Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

2014 Rule 5 Draft

UPDATE: The Cubs selected 2B-SS Taylor Featherston off the AAA Albuquerque roster (Colorado Rockies) in the Major League Phase of the 2014 Rule 5 Draft, and OF-1B Ariel Ovando from the AA Corpus Christi roster (Houston Astros) in the AAA Phase... The Cubs subsequently dealt Featherston to the Los Angeles Angels for cash considerations... The 6'4 225 Ovando was signed by Houston out of the Dominican Republic as a highly-regarded 16-year old left-handed hitting slugging RF in 2010, but he has been unable to hit anywhere over the last four seasons and has yet to get past Short-Season "A" ball... The Cubs are expected to convert Ovando to a LHP... 

The Miami Marlins selected LHRP Andrew McKirahan off the AAA Iowa roster (Cubs) in the Major League Phase of the Rule 5 Draft, and the Texas Rangers selected 1B Rock Shoulders and the Houston Astros selected C Luis Flores off the AA Tennessee roster (Cubs) in the AAA Phase... A 2011 21st round selection by the Cubs out of the University of Texas, McKirahan underwent TJS in 2012 and spent most of the 2013 season rehabbing at Fitch Park, and so 2014 was his first full-season of minor league ball... He had a nice year combined between Daytona & Tennessee in 2014, but he fared better against RH hitters than he did versus LH hitters... A power-hitting LH hitter with below-average defensive skills at 1B, Shoulders was the Cubs 25th round draft pick out of a Florida JC in 2011. and he received an "overslot" bonus ($294,000, which is about equal to "4th round money"),.. Shoulders was blocked by Dan Vogelbach and Anthony Rizzo in the Cubs system, and the opportunity to rotate Vogelbach and Shoulders between 1B and DH every day (as has been the case the last three seasons) is not possible at AA (where the DH is used only sporadically)... A Houston-native, the 28-year old Flores was the Cubs 5th round pick out of Oklahoma State in 2008... He was eligible to be a minor league free-agent post-2014, but opted to sign a minor league successor contract wiith the Cubs in October... He received an NRI to Spring Training as an extra catcher each of the last two seasons... Flores has a really good eye at the plate and has solid defensive skills, and he has been a role model and mentor to some of the younger Cub minor leaguers... 

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Rule 5 Selection Meeting (AKA "Rule 5 Draft") is the last order of business at the MLB Winter Meetings, and it is a mechanism that allows MLB clubs to select (draft) players off minor league reserve lists.

There is a "Major League Phase" where an MLB club can select Rule 5 Draft eligible players off the reserve lists of minor league clubs for $50,000, a "AAA Phase" where a club's AAA minor league affiliate can select Rule 5 Draft eligible players off the reserve lists of minor league clubs of a lower classification for $12,000, and finally a "AA Phase" where a club's AA minor league affiliate can select Rule 5 Draft eligible players off the reserve lists of Class "A" clubs for $4,000.

Cubs minor leaguers mentioned in the media as possible Rule 5 targets this year include LHRP Andrew McKirahan, SS Marco Hernandez, and INF Gioskar Amaya (who was converted to catcher at Fall Instructs), but I would also add RHSP Ivan Pineyro. LHRP Hunter Cervenka, and RHP Starling Peralta as possibilities. (Peralta was eligible to be a minor league free-agent post-2014, but he signed a 2015 minor league successor contract with the Cubs before he hit the open market). 21-year old "five-tool" OF Jeffrey Baez is the best prospect on the Cubs 2014 Rule 5 Draft eligibility list, but he only reached Lo-A Kane County in mid-season and is probably several years away from being MLB-ready.

Of course all it takes is one MLB "mystery" club to like a certain player, and all of the prognostications go out the window.   

Because the Cubs have one of the top farm systems in baseball, it might seem logical that one or more Cubs minor league players of value were left off the Cubs MLB 40-man roster when reserve lists were filed on 11/20, but the Cubs really don't have any one 2014 Rule 5 Draft eligible player who stands out as a "lock" to get selected. Hernandez, Amaya, Peralta, and Baez have yet to reach AA, McKirahan is tougher against RH hitters than he is versus LH hitters, Cervenka is more of a true"LOOGY" (lefty relief specialist) but he has control issues, and although Pineyro looked good in the AFL, he battled a forearm strain in 2014. 

Of more interest to me is what players the Cubs left off their AAA Iowa reserve list. Unlike the MLB Reserve List (which has a 40-man limit, hence it is known as the "40-man roster"), minor league reserve lists have a lower player limit. The AAA reserve list limit is 38 players, meaning that at most the Cubs were able to place 38 of their Rule 5 Draft eligible minor leaguers on the Iowa reserve list when it was filed with the MLB office on November 20th. However, in practice most MLB clubs leave 3-5 slots open on their AAA reserve list prior to the Rule 5 Draft to provide slots for minor league free-agents who are signed between 11/20 and the Rule 5 Draft (like ex-BOS utility INF Jonathan Herrera, who the Cubs signed last week), and to provide a slot or two for any players the Cubs might want to select in the AAA Phase of the draft. 

Players selected in the Major League Phase of the Rule 5 Draft can be re-claimed if the player is unable to stick on the drafting club's MLB 25-man roster (and more than 50% do not stick), but players selected in the AAA and AA phases are lost for good without the right to re-claim.

Last year the Miami Marlins selected 1B Justin Bour off the Cubs AA Tennessee Smokies roster in the AAA Phase of the draft for $12,000. and Bour had a nice season for the Marlins at AAA New Orleans, and then he held his own after getting a mid-season call-up to Miami. Because he was selected in the AAA Phase of last year's Rule 5 Draft, the Cubs could not reclaim Bour.

It is possible that because of the AAA 38-man reserve list limit and the desire to leave a few slots open for minor league free-agents and players they might want to select in the AAA Phase of the Rule 5 Draft, the Cubs may have placed 2014 Rule 5 eligible players like 1B Rock Shoulders, INF Wes Darvill, C Taylor Davis, LHP Austin Kirk, RHP Yoaner Negrin, RHP Yao-Lin Wang, and/or RHP Trey McNutt on the AA Tennessee reserve list, making them available for selection in the AAA Phase. If so, the Cubs could lose more players in the AAA Phase of the draft than in the Major League Phase. 

Also, the Cubs owe the Boston Red Sox a Player to Be Named Later (PTBNL) from last summer's deal where the Cubs acquired LHP Felix Doubront from the Sox, and the Oakland A's owe the Cubs a PTBNL from the trade where Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel were dealt to the A's. It is presumed that both PTBNL will be selected from the list of Rule 5 Draft eligible players after the conclusion of the draft, meaning the Red Sox might select a very young Rule 5 Draft eligible player like Jeffrey Baez (who has value but is not likely to get selected in the Rule 5 Draft because he is so far away from being big league ready) as the PTBNL, since they would not be bound by Rule 5 Draft restrictions if they acquire the player after the draft has concluded. Likewise, the Cubs would be able to select a Rule 5 Draft eligible player from Oakland after the conclusion of the draft, so that they would not have to place the player on the MLB 40-man roster or risk losing him in the Rule 5 Draft.  

It's also possible that the Cubs (who are selecting 8th) could draft a player for another club selecting further down the line, and then trade the player to that club after the conclusion iof the draft. The Cubs did that a few years ago, when they drafted OF Josh Hamilton from TB and then traded him to the Cincinnati Reds (for cash) after the conclusion of the draft. (The Cubs can make two selections in the Major League Phase of today's Rule 5 Draft if they wish, because although it might appear that their MLB 40-man roster is full after signing Jason Hammel and Jon Lester and acquiring Miguel Montero from AZ for two players not on the 40-man roster, the Cubs 40-man roster actually presently stands at 38, because the Hammel and Lester contracts are only "pending," and the Cubs have up to 20 days to submit the contracts to the MLB office and add Hammel and Lerster to their MLB 40-man roster). 


RULE 5 DRAFT ELIGIBILITY 

1. A minor league player who was 18 or younger on the June 5th immediately prior to signing his first contract is eligible for selection starting with the 5th Rule 5 Draft after he signs, and a minor league player who was 19 years or older on the June 5th immediately prior to signing his first contract becomes eligible for selection starting with the 4th Rule 5 Draft that followed his signing.

2. If a player signs his first contract after the conclusion of the season of the MLB or minor league club to which he is first assigned, the next season is considered to be the player's "first season" for Rule 5 eligibility purposes.

3. A free-agent with prior MLB and/or minor league service who signs a minor league contract prior to the Rule 5 Draft is eligible for selection if the player was 18 or younger on the June 5th immediately prior to signing his first contract and it is at least the 5th Rule 5 Draft since he signed his first contract, or the player was 19 years or older on the June 5th immediately prior to signing his first contract and it is at least the 4th Rule 5 Draft since he signed his first contract. 

4. Any player on a minor league reserve list who has either been released or had his contract voided, and then re-signs with the same MLB organization within one year is eligible for selection. However, a player who was signed after being selected in the First-Year Player Draft (MLB Rule 4 Draft) cannot be eligible for selection in a Rule 5 Draft until after the first anniversary of the player signing his first contract with an MLB organization.

5. Any player on a minor league reserve list who has been outrighted to the minors previously in his career is eligible for selection. 

6. A player on the Voluntary Retired List, Disqualified List, or Ineligible List is not eligible for selection. 

7. An MLB club can designate any player on a minor league reserve list "eligible for selection" in the Rule 5 Draft even if the player would not normally be eligible, but once a player is designated eligible for selection, he remains eligible for selection in all subsequent Rule 5 drafts. However, a player who was signed after being selected in the First-Year Player Draft (MLB Rule 4 Draft) cannot be designated "eligible for selection" in a Rule 5 Draft until after the first anniversary of the player signing his first contract with an MLB organization.

8. A minor league player-manager who would be eligible for selection in the Rule 5 Draft if he was only a player can be selected, but if he is selected, the player-manager can reject the selection. He has 30 days to decide. If he rejects the selection, the player-manager cannot be re-signed as a player during the following season.  

CUBS MINOR LEAGUE PLAYERS ELIGIBLE FOR SELECTION IN DECEMBER 2014 RULE 5 DRAFT (last updated 12-02-2014):
Gilberto Abreu, RHP
Gioskar Amaya, INF
John Andreoli, OF
Jeffry Antigua, LHP
Delbis Arcila, OF
Jeffrey Baez, OF
Frank Batista, RHP
Marcelo Carreno, RHP 
Zach Cates, RHP
Hunter Cervenka, LHP
Pin-Chieh Chen, OF
Gerardo Concepcion, LHP (Article XX-D player - can elect free-agency if drafted & then later re-claimed by Cubs)
Willson Contreras, C
Blake Cooper, RHP
Wes Darvill, INF
Taylor Davis, C
Alberto Diaz, LHP
Kevin Encarnacion, OF
Luis Flores, C 
P. J. Francescon, RHP
Humberto Garcia, INF
Victor Garcia, LHP
Dustin Geiger, INF
Anthony Giansanti, OF
Jae-Hoon Ha, OF
Marco Hernandez, INF
Jonathan Herrera, INF  (Article XX-D player - can elect free-agency if drafted & then later re-claimed by Cubs) 
Michael Jensen, RHP
Austin Kirk, LHP
Matt Loosen, RHP
Jeff Lorick, LHP
Barret Loux, RHP
Dillon Maples, RHP
Andrew McKirahan, LHP
Trey McNutt, RHP (Article XX-D player - can elect free-agency if drafted & then later re-claimed by Cubs)
Alberto Mineo, C
Yoanner Negrin, RHP
Carlos Penalver, INF
Felix Pena, RHP
Starling Peralta, RHP (Article XX-D player - can elect free-agency if drafted & then later re-claimed by Cubs) 
Ivan Pineyro, RHP
Austin Reed, RHP
Jose Rosario, RHP 
Julio Sanchez, RHP 
Tayler Scott, RHP
Rock Shoulders, 1B
Rubi Silva, OF
Brian Smith, LHP
Elliot Soto, INF
Antonio Valerio, C
Yao-Lin Wang, RHP
Ben Wells, RHP
Tony Zych, RHP

Additionally, any player eligible to be an MLB Rule 55 Six-Year Minor League Free-Agent (6YFA) post-2014 who signs a 2015 minor league contract or agrees to a 2015 minor league successor contract prior to the December 2014 Rule 5 Draft will be eligible for selection.

Also, any player eligible to be a Rule 55 Second Contract Minor League Free-Agent who signs a 2015 minor league contract prior to the December 2014 Rule 5 Draft will be eligible for selection if the player was 18 or younger on the June 5th immediately prior to signing his first contract and it is at least the 5th Rule 5 Draft since he signed his first contract, or the player was 19 years or older on the June 5th immediately prior to signing his first contract and it is at least the 4th Rule 5 Draft since he signed his first contract.  

RULE 5 DRAFT RESTRICTIONS

1. A minor league player eligible for selection in the Rule 5 Draft cannot be added to an MLB Reserve List (40-man roster), traded to another organization, or transferred from one minor league reserve list to another within the same organization, starting with the filing of MLB & minor league reserve lists on November 20th up through the conclusion of the Rule 5 Draft.


2. A player cannot be sent outright to the minors on the two days prior to the Rule 5 Draft and on the day of the Rule 5 Draft (through the conclusion of the draft).

3. A club must have as many slots open on its MLB Reserve List (40-man roster) prior to the Rule 5 Draft as the number of players it selects in the Major League Phase, and an MLB club's AAA and AA affiliates must have as many slots open on their respective reserve lists prior to the Rule 5 Draft as the number of players the affiliate selects in the AAA and AA phases of the draft. There is no limit on the number of Rule 5 eligible players any one organization can lose.

4. A player selected in the Major League Phase of the Rule 5 Draft must be placed on the drafting club's MLB Reserve List (40-man roster) immediately, and must be tendered a major league contract by 5 PM (Eastern) on the day of the draft.

5. A player selected in the Major League Phase of the Rule 5 Draft can be traded at any time, but the player cannot be released or sent to the minors any earlier than 20 days prior to MLB Opening Day, and then only if Outright Assignment Waivers have been secured and the player's former club declines to re-claim the player.

6. If a player selected in the Major League Phase of the Rule 5 Draft remains on an MLB Active List and/or MLB Disabled List(s) for the entire MLB regular season following selection & spends at least 90 days on an MLB Active List (25-man roster), Rule 5 restrictions are removed at the conclusion of the MLB regular season. (If time spent on an MLB Active List is less than 90 days in the season following selection, the player remains a Rule 5 player into the next season, and the player continues to be a Rule 5 player until he has spent 90 days total on an MLB Active List).

7. If a club decides not to keep a player selected in the Major League Phase of the Rule 5 draft on its MLB 25-man Active List (and/or MLB DL), the player must be placed on Outright Assignment Waivers, where any of the other 29 MLB clubs can claim the player for the $25,000 Rule 5 waiver price and assume the Rule 5 obligations.

8. If the Rule 5 player is not claimed off Outright Waivers, the player then must be offered back to the club from which he was drafted, and the player's former club can reclaim the player for $25,000, with the player being automatically outrighted to the Reserve List of the minor league club from which he was drafted. The club from which the player was drafted usually has 72 hours to decide whether to reclaim the player, but it has only 24 hours to decide if the player is eligible to be an Article XX-D Free-Agent if outrighted to the minors (player has accrued at least three years of MLB Service Time, qualifies for salary arbitration as a "Super Two" player, and/or has been outrighted to the minors previously in his career).

9. If a Rule 5 player is returned (outrighted) to the minor league club from which he was drafted, the drafting club is responsible for any portion of the player's salary above what the player was paid the previous season.

10. If a Rule 5 Player is returned (outrighted) to the minor league club from which he was drafted, and if the player has accrued at least three years of MLB Service Time, qualifies for salary arbitration as a "Super Two" player, and/or has been outrighted to the minors previously in his career, the player can elect to be an MLB Article XX-D minor league free-agent after being outrighted (he has three days to decide), or he can accept the Outright Assignment and defer the right to be a minor league free-agent until after the conclusion of the MLB regular season. (An outrighted "Super Two" Rule 5 player who has not previously been outrighted to the minors can elect free-agency if he is outrighted to the minors, but he cannot defer free-agency until after the conclusion of the MLB regular season).

11. If the club from which the player was drafted declines to reclaim the player, the Rule 5 restrictions are removed, the drafting club retains the player, and the player can be sent to the minors or released.

12. A player selected in the AAA or AA Phase of the Rule 5 Draft must be assigned to the Reserve List of the AAA or AA club that drafted the player, but the player can be assigned to the Active List of any minor league affiliate in the MLB club's organization once the minor league regular season commences. Also, unlike players selected in the Major League Phase of the Rule 5 Draft, a player selected in the AAA or AA Phase of the Rule 5 Draft does not have to be offered back to the club from which he was drafted if the player is ultimately assigned to the Active List of a minor league affiliate below the level of the minor league affiliate that drafted the player.

13. A club can select a player off the reserve list of one of its own minor league affiliates, but if the player is selected in the Major League Phase, the club is bound by the same Rule 5 roster restrictions as if it had selected the player off the reserve list of another club's minor league affiliate.

14. A player eligible for selection in the Rule 5 Draft cannot be "covered up" from selection, either by agreement between two clubs or by effect. Also, a player selected in the Major League Phase of the Rule 5 Draft cannot be "hidden" on a Disabled List to help the drafting club fulfill Rule 5 roster obligations. If the MLB Commissioner believes a club "covered up" a player to avoid losing the player in the Rule Draft or "hid" a selected player on a Disabled List, the offending club or clubs are subject to a penalty (TBD by the MLB Commissioner).




Comments

Cubs select SS Taylor Featherson from Colorado, yes, I'm surprised.

@MattSpiegel670  From a solid source: Cubs in serious talks,deal nearly final, to put 45 games on WGN-9, local only,for 2015. Fate of other 15 games unclear.

Would only be broadcast locally, not on WGN America for out-of-towners.

[ ]

In reply to by Carlito

I'm out of town so I watch MLB for everything. Stuff only gets blacked out if it is national TV. Being on WLS shouldn't matter. Even if for some odd reason MLB.TV doesn't show the WLS feed (I don't know why that would happen) you can always watch the bad guys' feed. I did that a lot last year, anyway, because it was fun hearing their reaction to the kids. It'll be even more fun next year. That, and I love Vin Scully, even if all he does these days is tell stories.

@CarrieMuskat #Cubs expected to complete PTBNLs w/A's and Red Sox early next week. Deadline is Dec. 15

Junior Lake leads the DWL in SB with 18 (1 CS), is 2nd in walks(!), and is 4th in OBP. He also is tied for 2nd in strikeouts. 

Gordo at it again...

http://chicagosuntimes.com/sports/signing-lester-isnt-a-sign-that-cubs-…

Apparently the $30M signing bonus, which I'm not sure he completely understands how it's being spread out, is a bad thing and shows how cheap and restrained the Cubs 'Op department is...or something like that. He lost me. I think if the Cubs aren't north of $200M, it's bad, and if it is north of $200, then they spent it on the wrong players.

http://sportsworld.nbcsports.com/gamechanger-for-cubs/

The Cubs are not a small-market team, but they have been pretending to be one. And, behind the veil, Theo Epstein and general manager Jed Hoyer and the rest have been building the team unencumbered by the massive pressures to win a few extra games. They have refused to sign a few free agents to curtail the losing. The major team lost 101, 96 and 89 games. Their payroll dropped from sixth in payroll the year before Epstein arrived to 15th his first year to 28th of 30 teams last year.

Sure, there were a few howls about it, a few harsh criticisms – “We’re the Chicago Cubs! This is ridiculous!” — but Epstein was running this team exactly like he had hoped.

Damn the Ricketts.

"According to WEEI's Rob Bradford, free agent Craig Breslow has had dialogue with the Cubs." i hope he just needed to borrow $1 for the snack machines or something...

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Well, last year was bad for him, but from 2009-2013 he had a 2.95 ERA and 1.19 WHIP in 326 IP. His ERA was 1.81 in 2013.  And in reality, his bad ERA last year was the product of a few home runs in a just a couple of bad outings.  He gave up 18 of his 36 earned runs on the year in just 2.1 innings over 4 outings (4, 5, 4, 5 runs allowed).  In the other 52 innings his ERA was 3.11.  But he's old and bullpen arms are fickle.  Still, Welsey Wright would have cost between 1.5 million and 2, so if Breslow doesn't cost much more than that, it's probably a good deal and he's likely to replace that production.

The Rock Shoulders tweet on the left sidebar may be the coolest thing I have ever seen.

Guess where the Blackhawks are playing tonight? @LenKasper 58 minutes ago Scott Darling has a Cubs logo on his goalie mask. Very cool.

In his first game, Baez went 0-3 with 3 Ks. He did have an RBI on a sac fly. Am I the only one who thinks he will start the season in Iowa?

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

seems like a fair comp...

I think you can find use for most players and all depends on the cost. Revere has 3 years before free agency and will be age 27 next year and does have speed and contact skills the Cubs don't have a lot of right now.

It also doesn't mean I'd plug him in CF and leadoff and leave him there. But Alcantara may need some more seasoning, may need to play INF (Not a fan of him being a bench guy, but Maddon uses everyone so not that worried about it).

Revere could bring some balance to the lineup and be useful occasional starter/4th OF type and you'd be getting him during what is usually the peak years. Wood and possibly Castillo (if they sign another catcher) are duplication at this point. Wood is a year closer to free agency, so you'd probably have to kick something else in there to get Revere, adding Castillo would be a bit too much though.  Castillo for Revere may be pretty close though/although I'd prefer the Montero/Castillo platoon myself.

 

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

I don't think he'd start striking out all of a sudden, I imagine he could play a lot though. Maddon played Sam Fuld for a long time. Of course Fuld was real good defensively.

Revere's the kind of guy you ride until he slows down. If he's hitting .300 despite the lack of walks, he's still quite useful, especially in this current run scoring environment.

Just seems like a guy that could play any 3 OF positions if absolutely needed and currently LF and CF aren't really spoken for with any type of authority. I think Alcantara is gonna be good, but he wasn't last year in the majors and his defense was really bad. That's not his fault, they threw him out there, but he's got work to do.  And Soler is gonna get a lot of days off I'm guessing to keep him healthy.

I'll also add guys like Revere always have a market, look what Dodgers just got for Dee Gordon. So I think Phils could do a little better than Wood or Castillo and I think if Cubs get him, they could move him for something quite easily.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

not to worried about the contact and speed declining at age 27 though. The defense is a concern, but can't be worse than Alcantara's was last year. Pierre wasn't all that bad for Cubs in 2006, a .330 OBP plays a lot better in 2014 than it does in 2006. Pierre was also the big offseason acquisition with Cubs giving some pretty decent parts, I imagine Cubs would only get Revere on their terms from positions of depth.

Man that 2006 team, Derrek Lee's injury and one good starter. Well 2, but Maddux got dealt and was just doing okay that year.

and no, I'm not advocating the deal, just trying to figure out the upside or what they may be thinking.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

It was the in the duldrooms of 2006 that I found TCR.  Dempster giving up home runs on his way to 9 blown saves/losses, Jaque Jones throwing ball straight into the ground, Ronny Cedeno hitting .245 with 25 errors at short, Marmol starting 13 games with an ERA over 6.00, and soooo many at-bats to Neifi, Mabry, Bynum, Hairston, Pagan.  What a crapfest that was.

[ ]

In reply to by WISCGRAD

it got ugly quick that season, Pierre shouldered the burden of being the marquis pick-up that offseason, but the team just had no pitching, despite it being the year that Hendry finally (allegedly) figured out he couldn't rely on Prior and Wood being healthy.

But at least it meant the end of Dusty.

Did get the Ryan O'Malley game and a lot of excitement over Rich Hill, which lasted a season+.

 

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I do remember a lot of hope about the youth. Murton was 24, hit 297/365/444 in a full season and we assumed would hold down LF for a while. In 53 games Theriot hit a clearly unsustainble 328/412/522, but we figured he'd be solid at 2B or SS going forward.  Cedeno was still 23 and we assumed he HAD to get better than he was. We got a glipse of Soto. Angel Guzman made his big league debut.  Rich Hill and Sean Marshall were perhaps just getting their adjustments out of the way and starting to settle in.  And a lot of those guys did really contribute to the 2007-08 teams

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

"doesn't really get on base" First of all, .324 isn't a terrible for a speed guy, someone the pitcher never wants to give a free pass to. (Full disclosure: I liked Pierre when he wasn't throwing to a base.) If I understand bold type in Baseball Reference tables, Revere led the league in hits. So is it fair to say that he "doesn't really get on base"? Zero power, but in the 8th and 9th, against their best bullpen arms, a walk may be tougher for a higher-OBP guy to earn than a scratch single will be for Revere.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Zero power, but in the 8th and 9th, against their best bullpen arms, a walk may be tougher for a higher-OBP guy to earn than a scratch single will be for Revere.

I would think you have that backwards, hard-throwing bullpen guys are usually hard to hit, but have trouble finding the zone. Regardless, how they get on-base isn't as important as if they get on-base. .324 ultimately tells it all. Regardless, he's not terrible offensively, he should be able to maintain a .300 BA (or close) nd that means a respectable albeit not great OBP (at least in this day and age), in 2006, it would be a lot less useful. A little stolen base ability on this team certainly wouldn't hurt. If his speed meant good defense, I'd be more interested myself.

Leading the league in hits is generally a combination of not walking, making lots of contact and hitting 1st or 2nd in the lineup to get tons of PA's, I find it as useful a predictor of future performance as pitching wins.

Rob G. -- Wanted to email you but didn't see a "contact us" option on the site here. I'm cannot get the Cub Reporter at my home. I have tried using different browsers, different computers (an Apple, a windows laptop, an I-pad) and no matter which combination I try, I only get a 504 error message when I put the URL in the address bar. I have no problem loading the site at work, including on the I-pad that can't access it when I am at home. Do you (or anyone else) have any idea what the problem could be and/or how to fix this? I'd prefer to be able to read and comment at home, as I should be spending most of my time at work doing, y'know, work. Any assistance is appreciated. Thanks! Edit: I'm about to leave work now, so it may be a few days before I can read any answers posted here...

[ ]

In reply to by JoePepitone

504 error or 503? Regardless, I'll email you the solution we used for Arizona Phil though. See if that works...

There's an envelope icon in the upper right to contact me with if you wish. 

"TR Sullivan of MLB.com reports that the Rangers are working on a deal with free agent right-hander Kyuji Fujikawa."

"Blue Jays signed 1B Jake Fox to a minor league contract with an invitation to spring training." lulz. well, at least we know he's got a good shot at having a nice spring training.

"Diamondbacks general manager Dave Stewart said Friday that Josh Collmenter would start on Opening Day." they really shook up their roster and they're going with josh "king of the crapballers" collmenter on opening day. he's a really fun guy to watch if you've never seen him...throws 86-88mph "heat" and gets enough off his complimenting pitches, command, and control to throw like a 2/3 slot rotation guy. also, it's been neat to see dave stewart finally become a GM and it's been surprising to see what he's done with the club in his short tenure.

Amazing comment from the Hammel/BTBS article in the sidebar. - - - I just don't understand why the perception that Hammel was bad in Oakland continues to linger. He showed up and had four absolutely wretched starts, but he claimed that something in his mechanics had gone wrong and he fixed it up (see quote at end of this comment). Then he was awesome for the next two months, just about as good as he’d been on the Cubs. Oakland, July (4 starts): ……….. 17.0 innings, 9.53 ERA 12 Ks, 10 BB, 5 HR, 7% swinging strikes Oakland, Aug-Sep (9 games*): 50.2 innings, 2.49 ERA, 42 Ks, 11 BB, 8 HR, 9% swinging strikes (note: 9 games included 8 starts, 1 relief outing) He was one of Oakland’s best pitchers down the stretch. However, he’d been so bad in those first four starts that everyone kind of wrote him off as a failure and never looked back. The thing is, those first four starts skewed his stats for the rest of his time with the A’s, but his good stretch was twice as long as his bad one — I mean, when he gave up eight runs in a loss to the Astros in July, the A’s didn’t get two losses because he was so bad, but his ERA acts like they did. While he did keep giving up homers for some reason, his K:BB got remarkably better — nearly 4.0 over two months. And if you cut off his first start in August and just look at the last eight games of the year, it’s 40 Ks, 7 BB, 10% swinging strikes. That’s a whole different pitcher from the guy we saw in July. Of course, it didn’t help his perception that the A’s utterly failed to score runs for him (as they failed to score in general at all in the second half); the A’s went 2-6 in those final eight starts, and 2-10 overall in his 12 total starts. (2-11 overall if you count his mop-up relief outing.) And then, of course, as the cherry on top, he "blew" the Wild Card game. His outing consisted of entering in the 12th inning, facing one batter, and getting All-Star Sal Perez to hit a ground ball to third. Unfortunately, it went a few molecules too far to Josh Donaldson’s right, and it squeaked through for the game-winning hit. Note that balls to Donaldson’s right are usually his specialty, and he’s among the best in the league at fielding them (I still think he got robbed for Gold Glove in the AL), so Hammel got his only batter to hit a ground ball into the defensive wheelhouse of the Fielding Bible award-winning third baseman. Add it all up, and I’m actually really disappointed that the A’s didn’t re-sign Hammel. They had space for a veteran free agent starter to keep the depth strong, and he turned out to be so cheap and so short-term. I think the Cubs are going to get great value on him these next two years, and I’m bummed and a little surprised that Billy Beane didn’t try harder to cash in on that value when he could have bought low. I think this was a huge miss by the A’s. Link to story on Hammel’s improvement. Quote: "When I came over, I was just trying to do too much. You pick up bad habits trying to do that," said Hammel, adding his mechanics took a hit. "You start doing amateur-type things, making the same mistakes over and over and trying to make the perfect pitch when you don’t need to. That unfortunately develops into bad habits. "You’ve got to clear your head and get back to doing what you’ve been doing." I’d be curious to see these "sniping" splits for just August-September to see if he was truly back to his old Cubs self after his brief meltdown.

Per Yahoo's Jeff Passan:
Physical passed, particulars hammered out, the Jon Lester deal with the Cubs is now official. Press conference Monday.

Brooks Raley signs with the Korean League Giants. I always had trouble figuring out which of the soft tossing lefty's were better Chris Rusin/Brooks Raley, turns out, neither.

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2014/12/14/major-league-teams-always-…

4. Cole Hamels, LHP, Phillies — The Cubs, Red Sox, Dodgers, Padres, and Rangers are interested in Hamels. The sleeper team is the aggressive Astros. The Giants may be in if they can’t get James Shields. The feeling has been that if the Red Sox would pick up Hamels’s 2019 option at $20 million, he would waive his no-trade. The five years remaining on Hamels’s deal would be worth $110 million. Would he want an extension beyond that to OK a trade?

Cliff Lee is owed $25M next year, has a vesting option for 2016 that he won't reach, but a $12.5M buyout...what is less than one season of Cliff Lee at $37.5M worth?

 

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

i can't even imagine what it would take to get cole. even without the extension he's still undervalued by $5-ish million a year, easy, through 2018. with the extension he's closer to $8-ish million a year undervalued through 2019. you're going to get 4-5 seasons out of him saving $20-$40m off current market value...that's big loot. i wouldn't complain about snagging hamels except for the fact having hamels + hammel on the same team would cause a lot of confusion with casual fans...as well as extra m's and l's being incorrectly thrown around while writing about them. if it's going to cost a "key" prospect, though...i wouldn't mind baez being the anchor as much as the other top guys. ...as far as c.lee goes...danger danger...avoid...etc...too much contract loot, too few years for a team in transition to take on, too much age, and a very questionable projection of value going forward (even with the short commitment).

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

28 year old left-handed power hitter/CF option..obvious flaws of course. Imagine on a short deal/incentives...guessing there's enough competition for his services that'll he go somewhere else though.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

If you catch him having one of his .350 BABIP years, you get a heck of a value. If you catch him closer to his career average .290-ish BABIP, on the other hand, you have a guy whose OBP is going to be under .300, and you have to pay him like a productive veteran. I'd rather see them stick with Alcantara in CF. I'm ready for the season to start with the roster as it is now.

We are #34: Zack Taylor(1932), Roy Henshaw(1933), Stan Hack(1934), Ed Hanyzewski(1943-46), Cy Block(1946), Freddy Schmidt(1947), Mort Cooper(1949), Johnny Vander Meer(1950), Bob Schultz(1952-53), John Pyecha(1954), Russ Meyer(1956), Dick Littlefield(1957), George Myatt (c)(1958-59), Dick Burwell (1960-61), Cal Koonce(1962-67), Jack Warner(1964), Frank Thomas(1966), Jim Ellis(1967), Hank Aguirre(1969-70), Jim Dunegan(1970), Clint Compton(1972), Ray Burris(1973-79), Randy Martz(1980-82), Steve Trout(1983-87), Damon Berryhill(1987), Dick Pole (c)(1988-91), Ken Patterson(1992), Glenallen Hill(1993), Tanyon Sturtze(1995-96), Kent Bottenfield(1997), Kerry Wood(1998, 2000-08, 2011-12), Jeff Gray (2010) http://www.cubsbythenumbers.com/cubs-all-time.html and then there was Sweetness

Casey Coleman, DFA'd by Royals. Ah, yes...the rebuild is much farther along.

No Colby. Gouda. Mooney channels signing of reliever Motte
Patrick Mooney ‏@CSNMooney #Cubs trying to add an OF but it won't be Colby Rasmus. They might be done with rotation after Lester deal but could use a veteran reliever.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

I doubt Maddon is gonna get too wrapped up in preseason depth charts on the bullpen. He'll go with whomever is pitching the best in spring training and however he thinks the bullpen will line up best. It wouldn't surprise me at all if Motte got the gig if he's throwing well. I doubt they'd save it for any of the names you mentioned if they're not clearly pitching better.

Mark Gonzales @MDGonzales · Cubs send infielder Marco Hernandez to Boston as the PTBNL in the Felix Doubront trade. Ouch.

Recent comments

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Mastrobuoni can't come back, yet

    Wisdom does have an option left. He can hide in Iowa if Jed DFA's someone else

    Does Brennan Davis get shown the door? I know it's too early for that, but these injuries are crunching the roster of a 12-7 team playoff demands and BDavis isn't going to help anytime soon.

    Someone has to go to add Peralta. And Canario isn't going to get to play everyday regardless of RHers or LHers. Neither is Tauchman. Also don't see PCA getting a chance over Peralta.

    If Jed does those moves:

    4 OF: Belli, Peralta, Canny, Tauch

    2 C: Gomes and Amaya

    2 DH: Cooper and Mervis

    5 INF: Busch, Nico, Dansby, Morel, Madrigal

    Little short on OF depth but two injuries will do that  

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I have had the pleasure of watching some of the young A's pitchers lately (first Joe Boyle the last day of Minor League Spring Training in March, and more recently Luis Morales last week and Steven Echavarria yesterday at Extended Spring Training), and it reminds me of the Miami Marlins a couple of years ago. A really nice collection of young pitchers. It will be interesting to see what the A's will get for two years of ex-Cub Paul Blackburn at the Trade Deadline (there should be a robust market for Blackburn). 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Good deal

    MB needs some talent infusion!

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: Very possible. Suriel, too. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    DJL: if a pitcher is recalled to be the 27th man for a doubleheader and then is optioned back to the minors the next day, the 15-day "clock" does NOT reset. The one day call-up for the doubleheader is treated like it never happened with respect to a pitcher having to spend at least 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Probably the only reason David Peralta is still in the organization (he is at AAA Iowa) is to be available in case anything bad were to happen to Ian Happ (which it just did). So if Happ needs to go on the IL, the Cubs can select Peralta to play LF, DFA Wisdom (and hope he and what remains of his $2.725M salary gets claimed off waivers), and recall Mervis to platoon at DH with Cooper (with Canario / Tauchman sharing RF), at least until Suzuki and Happ are back...

     

  • crunch (view)

    i'd just like to take a moment to express to the world i'm still pissed willson contreras is not a cub when the pricetag was 5/87m (17.5m/yr).

    it would be nice to have a legacy-type player to stick around, especially one with his leadership and the respect he gets from his peers.  cubs fans deserved more than 1 season of contreras + morel...that was gold.

  • crunch (view)

    happ, right hamstring tightness, day-to-day (hopefully 0 days).

    he will be reevaluated tomorrow.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I guess I'm not looking for that type of AB 

    Just a difference of opinion

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.