Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Superstitious I Am

Bear down, Chicago Bears, make every play clear the way to victory; Bear down, Chicago Bears, put up a fight with a might so fearlessly. We'll never forget the way you thrilled the nation with your T-formation. Bear down, Chicago Bears, and let them know why you're wearing the crown. You're the pride and joy of Illinois, Chicago Bears, bear down.
Classical Version | Ska Version | City of Chicago Version Join the mayhem at Chad's Bears Chat.....

Comments

BEAR DOWN!!! Go Bears!!! Defeat the Fetus Head and the Indy Mayflowers!!!

He has Dallas beating the Bears? If Dallas beat the Seahawks. Wow . Why not make a case for the Cardinals to win it all with all the right breaks. And he's a writer for the Rams, they still have kneck braces on from Devin Hester blowing by them.

Phil Rogers, the first step to recovery is to admit you have a problem. " The Cubs should go to camp with at least 15 solid choices for the 12 jobs on the pitching staff. The doesn't count anyone from the group of prospects that includes Sean Gallagher, Carlos Marmol, Angel Guzman, Juan Mateo, Jae Kuk Ryu, Clay Rapada and Rocky Cherry. Ex-manager Dusty Baker never was blessed with this much depth." I guess having a 300 game winner as your fifth starter in 2004 was not a blessing.

I love how the field became magically sloppy when the Saints had the ball, and solid for the Bears. They knew that they were coming to Chicago to play, and should've practiced accordingly. The Bears took the ball from the Saints, and ran it down their throats. They deserved to win that game. Period.

Hate to say it, Rob, but I totally agree with that article. What games have you been watching this year?

Jacos, I saw that line, and just blew a fuse. It's wrong in so many ways........ In 2003 and 2004, Cubs had outstanding talent and depth in their staff. And we won many games. In 2005 and 2006, we didn't. And we lost many games. But this whole "Dusty wasn't given the talent/money/players to win" myth needs to be killed before it starts.

Come on now guys, Dusty never had a second starter like Ted Lilly. Whichever writer wrote that was correct though, I can't remember the Cubs having this many pitchers on the 40 man roster/

What games have you been watching this year? Every one. We've both seen good Rex and bad Rex. We've both seen good Bears' D and bad Bears' D.

so because the Bears didn't play a pefect game each and every week, they don't deserve to make the Super Bowl because the Saints had to play on bad field...gotcha.

well the reason the saints lost was totally dusty's fault...i dont know how anyone reasonable could say otherwise.

so because the Bears didn’t play a pefect game each and every week, they don’t deserve to make the Super Bowl because the Saints had to play on bad field…gotcha. The gist of the article, as I read it, was that the Bears were damn lucky to get to the Super Bowl. I think that's fairly true, considering they squeaked by the Seahawks and beat up on a Saints' team that clearly wasn't prepared well for the terrain or the scale of the game. That being said, the Bears are still there. One could make a similar argument that the Colts were damn lucky as well. I don't think either the Bears or the Colts were the best teams in their divisions (although picking a best team out of the NFC is sort of an oxymoron) but they're both there nonetheless. If the Bears beat the Colts, they'll have earned their spot. It doesn't matter whether a team "deserves" it or not.

if Dusty didn't let Rex throw those last 3 passes against the Packers in that first blowout, Rex would have had more in the tank for the games versus Arizona and New England...

Sorry, meant to say "conferences" instead of "divisions" above.

the RCRFRPATTELTTS index (Really Cool Rating For Ranking Passing Attempts That Treats Everyone Like They're The Same) points directly to dusty pushing grossman beyond the limits of humanity. in back to back games he had him throw 5-10 more passes than any human is capable of therefore ruining his life and making him a cripple for life. i mean, its plain as day that every human is just like every other human and a simple equation can manage a human independant of his actual talent. this is pretty simple stuff that lots of people who have seen more spreadsheets than actual baseball players can attest to. what an idiot.

the gist of that article is that guy is a moron... barring a horrible official's call or absolute bad luck play, every team that advances in the NFL playoffs deserves it, they played better than the other team that day. And I love the "if Hassellback didn't fumble the snap", the Seahawks would have won. First, that's presuming Lance Briggs still wouldn't have made the play, which is a big enough assumption since he stuffed him for a substantial loss, second it assumes they would have gotten the necessary yardage after that play to set up what would have likely been a rather long field goal. Second, this isn't the NCAA college tournament or the NCAA football, you play the season to get homefield advantage and the Bears deserved whatever breaks they got from the homefield by being the best team during the regular season (by a far and away margin). Brees fumble had nothing to do with the weather, he just got nailed. Bush and Mcallister didn't run well because A) they didn't even try to run as a team and B) the Bears stuffed them when they did because the Bears have a great defense. Meh, we're in and we deserved it because we're the best team in the NFC.

Really, the Bears were lucky to even make the playoffs. They should have been sending coaches to the Senior Bowl by now. Sure, they were the NFL's best team until injuries to Brown and Harris, but they were really just lucky those two were able to play as many games as they did. Obviously, the Packers were the NFC's best team, just look at the way they dismantled the Bears in week 17.

Sure, they were the NFL’s best team until injuries to Brown and Harris And until Rex Grossman devolved into a Pops Warner quarterback. Okay, that's my last jab. I'm off to watch the game. Enjoy it all.

it's the same as Baseball Prospectus with a few guys shuffled around, but the same 10.

Sigh.

BAh. So much for expecting Rex Grossman to hold the fort. I'm still undecided on whether he was shackled down too much early on and not allowed to make plays or he was just plain bad. I still blame the Bears loss on Dusty for overusing his SP's in '03. Maybe with Piniella this year, the Cubs will maximize their pitching staff and allow the Bears to win next year. Congrats anyway to the Colts for the win.

Speaking of holding down the fort, I just wanna say good job Rob G. for keeping TCR running. It must feel like a one-man show lately. If only A.Phil could put those really great comments into actual posts...

well thanks 10-man, I'll talk to AZ Phil about that. :) There was a lot of blame to go around in that game beyond Rex, start with Chris Harris in the 1st quarter. He doesn't blow that coverage on a 3rd down and it's a whole different game in the 4th. Benson and special teamer's fumble sure didn't help either. Ron Turner sucked too. Oh yeah and Grossman. Honestly though, that Chris Harris boner was not only a huge momentum changer, but just take those 7 pts away and we're leading in the 4th quarter and Rex probably isn't throwing as much. Meh, great season, tough ending, congrats Colts!!

Loses are much easier to take for me when I know the better team (at least for that day) won. Bears just got beat...on offense and defense. Indy had a great game plan to go for 5-10 yard plays versus big bombs...kept our defense on the field most of the game, and just wore the Bears down. Yeah, I too can't figure out if Grossman was just shackled early, or if he wasn't confident to throw for more then two yards a shot.

Grossman just played a terrible game -- it's that simple. When he threw the ball over 10 yards, it was either a bad throw or it was going to a receiver who was blanketed by the Colts secondary. The deep ball to Berrian was horrendous -- he was covered, the ball was a floater, and Muhsin Muhammad was open on the near-side (TV angle) of the field. The pass that was intercepted by Hayden and returned for a TD shouldn't have been made, and should have resulted in Grossman being benched. Oh, and the horrible decisions to throw screen-passes to a surrounded Thomas Jones also didn't help. Scarily enough, Grossman finished with a higher completion percentage than Manning. It all looked good until the 2nd half -- when great QBs shine and bad QBs whine. One other thing: there's no way in hell Peyton Manning should have gotten the MVP. It belongs to Dominic Rhodes.

The defense is to blame for the loss. You cant give up 400 yards and expect to win. Grossman didnt play that bad and took what the Colts defense gave him. As for his picks on the first one Muhammed should have tackled Hayden and on the second one there down 12 and you need to make a play and he forced one in. Its obious they need a new offensive coaching staff to develop Grossman because that is not Turner's strongpoint (see his tenure in champaign). my choice for OC would be Chargers QB coach John Ramsdill who had the postion with the Rams devloping Trent Green, Kurt Warner, and Marc Bulger into solid NFL QB's and did as nice job with Rivers this season. As for QB coach I would go with Mark Whipple who held the job with PIT the last 3 season as did a good job with Roetslisberger.

I read somewhere and I agree. The Bears lost this game because they couldn't get any pressure on Manning. Grossman wasn't good but I've seen him play a whole lot worse so let's not hang this loss on them. Lovie will need to answer for the seeming letdown of a plan on defense. Sure, they stayed on the field far, far too long but it wasn't until the game was pretty much decided that they came up with their first sack of Manning. That's unacceptable. Anyway, great year. Hopefully we'll be back again soon and this time I hope we win. The NFC is weak and the Bears are currently the best or near best of a weak bunch. That means they have a good shot at making it back. Let's look forward and not back!

After watching our front four get manhandled, for what like 42 minutes (?), it sure makes me wonder 'what if' we had our best defensive player on the field. They should be back next year, and hopefully with a one year less stupider Rex.

Oh yeah, and I disagree on the MVP comment, it should have been one or all of the O-Line that got the award.

Almost every year our GM has signed a rehabbing pitcher from the scrap heap. Dempster, Williamson, Wade Miller (even Kerry Wood qualifies based on this years contract). Who will be Hendry's 2008 reclamation project? Food for thought: from the boston herald.com... http://tinyurl.com/29rd4p Matt Clement, who underwent surgery on his right shoulder on Sept. 26, is progressing well on his rehabilitation program, but the veteran pitcher still hasn’t begun a throwing program, Hoyer said. Clement, who went a disappointing 5-5 with a 6.61 ERA in 12 starts before being lost to shoulder pain in mid-June, is expected to begin throwing sometime next month. The team is taking an extremely cautious approach with the 32-year-old and won’t project a timetable for his return to the mound or to game action. Clement is entering the final season of a three-year, $25.5 million contract.

Get Hester the damn ball!!! The Bears have the most dynamic, feared player in the NFL, and they never use him on offense. A reverse, a screen pass -- anything that will get him the ball 3-4 times a game with a little room to run. I would have loved to have seen Benson in there pounding away on a sloppy field in the 4th quarter with the Bears down only 22-17. To not have him was a real shame... but that's the NFL. Very fun year -- but, in your heart of hearts, did you really think this was a Super Bowl winning team? Next up -- we've got to get Ted Lilly a nickname.

Would we have done any worse in that game with Cade McNown as our quarterback? He was confident too--it just played as misplaced arrogance because he was too stupid to know his limitations (and to grasp the playbook, sure). I've been somewhat of a Grossman defender this season--I felt like teams figured out how to pressure him and keep him off balance and that's why we saw his play change so dramatically. The great quarterbacks figure out how to adjust. How not to throw soft arcing deep passes in hopes that someone on his team will catch it in the superbowl. Rex has got to make a quantum leap in his ability to be comfortable when the pocket starts collapsing, how to scramble, and how to not just put the ball in the air because he made a decision before the lay started. He's also got to figure out how to hold onto snaps. It's time to start considering that quite possibly Grossman will never get there. And yes BillyBucks, this is a team I thought could win the superbowl--not once Mike Brown and Tommie Harris were injured, but before that I felt they could certainly get the job done. For the rest of the long season, I was surprised every time the Bears pulled one out. It didn't make it any more fun to watch the travesty of last night. On to baseball.

Tough game. But Colts beat the Bears every which way except in special teams play. Rex-ugh Defense-ugh Coaching- Hey look Desmond Clark. Hey look no blitzing on Manning. "It’s time to start considering that quite possibly Grossman will never get there." Wow 26 pro starts and your done. I want to thank the Bears to getting me to this point where pitchers and catchers report in two weeks. With the plethora of pitching, that was never given to poor Dusty, LouPa should have this team quick out of the gate.

"Would we have done any worse in that game with Cade McNown as our quarterback? " Uh...YES! I saw Cade IN PERSON. Many times. He is one of the three WORST QB's I have ever seen in a Bears uniform. Rex has more potential than Cade ever dreamed about. It remains to be seen if it will ever be developed. Rex sucked, I'll agree - but much blame to go around - including a poor game plan by the coaches. Certainly, one can't expect a defense to play an entire half with their offense not having more than 10-12 plays.

McNown sucked but sadly, I have seen far more than two other Bear quarterbacks worse than him. Having crappy quarterbacks is a Bear tradition.

Mr. Whipple -- Sorry -- I should have been more clear. Did anyone really expect the Bears team that headed into the playoffs (no Tommie H. nor Mike B., Rex in a downward spiral, no pass rush, etc.) to win the SB? Still, 2006 was an amazing ride -- I can't remember ever seeing a player like Hester. I had the good fortune to be at the Saints game -- that was a lifetime memory. So, now, we say "thanks for a great season", hope the key players can stay healthy next year, and be thankful we have Hester and Urlacher to look forward to again. Now -- on to Wood, Miller, Prior, CF, etc.......

>>The Joe — February 4, 2007 @ 10:08 pm I need baseball fast. This day was too great of a disappointment. Umm Joe, You realize this is a Cub-centric web site, right? DISAPPOINTMENT IS OUR MIDDLE NAME. I *laugh* at spirit-crushing sporting events. Actually, I'm a little under the weather today, and told my co-workers that was either Da Beers or Da Bears.

It’s time to start considering that quite possibly Grossman will never get there. I go back and forth on Rex, but he did more good than harm this year and helped lead us to a Super Bowl in what was essentially his first full season. He'll be back next year for certain and top of the depth chart. I think he has one more year on his deal. And my bad earlier on the Chris Harris rip, it was Daniel Manning apparently.

go get Jeff Garcia - today to do what, stock the Bears after-game parties with Playboy playmates? Don't be fooled by a few good games in a high powered offense, Garcia isn't that good. He stunk up the joint his last year in San Fran, along with Detroit and Cleveland and he'll stink up the joint for whatever team is fooled into signing him based off 5-6 games last year. Rex is our QB for at least one more year, for better or worse.

rob, Jeff Garcia competes and does not make mistakes. with our defense and running game, a good qb for the bears manages the game and should not make dumb mistakes. granted he's not a qb who will win games for a bad team, but he will not loose games for a good team. garcia would be a nice complement for the next few years, and who knows, Rexy may learn a few years by sititng behind garcia. from what i heard in the postgame show, rex was clueless that he had a bad game. ugh.

Let's talk in a year, Jeff Garcia will have a worse year than Rex Grossman and it won't be close.

on Garcia - he is a system QB and the system is West Coast. he does not fit with the Bears. plus with all our expiring contracts (TJ, Briggs, etc) and Griese under for 4 more, there is no way they bring another QB in

cubfanbudman: great handle dude. why we lost in my opinion after 2 viewings of the game: 1. grossman fumbling away the ball at the end of the half the 1st play after we took it away from them. though viniateri shanked the kick anyway, we could have at least given robbie a chance at 3 more or even better, which wouldve gone a long way toward alleviating the damage from the blown coverage TD that erased hesters return and kept momentum w/ us. 2. grossmans floater (returned for a TD) that should have been upfield leading moose, not a duck straight over his head. just a terrible throw off his back foot. the argument against turner: though the pick for a TD was basically it for us, calling those hopeless screens on our last drive to stay in it, was plain moronic. the call on 4th down should have been made on 2nd down. you cant hate on turner for the call to go deep to berrian over the middle on the drive before that though cuz if not for spectacular coverage by the other safety berrian makes that catch by coming back to the ball the way he did and turner wouldve looked like a genius, but oh well. though it really sucked to lose benson so early, basically rex's lost fumble from center and the duck over moose's head were the mistakes that let indy off the hook. we could have won that game. but, its over and done.

cubby, i agree with you 100%. i'm curious what the tribune has to say about this "gross" quarterback. i'm not sure he has the head needed to play the position.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.