Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Tough Week for the Cubs and Their Fans

Click on the image for the full-size graphic.

Tim Souers is the illustrator and author of Cubby Blue and appreciates the opportunity to guest blog here at The Cub Reporter.
http://www.cubby-blue.com

Comments

i'm tired of people feeling sorry for Cubs fans? what are we a bunch of wussies? NO we have fun watching win or lose. in fact we revel in the fact that we can make fun of an often crappy team.

It's raining like hell in the western suburbs, hurricane like winds at times too (ok, not hurricane like but extremely strong), bottom line, in an hour or so when this moves into the city I would expect a rain delay.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

“I talk to the players about all this, but as manager I don’t have to talk to anybody about anything,” Baker said. “It’s just I’ve always done as a manager. As a player you always like to know why things were done." ha...welcome to "no shit" CIN beat writers. is it your first year on the job? doesn't everyone in baseball know this for oh...15+ years now? can someone get this guy a TV or a newspaper? wait... ...and no amount of crying about it in print will change it. baaaaaaaaaaw!!!!! *cry cry cry*

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

yeah, didn't mean to imply that was breaking any new ground...but interesting to see the actual numbers and comparision to the rest of the league...

Stat I would like to see: Attendance figures at parks when Cubs are visitors vs other teams, like how does attendance at Houston go up when the Cubs play there. My theory is, teams are gunning for the Cubs more than ever because: 1) Cub fans are a high percentage of attendance and 2) More of their own fans show up to watch against the Cubs. Does Colorado average 40K when even the Dodgers are in town? What about San Diego? Is there more preparation, player and team aggression when they look ahead and see Cubs on the schedule and they know they will play before a bigger crowd? What I'm proposing is that fear-factor of losing to the Cubs is higher than most...when the Cubs beat the Nats 4 for 4 after that they went on a freak terror streak and payed us back by vamping the Phils up. Talk is always about inning management, maybe Lou should evolve a series management plan (I know there is some of that already), like go over a team's last 6 wins and loses, ex-cub factors, etc. Another stat (and I like this) is to use the plus/minus system like in hockey for defensive purposes. Runs scored against you, while you were at shortstop, for example, minus runs scored during an inning when you had an at bat... Is this over-analysis at it's best or worst? A rain delay can do strange things to ya!

Re: "Visiting Fans" - this was recently written about - I believe perhaps even in U.S.A. Today - during the Cubs trip in Colo. In the NL - its the Cubs, then Cards, & Dodgers/Phillies - Braves had more market share during their heyday. This is off gate receipts I believe. In the MLB - its Yankees, Red Sox, Cubs - the the rest of the above.

Fun facts for today: Remaining schedule: Opponents' combined records: Stl (.482 Wpct), Chc (.475 Wpct), the Cubs have a slightly softer schedule from here out. ------- StL record since the ASG: 18-10, Cubs: 17-12 ------- Ted Lilly's (9-7 3.59 ERA) last game was July 20th, returning from injury tonight. ------- Zambrano's (7-4 3.35 ERA) last game was Aug 1, scheduled to return Aug 25 after rehab start this Thursday.

[ ]

In reply to by Chad

Sure Chad, I guess it should be obvious if they play 800 ball (or whatever number you guys decided that the cards have played in the last week) that they'll win. I guess my point was not really about their record, it was about how they are playing: Mashing the ball, good fundamentals, fighting back even when they are down runs. They improved significantly at the trade deadline and I would even venture to say they are a better team than the Cubs at this point.

the rain out struck me as odd...sitting at the park while it wasn't raining for nearly 2 hours. It did rain hard right before the cubs were about to take the field, they did get the national anthem in. Then the grounds crew rolled out the tarp but didn't unfold it to cover the infield, then they rolled it back up...until it poured and the umps said to put the tarp back on. Before 2pm it wasn't raining until almost after 4pm...but the radar looked like hell (all the tv screens, viewable in the grandstands and upper deck were showing live weather radar of the area) and the PA announced around 2pm that they expected heavy storms and would be waiting about an hour. Modern technology and the radar failed someone yesterday. In the 1960's this game would have been played...at least 5-6 innings worth but today they anticipate via radar and don't just play based on whether it's raining or not. Even leaving by 4:45 pm when the game was called, it was a light drizzle and could have continued (it the game had previously started). Of course, it was get-away-day so they probably didn't want to reschedule everyone's flight.

[ ]

In reply to by Cubster

We left the moments the words left the PA guy's mouth - "We are waiting until AFTER the thunderstorm arrives at Wrigley Field in about an hour" or something like that. It was 2:35 or something. I have seen games (and have sat there - we all have) where the rain was much worse, and still in play. After the initial downpour at 1:15 - there was ample time to get an "official" game in - in my opinion. It was just bullshit. The team is on a "winning streak", with our "hot pitcher" against theirs - and even with .197 Miles playing, I think we could have had a shot at keeping pace with the Cards yesterday. Not to mention, it was a waste of a day, and more money, for the 40,000+ fans who sat there for that. Boooooo!

FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH... Kaplan... The long awaited sale of the Chicago Cubs should finally be signed this week between the Tribune Company and the Ricketts family. The process has been ongoing since April of 2007 but now it is finally about to be completed. Excellent sources have assured me that there are no more hurdles to clear and the paperwork will be signed by Friday. It will then move on to an MLB ownership committee then a stop in front of the bankruptcy judge and finally it will need approval of the other owners in Major League Baseball. All of this should be wrapped up by the World Series or shortly thereafter and it should pave the way for Tom Ricketts and his family to finally have the keys to the Cubs Kingdom... There are several agonizing things about this blog entry from Kaplan. Number one I hate it when someone claims to have an excellent source. Even if it is a reliable source, if you only have reliable sources, you shouldn't have to tell us it's an excellent source. Second, how he says there will be no more hurdles, but then goes on to talk about how after signing the dotted line, they have all these other hurdles to go over. Not only that he makes all these other hurdles sound nonchalant, like "...then a stop in front of the bankruptcy judge..." as if bankruptcy court has a drive-thru or something.

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

It will then move on to an MLB ownership committee Actually the deal has to be approved by more than one MLB committee and the vetting process is expected to take weeks then a stop in front of the bankruptcy judge Where it may be challenged if Sam Zell loses control of the Trib between now and then and finally it will need approval of the other owners in Major League Baseball. All of this should be wrapped up by the World Series or shortly thereafter Well, it's not going to be wrapped up before the WS is over because the owners don't meet again until November 17th.

..then a stop in front of the bankruptcy judge..." as if bankruptcy court has a drive-thru or something. --- only works for bankruptcy filings like GM or Burger King

Nice post Ryno. I don't mind the affable Kap too much, and he was nice to me in the one instance I met him (that's all it takes for most of us right?), but its the same guy who said Crane Kenny assured him that if a move can be made to improve the team at the deadline, the money would be there. Yeah. Right, Crane.

this yrs 1st round draft pick is on fire...especially considering how many 1st rounders might not sign at all. CHC LoA Jackson, Brett CF 6 3 4 3 .320 HR (5), 2B (4);

[ ]

In reply to by jacos

Under honorable mentions, he should have just listed every sports team in America, then categorized the article as "Asinine Generalizations" instead of "Humor." Why did I read that? For what it's worth, I too despise the "woe is me, being a Cubs fan is all about losing, suffering, and being fated to fail," Cubs fan. I also hate that people perpetuate the perception that all Cubs fans are like that. Every time I read an article about sports printed in newspapers or magazines, or hear a TV report, I think that sports writing probably shouldn't exist. But that's unfair. Just these people shouldn't be doing it, and we should all ignore ESPN.

I would say if anything wrong about most Cub fans they are overly optimistic. --- yep I'm optimistic, been down so long it feels like up to me (...till I met a Cub fan who told me to fuck off and stop feeling sorry for myself)

I liked the Brett Jackson pick, but I can't get too excited about a college player in low A. I don't know where low A compares to a top NCAA schedule , but let's see how he does when he goes up the ladder.

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

Does anyone remember way back when who Rays wanted for Huff from Cubs? I remember it was like something Cubs would not part with but now looking back....

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

Pretty "meh" towards the deal. I actually thought the Tigers paid a pretty high premium for Huff given that they assumed his salary for the rest of the season and also lost a pitcher who was rated their 10th overall system prospect and was a 4th round pick a year ago. Remember, all of this for a month and a half of a guy who, despite having a decent bat, is really inadequate at best at a slew of potential positions. His .725 OPS is a far cry from the .912 he posted last year and his July / August numbers have been nothing short of awful after a respectable first half. If the Tigers wanted this, they should have just held onto Sheffield. I'll take Jake Fox anyday over the current incarnation of Huff (although certainly not over the 2003 or 2008 incarnations).

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

Is this sarcasm? Aubrey Huff, who is as likely to be outplayed by Lee, Ramirez, Bradley, Soriano, and Fox as he is to add any value to the team while still earning a pretty considerable salary? I'll hold onto my prospect and my cash, thank you. For the Tigers he at least can slot into LF immediately, though Clete Thomas has put up a .742 OPS, .011 better than Huff's .731. Of course, Huff's middling performance this year is a big part of why he's still available, and I'm sure the Tigers are mostly hoping they get lucky and get 1 1/2 months of red hot Huff.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

hell, i'd put a not-quite-100% guillen in LF before i considered huff, myself. the idea of huff playing 3rd is about as bad as fox, too. btw, for the lack of errors at 3rd fox is still playing a pretty bad/iffy 3rd. he catches almost everything off the hip, backhanded, or both at the same time. it's like watching an immobile hockey goalie. he doesn't come up in great position to throw, either. aram used to do this a lot when he got to the cubs. now he gets in front of a lot more stuff and it's let him use that cannon arm a lot better as a result (along with less number of clumbsy looking passed balls).

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.