Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Cubs Win, Gatorade Cooler Loses Again...Bradley Sent Home.

I'll make this brief, but wanted a place to discuss the latest in "As Milton's World Turns". First though, the Cubs won, they hit a 2-run home run and a 3-run home run. It's nice to know those haven't gone extinct. Jake Fox and Geovany Soto did the damage and no truth to the rumor that Soto was promised White Castle if he hit one out today.

Randy Wells got his second win on the year, two solo shots being the only marks against him.  After 98 pitches and 7 innings, the increasingly baffling Lou went to Carlos Marmol and he predictably walked two of the first three hitters, gave up a couple of hits with some assistance from Soriano losing a ball in the sun (which I admittedly didn't see) and was mercifully pulled for Sean Marshall who got out of the jam by inducing the 3-2-3 double play by A.J. Pierzynski with the bases juiced.

The big story though will unfortunately be Milton Bradley.  He struck out his first two times and then flew out to left and then apparently took out some frustration on a Gatorade cooler. Details are a bit sketchy now, but either Lou was already rethinking his change of mind of playing Bradley on Friday or Lou took exception to Bradley's freak out and the two exchanged words and Bradley was replaced by Ryan Freel in right field. Why Bradley freaking out is any different than Z or Dempster or any other player is beyond me, but I'm guessing there was some tension before this moment between the two. Or maybe Lou is standing up for the rights of Gatorade machines and coolers everywhere to dispense thirst-quenching beverages to athletes. Then to complicate matters, Bradley was spotted in street clothes leaving the game. It seems Lou told him to go home after the Gatorade thrashing, so at least he didn't walk out on his own, because we all know what Cubs fans think about that.

Hopefully this is much ado about nothing and Lou seems to have already decided to put in the past, suggesting Bradley could still play tomorrow(lefty happens to be on the mound). I do know that trouble seems to follow Bradley and some of that is his own doing and some of it is unfairly going after someone with a checkered past. As I mentioned, Z can punch out a catcher and take out a Gatorade machine and Lou gets the catcher traded and laughs at Z's freak out. Soriano is hitting worse over a 2-month period than anyone I've ever seen wear a Cub uniform, but Bradley is threatened with a benching. Then of course, Bradley can't buy an extra base hit when it counts to save his life and thinks the entire world is out to get him, when all they really want him to do is hit over .250 with a little pop.

Comments

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-cubs-sale-momentum-090626-,0…

Sources familiar with the matter said the parties have made "good progress" recently in what have become protracted extended negotiations to reach a definitive agreement on the sale of the Cubs, Wrigley Field and Tribune Co.'s 25 percent stake in Comcast SportsNet Chicago. Talks had hit a snag more than a month ago when the two sides could not agree on some issues, including how to value the broadcast rights to the Cubs.

"We're closing the gap," said one source, who asked not to be identified because the sales process is ongoing. "The attitudes are much more positive."

A second source said, "I don't want to speculate why but momentum has picked up."

The game would have been even cooler had Lee proceeded to knock out Pierznisky as he headed towards first in the bottom of the 8th. Other than that, and the pitching of Marmol, it was pretty good. Our useless closer even managed a one-run save!

"I told him to take his uniform off," Lou said. "He threw his helmet and smashed a water cooler, water flying all over. I just told him to take his uniform off and go home. I followed him up into the clubhouse, and we exchanged some words." ruins my headline if it's a water cooler... http://blogs.dailyherald.com/blog/18 Miles also repeats that good chance Bradley will start tomorrow.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

should have hit the "read more" link...

Apparently, the Cubs feel that Bradley is acting selfishly. GM Jim Hendry talked with us in the runway after the game and said he wanted players to be "all in."

I pressed him on that, and he said that "all in" means all for the team. Some of Bradley's teammates also are beginning to wonder.

 

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

That stuff flows both ways, though. Why is it that the team is 100% behind Soriano being the leagues worst regular, but not Bradley? No one likes to be treated unfairly at work. If Lou would come clean with Soriano, that would probably go some of the way towards getting Bradley back in line.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

my assumption is that the "selfishness" doesn't have much to do with slumps or how anyone is hitting, since all players go through them. I mean, you have to figure players are pretty sensitive to that.

I would guess there's more to this story that we can only theorize at the moment.

And I'm not sure what your cutoffs are for worst regular (and trust me, Soriano is a waste of space right now), but there are a dozen or so regulars with worst numbers in June, Fukudome would be one of them. A lot more if we want to go the full season. Maybe most overpaid...or biggest discprepancy between expected and actual results.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

further solidifying him as the worst regular over the last 2 months...

Francouer and Bonifacio also with worst OPS numbers since May 1st, no real easy way to search and I'm sure Soriano is near the bottom and probably giving the worst value of any player.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Ok... looked it up. Unfortunately the database doesn't have OPS, but you can sort by OBP and SLUG individually. Soriano hasn't been close to the worst regular since May 1st. Ok... maybe close, but there have been several who have been worse (minimum 100 plate appearances, which may have been too low of a cutoff). Starting with Jordan Schafer, Bill Hall, and Austin Kearns.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Fair enough... 200 plate appearances wouldn't include many people though. And Schafer was a regular for the entire month of May, before getting sent down. Here is the list of players with 200+ plate appearances, sorted by SLUG. Soriano has the 6th lowest SLUG and the 2nd lowest OBP.

[ ]

In reply to by big_lowitzki

well yes, it wouldn't include a lot of players since anyone who's hit like Soriano over the last 2 months would normally have gotten benched long ago...with a few minor exceptions.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Amen - I was told by MikeC a couple of weeks ago to crawl back under my rock for talking about how bad Soriano has been, and how big of a factor that has played in the struggles of the Cubs. I think MikeC has a man-crush on Soriano, because he has been stoutly defending his honor since then. I would argue that no player has been more detrimental to his team than Soriano since Ramirez went down, factoring in both offense and defense. Jordan Schafer, Bill Hall and Kearns? Not much is expected of those turds...

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Yes, Rollins has been hitting like shit, but I expect he is still WAY more valuable than Soriano because of his glove.

[ ]

In reply to by big_lowitzki

Rollins has what looks to be really bad BABIP luck in his 'favor'. Soriano just sucks.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

While poor performance might not be "selfish", I would say his lack of enthuism for playing defense is. You can count on him once a game totally misreading a fly ball or walking to pick up a ball that is in the gap.

"Lou seems to have already decided to put in the past, suggesting Bradley could still play tomorrow" good. bradley is explosive, but tends to calm and collect himself "after the storm"...this is something lou should already know and be familiar with.

Hmm... this one kinda' sounds like it was on Lou. Not Bradley. Don't get me wrong - Bradley got angry. Again. But lots of players get angry when they struggle. I actually like that Bradley gets angry when he struggles. It shows that he cares. But Lou got pissed that Bradley got angry, got into a verbal altercation with him. Like I said in parachat, Lou wouldn't have done anything (and never does do anything) when Zambrano does the same thing. Hell - when Lee was struggling in April, we say more than one emotional outburst after a strikeout or a pop-up. And does anyone else find it incredibly ironic that Lou is complaining about players' temper tantrums?

Alfonso Soriano said he'd never seen a player and manager fight the way Piniella and Bradley did. "I hope he comes back and he can help the team to win," Soriano said of Bradley. "If he's not that way, we don't need him. We have 25 players, we have to be on the same page. If he's not 100 percent to help the team to win, we don't need him. If he's 100 percent and he comes and wants to play, he's more than welcome." anyone else find it amusing that Soriano is calling someone out for not being a team player?

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Yes I thought that was an interesting comment as well. Maybe this puts a little pressure on Soriano to turn his 'mall walk' into (at least) a canter for the next ball in the corner. Soriano v Bradley in a cage match. Hmmm. I would have to say that Bradley has the edge in this one ...

Personally, I don't understand the comparisons to Soriano. Soriano has proven himself (as a Cub) offensively and has carried the team at times. Bradley hasn't hit as a Cub. Soriano is well-liked by everyone and has never had 'attitude' problems. Bradley has a 'why me' attitude and has talked about how he's 'going to hit'...but hasn't. It seems like these explosions have been a common occurrence, and if so, I can understand why it would have gotten annoying. Soriano can pretty much do what he wants (although all he does is play every day and generally keep his mouth shut) because he's earned it. He's not responsible for filling out the lineup card. He wants to play everyday even if he's not hitting...that's not a bad thing. He also doesn't decide where he hits in the lineup.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Excellent interpretation of what I said. What's with all the vitriole? Chill out. I recognize that he is having a bad year, but I was challenging his comparison to Bradley. They're both having bad years, but only Bradley is creating enemies on the team. Perhaps I chose my words poorly, but I was merely saying that he 'can' do what he wants...but doesn't. By your assessment, Soriano isn't a team player because: 1) he gets injured (though still leads the team in many offensive categories year in and out) 2) wasn't good in the playoffs (apparently unlike everyone else on the team...yeah he is solely the reason they get swept twice. 3) goes into a slump 4) plays a poor defense...though many would challenge this 5) WWF? Wtf? yeah, how dare he not just go home every night, turn off the lights and wait for baseball to resume. 6) doesn't fit into your mold of what a leadoff hitter is 7) Furthermore, we've never heard him complain about where he hits in the lineup, so that's just speculation. Soriano doesn't get a free pass. Bradley was taken out for being an asshole, not for sucking. They both suck, but only Bradley has caused problems off the field.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

A bigot? Brilliant. Way out of left field there. What exactly am I bigoted against? Assholes or black people? If its the former, you're right. You're also right, it doesn't preclude me from being a dipshit. Your point? If you want to disregard the intent of a person's stance and focus on minutiae for the sake of 'winning' what should be a peaceful discussion, then feel free. My discussion was towards Bradley's personal problems as opposed to Soriano's. They're willingness to be team players. Your response is towards how bad of a player Soriano has been. Keep arguing against what I'm not arguing for if you like. You treat the internet like it's your own personal pissing contest. You condescend to anyone who dares to disagree with you and treat others like shit due to the anonymity of it. I was attempting to contribute to an actual discussion which seems to have enraged you. You define asshole. You epitomize it. I'd say 'grow up' but I have little hope of that.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Thanks. I appreciate that. And I shouldn't have resorted to name-calling, so for that I apologize. I get frustrated when discussions turn to personal attacks...which is what I resorted to. I actually thought Soriano and Bradley were both black. To be honest, when Soriano was signed I had the impression that he was a problem and have since come around to liking him. I was happy about Bradley coming here (despite an Ibanez preference) and didn't think his personal issues would be an problem. I still like him, but I'm getting more and more tired of the chip that he has on his shoulder. I would love for him to come around and become a fan favorite. Baseball-wise, they both suck donkey balls this year.

[ ]

In reply to by WISCGRAD

Kenny Rogers, Jeff Kent, Clemens, Schilling, etc all white guys who have exhibited jerk-like behavior and have been called out for it in some manner. K.Rogers might be the closest to Milt when you factor in fan interaction, temper, and getting moved team to team seemingly each year. The only difference would be Rogers was usually a lot less quiet in terms of dealing with the media, or in his case sometimes not at all. Regardless, race might play a factor with the bigoted crowd, a generally small sized community, but jerks and under-performers tend to get called out by fans & the media no matter their race or religion. Even Ichiro has gotten a bit of a rep over the last two years for being a bad teammate even though he rarely talks to the media. A jerk is a jerk and in general a lot of people are just getting tired of Milt's proverbial giant chip-on-the-shoulder routine that has sealed his exit from 6 or 7 other organizations and never taking any of the blame on himself. It's always someone else's fault (usually the media). It also doesn't help that he's hitting like a utility infielder and the team is woefully under-performing. He just isn't a good enough player to warrant the baggage, but unfortunately GMs subscribe to the old adage "the one thing we know about history is that no one learns from history".

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Re: #62 -- "Who's a good comparison for Bradley who's played for the Cubs?" I recall Dave Kingman (white guy) as being a pretty significant jerk/douchebag, except that he had two pretty damn good years offensively ('78 & '79) before he combined his douchieness with an injury-plagued third year and wore out his welcome pretty quickly. If he had struggled and acted out like Milton has in his first year, who knows how Cubs fans would have reacted. For example, Kong's stats on June 27 in his first year were .236/15/41 with a slg. of .517 and an OPS of .830. He finished the year with .266/28/79 with slg. of .542 and OPS of .878. Also, he did not exhibit his douchieness until his third year here. By comparison, MB has only produced .237/5/16 with a slg. of .379(?!) and an OPS of .734 to date. Milton can redeem himself by doing a Moises Alou-type turn-around, but he needs to get started. Just for reference, as of June 27, 2002, Moistened Alou had put up a Bradley-esque .229/4/21 with an even more pathetic slg. of .319 and OPS of .612. I knew he had started off incredibly bad but I had forgotten how bad it was. He ended up at .275/15/61 with a slg. of .419 and an OPS of .757. At this point, I would accept that as an end result for Milton.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

1. He led the team in HR in 2008, ABs, Runs, Triples, and Slugging in 2007. So I would say that's are more than "1" 2) In 2007-2008 Ramirez is 2/23 in the playoffs, Soriano is 3/28. Ramirez has been even worse. And seriously, they've all struggled, you really want to pick who was "the worst." That's dumb. 3) There is no definition of how long a slump lasts. Feel free to make things up though. 4) Stats have shown he is at least average on defense. 5) So is TV allowed? What about going to a movie? Can they hang with their families? Dempster must not care about the team's success because he visits his daughter instead of sitting around all night alone in the dark pondering the team. Every player has their mind on other things. If you hear that Lee, Soto, and Ramirez went out for sushi, would you criticize them as well? What about if Fukudome and Blanco went to see Transformers? What bastards for having lives!!! The audacity. 6) He's been struggling this year. He'd be the worst 3 hitter if he hit 3rd. What's the point? No one is denying he has done poorly. Him and just about everyone else on the team. 7) You are the one who used the word "insist." Google that shit and come back and let us know when Soriano "insisted" on hitting leadoff. If this: "He has said that he is most comfortable batting leadoff and that he doesn't mind where he hits as long as he doesn't get moved around" is the closest you can get to "complaining" about where he bats then keep looking.

Recent comments

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    I suspect Brown will spend some time in the bullpen due to inning restrictions.  Pitched only 93 innings last year and career high is 104 innings in 2022.  I would expect them to be cautious with a young player with his injury history.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Teheran minor league deal is done, per MLB.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Based on Phil’s sound analysis it sounds like a no brainer for Almonte to be placed on waivers as today’s roster move. We shall see.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: I think there was an issue with Luke Little coming into a game with men on base. He seems to need a "clean" inning to be dominant. So he is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AAA. Same goes for Michael Arias. He needs to come into a "clean" inning, and is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AA. Porter Hodge is a more versatile pitcher, a better version of Keegan Thompson (multi-inning RP). But Little, Arias, and Hodge (probably in that order) are the Cubs top three RP prospects (all three are Cubs Top 15 prospects).

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    So, let’s do a little war gaming. Taillon is back for tonight’s game. He pitched two rehab games, just a few innings each, and not especially sharp. Let’s face it, he hasn’t been lights out since the Cubs gave him the big contract. In other words, as flat out bad as Hendricks has been, the chances of Taillon being the savior don’t look exactly promising.

    If Taillon is equally ineffective or perhaps even worse, what’s the next move? Winning teams can often find a way to work around a dud fifth starter - kinda. Two dud starters make things much more difficult.

    I believe the biggest reason for the recent bullpen moves was dissatisfaction with the recent blowing of big leads and the recognition that the bullpen wasn’t all it was thought to be. In other words, they are exploring alternate options and configurations. If similar juggling becomes necessary (even more so than it already is), what kind of reasonable maneuvering do we think could be explored?