Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Gameday Open Thread/Angels @ Cubs; Bullpen Rumors

The Angels show up in Mesa today sending prospect Nick Adenhart to the mound -  Sean Marshall will go for the Cubs. Here is the lineup according to Muskat:

LF Alfonso Soriano, CF Kosuke Fukudome, 1B Lee, RF Micah Hoffpauir, 3B Aramis Ramirez, 2B Mike Fontenot, C Geovany Soto, SS Ryan Theriot, P Sean Marshall.

Other than Hoffpauir in there for Bradley, it's pretty much what we should expect to see on Opening Day.

On the rumor mill, Paul Sullivan says that Chad Fox will head down to Iowa after the Cubs vs. Yankees series which leaves Patton, Gaudin, Guzman and Samardzija for the final two spots in the bullpen. Sullivan says a trade would have to go down by Wednesday and it looks like the Cubs are trying to move Gaudin or Guzman. Also, Lou said, "There will either be a trade, an option.... anything but (putting one of them through) waivers."

So with Fox going to Iowa and Samardzija with options, that leaves three players (Patton, Guzman and Gaudin) with two spots left. The article says the Cubs would like to keep Patton which leaves one spot left for Guzman or Gaudin. Before we get to that, Hendry could try and work a trade with the Rockies, but Patton would first have to go through waivers and be passed on by the other 29 teams. Considering the spring training he's had, that probably wouldn't happen. So it would be best to have Patton make the team, see if he can make it in the big leagues and if he shows he's not ready - but the Cubs would like to keep him - then put him through waivers. Most clubs by that point probably won't take a chance on Patton and then Hendry could work out a deal with the Rockies to try and keep Patton in the Cubs' system.

As for Guzman or Gaudin, if Lou is serious about not putting any of them through waivers, the Cubs are going to have to accept pretty much anything a team offers and chanes are they'll get more for Guzman who doesn't have a $2 million price tag next to his name and possesses a more dynamic pitching repertoire and all-important "upside". Gaudin though has been kinds of awful all spring and for much of last year with the Cubs, so I would think they just might as well release Gaudin (unless they can of course actually get something for him) and raise the beer prices by a dollar to cover whatever they lose. I mean if you're dumb enough to buy an Old Style for $9, you'll buy one at $10.

UPDATE: Bruce Miles makes it clear that the Cubs will not put Patton or Guzman through waivers, preferring to trade Chad Gaudin and that the competition will go through the weekend.

Comments

So if I understand this correctly... OPTION 1: Trade Gaudin, option Samardzija; Guzman and Patton make the team. OPTION 2: Trade Guzman, option Samardzija; Gaudin and Patton make the team. OPTION 3: Release Gaudin, option Samardzia; Guzman and Patton make the team. OPTION 4: Trade Guzman and either trade or release Gaudin; Samardzija and Patton make the team. I suppose they could trade Patton and his Rule 5 rights, but I doubt that's really on the table.

[ ]

In reply to by dc60124

I've never heard from the Cubs about putting Harden on the DL, just our theories around here, but they could buy a week or two by putting him on the DL to start the season and then all three could make the team, so I guess that's OPTION 6.

OPTION 1: Trade Gaudin, option Samardzija; Guzman and Patton make the team.
OPTION 2: Trade Guzman, option Samardzija; Gaudin and Patton make the team.
OPTION 3: Release Gaudin, option Samardzia; Guzman and Patton make the team.
OPTION 4: Trade Guzman and either trade or release Gaudin; Samardzija and Patton make the team. OPTION 5: Trade Patton and his Rule 5 rights, option Samardzija; keep Gaudin and Guzman OPTION 6: DL Rich Harden, option Samardzija; keep Patton, Guzman and Gaudin until they need Harden.

This game is on MLB.com right? The video player won't load and when I go to the audio-video page for MLB it shows three games available but they are grayed out and I can't click on them. I just watched a game a few days ago, so I don't think its my system or account. Anyone else having problems or is there something I am missing?

OK I'm relaxing...this game doesn't count. Repeat after me....it's an exhibition. At least the new mlb at-bat 2009 application, and gameday works well. It's slightly ahead of the mlb.tv feed. It has an audio button but I don't think that will work until the regular season starts. DLee 2nd hit of the day, a dooble after a Fuku F7

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I hope Victornio likes running, because if he sandwiched bewteen Ibanez and Sheff he will be doing alot of it. If its a trade of Gaudin or Guzman that happens, it will be interesting to see who Jimbo gets as he tends to do well with dump off/minor trades like: Sosa for Fontenot Aardsma for Cotts Twalk for Ceda Bynum for Hart Lawton for Berg Monroe for Deeds Anytime you can dump-off a guy for a fringe prospect who logs some MLB service time its a good job.

Spring after spring, season after season (when they square off), the "LA Angels of Anaheim" always pants the Cubs. I thought for sure they would be in the World Series last year. And the year before...It seems as if they are the AL version of the Braves in their heyday.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

"Theriot has strong range up the middle and good hands, but he has occasional trouble when he backs up on groundballs instead of attacking them," the author states. "His arm is an asset when turning two or completing a tough play. He is tremendous on any kind of ball hit in the air, both line drives and pop-ups... A favorite of veterans and rookies alike, Theriot brings a steady glove to the Cubs infield." i wonder if this guy will sell me some weed.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

the arm thing was intriguing, everything else seemed fair. His range seems better to his left than his right imo.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

i'm not that confident on his range to his left, myself. the guy throws his body into too much stuff rather than being there with his glove. dive/block/stop/etc...at least he can actually block and knock down, though. ...and the defender at 1st probably saved riot a good 5+ errors (being generous because it was WAY more chances) with riot's arm. his penchant for low throws is getting pretty predictable on whole. and yes, im happy with riot at SS...and he's more than adequate for now...so let's no one go there because i don't think the guy's D is worth applauding...much less celebrating.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

I agree with you completely on this, crunch, he throws himself at balls up the middle--and he doesn't throw himself very far. You want range, check out Barney or maybe that Castro fellow. As for popups, I think he has Theriot confused with Fontenot, who is excellent on balls in the air. Lou's first spring training, they tried Theriot in centerfield. That didn't last long: too many balls falling harmlessly to earth. I do think his arm is decent, though. And I have a hunch that Theriot is well above average in positioning himself on defense.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

It wasn't just a spring training experiment. Theriot played 5 games in LF and RF in 2007 in the regular season, and had a 1,000 fielding percentage to boot (5/5)! I was in Milwaukee for a Sunday game in April 2007 with seats in RF and Theriot got the start there. Seemed to do ok.

[ ]

In reply to by WISCGRAD

no he was pretty terrible, misjudged a lot of baseballs I rememeber...

of course that has nothing to do with his ability to judge pop-ups from the infield.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

"seemed to do ok" refers only to the game I was at... Other than that I don't really remember, but I wouldn't expect him to be good at it since he is an infielder.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Since he didn't play the infield, I guess we'll never know how Willie Mays would have handled pop flies.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Huh? How is that relevant? If you don't think that handling balls in the air as an infielder is different than as an outfielder, I am not sure why we should listen to you about anything baseball related.

I would say option 3 has the most chance of actually happening. Teams have the information available...There is no market for him (gaudin). RIP Herman Franks. The '77 Cubs were one of my favorite teams. Everything was great until Bruce Sutter got hurt... Dallas McPherson available for anyone looking for a 3b...

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.