Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Archer and Guyer Earn Top Minor League Honors

The Cubs named outfielder Brandon Guyer their 2010 Minor League Player of the Year and Chris Archer was named the pitcher of the year.

Guyer and Archer are still competing for the Tennessee Smokies in the Southern League champioship that begins tomorrow against the Jackson Suns.

In 410 PA's during the regular season, Guyer hit 13 over the fence with a slash line of 344/398/588. He topped the Southern League in slugging percentage and finished 2nd in batting average. He was a 5th round pick by the Cubs in 2007.

Archer was one-third of the package received for dealing Mark DeRosa to the Indians before the 2009 season. The 21-year old put up a 2.34 ERA between AA and Hi-A in 28 games (27 of them starts). That includes an 8-2 record and 1.80 ERA at AA in 70 IP with 67 K's and 39 BB's. Overall, he ended up 15-3 with that 2.34 ERA in 142.1 IP with 149 K's, 65 BB's and just 6 HR's allowed and a 1.173 WHIP.

For as full of a list as I have been able to compile at this point of minor league players of the year, check out Wiklifield. Guyer and Archer have joined the esteemed ranks of Brian Dopirak, Kevin Hart, Eric Patterson, Micah Hoffpauir, Kyler Burke, Sean Gallagher, Rich Hill and so on (Geovany Soto at least earned one in 2007). If you can assist in filling out any missing info on that page or any other, feel free to drop me a line or throw it in the comments.

Comments

silva...right elbow tendonitis according to gordo witty...no elbow "strain" he could be back by this coming weekend. thrilling. c.m. says he's rejoining the team tuesday and they'll figure it out from there. also, 2b baker, ss castro, cf byrd, 3b ramy, 1b nady, c soto, lf sori, rf colvin, p samardzija

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Submitted by The Real Neal on Mon, 09/13/2010 - 5:58pm. Well, Gaub and Stevens have been pretty useless. I really thought Gaub would do something this year, but he just can't seem to throw strikes and not get lit up. ===================================== REAL NEAL: John Gaub spent most of the past two months at Fitch Park trying to overcome "Steve Blass Disease." He pitched in one AZL game at the end of July and it was pretty sad. Along with Brian Schlitter and Jeff Stevens, Gaub is a good candidate to get outrighted to make room on the 40-man roster for Chris Archer, Brandon Guyer, and Marquez Smith on 11/20. However, none of the three (Gaub, Schlitter, or Stevens) would be eligible to be a minor league free-agent if outrighted to the minors. On the other hand, because each is eligible to be a Rule 55 minor league free-agent if not on a 40-man roster by the 4th day following the conclusion of the World Series, Mitch Atkins, James Adduci, Jeff Gray, and Bobby Scales (the four others likely to get removed from the Cubs 40-man roster post-2010) will have to be outrighted sometime before that deadline, so look for the Cubs to outright three or four guys in October (probably sometime before the conclusion of the World Series), and another two or three in November (on or just before 11/20). Another roster slot will open up when Xavier Nady becomes a FA.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Submitted by VirginiaPhil on Tue, 09/14/2010 - 7:08am. Are you sure there weren't arm issues with Gaub? They seem to pop up every year. He went on Iowa inactive on 7/9, and threw one third of an inning in Arizona after that, in which he walked two batters. ==================================== VA PHIL: Gaub has had medical issues related to his shoulder in the past, but not this year. I was at the game he pitched at HoHoKam in July, and he was three balls on every hitter, walking two of them. That was the one and only game action he has had in the last two months. BTW, the Cubs now employ a sports psychologist at Fitch Park who works with players having problems with various issues.

[ ]

In reply to by chuck

Submitted by chuck on Mon, 09/13/2010 - 5:35pm. Remember when a lot of people on this site wanted to hang Hendry when he made the Derosa for Archer, Stevens and Gaub trade? Not looking too bad at thes point. ======================================== CHUCK: I know I was opposed to the DeRosa trade because I believed then (and still believe now) that trading Mark DeRosa and signing Milton Bradley and Aaron Miles made the Cubs (which had the best record in the N. L. in 2008) a worse team in 2009. It's a nice consolation prize that Chris Archer has developed into the Cubs #1 pitching prospect in 2010 and kudos to the Cubs scouting department for projecting Archer to be that good, but I still believe the Cubs (unintentionally) sold-out the 2009 season by trading DeRosa and signing Bradley and Miles.

ROB G: 3B Gary Scott was the Cubs "Minor League Player of the Year" in 1990, 3B Pedro Castellano in 1991, RHP Steve Trachsel in 1992, and OF Eddie Zambrano in 1993 (Eddie Z. was also American Association MVP in '93). I don't know if there was a Cubs Minor League POY in 1989, but there wasn't one in '87 or '88, so it started either in 1989 or 1990. I'll try and get 1997 for you if I can find the doc, but I seem to remember that Kerry Wood was POY in both 1996 and 1997, or else it was Wood in '96 and LHP Phil Norton in '97 (can't confirm at this time). Rich Hill was the Iowa Cubs "Pitcher of the Year" in 2005, and Scott Moore was West Tenn Diamond Jaxx "Player of the Year" in 2006 (and he probably should have been the Cubs Minor League Player of the Year, too, except for some reason they gave "Minor League Player of the Year" to Rich Hill and Donnie Veal).

It'd be nice if Samardzija had one secondary pitch he could control at all. He is all over the place with both the changeup and the slider. (I know, his fastball isn't exactly pinpoint, either.)

soto bats 9th the rest of the season... it's not like i expect him to hit 3rd or 4th, though i wouldn't bitch about it...but he seems like an obvious #5 hitter at worst...hell, he's not a traditional #3 hitter, but he probably wouldn't stink it up there.

Sergio Meat Tray relives Chad Gaudin in the bottom of the 11th and promptly gives up a lead-off, walk-off HR to the Rays' Reid Brignac. 1-0 Rays over Yankees in 11 innings. Rays climb into 1st over the Yanks by a 1/2 game. Yankees pitched 3 ex-Cubs in the game (K. Wood, Gaudin & Meat Tray).

the good: 5.2 IP, 0 ER, 8 GB - 4FB the not-so-good 4 BB - 1 K nice effort, even if against a struggling team

Xavier Nady has $2M in potential performance bonuses in his contract, and he isn't going to reach very many of them, but two he can reach fairly easily are $100K for 70 GS (he has started 59), and $125K for 300 PA (he has 285 after tonight). So there is a good chance Nady will make another $225K on top of his $3.3M base salary. Even though it costs them money in added payroll, the Cubs usually try (if possible) to help their guys get to their bonuses. For instance, last year John Grabow was used the last weekend of the season so that he could get to 75 Games (Appearances), when if he hadn't been used, the Cubs would have saved $25,000.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

Submitted by John Beasley on Tue, 09/14/2010 - 5:05am. Isn't there a difference between $25K for a guy one wants to bring back (and they did) and $225K for a guy who likely will be gone in a few weeks? I'm not necessarily saying they should bench Nady and deny him his money, especially if the org feels he's been a good troop this year. But at first glance these would appear to be quite varying situations. ============================================ JOHN B: If they wanted to make it look like they weren't trying to avoid paying him any part of his bonus, the Cubs could have just released Nady on September 1st once it became clear that no other MLB clubs were interested in acquiring him in a trade, and then announce that they were releasing Nady to give Micah Hoffpauir a chance to play everyday or that they were going to move Tyler Colvin to 1B immediately. Or they even could have released him prior to August 31st so that he could have made his own deal with a contender prior to the 8/31 roster deadline, and then the Cubs would have saved both one month of pro-rated MLB minimum salary (about $65K) while also not having any liability for his performance bonus. I just think Hendry wants to always do what's best for the player, even if it costs the Cubs more money. That's probably why Hendry is so popular with player agents. He's even friends with Scott Boras! Which then begs the question, "Why didn't Nady ask for his release at the end of August so that he could at least sign a minor league deal with a contender prior to the 8/31 deadline?" Maybe Nady is one of those guys who just doesn't care much about whether he plays in the post-season or not, he just wants to play somewhere where he can be more sure of reaching at least a part of his performance bonus (which apparently will be the case with the Cubs, at least about $225K of it).

If you set an age limit of 24, and you didn't reward work done in low-A ball, you would have a better list of minor league players/pitchers of the year since 2004: Guyer, Archer, Coleman, Atkins, Soto, Hart, Pinto. Burke, Patterson (both Pattersons, actually), Gallagher and Dopirak earned their awards in low A ball. Veale's season was split between low and high A. Hill was 26 when he had that big year at Iowa. Hoffpauir was 28. Brad Snyder is 28 this year, and didn't win the award, which is good. AA players are better bets.

[ ]

In reply to by Charlie

Submitted by Charlie on Tue, 09/14/2010 - 4:42am. That kind of assumes that Minor League Player of the Year is meant to indicate who is the best prospect. Maybe it's meant as an award to hold up a guy who has improved drastically, done what the organization/coaches asked of him, and worked his ass off? ============================================ CHARLIE: The Cubs Minor League Pitcher of the Year and Minor League Player of the Year are awarded to the Cubs minor league pitcher & player who had the best years. It is not the Cubs Best Prospect Award, or Best Tools, or Most Likely to Succeed. Those eligible for the awards include older players at AAA (even a 4-A minor league free-agents at Iowa could win the award), although I suspect the Cubs give greater weight to younger prospects who are still progressing up through the system (especially those who "Get with the Program"), but the awards do not exclude older guys. There is also apparently an element of "Good Citizen" (Lady Bing) implied in the awards, though it's mainly based on performance on the field.

I am sure glad to see Archer develop nicely, hope it translates to higher levels. At the time of the Derosa trade, I sure thought Gaub would be the most useful of the three, a lefty reliever that can get lefties out, Cubs really haven't had one since Will Ohman. Wasn't Archer hurt when the Cubs got him from Cleveland? The other thing I notice with Cubs prospects reports is, it is approaching the time that we call Josh Vitters a bust, another wasted #3 pick by the Cubs. I know Vitters is still young, but he has yet to post an impressive line at any level above A ball, and he seems to get hurt every year. Add in his lousy defense and from what I've read, questions about his dedication, and he sure looks to have bust written all over him at this point. Living in Kansas City, I am painfully aware that the HS player and 3B taken right before Vitters (Mike Moustakas) has absolutely dominated minor league ball all the way up to the AAA level, he could be the overall minor league player of the year for 2010. He'll be in KC for 2011. Of course, David Price (#1), Matt Wieters (#5) and Jason Heyward (#14) are in the big leagues now and performing well. Is Vitters even one of the top three Cubs hitting prospects at this point? Ugh.

[ ]

In reply to by Jim Hickmans Bat

If I wanted to defend Vitters, I would point out that he had a nice AFL season last year and then started this spring at Daytona hitting a quiet .290, which was an improvement over last year at Daytona. Then something possessed the Cubs to promote him to Tennessee. You might recall the inanities about putting him in an environment where he would be challenged. He certainly was challenged at AA. At the time, I thought that the Cubs were pushing Vitters in order to help their poker hand with Ramirez, who was expected to declare free agency at the end of the season, or at least threaten free agency while driving a hard bargain with the Cubs. Funny how things turn out. Vitters' season went to hell, and the Cubs can't get rid of Ramirez.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

No problem going from AA in 2011 to the majors in 2012. Colvin and Castro both skipped AAA. It's why I thought the timing of Vitters' promotion to AA was peculiar. They seemed in a hurry to get Vitters ready for 2011--not necessarily to use him in 2011, but to be able to say to Ramirez this fall, "We're comfortable at third. Don't bother threatening us, we're not sweetening your deal." Vitters would be fine--maybe Samardzija as well--if the Cubs just forgot about where they drafted him and how much they paid, and said what they say to everyone else: Earn your promotions!

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

He should get a walk every ten at-bats or so, to be in line with the better hitters in the Southern League. He's more like a walk every 16 ABs. But those 7 HBPs are interesting, and maybe they tell a story. He must be crowding the plate, trying to pull outside pitches. Give him a couple of years to figure out how to orient himself at the plate. Maybe he'll get some ball-calls on inside pitches and also learn to lay off the outside ones. His positioning at the plate might also be the reason he has trouble staying healthy. Hasn't Vitters had a couple of season-ending HBPs?

cubs interviewing bob melvin according to espn 1000

Haven't seen any mention of this here but----Baseball America" posted their "all Prospect teams" comprised of 8 position players, a DH, 5 Starting pitchers and 1 relief pitcher. Archer was a first team choice and Jackson and McNutt were second team choices. Could Archer help us next year? Howa far behind are Jackson and McNutt? And I saw Carpenter in Des Moines registering a lot of 95's on the speed gun....which is thought to be 2-3 mph slow. Could we have the possibility of some real #1 starters in the offing?

[ ]

In reply to by chuck

Submitted by chuck on Tue, 09/14/2010 - 10:17am. Haven't seen any mention of this here but----Baseball America" posted their "all Prospect teams" comprised of 8 position players, a DH, 5 Starting pitchers and 1 relief pitcher. Archer was a first team choice and Jackson and McNutt were second team choices. Could Archer help us next year? Howa far behind are Jackson and McNutt? And I saw Carpenter in Des Moines registering a lot of 95's on the speed gun....which is thought to be 2-3 mph slow. Could we have the possibility of some real #1 starters in the offing? ======================================== CHUCK: Chris Archer, Jay Jackson, Trey McNutt, and Chris Carpenter are all Cubs Top Ten Prospects right now (actually probably Top 7, with only Brett Jackson, Hak-Ju Lee, and Josh Vitters in the mix among position-players), and Chris Rusin is probably a borderline Top 10, and Casey Coleman is a Top 15. And Jay Jackson is one of the best-hitting pitchers in minor league baseball (possibly a future Silver Slugger candidate), and that would add to his value as a starting pitcher in the National League. All six pitchers are starting pitcher prospects, and all six could conceivably be ready in 2011. (Well, I guess Casey Coleman is apparently ready right now, but he's only 6th-best among the Cubs top starting pitcher prospects). The Cubs are loaded with starting pitcher prospects right now, with Archer and McNutt potential #1's, J. Jackson and Carpenter both probably a #2 or #3, Rusin a #4, and Coleman a legitimate #5 starter... IF THEY STAY HEALTHY!!!!

Recent comments

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: I think there was an issue with Luke Little coming into a game with men on base. He seems to need a "clean" inning to be dominant. So he is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AAA. Same goes for Michael Arias. He needs to come into a "clean" inning, and is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AA. Porter Hodge is a more versatile pitcher, a better version of Keegan Thompson (multi-inning RP). But Little, Arias, and Hodge (probably in that order) are the Cubs top three RP prospects (all three are Cubs Top 15 prospects).

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    So, let’s do a little war gaming. Taillon is back for tonight’s game. He pitched two rehab games, just a few innings each, and not especially sharp. Let’s face it, he hasn’t been lights out since the Cubs gave him the big contract. In other words, as flat out bad as Hendricks has been, the chances of Taillon being the savior don’t look exactly promising.

    If Taillon is equally ineffective or perhaps even worse, what’s the next move? Winning teams can often find a way to work around a dud fifth starter - kinda. Two dud starters make things much more difficult.

    I believe the biggest reason for the recent bullpen moves was dissatisfaction with the recent blowing of big leads and the recognition that the bullpen wasn’t all it was thought to be. In other words, they are exploring alternate options and configurations. If similar juggling becomes necessary (even more so than it already is), what kind of reasonable maneuvering do we think could be explored?

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Cubdom needs to prepare themselves for Wicks to be sent to Iowa for Taillon to come up.
    Ben Brown has 4 appearances. Wicks has 4 appearances.
    Ben has 16.1 IP.  Wicks has 17 IP
    Ben was a 1.1 WHIP.  Wicks has a 1.7 WHIP. Wicks does have significantly more SOs. 
    Ben has been better, though.
    I love Wicks. I think he's a fighter and his stuff has improved.
    But, Jed isn't ditching Hendricks just yet. He should. But he won't.
    Hendricks should go to the IL and Taillon-Imanaga-Assad-Wicks-Brown should be the rotation.
    Wont' happen though.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil,
    Did you agree with the demotion of Luke Little? He'd been pretty good up until the AZ/wild pitch appearance. I know that can't jettison Smyly (just yet) so they didn't need another LHRP. Especially with Leiter effectively being a LHRP. I still thought he deserved to stay. It's not permanent. He'll be back. Lots of moves to come with Taillon, Steele and other guys coming and going.

    Also, do you see Hodge being able to "control/command" his stuff to get a chance this year?
    Is Arias better than Hodge?   Thanks

  • crunch (view)

    just waiting to hear patrick wisdom and masterboney are spotted at the airport going in opposite directions...

    aj puk going for the marlins (lefty)...gotta imagine we'll see wisdom in the lineup.

    someone has to make room for taillon, too.

  • crunch (view)

    he's a low-level cubs star in the modern history of the cubs (c.zambrano, k.wood, r.dempster, etc), but that star has dimmed...and has been dimming since 2021.

    2024 has been ugly the whole way and we're only in mid-april.  homers aside (even though there's been 7 in 17ip) he gave up 29 hits in 20 spring innings and 31 in 17 regular season innings.

    he's pretty much only got 2 pitches at this point in his career and the mix isn't fooling anyone.  he threw a noticable amount more curves in his last start to add to the mix and it didn't help his issues.  he don't have many moves left to break out.