Yeah That One Hurt

Submitted by Rob G. on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:03am
A tough day at the office for the boys in the blue, Lou summed it up well after the game:
“We had a plethora of wasted opportunities.”
You don't say. Before we play the blame game, let's look at a few positives: - Ted Lilly threw yet another quality start and on a night when it seemed he didn't have his best stuff. At least early on he seemed to be missing his locations by quite a bit and getting hit hard, a cruddy Pirate offense certainly a contributing factor. - The top two spots in the order continued to produce going 6 for 13 with a run, three RBI's and two stolen bases. Unfortunately the middle of the order decided to take the night off. - Some nice defensive plays to keep the game going by Soriano and Theriot, although both looked like they were umpire-aided calls. The umps owed us a few from earlier in the year so file it under baseball karma. - Will Ohman performed his LOOGY duties to perfection and has only allowed one hit to a lefty all season on top of four walks in 19 plate appearances. It's the righties that have been giving him more trouble than usual. - Scott Eyre's three shutout innings lowered his ERA to 8.47. - Lou Piniella actually had a relief pitcher left for the 15th inning and a pinch-hitter for the 14th. Baby steps. Oh but much went wrong, beginning with the eight inning: - Lou brings Felix Pie into the game in the top of the 8th as a defensive upgrade over Cliff Floyd. One-run lead, a flyball pitcher and the middle of the Pirates lineup due up, seems like a smart move. But Lou negates all that in the bottom of the inning. Lee and Ramirez reach to start the inning and the Pirates bring in a lefty to face Pie. Lou, going for the kill, brings in Murton to counter and he pops out rather unceremoniously. If you're playing for defense in the top of the inning, why change your mind in the bottom half? With zero outs and runners on second and third, it would have been a good time to try the squeeze with Pie for that insurance run. If it fails, the team should still have a runner on third with less than two outs and you would have set yourself up with a better defensive outfield for the 9th even with a groundball pitcher coming to the mound. And of course... - Ryan Dempster issues a one-out walk to Nate McClouth although I didn't think it was a bad 3-2 pitch. Tailing two-seamer that just missed the plate that most lefties will chase thinking it's going to be a strike. A single later and Jack Wilson hits a flyball to right field. Jones should be out there if not for Lou's substituting in the eighth and while he may have just thrown it ten feet to either side of the plate or in front of him, he does have a stronger arm that would have had a better shot to nail McClouth. - More adventures on the basepaths that I could do without. Soriano gets thrown out at third when a ball doesn't get far away enough from the catcher. Theriot gets doubled off second when a liner by Murton that is in FRONT of him gets caught and Barrett gets thrown out at second base on a missed hit and run by Jacque Jones. - Neil Cotts is no longer invulnerable giving up his first run of the year. I'll pass out equal shares of blame on the offensive ineptitude in the eight to add insurance runs when we had two runners in scoring position and zero outs and Ryan Dempster for blowing his first save of the year against the bottom of the Pirates lineup. And of course Lou for some more questionable decision-making which of course would have been less questionable had Dempster, Murton or Jones done their jobs. While I wasn't nearly as up in arms about Sunday's game as some were, I did understand the concern. The concern was for games like today. Using up bench guys when you're losing to gain just the slightest advantage has a sort of Old West nobility about it. Better to go down with no bullets in the chamber than be left with a loaded gun and a bloody corpse. But when you're ahead or tied, I think the roster shuffling has to be more controlled. That's the time to save those bullets until you have an absolute clear shot and make sure that bloody corpse is in the opposing team's dugout. Well last time we blew a win against the Pirates we reeled off five straight, I'll take that trade-off.

Comments

Submitted by Sayers40  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:11am  
Sick, disgusting game tonight. To be honest, we deserved to lose. Soriano was a train wreck on the basepaths and the defense was horrid all over. From Derrek Lee's two big mistakes to the blooper into center field that Theriot and Izturis couldn't catch to the double play that Ramirez couldn't turn. Not getting even one run across in the eighth was also terrible and I had a feeling it would lead to disaster. We deserved to lose. We've played plenty of games this year where we lost when we deserved to win so I was hoping we'd pull this one out. Alas, it wasn't to be. Perhaps tomorrow.

Submitted by Cubster  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 4:20am  
Soriano not tagging up from 3rd on the flyball to right center in the very first inning was there haunting the team all night. Baseball Gods don't let that kind of bad decision not ultimately figure in the outcome.

Submitted by The E-Man  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 6:01am  
One irony is that a little dude, is "The Man" at the plate. Theriot. The other guys in clutch situations: A-Ram - not "The Man" DLEE - not "The Man" Barrett - for SURE NOT "The Man" These three guys I thought of as someone that could be reasonably counted upon to lead the team in an important, clutch, AB. Barrett and A-Ram are in a a slump. DLEE can get on base (obviously at a high percentage) but the guy who would end the game w/a HR has not appeared since 2005. Can't afford to fall further back from the BREW. And, don't look now, but the 'Stros are a game behind us!

Submitted by no  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 6:02am  
*More adventures on the basepaths that I could do without. Soriano gets thrown out at third when a ball doesn’t get far away enough from the catcher. * In typical Cubbie luck fashion, the ball DID get far enough away from the catcher, but promptly got stopped by the umpire's foot. Also, Soriano did not get a good jump. Don't get me going on Ramirez. Dude takes a 2-2 pitch about 4 inches off the plate [FSN Pittsburgh idiot announcers thought it was a strike] and gets lucky to have it called a ball THEN whiffs on a 3-2 pitch 4 inches further outside and down???? *Lou brings Felix Pie into the game in the top of the 8th as a defensive upgrade over Cliff Floyd. * Floyd looked like he didn't know what was going on at the plate tonight. I'd have yanked him after the first K. Piniella should just start Pie every day in CF. Anyone think he EASILY catches that ball that Jones dove for and barely missed that went for a double and later a run? Besides me? Plus, Jones seemed totally overmatched all night long at the plate. Every time I see him play he literally looks like he does not know how to swing a bat. *Soriano not tagging up from 3rd on the flyball to right center in the very first inning was there haunting the team all night. Baseball Gods don’t let that kind of bad decision not ultimately figure in the outcome. * What are you talking about? Same "gods" allowed Soriano to score a few innings later by temporarily blinding the ump.

Submitted by BillyBucks  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 6:12am  
We wasted opportunities, but so did the Pirates -- man thrown out at the plate, wasted leadoff triple, etc. Bad luck for Murton, who failed in the 8th but hit a rocket in the 10th. Did people really expect Dempster to go all year without blowing a save? If he converts 8 of 9 all year, we will be in good shape. I agree -- it was a pretty good 3-2 pitch. The use of Pie is ridiculous. How is supposed to learn ot hit MLB lefties if he's neve given the chance to face them? The great thing about baseball -- there's another game the next day.

Submitted by ARM  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 6:39am  
Soriano looked terrible scoring, what was it, the third run? He cannot run. At least he cannot run unencumbered. He is really laboring. Watching him try to run from third, I saw a guy who knew he has the ability to run faster. But can't right now. And so he tries anyway. And then looks like a guy who is injured. Yeah, he scored on the play. But I wonder how long it will be until his hammy completely blows. I have a bad feeling guys. I think we are gonna lose him for months at some point very soon. I have urged Lou to sit him for a week or even two if need be. Not that Lou would listen to me, of course. But I do have a bad feeling about this. On an unrelated topic, did you all see the tape of Clemens throwing yesterday in, of all places, Kentucky? Is it just me or does he look fatter than usual this year? I know that wearing black supposedly is slimming but I could still discern what looked to me like a very huge gut beneath that black t-shirt. He looked completely out of shape. Yeah, he is not paid to run the bases but I have to wonder about his conditioning.

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 7:00am  
DLEE - not “The Man” Hmm... not so sure about that: RISP: .429/.500/.686 OPS: 1.186 RISP w. 2 outs: .455/.500/.909 OPS: 1.409

Submitted by Bleeding Blue  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 7:00am  
The Cubs are jumping on the "Ban Beer in the Clubhouse" bandwagon. I still don't quite get what having a post game beer in a clubhouse has to do with an alcoholic getting drunk at a bar and then deciding to drive but whatever....

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 7:01am  
Oops... forgot to close a tag there.

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 7:02am  
The beer thing... I think it is two things. One, it is a symbolic guesture. But two, and probably more importantly, it is a liability issue. The last thing any team wants is to get sued because something happens after a play was drinking in the clubhouse.

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 7:18am  
PATHETIC!!!!! That was one of the hardest games to watch in years. Just piss poor baseball all over the place. Luckily I went to bed in the 13th, so I didn't have to see the Bad News Bears play in the 15th and blow the game. The Cubs got 2 HUGE breaks though and the game should of been over as the umps blew two calls that would of directly let a PITT run score, but too bad we couldn't take advantage of them. Barring an injury, I don't think the Cubs could of done anything else to take the air out of the sails then with that pitiful performance. But if we can win today, and look good, yesterday will be quickly forgot I am sure.

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 7:40am  
yeah forgot about that tag up in the first, seemed so long ago. Quade got an earful in the dugout they showed so I'm guessing that was on him.

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 7:42am  
But if we can win today, and look good, yesterday will be quickly forgot [sic] I am sure. As it well should be. There are many games, and you cannot focus on one loss. Funny, but it seems that you "quickly forgot" the last nine games, eight of which were wins. It looks like you are back to your original self. I got worried for a while after you actually said something positive a few days ago.

Submitted by Dusty Baylor  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 7:47am  
You ahve a point Manny, but an inadvertent one. (if you were beiing sarcastic) It is a looooooong season. Forgetting the night before and playing each game as it comes is very important. IMO anyway.

Submitted by Arizona Phil  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 8:23am  
For those of you who might have contributed a week's salary to the Steve Blass Disease Telethon last month hoping it might help cure Luke Hagerty... it didn't. After throwing several "live" BP sessions at EXST (but NOT being allowed to pitch in any games), Hagerty has been released. Hagerty, a 2002 Supplemental 1st round "sandwich" pick out of Ball State selected by the Cubs as compensation for losing David Weathers to free-agency, was rated the Cubs #7 prospect by Baseball America before suffering a torn elbow ligament in ST 2003 and undergoing TJ ligament transplant surgery. He was selected by the Baltimore Orioles in the '04 Rule 5 Draft and got traded immediately to Florida, but was returned to the Cubs during ST 2005 when the Marlins discovered Hagerty had major control problems. Hagerty has spent the last three seasons at Fitch Park trying (uunsuccessfully) to locate home plate. And so another one bites the dust. Ben Christensen Matt Clanton Chadd Blasko Bobby Brownlie Jon Connolly Lee Gwaltney Aaron Krawiec Robert Ransom Oh, the humanity!

Submitted by 433  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 8:30am  
I understand that was a frustrating one to lose, but we all need to step back and look at the bigger picture. We have won 8 of 10 games. This team is on a good track. In my mind the Sunday comeback win and this loss are a wash -- both were very loseable, very winnable games. We won one, lost the other -- about what should be expected. The extra 6 innings of work taxed both bullpens, but with two games to play in the next 30 hours, I think the Cubs come out on the better end of that one. While our bullpen guys are tired, they are generally very good. The Pirates' pen is suspect to begin with will now be in shambles for these two games. If we can get to Gorzelanny and knock him out early tonight, we could win two games in one.

Submitted by The E-Man  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 8:51am  
DAVE: Hmm… not so sure about that: RISP: .429/.500/.686 OPS: 1.186 RISP w. 2 outs: .455/.500/.909 OPS: 1.409 Source? How many AB's for the above in your splits?

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 9:07am  
Source? Are you serious? I got it from yahoo sports stats... you find D-Lee's stats with risp on most, if not all, sports sites (espn, cnnsi, yahoo, cbs sports, etc... ). i didn't know i had to quote a source for basic stats now. How many AB’s for the above in your splits? 35 and 11, respetively. I know - small sample size, but you are the one who said he hasn't been "the man."

Submitted by Tom C  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 9:15am  
I was more perplexed at the fact that we walked 8 and struck out 7 while PITT walked only 2 and struck out 14

Submitted by The E-Man  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 9:24am  
DAVE: O.K. well, yes, since people make up shit - a source is fine. DLEE is still The Man sort of. It just doesn't seem like it in situations such as last night. As I said, I believe him to be the best 1B in baseball, but he had a REALLy bad night. And, I stand strong on my other under-achievers in key situations: A-Ram and Barrett. Players I was really expecting a lot more out of this year.

Submitted by Doug Dascenzo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 9:38am  
"The Cubs are jumping on the “Ban Beer in the Clubhouse” bandwagon." Me thinks Casey Moran's/Bernie's/Murphy's, etc are going to see a rather large spike in their attendance by Cubs' players.

Submitted by Dusty Baylor  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 9:42am  
A-Ram RISP 2007: 8/32, 2 HR 12 RBI 2004-2006:.303/.389/.575, 27 HR, 202 RBI Barrett RISP 2007: 6/30, 1 HR, 11 RBI 2004-2006: .292/.367/.469, 17 HR, 148 RBI. ESPN.

Submitted by The E-Man  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 9:44am  
DUSTYBAYLOR: RISP 2 Outs? RISP 2 Outs, late innings?

Submitted by The E-Man  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 9:47am  
DUSTYBAYLOR: A-RAM RISP 2004-2006 APRIL-MAY? A-RAM RISP 2004-2006 APRIL-MAY, 2 Outs? A-RAM RISP 2004-2006 APRIL-MAY, 2 Outs, late innings? Barrett RISP 2004-2006 APRIL-MAY? Barrett RISP 2004-2006 APRIL-MAY, 2 Outs? Barrett RISP 2004-2006 APRIL-MAY, 2 Outs, late innings? Barrett 2007 RISP 2 Outs, late innings?

Submitted by Jace  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 9:49am  
Jeez, E-man. In the time you spent requesting all of those things, you could have looked them all up yourself!

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:04am  
E-man... here are a few links: http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/players/index.jsp http://baseballprospectus.com/ You should be able to find some of your questions there.

Submitted by cubswinthepennant  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:06am  
One of the problems the Cubs lineup has is DLee batting 3rd and supplying no power. He and Soriano are on a pace to only hit 11 dingers. JJ is worse. If he keeps this up he'll hit a total of 5. The Cubs are proving that lineup order does count.

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:11am  
btw... Manny wanted to know Marquis's and Blanco's splits against rhp over the last three years (2004-2006 - does not include this year), so here you go: Marquis: .281/.301/.393 - 694 OPS - 178 at-bats Blanco: .228/.264/.362 - 636 OPS - 508 at-bats As you can see, marquis is the superior hitter against right handed pitchers. I have no problem with LouPa pinch hitting with Marquis before Blanco, especially against RHP. It makes even more sense when you factor in the fact that if you use Blanco, you lose your only back up catcher.

Submitted by George Altman  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:16am  
Rob G, Great summary of the game which was really fun to watch as a baseball fan, but not a great outcome being a Cubs fan. Anytime you lose by 1 run, you can kill yourself in the clubhouse replaying every event that could have turned it into a victory. But a couple of points to augment your analysis, if I may: Soriano doesn't get thrown out at 3rd if he gets his secondary lead going towards 3rd base. He got the lead, stopped, then took a half step back to 2nd, and then broke for 3rd. You're taught to break immediately for the next base if your secondary is moving forward, and the ball gets loose from the catcher. Murton in RF for the 9th inning. Pie or Jones throws the runner out at home. If Lou isn't going to play Pie 5-6 days a week in CF or RF, then send him to Iowa tonight. BUT, you need to call up an OF who can play RF in the late innings who has a solid ML average arm or, ideally, a plus arm. That isn't Floyd and it isn't Murton and it cost us a game last night. I'll keep saying it..........bad OF defense kills. I'm keeping track of games that are lost this year to OF defense and that's 1.

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:22am  
Just to clarify George, While I do think you should gravitate towards defense with a one-run lead late and do think Jones should have been playing RF at that moment, the play at the plate is no different for a RF or LF in terms of arm strength. The only reason team's put the better arm in RF is for the throw to 3b. And as I mentioned, Jones is no lock to not have thrown a 10 foot worm-killer on that play. Our OF defense also saved the game on Soriano's throw in extra innings, at least for a bit.

Submitted by Dusty Baylor  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:24am  
E-Man-Get a life. Take your love of minutiae with you.

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:28am  
One of the problems the Cubs lineup has is DLee batting 3rd and supplying no power. Derrek's got a .585 SLG pct and 21 RBI's (18th best in the NL). Bonds has 11 homers and 23 RBI's. Aramis has 6 homers and 18 RBI's. Derrek's "lack of power" hasn't really been the problem at all. Let's assume he doesn't go on-pace for 92 2B and 11 HR's and that ends up evening out.

Submitted by cubswinthepennant  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:30am  
A home run here or there, a dink hit or even just a healthy fly ball in the right spot, and no one would be pinning this loss on the outfield defense.

Submitted by cubswinthepennant  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:31am  
You could not be more wrong about Lee's lack of power in the third spot. A 3 hitter HAS TO hit home runs. It's not arguable.

Submitted by Dusty Baylor  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:33am  
So let's move DLee to the 7 spot right away, and put Barrett in the 3 spot, since he has more HR's.

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:36am  
You could not be more wrong about Lee’s lack of power in the third spot. A 3 hitter HAS TO hit home runs. It’s not arguable. end o' subject? as I said, don't see Lee hitting 11 homers this year and in the meantime he's produced well above average for a #3 hitter.

Submitted by Dusty Baylor  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:41am  
Sorry for just the sarcasm there... I agree Rob. DLee's always been a 25-35 HR guy...let's not panic the first week of May.

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:44am  
dave: "Funny, but it seems that you “quickly forgot” the last nine games, eight of which were wins. It looks like you are back to your original self. I got worried for a while after you actually said something positive a few days ago." Just curious as to whom are you talking about? because i did not forget the previous run, but that still shouldn't stop me, nor anyone else to call the Cubs performance last night what is was...PATHETIC!!!

Submitted by Chad  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:45am  
"A 3 hitter HAS TO hit home runs." You can say that but it has nothing to do with actual baseball. The classic lineup rules for baseball dictate that you're #3 hitter, is the best hitter on the team. The 4th hitter is you best 'power hitter'. Take Tony Gwynn for example. He hit third. Paul Molitor hit third. It just so happens that in today's game, the best hitter is often a guy who hits home runs, but it's not designed to be that way.

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:47am  
Dusty: "You ahve a point Manny, but an inadvertent one. (if you were beiing sarcastic)" Nope, I wasn't being sarcastic at all. While, last nights performance was pathetic, the good from the previous few games out weight it and if the team looks good today, even if they lose, will make yesterday's game leave the memory pretty quick.

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:48am  
but that still shouldn’t stop me, nor anyone else to call the Cubs performance last night what is was…PATHETIC!!! I didn't say it did... I simply said that we should move on, which is not what you want to do. You want to "not forget" the one loss last night. And I say it is ridiculous to focus on one loss.

Submitted by The E-Man  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:50am  
DUSTY; "E-Man-Get a life. Take your love of minutiae with you." I have a life. You get one. You are the one that posted splits for your pov.

Submitted by Chad  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:51am  
For a more recent example, please see Nomar Garciaparra.

Submitted by BillyBucks  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:51am  
I wonder what Hendry & Lou are thinking about the middle infield. I thought signing DeRosa was unnecessary at the time, and now it looks even worse with Theriot continuing to do what he did last year (with both the Cubs and at Iowa), and DeRosa confirming that he is a high strikeout guy with some decent pop (we have enough of those). Theriot should be the everyday 2B, because he brings a comibination of OBP and speed that no one else on the team can provide. Based on last year and this year, Izturis is an offensive disaster, and his defense, which can be spectacular, has been far too inconsisitent for a guy who is going to hit .200-.220. The rotation/juggling of the middle infield can't be good for the defense, and doesn't seem like a viable long-term solution. I'm not aware of many teams that successfully switch a guy to SS during the season, so making Theriot the everyday SS doesn't seem like the answer, either. What to do?

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 10:55am  
manny... maybe we all read you wrong, but it sure appeared like you were saying that the rest of us would forget last night's game even though we should not.

Submitted by Dusty Baylor  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:01am  
E-man- I used those splits for my argument, which is true. I did not see any splits for hitting with RISP, 2 outs, on Thursdays against knuckleballers, so I don't know how Barrett and A-Ram do in that situation I do know that Ramirez and Barrett have been good in the past with RISP, and have struggled with RISP-2 outs this season.

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:05am  
Dave- If you look at 2005-2007 stats for Blanco and Marquis vs RHP, here is what you come up with: Blanco: .667 OPS Marquis: .628 OPS It is not the end of the world that Lou used Marquis, but it is not something I would of done and the stats over the past 2+ years bare that out.

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:14am  
dave: "manny… maybe we all read you wrong, but it sure appeared like you were saying that the rest of us would forget last night’s game even though we should not." You did read it wrong. Here is my statement I am sure you and others are referring to: "But if we can win today, and look good, yesterday will be quickly forgot I am sure." There was no sarcasm in there. You and others just took it that way.

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:16am  
MVN mock draft... http://mvn.com/mlb-draft/2007/05/08/first-moc... Wieters to the Cubs.

Submitted by The E-Man  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:32am  
"...and have struggled with RISP-2 outs this season." Yes. Thank you, DustyBaylor.

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:43am  
The kid in the mock draft going #6 is Matt Harvey, RHP from Fitch HS in Groton, CT. He is right down the road from the stadium basically and Fitch is suppose to be playing here in the stadium later in the year. I hope he is pitching that day. I hear from the ocal scouts that he is a stud.

Submitted by cubswinthepennant  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:45am  
“A 3 hitter HAS TO hit home runs.” You can say that but it has nothing to do with actual baseball Thanks for the laugh, Chad.

Submitted by Dusty Baylor  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:47am  
"The other guys in clutch situations: A-Ram - not “The Man” DLEE - not “The Man” Barrett - for SURE NOT “The Man” " I'm sorry, I didn't realize that "clutch" meant only with runners in scorng position with 2 outs. My bad E-Man....

Submitted by Dusty Baylor  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:47am  
"The other guys in clutch situations: A-Ram - not “The Man” DLEE - not “The Man” Barrett - for SURE NOT “The Man” " I'm sorry, I didn't realize that "clutch" meant only with runners in scoring position with 2 outs. My bad E-Man....

Submitted by Chad  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:54am  
#51, care to explain?

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 11:56am  
well at least Milwaukee isn't winning... of course they're not losing either. 1-1 in the bottom of the 7th

Submitted by crunch  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 12:16pm  
it also helps to have your RH thrower in RF and your LH thrower in LF, but those events where it becomes an advantage are only a handfull a season. knowing someone has a weak arm in RF can be dangerous whether its true or not...or someone wants to say someone else's arm is just overrated, etc etc... what really matters in that situation is what the 3rd base coach thinks of that person's arm and what they're gonna do with runners at 2nd/3rd when it comes down to a popup vs. how deep its caught vs. position to throw etc etc...

Submitted by Jace  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 12:22pm  
Way to jinx that one, RobG... Brewers now in front...

Submitted by cubswinthepennant  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 12:26pm  
Just for the record: (1)At this point in the season, NL 1st baseman(67 HR) trail only LF'ers (76HR) NL position players in home runs but lead in RBI's (299). (2)Again, for NL hitters at this point, batters hitting #3 have 71 HR, 312 RBI, while #4 hitters have 72 HR, 316 RBI. D Lee's RBI total is just average. His HR's are below average.

Submitted by George Altman  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 12:29pm  
Rob G., I guess I'm going to continue to split hairs on this, but you actually make my point on OF defense. Soriano is playing where he should play and led the NL OF in assists last year - LF. He made the play he should have made given his skills and arm while playing LF. Murton was in medium RF, almost halfway between the IF dirt and warning track. A RF has to make that throw to a location near the Catcher's knees who then drops the tag between home plate and the baserunners shoes. Maybe Jones throws it into the stands - who knows - but at least he has the arm velocity to get the throw there a fraction of a second sooner. Pie - a slam dunk to Barrett for the out. If Lou's going with LF-Soriano, CF-Jones, and RF-Murton/Floyd, then he better get someone to play RF in the 8/9th inning who can make that throw. Other observation's: Lee, Theriot, Ramirez, Barrett, Soriano, Jones have to play every day. Does Izturis' glove equal or outweigh his anemic bat - the jury is still out. Floyd can hit the crap out of the ball, can'f play OF worth a crap. Murton - nice addition to a team who needs a LF that can hit. DeRosa - "Attention Eric Patterson, you're table is almost ready".

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 12:33pm  
I'm not exactly sure what you're defining as average... Lee has 17 RBI's when batting in the third spot in the order which is tied for 9th best in the NL and also only 9th in PA's in the NL at the #3 spot. (happens to be 2nd in runs out of that spot) And he leads all 1b in OPS in the NL, 4th in RBI's. what the hell are you trying to get at?

Submitted by henry  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 12:51pm  
okay. what is the freaking deal with the brewers? this is getting old.

Submitted by crunch  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 12:54pm  
along with the "kids" growing up a bit in MIL, geoff jenkins remembered he's a professional baseball slugger again. they got a solid, but unspectacular, team. no one's got the complete package, but they got a nice mix of speed/contact/power in enough guys. the defense can be scarey...the pitching is unspectacularly good...

Submitted by Chad  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 1:00pm  
The pitching will fail. The death spiral looms closer and closer.

Submitted by Brick  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 1:26pm  
I'm just worried the death spiral won't get here until after October.

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 1:34pm  
Chad: "The pitching will fail. The death spiral looms closer and closer." I hope you are right, but I think many thought it was going to come for DET last year and CHW a few years ago and it never did.

Submitted by big john stud  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 1:39pm  
Lee's 10-12 HR's will be enough.... He'll drive in 125 runs with the 90 doubles he's gonna hit.

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 1:41pm  
but I think many thought it was going to come for DET last year and CHW a few years ago and it never did. Actually...both teams did fall, but the fall was not enough. Both teams essentially collapsed in the second half, but were fortunate enough to just hold on and get into the playoffs. Remember, the White Sox were a game away from not making the playoffs in 2005.

Submitted by ZHL  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 1:54pm  
Nah, the Sox clinched on the fourth-to-last day that year, then swept Cleveland out. Penny fanned 14 Marlins with his fly down: http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o104/babes...

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 1:57pm  
thats right.. but my point still remains. both the sox and the tigers collapsed in the second half only to barely hold on to a playoff spot.

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:02pm  
dave: "Actually…both teams did fall, but the fall was not enough. Both teams essentially collapsed in the second half, but were fortunate enough to just hold on and get into the playoffs. Remember, the White Sox were a game away from not making the playoffs in 2005." It might be semantics here, but "collapsed"??? The White Sox won 99 games in 2005 and went 42-34 in the 2nd half. Yes, they cooled off, but they did not collapse, IMO. And what do you mean the White Sox were a game away from not making the playoffs? They won their division by 6 full games and had the best record in baseball. As for Detroit, they did stumble I guess. They went 36-38 in the 2nd half, but after the 1st half they had (59-29) all they had to do was coast in. And they were nowhere near in risk of not making the playoffs. they won the WC by 5 full games.

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:12pm  
Okay... collapsed was a little strong, but both teams had significant struggles in the second half. And while the Sox still had a good record in the second half, if I remember correctly, they are quite bad in August. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I remember it not being pretty and Sox fans were very concerned about not making the playoffs. Considering how well they started, making the playoffs would not have thought to have been an issue. But yea... semantics. Both teams struggled significantly at different points in the second half, to the extent that there was actually a pennant race that would not have occurred if they had maintained there high levels of play.

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:25pm  
if you still watch the rather unwatchable Baseball Tonight http://deadspin.com/sports/we.re-shocked-%27%... John Kruk essentially admitting that what he says on Baseball Tonight is B.S....

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:31pm  
anyone care to guess tonight's lineup? assume Murton plays RF, who's the lefty sucker in CF, Jones or Pie?

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:38pm  
i would guess that the cf is jones, only because it seems that LouPa does not seem to trust pie for some reason. not sure what that reason is, but he sure as hell doesn't like to play the guy.

Submitted by jacos  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:38pm  
I'll crap my pants if the Brewers make the playoffs- http://www.peeyourpantsforthebrewers.com/

Submitted by jackie t  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:43pm  
the brewers obviously aren't going to play at a .700 clip from here on out. a home- and patsy-heavy schedule and a bunch of 1-run wins have them ahead of where they might otherwise be, but 24 wins is 24 wins. they win 88 games if they play .500 ball the remainder of the year, and from what they've shown, they're probably at least slightly better than .500 here on out. and one of the dynamics in play is that winning baseball games gives them confidence that they can win baseball games -- a good start with a young team is going to help them in the confidence department. the lesson of the 2005 sox and 2006 tigers seems to be that a hot start gives you wiggle room to struggle and still make the playoffs. don't know why citing second-half 'collapses' makes you optimistic for the cubs' cause if those collapses still resulted in playoff births. the brewers still have a ways to go to match those tigers/sox starts, though. and, chad, thanks for the input. you were right on the mark a week ago when you called their high-water mark. should we mark it down this time, too? at least this time you might be right -- the brewers are on the road against some good teams coming up, which will be a test for them.

Submitted by cubswinthepennant  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:46pm  
Good Grief, this like trying to teach Statistics for Dummies today. When someone like DLee (or Juan Pierre) plays every game at his position his raw stats are best compared to the league average rather than against individual players who don't get as many PA's. Usually only a select few players (ten or less) are everyday players at any given position. So, this year the composite First Baseman (the total output by all men playing first base for an NL team) has 124 AB's. Lee has 123. He's played all 30 games and is right at league average for all AB's by the men playing first base for any given team. Given that the average total output by the average NL team's first baseMEN is 4 HR and 19 RBI and DLee has 2 HR and 21 RBI, I'd say he's average in RBI's and below average in HR's. And given that the average total output by the average NL team's #3 hitters is 5 HR and 20 RBI I'd again, say the same thing.

Submitted by Jace  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:56pm  
Let me just take a moment to bask in your obviously superior wisdom, cwtp.... ahhhhh.... How would you say Lee's 2B output is, compared to your "typical first baseman?"

Submitted by mannytrillo  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 2:57pm  
dave: "And while the Sox still had a good record in the second half, if I remember correctly, they are quite bad in August." Yes, they did struggle in August. They went 12-16.

Submitted by Jace  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:01pm  
Or... how would you say that Lee's batting average is? Lee - .398 BA, 17 2Bs Average - about .270 BA, 7 2Bs....

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:03pm  
cwtp... i don't think that anyone really disagrees with your analysis in the way that you do it. the problem is that your methodology sucks. sure... d-lee is average in terms of rbi and a little below average in homeruns. but as far as I know baseball is about more than just homeruns and rbi. there is not another 1b's production this year that I would want instead of lee. while he is average in rbi and below average in homeruns, he is well above average in average, obp, slugging, doubles, stolen bases, hits, walks, etc. but sure... he is just average because of his rbi and homerun output.

Submitted by Jace  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:07pm  
WSCR: Hill and Guzman will be in the bullpen tonight, in case of a bad outing by Marquis, or extra innings, I would imagine.

Submitted by Jace  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:08pm  
WSCR - Jones in CF, batting 8th...

Submitted by dave  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:10pm  
at least lou knows enough to bat Jones 8th against a lefty. for all of you who want to trade murton, would you really want two of these guys in a lineup against lefties: jones/floyd/pie?

Submitted by Rob G.  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:10pm  
other NL averages for 1b OPS: 794 Runs: 16 2B: 7 I do hope you're just trying to make some insignificant point rather than trying to say that Derrek has just been average this year.

Submitted by 433  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:11pm  
Um, are we really arguing about whether DLee is having a good season? Really? If so, that's great news for the human race -- we've officially run out of things to argue about.

Submitted by crunch  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:14pm  
hahaha

Submitted by Bleeding Blue  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:19pm  
The pitching will fail. The death spiral looms closer and closer. I think the same thing was said about Castro's demise back in the 1950s... How many more games are the Brewers over 500 than Chad's previously predicted "mark it down," "high water mark?"

Submitted by ZHL  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:22pm  
You guys don't get it! 2 HRs for a 1B ... no excuses. He Fing Sucks! Go get Richie Sexsox already so this team has a shot!

Submitted by ZHL  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:24pm  
Beermakers - 14 over, 5 above Crest of Chad

Submitted by Rynox  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:26pm  
Bah, every team has a place for a few of the high-average-type hitters and DLee is one of the best. Problem is the Cub's and Cub fans fall in love with anyone with a avg over 300. Sorry, but you need some thumpers and some runners in the lineup, too. A lineup full of .300+ hitters wouldn't score as much as you think they would.

Submitted by Wes  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:32pm  
I'm glad Lou decided to put those guys down there for tonight. It's Goozy's side day anyway. He won't throw his side session until after the game is over if he isn't needed.

Submitted by Jace  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:34pm  
Rynox - I think I know where you are going with that. I think you're saying the a lineup full of 300+ hitters that hit just singles would not score much. I agree. If you are making any indication about Lee just being a 300+ hitter with no power, that is where you and I disagree. For one, Lee's HR totals will pick up, and I do expect him to finish somewhere around 25-30. Also, he has hit 17 doubles!! If we had a lineup full of those types of hitter, we would score PLENTY of runs.

Submitted by Bleeding Blue  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:34pm  
BTW, since I've given Chad a hard time about the Brewers, I will agree with him about not necessarily needing to hit HRs in the 3 spot.I'll also add Joe Mauer's name to the list of good hitters who bat 3rd without hitting a ton of dingers. You want some power from the 3 spot in the lineup to knock in the first two batters, but it doesn't necessarily have to be Home Run Power, since you've got more HR power coming up in the 4th and hopefully 5th spot in the lineup. As long as DLee is hitting for a high average with lots of doubles, he's doing just fine in the 3 spot.

Submitted by bizmarquis  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:45pm  
"Crest of Chad" just made me shoot an adult beverage out my nose at a high speed. Note to self: People dont inhale whiskey nasally for a damn good reason.

Submitted by 433  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 3:54pm  
If you arbitrarily assume that Lee's lack of HR's will continue, then it's just as valid to arbitrarily assume that his .398 avg will also continue. You can't just pick half of his performance and say it's a trend, and say the other half is a fluke. And what's up with holding DLee's spot in the order against him, anyway? There's been a lot of "for a guy in the 3 hole, he should be doing X, Y, Z" in this thread. Isn't that a criticism better directed at Lou, not Lee?

Submitted by Vince  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 4:00pm  
"Good Grief, this like trying to teach Statistics for Dummies today" You're right it is. Its getting old, so start paying attention already............... BTW - Slugging % is a much better indicator of a players power than looking at his HR total (Flame away Chad)

Submitted by Chad  on Wed, 05/09/2007 - 4:09pm  
"Crest of Chad" whether this is used to revere me or mock me, I love you all more everyday. First there was "Chadball" now "Crest of Chad". You have my full endorsement to use that as meaning the Brewers stance based on 9 games over .500. I really should have realized that it was the Pirates and the Nats they they would be playing. Having said that, I have made my bed, and I will lie in it.

Recent comments

Subscribe to Recent comments
The first 600 characters of the last 16 comments, click "View" to see rest of comment.
  • JustSayin' 18 hours 15 min ago (view)

    The organizations will cut rosters down, as if the full-season teams were breaking camp to start the season, THEN pay the remaining minor leaguers $400/week or whatever.  That's similar to what costs would have normally been but the "one last chance" players who got spring training invitations this year and didn't have an obvious roster spot won't be getting their last chance.

     
  • crunch 19 hours 47 min ago (view)

    "According to Jeff Passan of ESPN, all minor league players will be receiving $400 per week from MLB through at least May 31."

    so that's where that promise landed.  the scary thing is that's still more than some in the low minors make on a weekly basis.

     
  • crunch 3 days 12 hours ago (view)

    "Jeff Passan of ESPN writes that the players and league agreed that the 2020 season won't start until "there are no bans on mass gatherings that limit the ability to play in front of fans, there are no travel restrictions and medical experts determine games will not pose a risk to health of teams and fans." Passan does add that the two sides "will consider the feasibility of playing in empty stadiums" and also at neutral sites.

     
  • crunch 3 days 17 hours ago (view)

    i miss baseball.  it could happen in june...it may happen in late may...it might not happen either way.

    there's so many things getting messed up right now i would get lost making a list.  there's some college guys making a serious "okay, we need to look at that guy" push that's dead.  former cubs draft pick russell smith (2017, LHP highschool) took last season off for injury (TCU college) and returned with a low 90s fastball, impressive control, and a MLB-quality changeup.  his "comeback" was 4 games and done thanks to this current situation...

     
  • JustSayin' 3 days 20 hours ago (view)

    COVID 19 + a short draft + Manfred's obsessive drive to shrink the minor leagues will change baseball forever.  It WAS still America's grass roots sport.  Where I live, from June through August, you could see a quality live game any day of the week, within an hour's drive.  I believe that era is over.  What's going on will have ripple effects, contracting serious college ball, college summer leagues and independent pro ball just as much as the MiLB systems.  With those changes, some of the game's charm will also go.  I've seen a kid from Cape Cod play in the Ca

     
  • crunch 4 days 18 hours ago (view)

    fyi for anyone who bought MLB.tv

    for "some reason" getting a cancel+refund via phone is like pulling teeth, but if you contact them via a webpage contact request many people are getting a cancel+refund confirmation within an hour or 2...

     
  • bradsbeard 5 days 1 hour ago (view)

    I imagine because the new labor agreement freezes rosters as of whenever the agreement is approved by the owners and it might affect what those guys are paid under the agreement. 

     
  • Hagsag 5 days 3 hours ago (view)

    AZ Phil. what was the reason that a whole bunch of teams optioned or assigned players to the minor leagues yesterday on March 26 ? Thanks.

     
  • Arizona Phil 5 days 7 hours ago (view)

    jdrnym: Ordinarily, players on an MLB Reserve List (40-man roster) who are on Optional Assignment to the minors do not accrue MLB Service Time, are paid at the minor league rate rather than at the MLB rate if the player has a "split" contract, and if the player gets hurt or becomes sick after being optioned, he can be placed on a minor league IL instead of on an MLB IL (so that he cannot accrue MLB Service Time or be paid at the MLB rate while he is on the IL). Also, a player who is optioned to the minors for at least 20 days will burn an option year.   

     
  • jdrnym 5 days 20 hours ago (view)

    AZPhil, what are the technical ramifications of optioning/not optioning guys during this period of no baseball? Seems like some teams are more eager than others to trim their roster down.

     
  • crunch 6 days 23 hours ago (view)

    "Major League Baseball has agreed with the MLBPA to grant a full year of service time to players in 2020 regardless of how many games the schedule includes.

    Rosenthal adds, however, that the two sides have agreed to "table discussions" on how much service time the players would receive if the worst-case scenario plays out and the 2020 season has to be canceled entirely due to the coronavirus pandemic."

    ---

     
  • bradsbeard 1 week 1 day ago (view)

    This one has me scratching my head too. Surely they knew Lakins would have a hard time clearing waivers. Hate to just lose Pereda like that. Feels like they gave up more for Lakins than for Sadler, and I'm guessing Sadler might have been slightly more likely to clear waivers since he's out of options. 

     
  • Arizona Phil 1 week 1 day ago (view)

    I think the most puzzling aspect to the Travis Lakins Caper is that the only plausible reason for the Cubs to have struck a pre-emptive trade with the Red Sox instead of waiting and hoping to win a waiver claim is that the Cubs believed that another club with a better waiver claim priority would almost certainly claim him. So to ensure that they would be able to acquire Lakins, the Cubs must have offered the Red Sox something more than the $50,000 waiver price, otherwise there would have been no point in the Red Sox agreeing to the deal. 

     
  • crunch 1 week 1 day ago (view)

    RedSox acquire catcher Jhonny Pereda from the #Cubs, completing the January 21 trade for RHP Travis Lakins

    ...cubs lost lakins on waivers to BAL, btw

     
  • erich081 1 week 2 days ago (view)

    I wore my Rick Wilkins #2 shirsey today and kept thinking real baseball was only a week away. And then I remembered this weird alternate reality we've seemed to have slipped into. Hope everyone stays healthy and safe.

     
  • Hagsag 1 week 2 days ago (view)

    I am installing a padded room to sit in until this hell is over.

     
more
Click "More" for the last 50 comments in full.