Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

37 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (three slots are open)

Last updated 11-17-2023
* bats or throws left
# bats both

Adbert Alzolay 
Michael Arias
Javier Assad
Ben Brown
Jose Cuas
Kyle Hendricks
Porter Hodge
* Bailey Horn
Caleb Kilian
Mark Leiter Jr
* Luke Little
Julian Merryweather
Daniel Palencia
Michael Rucker
* Drew Smyly
* Justin Steele
Jameson Taillon
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
* Matt Mervis
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Luis Vazquez
Patrick Wisdom

Kevin Alcantara
Alexander Canario
* Pete Crow-Armstrong
Brennen Davis
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman


Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

2017 Cubs Spring Training Uniform Numbers

CUBS SPRING TRAINING UNIFORM NUMBERS NOTE 1: These are preliminary and are subject to change NOTE 2: Minor league coaches and instructors usually are assigned numbers 67, 88-94, and 96-99 (TBA) NOTE 3: Numbers 3, 24, 53, 54, and 69 are not assigned at this time (Cubs do not issue #69) 1 Gary Jones, COACH 2 Tommy LaStella, INF 3 --------------- 4 Dave Martinez, COACH 5 Albert Almora Jr, OF 6 Carl Edwards Jr, P 7 Jeimer Candelario, INF 8 Jemile Weeks, INF 9 Javy Baez, INF 10 RETIRED 11 John Mallee, COACH 12 Kyle Schwarber, C-OF 13 Carlos Corporan, C 14 RETIRED 15 Chris Dominguez, INF 16 Brandon Hyde, COACH 17 Kris Bryant, INF 18 Ben Zobrist, IF-OF 19 Koji Uehara, P 20 Matt Szczur, OF 21 Dylan Floro, P 22 Jason Heyward, OF 23 RETIRED 24 --------------- 25 Chris Bosio, COACH 26 RETIRED 27 Addison Russell, INF 28 Kyle Hendricks, P 29 Rob Zastryzny, P 30 Jon Jay, OF 31 RETIRED 32 Brian Duensing, P 33 Fernando Rodriguez, P 34 Jon Lester, P 35 Lester Strode, COACH 36 Aaron Brooks, P 37 Brett Anderson, P 38 Mike Montgomery, P 39 Manny Parra, P 40 Willson Contreras, C 41 John Lackey, P 42 RETIRED 43 Jake Buchanan, P 44 Anthony Rizzo, 1B 45 Casey Kelly, P 46 Pedro Strop, P 47 Miguel Montero, C 48 Jim Henderson, P 49 Jake Arrieta, P 50 Gerardo Concepcion, P 51 Jack Leathersich, P 52 Justin Grimm, P 53 --------------- 54 --------------- 55 Daniel Corcino, P 56 Hector Rondon, P 57 David Rollins, P 58 Mike Borzello, COACH 59 Zac Rosscup, P 60 Felix Pena, P 61 Conor Mullee, P 62 Caleb Smith, P 63 Maikel Cleto, P 64 Henry Blanco, COACH 65 Franklin Font, COACH 66 Munenori Kawasaki, INF 67 --------------- (worn by Minor League Outfield & Baserunning Coordinator Doug Dascenzo in 2016) 68 Eloy Jimenez, OF 69 --------------- 70 Joe Maddon, MGR 71 Wade Davis, P 72 John Andreoli, OF 73 Victor Caratini, C-1B 74 Duane Underwood Jr, P 75 Jacob Hannemann, OF 76 Jose Rosario, P 77 Eric Hinske, COACH 78 Mark Zagunis, OF 79 Andury Acevedo, P 80 Pierce Johnson, P 81 James Farris, P 82 Taylor Davis, C-1B 83 Seth Frankoff, P 84 Jhondaniel Medina, P 85 Chesny Young, INF 86 Ian Happ, IF-OF 87 Ryan Williams, P 88 --------------- 69 --------------- (worn by Tennessee manager Mark Johnson in 2016) 90 --------------- (worn by Iowa pitching coach Rod Nichols in 2016) 91 --------------- (worn by Iowa manager Marty Pevey in 2016) 92 --------------- 93 --------------- 94 --------------- (worn by Minor League Hitting Coordinator Andy Haines in 2016) 95 Chad Noble, BULLPEN CATCHER 96 --------------- (worn by Minor League Pitching Coordinator Jim Brower in 2016) 97 --------------- (worn by Minor League Field Coordinator Tim Cossens in 2016) 98 --------------- (worn by Tennessee pitching coach Terry Clark in 2016) 99 ---------------


Wade Davis usually wears #17, but Kris Bryant already has that number locked-up, so Davis took #71 (#17 reversed).

I find it interesting that Eloy Jimenez was assigned Jorge Soler's old number (#68).

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

VA PHIL: I only mentioned it because Eloy Jimenez somewhat resembles Jorge Soler physically, and I thought it was interesting that Jimenez (in particular) got Soler's old number 68 when most of the in-house NRI and even some of the guys on the 40-man roster (Andreoli, Caratini, Hannemann, Rosario, Underwood, Zagunis, Acevedo, P. Johnson, T. Davis, Young, Happ, R. Williams, et al) were issued generic "Spring Training numbers" in the 70's and 80's.

As for why Soler wore #68, it probably was just a matter of keeping the number he was first issued in Spring Training, but it did become associated with him while he was a Cub (there were jerseys sold with his name & number on them), and because of that, Cubs #68 is probably no longer just another generic "Spring Training number." It's Jorge Soler's old number. 

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Back when AZ Phil first became a Cub fan circa 1960-61, the Cubs uniform numbering system was very simple... catchers wore single-digit numbers, infielders were numbered in the teens, outfielders in the 20's, pitchers in the 30's and 40's, and the Kollege of Koaches wore numbers in the 50's and 60's. No numbers were retired. That's the way it was, and we liked it! Now, get off my lawn!!!! link

Is the reason the Cubs don't assign/use #69 because of the collapse of 1969 or because of, well, sexual reasons...?

Cleveland was awarded the 2019 All Star Game yesterday. They will follow Miami this year and Washington in 2018. 2020 will be the 30th anniversary of the last time the Cubs hosted the game. In the meantime, only three teams have not hosted the event. In addition to the Dodgers, that includes Oakland and Tampa Bay - the league's two current examples of bad ballpark situations. Pittsburgh and San Diego have hosted twice in that period, which is why the math doesn't add up. However, a caveat: none of the Yankees, Philadephia, or now Atlanta have hosted it in their new park. Combined with the ongoing renovations at Wrigley, I have to think the Cubs will be one of the next 5 teams announced to host, and possible within the next 1-2.

I have updated the TCR Cubs Organizational Depth Chart to reflect Spring Training assignments, including projected assignments at Minor League Camp.

Just as a Point of Information, Kevin Cornelius MUST be assigned to the Iowa squad, because a player selected in the AAA Phase of the Rule 5 Draft MUST be assigned to the AAA affiliate's squad at Minor League Camp for at least 15 days, but then the player can be assigned to any affiliate once the season starts.

Two more minor league signings to report: - Todd Glaesmann (OF) - Frank Batista (RP)

No one assigned Ross or Dexter's number I get. I don't quite get no one with Chapman's number, and certainly not Cahill's!

[ ]

In reply to by Dolorous Jon Lester

DJL: David Ross's number might be left open for a while in case he decides to un-retire sometime during the season (and if Lester is struggling, he might!). The other open numbers (24, 53, and 54) are just chance. Normally the Cubs don't reissue the numbers of their free-agents until they actually sign elsewhere or until it's absolutely sure they are not coming back. That's why I was surprised that Brett Anderson got #37 (Travis Wood's old number), especially since Anderson has never worn #37 in MLB before (he wore #35 with the Dodgers and #49 wth the A's), and Wood has still not signed elsewhere. So it is possible that if Wood comes back, Anderson could maybe switch to #53 (#35 reversed), or Bullpen Coach Lester Strode could give-up #35 so Anderson can have it and switch to a different uniform number. But again, the uniform number assignments are preliminary and are subject to change, both at the start of Spring Training, and then again on Opening Day.

@Buster_ESPN 2m2 minutes ago MLB strips Cards of their first two picks in '17 draft (56, 75 overall) and fines them $2 million; money and picks forwarded to Astros.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

The team penalties seem about right (although it should probably have been their first pick this year and next year instead of 1 and 2 this year) and Correa got 4 years in jail and a $280K fine, so I'm OK with that. But, as always with stuff like this, the big question is : WHY? What the hell? Were the Astros a huge threat to the Cardinals in 2012? Don't the Cardinals have their own system for evaluating talent, which has been (too) successful?

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

The $2M fine payable to the Astros is almost exactly the combined Signing Bonus Pool (SBP) slot values for the two 2017 draft picks (#56 and #75) forfeited to the Astros by the Cardinals, so the Astros should be able to sign both draft picks essentially for free (that is, with Cardinal money) while increasing their own 2017 Rule 4 Draft SBP (the money they will be allowed to spend without penalty) for all of their other selections in the first ten rounds by $1,853,200 (the combined slot values of the two Cardinal draft picks). And that would allow the Astros to pay significant "overslot" bonuses (if they so choose) to some of their 2017 draft picks (including the two draft picks they get from the Cardinals) that they might not otherwise have been able to sign for "slot money."

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred has placed Chris Correa on the MLB Ineligible List (lifetime ban), making him ineligible to be hired by any MLB organization. This also makes Correa ineligible for selection to the National Baseball Hall of Fame, but he is still eligible for selection to the Hackers Hall of Fame.

So I guess not signing and trying to trade Hammel was not such a bad strategy after all.

Cubs acquire Eddie Butler & international bonus slot #74 from Rockies for James Farris & international bonus slot #28. Dylan Floro DFA'd

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

we have this on Farris in case anyone is a fan: @sahadevsharma Re: Farris, he has a fringy slider and Cubs were considering bringing back his curve from amateur days. Looks like purely a reliever.

Butler was once upon a time a pretty big pitching prospect, (#24 in baseball before 2014). But he's had shoulder issues almost since he was first called up in 2014 and got DFA'd last week when they signed Holland. His numbers are pretty ugly looking the last 3 years. Maybe getting away from Coors/Denver will help.

Just watched the condensed version of Butler's best start last year, a 6-inning, 0-run, 6/2 K/BB performance in May at San Francisco. He did not even look very good in his best start, with the exception of part of the second, when he struck out two after loading the bases, and the fifth, in which he struck out the side. The ballpark saved him two home runs, there are a ton of hard-hit balls, some web gems, a TOOTBLAN, and overall it was a very lucky performance. I know I shouldn't read too much into one performance, but it was literally the best start of his major league career. I know he's probably a reliever with the Cubs. With his repertoire, he still has a shot.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

Initially, he should be a starter in Iowa. After that, it's all if he figures it out. If so or if not, it was a fairly logical gamble on a ninth-round pick in Farris. BTW, kudos to AZ Phil for nailing Farris as the guy who would likely be traded in this sort of trade.

TIM: Unless one of the Cubs MLB starting pitchers begins the season on the DL, the Opening Day starting rotation at Iowa will likely be Butler-Zastryzny-Buchanan-Brooks-Kelly (I suspect Ryan Williams will start the season at Extended Spring Training while he builds-up innings & his pitch count), with Butler, Zastryzny, Buchanan, and Brooks already on the Cubs MLB 40-man roster AND with minor league options available (and if Kelly is added to the 40 at some point, he has a minor league option left, too). This matters because ideally you would want all five starters at AAA capable of starting games in the big leagues, so whichever one of them is due to start for Iowa on the day you suddenly need a AAA starter to get called up, the one scheduled to pitch that day gets the call. Of course Maddon/Bosio could always go with a "bullpen day," but that usually requires relief pitchers who are more than "one-inning" pitchers. They had guys like that last year (with Richards, Cahill, and Wood in the pen coming out of Spring Training), but it looks like only Montgomery will be able to pitch multiple innings of the eight pitchers likely to start the season in the pen (W. Davis-Rondon-Uehara-Montgomery-Strop-Duensing-Edwards-Grimm). That's why one of the two relievers with options remaining who can't refuse an optional assignment (Edwards or Grimm) could get optioned to Iowa at the end of Spring Training, either to allow Rule 5 draft pick Caleb Smith to make the 25-man roster (and he could be stretched-out to pitch multiple innings in Spring Training), or for one of the presumed five starters at Iowa (Butler-Zastryzny-Buchanan-Brooks-Kelly) to make the Opening Day roster as the "long-man" in the pen (this slot could have pitchers rotate up from Iowa every couple of weeks). BTW, there could be some major carnage at the end of Spring Training. Depending on how many pitchers begin the season on the DL in Chicago, Iowa, and Tennessee, as many as twenty pitchers could get released just from the Iowa and Tennessee squads alone by the end of Minor League Camp.

Az Phil, Barring DL stints, the Opening night roster?: SP: Lester, Arrieta, Hendricks, Lackey, Anderson RP: Davis, Rondon, Strop, Montgomery, Uehara, Edwards, Grimm, Duensing IF: Contreras, Rizzo, Zobrist, Russell, Bryant OF: Schwarber, Almora, Heyward Bench: Montero, Baez, La Stella, Jay Szczur is out.

[ ]

In reply to by Childersb3

CHILDERS: I would tend to agree with that.

Two possible changes (though less than 50% chance for both):

1. Caleb Smith > Edwards or Grimm (Smith is a Rule 5 draft pick and can't be sent to the minors until waivers are secured AND the Yankees decline to reclaim him, and both Edwards & Grimm have minor league options left and neither can refuse an Optional Assignment)

2. Jemile Weeks > LaStella (IF Weeks proves his hamstring is 100%)

And of course injuries change everything.

I agree that Szczur (who is out of minor league options) is a goner (by trade or lost off waivers) unless an outfielder starts the season on the DL, so the Cubs might not make final disposition with regard to Szczur until the very end of Spring Training. 

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Damn. I just learned how to spell Szczur without looking. Well, I hope he leaves some of his bats behind for Rizz. Much easier to root for Szczur than LaStella, for reasons both obvious and not (he saved a child's life by being a bone marrow donor, which is no small thing). But, ironically, for a team swimming in infielders a while ago, they are a bit bench-thin there now.

[ ]

In reply to by tim815

i dunno if any team sees him as a guy who could handle CF reliably as an injury backup, but if so he's got something going on with his value. at the very least he could handle all 3 OF part time off the bench. that said, i doubt he'd bring someone that would make us say 'wow.'

Az Phil, Do you see Theo getting Boone Logan? I don't want any of the other Free Agent LHRP. Is Logan better than Duensing?

[ ]

In reply to by Childersb3

CHILDERS: Boone Logan would be an upgrade over Brian Duensing, but I doubt that the Cubs would strongly pursue Logan at this time. However, if Logan falls into their laps (like Dexter Fowler did last year), I would think the Cubs would try and find a way to sign him, because it would make the pen better. As a post-2016 Article XX-B FA, Duensing has automatic "no trade" rights through June 15th, and he can't be sent to the minors without his permission, either, so if they sign Logan, the Cubs would probably end up releasing Duensing at the end of Spring Training (presuming there isn't room for both Logan and Duensing in the pen on Opening Day). And if the Cubs do release Duensing and he ends up signing with another MLB club, the new club would only have to pay Duensing the MLB minimum salary ($535K in 2017), and the Cubs would be on the hook for the balance ($1.465M). But that's actually not that much if it means the Cubs can get Logan. Also, the Cubs may be maxed-out payroll-wise for 2017, but about $90M in payroll comes off the books in 2018, and if he is amenable, the Cubs could perhaps sign Logan to a two-year back-loaded deal with maybe a player opt-out with 2018 severance (like Fowler got last year).

Thanks Az Phil. I doubt Logan would fall to us, unless he wanted to win like Dexter did. And, if that happened, 1.465 mil to make Duensing play for someone else is a drop in the bucket with the 2018 potential savings. This won't happen, because Theo will want him to develop more or put up good numbers for trade bait, but could Jeimer out hit TLS in Spr Training? I know ole 3am can still swing it some, but I'm ready to move on from him.

Wouldn't mind seeing Blevins fall to us, especially on a contract similar to Logan. It's insane Logan got less than Mike Dunn or even Rzepczynski. Also wouldn't mind taking a chance on the injured Eovaldi for 2018, maybe even H. Alvarez. Bullpen wise, wouldn't hate to see us grab Aaron Barrett or Maness.

Recent comments

  • crunch (view)

    i know it's still very early, but i'd like to go into the xmas-to-newyears part of the off-season with something more than...*checks list*...patrick wisdom avoids arbitration with a 1-year deal

    also, steven brault retired and was spotted at the winter meetings with a demo reel and making contacts trying to break into broadcasting (not a joke).  unless he's more optimistic than talented (we already know he can sing) he should make it one day because he seems to be very serious about it.

  • Cubster (view)

    I blame Jason Schmidt’s 3/44

  • Craig A. (view)

    Was all that stuff with the Blue Jays just to squeeze an extra $10 million/yr out of the Dodgers?  It's more than enough to cover his California income taxes!

  • crunch (view)

    unless he pitches into his late-30 that is gonna sting.  a 70m DH...ow.

    it's great to take care of 2 roster spots in 1 player, and i'm sure the team will cut into the pay with the amount of merch/etc he can sell just by being attached to the team....but yeah, i'm not mad the cubs didn't go that extreme.

  • WebAdmin (view)

    Shohei Ohtani to join Dodgers according to ESPN. 10 years for $700 m
  • Cubster (view)

    I'm getting the feeling that Todd Walker might be a Shaw comp. A valuable hit first player but limited albeit not awful on defense. Hopefully, he has more upside. Not a bad floor if Steve Garvey is his ceiling.

  • Wrigley Rat (view)

    AZ Phil - If that's the level of return, I would want NO part of that trade to Cleveland for Clase and Bieber. I have some faith that the Cubs have a strong plan for which prospects they will keep (even if they dangle them in trade talks) and which they will move, because they have plenty of solid prospects they can trade but they shouldn't be trading any of the ones they hope will be future core players. Some guys are redundant, so I hope they choose the right players to keep and the right players to move. It's always important for a team to know its own minor league players better than scouts from other teams (obviously), but I don't think that's always been the case for the Cubs and many other clubs. 

    Cubster - I watched an interview with Carter Hawkins a couple days ago where he said that although Morel hasn't gotten into any Dominican games at 1B, the Cubs did send coaches down with Morel to work on first base skills during practice. So he is developing those skills, whether the Cubs end up using him there or not will probably be dependent on a lot of factors including how those coaches think he looks at the position while training. 

  • tim815 (view)

    He could still play SS at Double-A, but Vazquez, Hoerner, and Swanson are much better defensively, arm strength or not. I'd be good leaving Shaw at SS with McGeary and Ballesteros around, but by the first of June (?), 1B might make sense in DM.

  • crunch (view)

    i have no reason to see a problem, it just seems like it's his most obvious reason to give pause on him at 1st.

    the cubs situation dictates 2nd/SS isn't an option.  his arm dictates 3rd isn't an option.  1st or CF seems to be his best path and he's only played CF in summer ball back in highschool/college...and of course PCA is a better + closer to the bigs CF.

    it's a lot safer to say he's made for 1st than it is he's made for 3rd.  even as a SS his arm is weak, and it's not like his glove is so great he needs to stay in the middle-IF.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    CRUNCH: Steve Garvey (one of Shaw's comps as a hitter) was a 5'10 right-handed throwing first-baseman with a rag arm. Jeff Bagwell (another Shaw comp) was a 6'0 right-handed throwing first-baseman with a rag arm. Carlos Santana (who played 1B for Counsell in Milwaukee last season and is an above-average defensive first-baseman) is 5'11. It's not like Shaw is 5'7 or 5'8. I don't really see the problem.