Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

39 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (one slot is open), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL and one player has been DESIGNATED FOR ASSIGNMENT (DFA)   

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, and nine players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, three players are on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-23-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
* Luke Little
Hector Neris 
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
* Matt Mervis
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 9 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL: 3
Kyle Hendricks, P 
* Drew Smyly, P 
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P

DFA: 1 
Garrett Cooper, 1B 
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Gameday Open Thread/Angels @ Cubs; Bullpen Rumors

The Angels show up in Mesa today sending prospect Nick Adenhart to the mound -  Sean Marshall will go for the Cubs. Here is the lineup according to Muskat:

LF Alfonso Soriano, CF Kosuke Fukudome, 1B Lee, RF Micah Hoffpauir, 3B Aramis Ramirez, 2B Mike Fontenot, C Geovany Soto, SS Ryan Theriot, P Sean Marshall.

Other than Hoffpauir in there for Bradley, it's pretty much what we should expect to see on Opening Day.

On the rumor mill, Paul Sullivan says that Chad Fox will head down to Iowa after the Cubs vs. Yankees series which leaves Patton, Gaudin, Guzman and Samardzija for the final two spots in the bullpen. Sullivan says a trade would have to go down by Wednesday and it looks like the Cubs are trying to move Gaudin or Guzman. Also, Lou said, "There will either be a trade, an option.... anything but (putting one of them through) waivers."

So with Fox going to Iowa and Samardzija with options, that leaves three players (Patton, Guzman and Gaudin) with two spots left. The article says the Cubs would like to keep Patton which leaves one spot left for Guzman or Gaudin. Before we get to that, Hendry could try and work a trade with the Rockies, but Patton would first have to go through waivers and be passed on by the other 29 teams. Considering the spring training he's had, that probably wouldn't happen. So it would be best to have Patton make the team, see if he can make it in the big leagues and if he shows he's not ready - but the Cubs would like to keep him - then put him through waivers. Most clubs by that point probably won't take a chance on Patton and then Hendry could work out a deal with the Rockies to try and keep Patton in the Cubs' system.

As for Guzman or Gaudin, if Lou is serious about not putting any of them through waivers, the Cubs are going to have to accept pretty much anything a team offers and chanes are they'll get more for Guzman who doesn't have a $2 million price tag next to his name and possesses a more dynamic pitching repertoire and all-important "upside". Gaudin though has been kinds of awful all spring and for much of last year with the Cubs, so I would think they just might as well release Gaudin (unless they can of course actually get something for him) and raise the beer prices by a dollar to cover whatever they lose. I mean if you're dumb enough to buy an Old Style for $9, you'll buy one at $10.

UPDATE: Bruce Miles makes it clear that the Cubs will not put Patton or Guzman through waivers, preferring to trade Chad Gaudin and that the competition will go through the weekend.

Comments

So if I understand this correctly... OPTION 1: Trade Gaudin, option Samardzija; Guzman and Patton make the team. OPTION 2: Trade Guzman, option Samardzija; Gaudin and Patton make the team. OPTION 3: Release Gaudin, option Samardzia; Guzman and Patton make the team. OPTION 4: Trade Guzman and either trade or release Gaudin; Samardzija and Patton make the team. I suppose they could trade Patton and his Rule 5 rights, but I doubt that's really on the table.

[ ]

In reply to by dc60124

I've never heard from the Cubs about putting Harden on the DL, just our theories around here, but they could buy a week or two by putting him on the DL to start the season and then all three could make the team, so I guess that's OPTION 6.

OPTION 1: Trade Gaudin, option Samardzija; Guzman and Patton make the team.
OPTION 2: Trade Guzman, option Samardzija; Gaudin and Patton make the team.
OPTION 3: Release Gaudin, option Samardzia; Guzman and Patton make the team.
OPTION 4: Trade Guzman and either trade or release Gaudin; Samardzija and Patton make the team. OPTION 5: Trade Patton and his Rule 5 rights, option Samardzija; keep Gaudin and Guzman OPTION 6: DL Rich Harden, option Samardzija; keep Patton, Guzman and Gaudin until they need Harden.

This game is on MLB.com right? The video player won't load and when I go to the audio-video page for MLB it shows three games available but they are grayed out and I can't click on them. I just watched a game a few days ago, so I don't think its my system or account. Anyone else having problems or is there something I am missing?

OK I'm relaxing...this game doesn't count. Repeat after me....it's an exhibition. At least the new mlb at-bat 2009 application, and gameday works well. It's slightly ahead of the mlb.tv feed. It has an audio button but I don't think that will work until the regular season starts. DLee 2nd hit of the day, a dooble after a Fuku F7

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I hope Victornio likes running, because if he sandwiched bewteen Ibanez and Sheff he will be doing alot of it. If its a trade of Gaudin or Guzman that happens, it will be interesting to see who Jimbo gets as he tends to do well with dump off/minor trades like: Sosa for Fontenot Aardsma for Cotts Twalk for Ceda Bynum for Hart Lawton for Berg Monroe for Deeds Anytime you can dump-off a guy for a fringe prospect who logs some MLB service time its a good job.

Spring after spring, season after season (when they square off), the "LA Angels of Anaheim" always pants the Cubs. I thought for sure they would be in the World Series last year. And the year before...It seems as if they are the AL version of the Braves in their heyday.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

"Theriot has strong range up the middle and good hands, but he has occasional trouble when he backs up on groundballs instead of attacking them," the author states. "His arm is an asset when turning two or completing a tough play. He is tremendous on any kind of ball hit in the air, both line drives and pop-ups... A favorite of veterans and rookies alike, Theriot brings a steady glove to the Cubs infield." i wonder if this guy will sell me some weed.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

the arm thing was intriguing, everything else seemed fair. His range seems better to his left than his right imo.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

i'm not that confident on his range to his left, myself. the guy throws his body into too much stuff rather than being there with his glove. dive/block/stop/etc...at least he can actually block and knock down, though. ...and the defender at 1st probably saved riot a good 5+ errors (being generous because it was WAY more chances) with riot's arm. his penchant for low throws is getting pretty predictable on whole. and yes, im happy with riot at SS...and he's more than adequate for now...so let's no one go there because i don't think the guy's D is worth applauding...much less celebrating.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

I agree with you completely on this, crunch, he throws himself at balls up the middle--and he doesn't throw himself very far. You want range, check out Barney or maybe that Castro fellow. As for popups, I think he has Theriot confused with Fontenot, who is excellent on balls in the air. Lou's first spring training, they tried Theriot in centerfield. That didn't last long: too many balls falling harmlessly to earth. I do think his arm is decent, though. And I have a hunch that Theriot is well above average in positioning himself on defense.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

It wasn't just a spring training experiment. Theriot played 5 games in LF and RF in 2007 in the regular season, and had a 1,000 fielding percentage to boot (5/5)! I was in Milwaukee for a Sunday game in April 2007 with seats in RF and Theriot got the start there. Seemed to do ok.

[ ]

In reply to by WISCGRAD

no he was pretty terrible, misjudged a lot of baseballs I rememeber...

of course that has nothing to do with his ability to judge pop-ups from the infield.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

"seemed to do ok" refers only to the game I was at... Other than that I don't really remember, but I wouldn't expect him to be good at it since he is an infielder.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Since he didn't play the infield, I guess we'll never know how Willie Mays would have handled pop flies.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Huh? How is that relevant? If you don't think that handling balls in the air as an infielder is different than as an outfielder, I am not sure why we should listen to you about anything baseball related.

I would say option 3 has the most chance of actually happening. Teams have the information available...There is no market for him (gaudin). RIP Herman Franks. The '77 Cubs were one of my favorite teams. Everything was great until Bruce Sutter got hurt... Dallas McPherson available for anyone looking for a 3b...

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Walker was a complimentary piece who was well past his prime. Edmonds, Holliday, Ozzie Smith and a few others were good trades. Notably, they have almost always been quiet in the free agent market. But the fundamental workings of the organization were always based primarily upon the constant output of a well oiled minor league organization. That organization has ground to a halt. And when did that hard stop start to happen? Right at the beginning of the Goldschmidt/Arenado era, perpetuated by the Contreras signing, followed by the rotation purchases during the last offseason. The timing is undeniable and, in my mind, not coincidental.

    Again, we are all saying that player development became deemphasized. I’m just linking it directly to the recent trades and involvement in the free agent market. I don’t see how the two concepts can be decoupled.

  • Charlie (view)

    The Cards also traded for both Jim Edmonds and Larry Walker. It's the developing part that has fallen off. Of course, it could also be the case that there are no more Matt Carpenters left to pull out of the hat. 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Cubs sign 28 yr old RHRP Daniel Missaki. He was in MiLB from his 17yr old to 19yr old years and did pretty well.
    He's been in Mexico and Japan the last four years and has done well also.
    He's supposedly Japanese and Brazilian.
    Interesting sign. We obviously need to RP in the system
    Injuries are mounting everywhere!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Sure, they made generally short term trades for established players to enhance what they already had or traded for players early enough in their careers that they were essentially Cardinals from the start. What they never did was to try to use the more established players as foundational cornerstones.

    Essentially we’re saying the same thing. They have given up on player development to the point that even their prospects that make it to the bigs flop so that they have to do things like buy most of their rotation and hope for the best.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    I don’t buy that. They had been doing that for years.

    They did it with Matt Holliday. They did it with John Lackey. They did it with Mark Mulder. They did it with Jason Heyward, who had a great year for them. I’m sure there’s more but those come to mind immediately.

    I attribute it more to a breakdown in what they’re doing in terms of development than a culture thing.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    They won those trades and sacrificed their culture. That’s exactly their problem.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    The other part that’s kind of crazy is they made two very high profile trades, one for Goldschmidt and one for Arenado, and they very clearly won those trades. They just haven’t been able to develop players the last handful of years the way they usually do.

    I guess the moral there is it’s hard to stay on top of your game and be good at what you do in perpetuity.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Marmol was extended at the beginning of the year. Two years I believe.

  • crunch (view)

    Jesse Rogers @JesseRogersESPN
    Craig Counsell doesn’t have a timetable for Cody Bellinger who technically has two cracked ribs on his right side. CT scan showed it today.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Thought it might have been David Peralta given the open 40 man spot and how PCA has played so far.