Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

TCR Friday Notes

- Bruce Miles and the beat writers are back in business with the start of spring training. Miles says Geovany Soto has come to camp in great shape, Z is sporting a 'stache and will not pitch for Venezuela in the WBC. He also says that Z is holding off on laser eye surgery due to an infection and some odd eye geometry on his behalf. There appears to be some video at the Trib of Z and the Cubs in Arizona on the sidebar, but I can't get it to load.

- Fangraphs takes a look at the best outfield arms and comes to the shocking revelation that Alfonso Soriano is good and Juan Pierre is not. 

- An interview with the Phils former GM, Pat Gillick, gives some insight on the Cubs corner outfielder pursuit this winter.

--On whether the Phillies may have overpaid for Ibanez (three years, $31.5 million), given the one-year, $6 million deal that Bobby Abreu just signed with the Angels: "The Cubs were after [Ibanez] pretty thick. Lou [Piniella] and he had a good relationship, so I think Lou was plugging pretty hard for him. I don't think [the Phillies could've waited]. The Cubs were searching for left-hand hitting. My opinion is I would prefer Ibanez to Milton Bradley, just from an injury standpoint. Milton Bradley to me is an American League player, a DH/part-time outfielder. He's not a day-in, day-out player in the National League."

- Former top Cubs prospect Billy Petrick has signed on with the Windy City Thunderbolts of the Frontier League to try and get his career back on track.

- The hits keep coming for the Brewers.  Bill Hall is out 4-6 weeks with a partial tear of his left calf muscle and Tom Haudricourt goes over their - ahem - starting pitching depth (Cliff Notes version....not much).

- I've got the bulk of our archives from May 2005 to present day finally in (with February 2006 curiously missing) after a few false starts. I still have to finish up 2007 which should happen this weekend. I'm hopeful we can still locate and secure 2003, 2004 and the rest of 2005, but I'm not holding my breath either (thank you MVN.com). Unfortunately when they imported our archives from all-baseball.com to mvn.com, all the articles defaulted to different authors depending on when they did it. So a lot of the material is currently attributed to me or Arizona Phil for whatever reason, but eventually we'll get it fixed and cleaned up to the best of our abilities.

In the meantime, reading through the comments and articles of old has been quite fun the last few days for myself. A few examples (I'm linking to the month rather than the individual article so you can scroll through some other headlines if you wish):

2007 Preview

- Cubs Trade Ryu

- The Fun that was 2006 (the snark in the headlines is fantastic)

- The End of the Baker/McPhail Era

Enjoy the holiday weekend....

Comments

We usually get to about a dozen Windy City games a year, living 5 miles north of the park. I look forward to watching Petrick. They've won the Frontier League championship the last 2 years running, so they run some pretty good talent out there. Steve Trout was pitching coach one season, 2006 I believe. When they were the Cook County Cheetahs, Ron LeFlore "managed" them but at that time had trouble managing his life and didn't last too long. The FL has sent more than its fair share of players back to affiliated baseball, as well as three or four who hit the big leagues.

I would love to hear Gillick's opinion on Wes Helms and Geoff Jenkins. I keep looking at it, and besides trading for Lidge, Gillick didn't really make any great moves in his time as Phillies GM. I guess GM'ing, like in most things in life, it's better to be lucky than good. You can't argue with the guys' success, though.

Gotta hand it to her, she's pumping out columns daily. The latest (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090213&content_id=3826548&vke…) revolves around Lou Piniella. teasers: One reason for the off-season moves was to create a team that will allow him to rest the starters during the season. (Which seems to imply that a spot on the 25-man is there for Micah Hoffpauir's taking if DLee is going to get regular rest.) Dempster has taken Wood's locker.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

nice one. that's the one i got tired of superj's crap. got yelled at for not wanting fontenot playing SS, too. actually, got told i hate him even though i had a ton of posts for a year-ish of how i was a fan of him...just not at SS. i love it when people tell me what i mean even when i fully explain it. 3 shitty dumpster closing outtings in a row, and it's all about some noofie and the shock he's doing the exact same thing people had been bitching about for 2 years. at that point it's like being shocked soriano is a lead off hitter.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Ugh. Rosenbloom probably thinks he coined "A-Roid." I heard Bill Melton on the Score this morning offer the same kind of easy 2008-based putdowns of BP. Unfortunately for him, he continued: "I guess what they're looking at is we don't really have a starting center fielder...or a second baseman, I mean a confirmed second baseman...and the back of the rotation has some question marks..." LOL

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

I think every paper has to carry a couple paid assassins and Rosen-bore is one of the Trib's. Morrissey is the other one, a little less bombastic but always Boers-like in his crustiness. The Times had Mariotti, I don't read their columnists too much so I am not sure who picked up that torch. Maybe Telander is the college-guy's version. Imren at the Herald is not often a happy guy either.

that tribune link in the TCR friday notes (the part that links: some video at the Trib) has an article by Paul Sullivan quoting Piniella. Something about Get It Done... here's the correct link with more accurate quotes: http://tinyurl.com/5n4ec

Lee Hacksaw Hamilton on XM just said something that sounded to me like Cubs outfielder "Kazoo" Fukudome will start in RF but Lou Piniella isn't happy with his play huh? was he reading a shredded Carrie Muskat article?

" On whether the Phillies may have overpaid for Ibanez (three years, $31.5 million), given the one-year, $6 million deal that Bobby Abreu just signed with the Angels: "The Cubs were after [Ibanez] pretty thick. Lou [Piniella] and he had a good relationship, so I think Lou was plugging pretty hard for him. I don't think [the Phillies could've waited]. The Cubs were searching for left-hand hitting. My opinion is I would prefer Ibanez to Milton Bradley, just from an injury standpoint. Milton Bradley to me is an American League player, a DH/part-time outfielder. He's not a day-in, day-out player in the National League." This is pretty 3/44 Rob G. Why post this again, after it was pretty meaningless yesterday? Just a slow day, or was it particularly meaningful to you? Again - of course Gillick is going to stick with his pick - duh...

Rob G posted a link to an Onion baseball-related article in the previous thread. That lead me to to a pretty funny Onion video on the ONN (Onion News Network), entitled, "Use of 'N-work' May End Porn Star's Career". http://www.theonion.com/content/video/use_of_n_word_may_end_porn_stars Definitely NSFW, but damn funny. Watching it made me think of TCR, for some reason. "It's filthy and disturbing, you know, in a bad way."

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

Ryno, I know nothing about you, but if you are amused by the Onion. Shit. Okay, I'll start with Fawlty Towers. I mean, Onion writers? Funny? I could snare 3/4 of the dudes who comment here and create a better site. Sorry, I'm old.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

The Onion was hilarious when it was still running out of Wisconsin. When they moved the operation to NY a few years back, it went down the tubes. You can get it for free now on the North Side and their paper boxes are rarely ever empty. They need T. Herman Zweibel back!

Nothing pisses me off more than this fucking headline every year. Every year, my wife goes, "what's wrong?" "Never mind," I say. "No, something is pissing you off." "Insert the fucking manager name," I say. "What?" she asks, somewhat concerned. "We haven't had a cool fucking center fielder since Rick Monday." "But hon, you're an old liberal." "See?"

The Sun-Times/Gordon Wittenmyer article (link in post #33) is full of interesting stuff and GW bluntly says that the Cubs still are not upfront with releasing medical info with the last episode late disclosure following misinformation regarding Harden. Everyone here knows this but it's just good to see it in the major print media. No wonder I've favored GW over Sullivan. --------------- But they have no one to blame but themselves for the extended media attention this kind of thing gets or the longer term perception that the team tries to misdirect or deceive the public about injuries. Because that's exactly what they keep doing. And it makes little sense. Hendry focused Friday on the fact that the injury is nothing new. Of course, I never said it was. But it was newsworthy. Because of the way the team and player chose intentional vagueness in describing it all along. Can anybody tell me what the advantage is in omitting those details and being vague about these things? It's not like the Cubs have to protect the information for the purposes of shopping Harden or for any on-the-field competitive reasons (scouts have eyes). I've covered three other teams in my career, and the ones that were most up front about these kinds of things had the fewest headaches with the way the information got out. And the fans stayed well informed, without the yo-yo effect. It's not that tough.

[ ]

In reply to by Cubster

I'm confused when Wittenmeyer says Hendry insisted Friday this all was old news.. Bruce Miles reported this quote a few days ago, "I didn't know that he wasn't OK, when all that stuff started at the convention," Hendry said of a report Harden has a minor tear in the shoulder." Is Hendry insisting that Harden is okay or is he saying this tear is news to him or what? As for Hendry being a "straight shooter" (not a liar), I looked it up and it seems to have started with an interview where Hendry described himself as a straight shooter. IOW, he's self-described and it stuck.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090214&content_id=3828398&vke… Rich Harden didn't throw off the mound with the other Cubs pitchers on Saturday at Fitch Park, but there's no reason to panic. The right-hander did throw long toss and was seen smiling a lot on the first day of workouts. He's looking forward to 20-something starts with the Cubs and eager to put an end to the non-stop questions regarding his shoulder. Harden spent most of this past winter in Arizona rather than Canada, working with strength and conditioning coach Tim Buss, and called it his best offseason yet. The Cubs would be happy with 25 starts from the right-hander, which is how many Harden made last season combined with Oakland and Chicago. spin, spin, spin...

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Bruce Miles blog from yesterday is chock full of info on Harden. http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/1425 ----- The most sought-after guy was Rich Harden, he of the tear-non-tear-strained-issues-oriented right shoulder. Harden has been loath to say exactly what's been up with the shoulder, but he did say he's felt better than ever after a full winter of workouts down here. "I would say that," he said. "It's probably the strongest my shoulder's felt. I'm excited for the start of the season here." After that, I asked him about the "terminology" for what he's got. "Everybody's got their opinions," he said. "It's funny. People are telling me that they're reading this and that. Whatever. There's nothing, nothing that bad." Even a strained shoulder means that there are micro-tears, so if you want to use the word "tear," nobody around here is denying that, even if they aren't confirming it, either. That said, it doesn't mean Harden hasn't strengthened the shoulder sufficiently and that he can't dial it up and pitch well this year. Kerry Wood did a pretty good job of it last year. ----- from the comment section: •This issue regarding his shoulder is beginning to sound too much like Prior all over again.. Hopefully not, though. (BearsCubs) •That was my first reaction, having lived through the Prior/prior nightmares. This is a little more nuanced. Kerry Wood made no bones about having a tear in his shoulder and telling us. A Cubs guy said Rich likes to handle it his own way. I'll give him that, respecting his privacy. I've always felt that if a team and/or player just comes out and says what the deal is, we deal with it and move on instead of operating under all this mystery. It's fair to say he's got some sort of tear in there. As I said, the proof will be in how he throws the ball and how long he lasts. (BMiles)

He knows the word "tear" makes people skittish. There may be a tear, but it's nothing to fret about. Surgery was not something Harden considered. --- I'll say it again. Having a non-full thickness rotator cuff tear (ala Kerry Wood) can be managed non-surgically and that's what they are doing... including a spring training that will cast echos from the ghosts of springs past: --- compare and contrast: Harden:The right-hander did throw long toss and was seen smiling a lot on the first day of workouts. Wood: "I'm letting it go and throwing all my pitches," Wood said. "It's nice to go on the mound and actually work on stuff instead of worrying if it's going to hurt. It's nice to get up and go." He'd like to avoid the disabled list. Wood began last season still rehabbing from arthroscopic shoulder surgery, which he had in August 2005. He was able to pitch in four games from May 18 to June 6, but they weren't good outings and his velocity was off. When the tear was revealed, Wood opted to skip another operation and rehab. That tear may never completely heal. "Probably not all the way, but it's definitely strong enough to do it's job," he said. (2-14-07) http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20070214&content_id=18… ===== Prior: "I had some issues," Prior said. "I had some significant things I had to correct. He saw some things [in his shoulder] that weren't as good as he'd like to see in a 26-year-old." Prior has "looseness" in his shoulder, which is genetic, and which helps his delivery but also means he has to do a lot of shoulder strengthening exercises. His problems began when he collided with Atlanta's Marcus Giles in 2003. (2-16-07) http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20070216&content_id=18… ===== Wood: Chicago Cubs pitcher Kerry Wood did his long toss drills on Friday, and may be ahead of schedule..."It's pretty amazing," Wood said Friday. "It feels pretty good today, and today's better than yesterday. I expect the same tomorrow." (3-10-06) http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060310&content_id=13… ===== Prior: Chicago Cubs pitcher Mark Prior is taking a different approach in an attempt to get through Spring Training injury-free. "We're doing a lot more endurance," Prior said Tuesday. "I've been on throwing programs before but this is a little bit more structured and we're trying to build up more arm strength, doing extended amounts of sets, if that makes sense. I'm sitting out there throwing 20, 25 at a certain distance, then taking a little break, then going back a little farther. "It's a lot more structured," he said. "I think I'm responding to it well. We talked about it last year to take it slower, a little more methodical. I don't enjoy not being on the mound right now. But whatever you're dealt with, you deal with it." (2-21-06) http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060221&content_id=13…

Is Hendry insisting that Harden is okay or is he saying this tear is news to him or what? ----- I think Hendry believes Harden is OK (but fragile) and that he knows Harden has a partial thickness cuff tear. The tear info was told to JH after the October MRI-Arthrogram Harden underwent when the season ended. It was as much for the pitcher to plan treatment (even a non-surgical treatment plan) but it also was useful so the Cubs could decide to pick up Harden's option (or not if his condition warranted surgery). Here's the link to my article on Harden when the news of his "tear" came out in the Cubs convention. I pretty clearly go over the time sequence of news events. http://www.thecubreporter.com/2009/01/18/update-latest-cub-unicorn the reason Gordon Wittenmyer in the Sun-Times was irked stems from this mis-information last October. The press was told this on October 8th: General manager Jim Hendry said an MRI-arthrogram on Harden's shoulder revealed no tears of the labrum or rotator cuff, referring to Harden's problems as "subtle instability in the shoulder." Then in January, Hendry goes with the "tear in the joint" info. Hendry doesn't invent the terminology, He should just repeat what the medical staff tells him and that's what leads to these things. The October statement is not compatible with the January statement. Maybe the press needs to get their info straight from the doctors, that way JH can't hide under the "I didn't understand the difference in medical terminology" umbrella. I think after all these years and all these pitchers, Hendry DOES know the difference. Methinks GW's got a very valid point.

From GW, here is a list of pitching staffs over the last ten years. Remember these? FOR STARTERS * 2007 | Record: 85-77 Lilly (34), Zambrano (34), Marquis (33), Rich Hill (32), Sean Marshall (19). * 2006 | Record: 66-96 Zambrano (33), Marshall (24), Greg Maddux (22), Rich Hill (16), Carlos Marmol (13), Angel Guzman (10), Juan Mateo (10). * 2005 | Record: 79-83 Maddux (35), Zambrano (33), Mark Prior (27), Glendon Rusch (19), Jerome Williams (17), Kerry Wood (10). * 2004 | Record: 89-73 Maddux (33), Zambrano (31), Matt Clement (30), Kerry Wood (22), Mark Prior (21), Glendon Rusch (16). * 2003 | Record: 88-74 Clement (32), Wood (32), Zambrano (32), Prior (30), Shawn Estes (28). * 2002 | Record: 67-95 Wood (33), Clement (32), Jon Lieber (21), Mark Prior (19), Jason Bere (16), Zambrano (16). * 2001 | Record: 88-74 Lieber (34), Bere (32), Kevin Tapani (29), Julian Tavarez (28), Wood (28). * 2000 | Record: 65-97 Lieber (35), Tapani (30), Wood (23), Scott Downs (18), Ruben Quevedo (15), Ismael Valdez (12). * 1999 | Record: 67-95 Steve Trachsel (34), Lieber (31), Tapani (23), Kyle Farnsworth (21), Terry Mulholland (16), Micah Bowie (11), Andrew Lorraine (11).

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.