Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

4th of July Weekend Thread

The Cubs activated Kerry Wood before the game and put Carlos Zambrano on the disabled list. With the All-Star Break looming, Z may only miss one start. In the meantime, Wood sat on the bench while Wells gave up the game tying home run in the 7th and then the lead.

Oh Q-Ball, you're nothing if not consistently wrong...

Comments

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

what happened was quade only had ninja up in the pen so ozzie pinch hit dunn a bit early in the game compared to what a lot of managers would do...stacked lefties, paid off. meh. it wasn't until the HR was given up that anyone even got up in the pen...understandably, imo. wells was doing good enough to cruise after a rough 1st.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Q-Ball admits the strangest things in postgame interviews. He said he was trying to force Wellsy through the seventh and hoped he could go eight because he was pitching so great...this after the score was tied 4-4. He said he would have brought in Samardz earlier if they were protecting a one run lead (but with the game tied who gives a f$%k?) He also said that if he had to relieve Wells in the seventh it would mess up his pen-plan because it might leave him with only Wood to close and "that wouldn't be fair to Woody." ...

Ok..I know that it's not all poor Mike Quade's fault.....that the Cubs would be in contention if it wasn't for all the injuries...or whatever the hell.... But jesus.....can he just make some good basball decisions please? Weird lineups, leaving pitchers in too long, not using the bullpen properly, ignoring apparently stats....I don't get it. Why is he an all star coach again?

I think todays post-game is suffering from over-analysis. The Cubs got beat pure and simple. Say Q-Ball makes different decisions and the Cubs are beat anyways... you just don't know. Let's move on.

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

pretty much...it just sucks when you take a managerial gamble and it blows up in your face. i don't mind the wells thing, but i wish he at least had a token lefty warming up with ninja. wells finished up the 6th in short order...wasn't much of a reason to think he couldn't handle the 7th even after giving up a single so it's not like i blame quade for not having someone up warming going into the 7th.

Ramon Ortiz was pulled from the Iowa Cubs game tonight after throwing four shutout innings and 54 pitches. I strongly suspect this means that Ortiz will be brought up to take Zambrano's slot in the rotation at Washington next Tuesday and at Pittsburgh a week from Sunday.

Why bring up old tires to start. He didn't dazzle in AAA in any event. I would rather see youngsters, even though they aren't any that have really earned it. This is the dilema they are in by their poor system. The all-star manager said he wanted to have a coach that had never been there before. He could have said he wanted to have a coach that will never have a chance to be there ever unless it was as a fan.

[ ]

In reply to by TJ

Submitted by TJ on Sat, 07/02/2011 - 7:36am. Why bring up old tires to start. He didn't dazzle in AAA in any event. I would rather see youngsters, even though they aren't any that have really earned it. ======================================== TJ: If Ramon Ortiz were to pitch well over the next month, the Cubs could maybe get a second-tier prospect for him at the 7/31 non-waiver trade deadline, or even at the 8/31 post-season roster deadline. I'm not saying it's likely, but you never know. Every year some pitcher thought to have been long gone from the big league scene reappears and pitches lights-out for a couple of months before disappearing again the next year. That could happen with Ramon Ortiz, and so I think it wouldn't hurt to give him a look. That said, I do think the Cubs are waiting for Jay Jackson to put together a couple or three decent outings in a row at AAA, and then he will get brought up to Chicago and inserted into the starting rotation. J. Jackson will be eligible for selection in the Rule 5 Draft for the first time this December, and I think he is a virtual lock to get added to the Cubs MLB 40-man roster by the 11/20 deadline (if not sooner) even if he continues to struggle at AAA. One thing to keep in mind about J. Jackson is that he is only 23 years old (he is one year younger than Andrew Cashner and two years younger than Chris Carpenter), and he spent the entire 2010 season at AAA as a 22 year old. If you remember, J. Jackson struggled at AAA the first half of last season, too, and was even moved to the bullpen at one point (which negates the extra plus you get when his bat is in the lineup because he is one of best-hitting pitchers in the minor leagues), before being moved back to the I-Cubs starting rotation at mid-season and pitching very well the last two months of the 2010 PCL season.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

the Cubs could maybe get a second-tier prospect for him at the 7/31 non-waiver trade deadline, or even at the 8/31 post-season roster deadline. I'm not saying it's likely, but you never know. ========= Maybe they can re-acquire Ryan Buchter from Atlanta. Who has been "scouring" the majors and minors for someone just like Ortiz (Lopez), etc? Oh, wait... And I thought the Jeff Russell starting experience was ugly but not compared to the Dud Davis, Rog Lopez and Russ Ortiz plan. Bad Dream, please end.

Today is the start of the annual International Early Signing Period. Beginning on July 2nd every year, MLB clubs can sign 16-year old international players who reside in any country except the U. S., U. S. territories, and Canada, who were not eligible to be signed during the previous year's International Early Signing Period. Players who turn 16 during the International Early Signing Period can sign beginning on their 16th birthday. Players who turn 16 after the end of the International Early Signing Period are not eligible to be signed until the following season's International Early Signing Period. The International Early Signing Period essentially ends on August 31st, although a player who turns 16 after the 8/31 deadline could be signed IF the player is placed on the roster of a minor league club (or even an MLB 40-man roster) whose regular season will conclude after the player turns 17 the following season. In other words, let's say the Cubs sign a Venezuelan mega-prospect who turns 16 on September 25th. To do it they would have to sign the player to a Major League contract, place him on their MLB 40-man roster, and keep him on their MLB 25-man regular-season roster (or DL) for the entire next season, becaue there are no Cubs minor league affiliates still playing regular sesason games on September 25th. If the player is born during the first week of September (let's say Septembe 3rd), the Cubs could sign him when he turns 16 and then place him on the Boise roster (DSL Cubs #1 and #2 and the AZL Cubs always conclude their regular seasons prior to the 8/31 International Early Signing Period deadline), but ONLY if Boise's regular season the following year extends at least as far as the player's 17th birtday. And then the player would not be eligible to play for one of the Cubs DSL teams or the AZL Cubs during the season after he signs, either. He would have to remain on the Boise roster for the entire next season, basically wasting a year of development time (figuring he's not going to be ready to play at Boise at age 16). But anyway, here is the list of the Top 40 international 16-year old prospects (all are from Latin America) likely to be targeted by MLB clubs this year, as compiled by Baseball America. The Cubs have reportedly been linked to Venezuelan catcher Marck Malave and Dominican catcher Eric Otanez. Players prresently in the Cubs organization who signed as 16-year olds in past seasons are: Carlos Zambrano, RHP (1997) Carlos Marmol, C (1999) Jonathon Mota, SS (2003) Rafael Dolis, RHP (2004) Alberto Cabrera, RHP (2005) Marwin Gonzalez, INF (2005) Jeffry Antigua, LHP (2006) Starlin Castro, INF (2006) Miguel Gonzalez, C (2006) Larry Suarez, RHP (2006) Junior Lake, SS (2007) Carlos Romero, C (2007) Jose Tineo, RHP (2007) Joel Altagracia, 1B (2008) Antonio Encarnacion, RHP (2008) Ramon Garcia, RHP (2008) Alvido Jimenez, RHP (2008) Gioskar Amaya, 2B (2009) Manuel Barrios, OF (2009) Augusto Colina, LHP (2009) Marco Hernandez, SS (2009) Victor Salazar, RHP (2009) Luis Villalba, LHP (2009) Oliver Zapata, OF (2009) Jeffrey Baez, OF (2010) Jeimer Candelario, 3B (2010) Antonio Gonzalez, INF (2010) Gabriel Jimenez, 1B (2010) Jose Martinez, LHP (2010) Alberto Mineo, C (2010) Carlos Penalver, SS (2010) Wilfredo Petit, C (2010) Alexander Santana, RHP (2010) Francisco Sanchez, SS (2010) Although they are no longer in the Cubs organization, SS Ronny Cedeno (1999), 2B Robinson Chirinos (2000), and CF Felix Pie (2001) also were originally signed as 16-year olds by the Cubs.

[ ]

In reply to by Eric S

Submitted by Eric S on Sat, 07/02/2011 - 11:47am. Ariz Phil - thanks for the info! Would you attribute the current success (16-13 record) of the DSL Cub#2 team to players playing above expectations or did the Cubs distribute prospect talent more evenly this year between both of their Dominican teams? ================================ ERIC S: Last yeat DSL Cubs #1 had the best record in the DSL during the regular season, and DSL Cubs #2 (AKA "Bad News Cubs") had the worst record. I think the main reason for this disparity is that while the Cubs better Latin American position player prospects were fairly evenly distributed betwen the two squads (Gioskar Amaya and Oliver Zapata spent the entire 2010 season with #1 and Marco Hernandez and Delbis Arcila were moved to #1 from #2 during the season, but Wilson Contreras, Brian Inoa, Johan DeJesus, Gregori Gonzalez, and Eduardo Gonzalez spent the entire season with #2), ALL of the Cubs best pitching prospects either spent the entire 2010 season with #1 (Willengton Cruz, Rafael Diplan, Ramon Garcia, Felix Pena, Yilver Sanchez, Jean Sandoval, Jose Tineo, and Luis Villalba) or were moved to #1 from #2 during the season (Amaury Paulino, Starling Peralta, and Santo Rodriguez). It was the outstanding pitching that made DSL Cubs #1 the best team in the DSL last season, and it was the lack of quality pitching (especially after Paulino, Peralta, and S. Rodriguez were transferred to #1) that made DSL Cubs #2 the worst team in the league. This season the Cubs better Latin American position player prospects are once again distributed fairly evenly between the two DSL squads, but this year the Cubs chose not to load up DSL Cubs #1 with all of the better pitching prospects. BTW, ten Cubs pitchers who pitched in the DSL in 2010 are in the U. S. this season. I have never seen that many Cubs pitchers come to the U. S. from the DSL at one time before. Maybe four or five, but not ten. Also, because the Cubs activated a second DSL team in 2008 (expanding one DSL Cubs roster of 35 players to two teams totaling 70 players), the number of Cubs minor leaguers who will be eligible for selection in the Rule 5 Draft will increase by about 50% in December 2012. (Again, not this coming December, but in 2012). As a result, the Cubs will probably lose several players in the minor league phases of the Rule 5 Draft every year starting with the 2012 Rule 5 Draft, because there won't be enough slots available on the MLB 40-man roster and the AAA Iowa 38-man roster to protect all of the prospects in the organization who came through the two DSL teams, leaving a lot of Rule 5 eligibles on the Tennessee, Daytona, Peoria, Boise, and Mesa reserve lists (rosters). And as you know, players selected in the minor league phases of the Rule 5 Draft (off AA and Class "A" rosters) don't get returned. They are gone. Another interesting thing about having two teams in the DSL is that the Cubs can sign two hot-shot shortstop prospects (like Carlos Penalver and Francisco Sanchez) and both can be everyday shortstops, giving them more experience at the position than they would otherwise get if there was only one Cubs DSL team and both players had to share playing time at shortatop, with the other serving as the DH or playing another position each day.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

Submitted by John Beasley on Sun, 07/03/2011 - 9:42am. How many other franchises use multiple DSL teams? The way you phrase it, it sounds like a serious disadvantage to develop so many guys just to lose them to eventual Rule 5 exposure. =================================== JOHN B: All 30 MLB clubs have at least one team in the DSL, but the Cubs, Mets, and Yankees are the only ones with two. However, the Cincinnati Reds, Detroit Tigers, Philadelphia Phillies, Pittsburgh Pirates, Seattle Mariners, and Tampa Bay Rays operate teams in the six-team Venezuelan Summer League (VSL), so that's just like having two teams in the DSL. BTW, the VSL is designed for Latin players from Venezuela, Mexico, Nicaragua, Columbia, and Panama, and the Cubs actually now have enough Venezuelan players on their two DSL rosters to stock one team in the DSL and one team in the VSL if they wanted to do that, but they choose to operate two teams in the DSL instead. (Prior to the Cubs establishing their second DSL team in 2008, the Cubs and Twins fielded a "co-op" team in the VSL where both organizations contributed 10-12 players a piece, but it was an awkward arrangement and so it lasted only one year).

[ ]

In reply to by QuietMan

BA ranked him at #9. Oddly, it's not ranking based on talent but on $$ for signing bonuses.
The rankings are a forecast of the expected top 40 signing bonuses, NOT a ranking of the top talent in Latin America
9. LUIS ENRIQUE ACOSTA, SS DOMINICAN REPUBLIC B-T: R-R Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 180 per Ben Bader...
Acosta, who is represented by Rob Plummer, has one of the best bats in the Dominican Republic. Acosta, 16, has a short load and gets his hands started easily with a clean, efficient swing and good bat speed. He has a good approach to hitting for his age and uses the whole field. Some scouts say his swing is shorter than Ronald Guzman's and Elier Hernandez's and that he has more power as well. He gets good extension and the ball jumps off his bat. He could have more pop once he learns to incorporate his lower half into his swing. He does have a tendency to open his hips early, leaving him susceptible to breaking balls. Acosta's speed, range, hands, arm and accuracy will force a position switch. Some scouts think Acosta has an outside chance to handle third base, though many believe he's a corner outfielder.

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

that rangers signing for the $5m outfielder was a weird one...i wonder who they were bidding against. i'm just glad the cubs snagged a SS/3rd out of the lot of kids, even if he may end up LF/RF before it's all over. projecting 18 year olds is hard enough...it'll be 2 years+ before we even see these kids...well, AZPhil might see them earlier.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

Hard to call Castro average or, for that matter, Marmol or Soto. While we aren't the best at developing hitters generally and I am not always positive about Wilken's choices for early round picks, I think we have done ok with recent player development, particularly in comparisong to our development of players in the 1990s.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

Submitted by Dusty Baylor on Mon, 07/04/2011 - 10:16am. Zambrano is a 3rd starter.....now. THey developed a starting pitcher...who they have had for a decade, with 122 wins and an era of 3.55. The Cubs mnor league system is much maligned for a reason, but let's not revise history here. ============================ DUSTY B: IP per start matters and so does durability (staying off the DL), but as a general rule of thumb I usually tend to rate starting pitchers this way: 1.15 WHIP or below: #1 starter 1.16 - 1.30 WHIP: #2 starter 1.31 - 1.40 WHIP: #3 starter 1.41 - 1.60 WHIP #4 starter 1.61 - 1.75 WHIP #5 starter Any starting pitcher with a 1.76+ WHIP should not be in a starting rotation. I base this rating on placing starting pitchers in groups of 30 (there are MLB clubs, hence there should be 30 #1 starters, 30 #2 starters, 30 #3 starters, etc). So if you accept my non-scientific criteria, Garza is a solid #2, Zambrano is a #3, Lopez is a #3 (but only three GS), Dempster is a #4 (but borderline #3), and Wells is a #5 (close to being a #4). I believe to be a contending team, an MLB club really needs a combination of three #1 and/or #2 starters, a solid #3 working as the #4, and a #4 working as the #5. Garza has consistently fallen into the #2 starter group for the last four seasons, but with his stuff, he could yet morph into a #1. Zambrano was a #1 in 2005, a #2 in 2004, 2006, and 2008, a #3 in 2003, 2007 and 2009, and a #4 in 2010. So who is the real Carlos Zambrano? That's the problem. He's been all over the map. Dempster was a solid #2 starter in 2008 after being moved back to the starting rotation from the bullpen that season, but he was only a #3 starter in 2009-10, and has been a #4 this season. And with age not on his side, it doesn't look like he will ever be anything more than a #3. Wells was a #2 starter in his rookie season (2009), but fell to a #3 in 2010, and to a borderline #4 (or worse) this season. Lopez was a journeyman #4 starter in 2005 and 2006 (with BAL) and in 2010 (with PHI), but was a #3 starter over a half-season (only 14 GS) with COL in 2007. Note that when the Cubs won the N. L. Central in 2003, Mark Prior was a #1, Kerry Wood and Matt Clement were both #2 starters, and Carlos Zambrano was a #3 as the Cubs 4th starter. 5th starter Shawn Estes was the weak link (a #5, but at 1.74, just barely). In 2007 (when the Cubs won the N. L.Central), Ted Lilly was a #1 starter, Rich Hill was a #2, and Carlos Zambrano, Jason Marquis, and Sean Marshall were all #3 starters (Ryan Dempster was the closer). In 2008 (when the Cubs had the best record in the N.L. during the regular season), Rich Harden (acquired in a mid-season trade with OAK) was a #1, Ted Lilly, Ryan Dempster, and Carlos Zambrano were all #2 starters, and Cubs 5th starter Jason Marquis was really a solid #4. The 2009 Cubs (who has a winning record but did not qualify for the post-season) had Lilly as a #1, Wells as a #2, and Zambrano, Harden, and Dempster all #3 starters (same configuration as the 2007 club). The 2010 Cubs had Lilly as a #1 (but he was traded mid-season to LAD), Carlos Silva was a #2 (but he was shut-down the last two months of the season), Dempster and Wells were both a #3, and Zambrano, Tom Gorzelanny, and Casey Coleman were #4 starters. The Cubs probably miss Ted Lilly, who is still a #2 starter with LAD in 2011 after being a #1 MLB starter in 2007, 2009, and 2010, and they also miss Tom Gorzelanny, who was an MLB #4 in 2010 but has been a #2 MLB starter for WAS in 2011. What's really galling about the Gorzelanny trade is that he was traded during the off-season ostensibly to save the Cubs $2M in 2011 payroll, but they ended up spending the $2M on Doug Davis and Rodrigo Lopez (both inferior to Gorzelanny). BTW, Coleman, Russell (as a starter), and Davis have 1.76+ WHIPs in 2011 and should probably not be MLB starting pitchers (at least Davis has been released and Russell has been moved back to the bullpen).

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

This may be lead to tons of attach on this site, but IMO there is much more to being a number one than particular stats, especially WHIP. Jack Morris is the example I always think of, where during his best seasons, he seemed to hold the other team to just less offense than his team scored (i.e., he'd win 1-0, then win 7-6). This could be luck, but consistently eating lots of innings and getting the win indicates, IMO, that he was a number one during those years, regardless of his WHIP.

K. Fukudome rf D. Barney 2b S. Castro ss A. Ramirez 3b C. Pena 1b M. Byrd cf A. Soriano lf G. Soto c ...and lopez going for the cubs ...if anyone is actually watching this. i kinda wish i wasn't homebound right now even with a wsox/cubs game on. 34-50. woo!

via rotowurld "Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun Times is reporting that Ryan Dempster will miss his next scheduled start due to back pain." cue another casey coleman visit...

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Twittenmyer should just read MLB.COM where the probable pitchers have been up waiting for the media to find them Coleman vs Zimmerman (got to hate our chances here) Ortiz vs Detwiler (a 2011 double-debut) Wells vs Gorzelanny (ex-factor matchup:Wells has been literally twice the pitcher Gorz has been this year...and not in a good way) Garza vs Hernandez (I'm looking forward to this one as the 1-2 Cubs try to even up the series)

Recent comments

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.