better to start out with offense and then bring in Jackson and LaStella once they have a lead. Stella has very good PH #s too.