Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Today in Cubs History: 12-23

Not too much happens, generally, the closer we get to Christmas. But here's one gem: 12-23-1997 - Traded Doug Glanville to the Philadelphia Phillies. Received Mickey Morandini. I believe there will be at least one detailed article, perhaps more, posted today and tomorrow. So feel free to use this as an open-thread, while the articles stay more on-topic.

Comments

Reggie Sanders, http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/sports/baseball/mlb/kansas_cit… Sanders now a Royal Reggie Sanders said Thursday that he has agreed to a two-year, $10 million contract that is expected to be signed today. hmmmm.....hard to believe they have signed anyone, but their money is still green R. Sanders M. Grudzielanek D. Mientkiewicz P. Bako

I'd have liked sanders in a 4th OF/platoon type role, but 2/10 for a 38 y/o? Makes the jjones deal look better. Also, X in the last thread nailed it on the head about prior, I would hate like hell to see him go, but I guess it depends on if you want to win now or later...I say now, and I say keep him. I don't think tejada's worth it for one, and I think the cubs could get him for less, for two. I know about angelos and the asking price, but if it's really that high, let them keep him. If he's really disgruntled (which I quetsion) it'll show, and his value will be less at the deadline or next winter

"R. Sanders M. Grudzielanek D. Mientkiewicz" That's really not a bad haul for the Royals. It's not going to put them in the top 3 in their division. It probably doesn't even get them out of last place. But it is an improvement over what they had before without spending big bucks on anyone. It's really a shame that franchise can't be competitive. In the 70s and 80s, they had one of the best fan bases in baseball relative to population. The economics of the game have made thriving in KC/Pittsburgh nearly impossible. It's things like that that make my back off of my republican economic beliefs and start to think the Communists or at least the socialists had a decent idea. KC and Pittsburgh are great small cities with great sports fans. They deserve better than the snot with bats that they are forced to root for. The Cubs bring most of thier problems on themselves, as they have the resources to do better. But the Royals and Pirates in particular are truly handicapped.

Frankly, I think the O's should be keeping Tejada. It would send a terrible message to their players and their fans if they do otherwise.

"Frankly, I think the O's should be keeping Tejada. It would send a terrible message to their players and their fans if they do otherwise." X, I think that is why this deal will not get done now, but once the season starts and there in last place and their fans see that they would be better off trading Tejada for prospects like Cedeno, Hill, Dopiriak, and Ryu or Marmol a trade would become more possible.

Any idea on how this trade talk may affect Prior if he stays (which I hope is the case)? Would he resent it?

"trading Tejada for prospects like Cedeno, Hill, Dopiriak, and Ryu or Marmol" I don't think they'd want guys like that for Tejada. They'd want top tier, A level prospects. And they'd get them.

Brick- I can't imagine it being a sign of goodwill towards Prior. And all the talk of him being a So Cal kid will be pushed away with big wads a cash from the highest bidder. Ask Mr. Texan Roger Clemens, who will be pitching in Boston or NY in 2006.

If the Royals didn't give those guys no-trade deals, then they're brilliant. Think about it from the player's perspective: make more money, have less stress for the first half of the year, and know that you're going to get traded to a contender in late July.

From Neyers chat: "BT Chicago: Rob, What's your take on the Prior/Tejada rumors? Would you trade a starting pitcher of his potential whne he's only 24? Rob Neyer: (11:11 AM ET ) Yes, I would. Prior's still got the potential, but he's not proved he can stay healthy. Meanwhile, Tejada's an outstanding player who's missed exactly zero games in the last five years."

I for one am happy to see some teams like the Royals and Pirates making some decent moves. While it may not get them to the top of their division, at least they are improving their teams. I also like that some good ballplayers (albeit older) are taking reasonable contracts from teams that can only offer reasonable contracts.

Under the heading of Don't Know What It Means, But It Looks Interesting: Looking at the Cubs two recent pennant-contending years, '03 & '04, they succeeded in 2003 by being a better defensive team than the league, allowing 4.22 R/G against a league adjusted average ( by subtracting the Cubs numbers out) of 4.63. Offensively, they were sub-par, plating 4.47 R/G against an NL adjusted 4.62. Yet, in 2004 they were better than the league-adjusted averages on both sides and finished worse. Offensively, they improved to plus-.15 over the league (4.87 vs. 4.62) and even improved their pitching numbers by posting a 4.10 RA/G against the NL adjusted 4.69. Yet, they improved their record by only one win and finished 16 games out of first. Clearly part of this oddity is that the Cubs had a horrendous final two weeks along with St. Louis's phenomenal improvement from 2003. they dropped their RA/G by nearly a run, even though their offense slipped a little; they were still above par in 2004 but not nearly as much as they were in 2003. As I said, I have no idea what this means, but it seems fascinating.

The rumors about the prior trade are interesting, now if we could only button down the teams & players... 1. Prior & C-pat to Red Sox, Manny to O's, Tejada to Cubs? 2. Prior & C-pat to O's for Tajada? 3. Prior to Yankees, Crosby +1 to O's, Tejada to Cubs? My head is spinning...any way you slice it, If the deal goes, we've got to get Millwood. I'd be sad to see Mark go, but you've got to give to get. This move solidifies our offence despite our outfield challenges, firmly places Neifi on the bench, provides an all star caliber everyday player for a pitcher with significant potential. I like the Idea...Substitute Wood and I LOVE the idea, substitute Z and I'm not so sure...

The Baltimore Sun reported today that there were preliminary discussions involving a 3-way with the A's--but not like Az Phil was thinking. Registrations is required, so I'll save you all the pain: Orioles still in Tejada trade talks Sources: Cubs offering Prior, but O's wary of injury-prone starter By Jeff Zrebiec Sun Reporter Originally published December 23, 2005 The Orioles remain in trade talks with several teams about Miguel Tejada, but as of now, no team has matched the club's asking price for the disgruntled All-Star shortstop. According to team and industry sources, the most serious discussions the Orioles are having about Tejada appear to be with the Chicago Cubs, who are dangling a package that includes standout right-handed pitcher Mark Prior. According to industry sources, however, the Cubs want Orioles left-hander Erik Bedard included in the deal and don't want to trade top outfield prospect Felix Pie, whom the Orioles covet. The Orioles also are slightly wary of Prior's recent history of elbow troubles and would prefer obtaining Carlos Zambrano, but the Cubs reportedly have no interest in trading him. As of now, according to a source with knowledge of the trade talks, the two teams are not yet close to an agreement despite several proposals being sent back and forth. Cubs second baseman Todd Walker, center fielder Corey Patterson and 25-year-old left-handed pitching prospect Rich Hill have also been mentioned in a deal, but the Orioles aren't enthralled with Walker or Patterson. Walker would essentially be a bench player with All-Star Brian Roberts entrenched at second base, and Patterson struggled mightily last season and would not seem to constitute that big of an upgrade over Luis Matos, whose status as the Orioles' everyday center fielder is in jeopardy. The Orioles and Cubs have been in discussions for several weeks and have even gotten several teams involved in the trade talks. According to two industry sources, there was some preliminary discussion between the Orioles, Cubs and Oakland Athletics on a three-way deal that included Tejada, Bedard, Prior and Oakland ace Barry Zito among others heading to new homes. Prior and Zito were the centerpieces of the package coming to the Orioles in the early talks. But at this point, the A's asking price for Zito appears to be sky-high, and the Orioles wouldn't be interested in obtaining the left-hander in a deal unless they can sign him - this is his contract year - to a long-term deal and that appears unlikely. The Boston Red Sox, Houston Astros, New York Mets, Chicago White Sox and Los Angeles Angels also reportedly have interest in Tejada, though to this point, none has come close to matching the Orioles' asking price. The Orioles have no interest in trading Tejada within the division to the Red Sox, but it is not impossible, according to a team source, that the club could get Red Sox slugger Manny Ramirez in a three- or four-team deal without trading Tejada to Boston. The Orioles are interested in White Sox right-hander Jon Garland, who is a free agent after this season, and had some talks with Chicago last week in a deal that didn't include Tejada, according to industry sources. However, the White Sox wanted Bedard, instead of pitching prospects in the deal, and the Orioles balked. Despite telling several teammates, including Brian Roberts and Ramon Hernandez, that his public demand for a "change of scenery" earlier this month was said out of frustration and he didn't want to leave Baltimore, Tejada's representation has told the Orioles recently that the former MVP still wants a trade. The Orioles clearly want to keep the shortstop but seem to be at least willing to deal him if the price is right. However as of now, it appears that Tejada will remain an Oriole at least through Christmas.

"3. Prior to Yankees, Crosby +1 to O's, Tejada to Cubs?" Um...Who exactly is +1? Cuz in order for the Os to give up Tejada for Crosby +1, that +1 better be pretty damn good. I don't see this one happening. Your scenarios also leave out any mention of Bedard, Hill, Pie, Cedeno, etc. all of whom are being mentioned. If I am baltimore, I insist on Cedeno as they need someone to play SS and they have nobody right now either on the MLB team, or near ready in the high minors.

Looking at it from the historical perspective, I'm on the fence concering Tejada. The Cubs getting rid of a talented pitcher, something they always have a shortage of, for still more power, something they've had my whole life and have yet to win with. Now i know with the outfield as currently constituted, power has to come from somewhere else, but moving your #2 when the distance from you #2 to #3 is a horrifying drop (not counting on Wood) I just don't know. I'd be more excited if they added Millwood (I know, really expensive) or Zito (wouldn't include Prior) On those cold days in April, May and September, when 400 foot homers become 340 foot outs, a power hitting shortstop won't be so thrilling. Pitching always wins. As this year's mantra goes: Just look at the White Sox.

Re #14, I was just about to post that article myself, Brian. The Orioles are smoking something if they think they can trade Tejada and get both Zito and Prior! I think that has to be a reporting mistake.

And obviously I didn't mention Bedard in my post which would take a bit of the sting out of losing Prior. But I remain in love with adding pitching, not subtracting pitching and adding power.

More Neyer: "Kevin DC: Hi Rob, Is Jim Hendry an idiot? He seems to be making moves that will hamper the cubs.... Rob Neyer: (12:06 PM ET ) An idiot? No, I wouldn't say that. I'm sure Hendry could manage a meat market in Texas or a lemonade stand in the Sahara. A baseball team in a Chicago, though? I'm starting to have my doubts..."

X, You probalby already are a communist. If you're like most Americans you're basing your retirmentent on a 401k scheme. If you work for a publicly traded corporation, your company's stock is proabably owned by millions of other Americans through thier 'shares' of mutual funds. Millions of other Americans are working for you by making thier company more successful, and thus increasing your 401k's value. Welcome to communism- it's not as bad as everyone thought. As for trading Prior for Tejada- the truth is that Prior is more easily replaceable (Millwood or Weaveror for 2007 :Garland, Schmidt, Radke,Contreras, Petitte, Mulder, Zito + whoever becomes the next Garland). I'm not keen on getting Millwood, though. It's posible the Cubs bullpen will be good enough to save his butt like Cleveland's did last year- he still had a lot of luck going by DIPS, as I recall.

Do you ever wonder if: ;Your call Do you trade Mark Prior? No -- you win with pitching Yes -- you have to give up good players to get good players Maybe -- it depends on what you get in return On the Cubs website is used as a public sounding board by McPhail? And of course, if it is, the next question is, should it be?

Yes, I do wonder, yes, i think it's very possible, I know they've got people scanning places like these (they've got to for fan reaction) yes, they probably think half or all of us are nuts, yet they inexplicably love a certain poster we'll call 'MT' At the end of the day, trade prior or don't, I love the guy, i dig the fact that they drafted him, but if it'll make the team better, so be it. I just don't see how you top a healthy (presumably) prior at this point, and I don't think tejada's bat or his D are enough to outweigh the cost

Sign Roger Rocket.... Trade Rusch, Williams Move Wood to bullpen Trade Patterson, Williams and a minor prospect to Boston for Matt Clement You'd have a rotation of Zambrano, Prior, Clemens, Clement and Maddux..... An outfield of Murton, Pierre and Jones an infield of Ramirez, Cedeno, Perez/Hairston/Walker and Lee Catcher Barrett... Should prove to be a pretty good team...a very formidable pitching staff...and a league average offense.

so you're trying to have the same conv on two threads too, huh? I'm really starting to like the 'concentrate on Zito' idea. I'm not sure it'll work, but any combination of Z Prior Zito Wood Maddux Rusch Williams (preferably the top 5) sounds like a division winner waiting to happen to me, and that's with the lineup as it stands right now today

Zito would be a nice pickup for the Cubs. But with Zambrano already owning the "Z" nick, I propose we refer to Zito as Z2, which pretty much sounds the same as well. So our rotation would be: "Z" "Z2" "Z other 3"

very nice, I was thinking more along the lines of (you guessed it)... The Killer Z's

Didn't the Cubs have the Killer Z's last season? Because it always seemed like the team was alseep during the games....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

"You probalby already are a communist" The worst part about blogs is that they don't have IGNORE buttons.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.