Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Cubs Get Wood, Torreyes and Sappelt from Reds

The Cubs end up getting OF Dave Sappelt and INF Ronald Torreyes along with LHP Travis Wood for LHP Sean Marshall. Torreyes sounds like the most intriguing prospect of the group, but not a bad haul for a reliever in my opinion. Follow the comments starting from here for some great quotes that Cubster found on the new guys.

Comments

I like Marshall, but this feels like a good move for us right now. Everything so far feels like part of a plan; don't ask me what plan just yet, but it all feels thoughtful, planned, etc. No complaints so far.

Would love to hear where these guys will start their seasons. Torreyes seems destined for Daytona's 2B job. Sappelt will likely be RF for Iowa with Brett in CF? I like what I've read about both guys. Wood's trade value must have been very low for these two to be included.

The trade's definitely a win for us, but I'm taking a wait and see on Torreyes. Sappelt's a 4th OF in a good scenario (I mean, since we're rebuilding for 2012, if he has to start, whatever). I know Torreyes has that great hit tool, and good speed, and plays a solid 2nd, but his ceiling isn't all that high (still don't think I'd put him top 15 in the system). I thought Altuve was one of the more overhyped stories last year (most people still think he's an average starting 2nd baseman), and I think Altuve is probably a better talent than Torreyes. The fact that I'm not as high on Torreyes or Sappelt (or even Wood for that matter) doesn't diminish the fact that this was a good trade and a "win" for us relative to the direction of the organization. The FO certainly didn't believe it could compete now, so Marshall's value to us was minimal, and in return, we get some assets to look at. I could see Sappelt fight for big league time, or be a reserve in Iowa, and Torreyes probably fits into Daytona to start 2012 (although I was thinking Silva/DeVoss/LePage would get 2nd base time there so not sure how that works out .... Silva is probably better in the OF, and I guess they could "slow-play" DeVoss and keep him in Peoria, or play both in the OF).

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

That's the one thing I don't like. Again, overall, the trade is a win IMO, but I would've preferred going with upside, even if it was riskier. That said, while I think Wood is a 4/5, end of the rotation, type of guy, if he sharpens up his command and if his change-up stays consistently plus, he could have a chance to be a mid-rotation arm. The one good thing about adding Torreyes is that I don't think some folks have realized how thin the MI depth charts potentially were for our A+/AA/AAA clubs. The Cerda/Watkins duo will likely fight for time with Lake in AA, and all three have big question marks. A+ shortstop options, on paper, as of now, to start 2012? It's looking like Soto/Soccorro/Valdes/Zapenas types (noted the 2nd base options above). Loss of LeMahieu/Flaherty and Co. hurts the AAA. So adding some depth and a guy who could potentially push into AA by year's end is nice.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

I saw him once this year, but in general, I'm never too enthused about talents like that. There are exceptions to the rule, but he has two above average assets, a plus hit tool and above average speed, while being solid/capable defensively at 2nd. He doesn't have an exceptional approach at the plate, so the hit tool is going to have to carry him. There are always exceptions to the "rule", but an undersized guy with an average approach, but plus hit tool is going to need to show me that he can hit upper level pitching. To be honest, he's going to need to prove himself at every stage. That's my thinking at least on Torreyes and overall ceiling, and that's me. I'm sure there are more knowledgeable folks that would disagree.

[ ]

In reply to by toonsterwu

"The FO certainly didn't believe it could compete now, so Marshall's value to us was minimal" I don't think that what made Marshall expendable was the feeling that we're not going to compete. That doesn't sound like the way Epstein thinks (which is why I thought Kaplan was off-track yesterday when he predicted that everyone except Castro would be gone). Apart from Marshall, the Cubs had four lefty relievers who earned a good shot at making the roster out of ST. Marshall was obviously the best, but he was the only one you could sell high on. With the glut of lefty relievers, they weren't going to pay Marshall to stay beyond 2012 anyway. Winning aside, the Cubs didn't need him as much as another team might. That's when you trade a guy.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

fair enough, but if the front office thought they could compete now, there would probably be little chance that they deal Marshall, regardless of selling high at peak value or the depth of lefties in the system. They won't come out and say it, but Epstein's history hasn't shown him to deal key assets off a team that he feels could compete the upcoming season, to the best of my recollection of his trade history. If they thought they could compete now, I don't think there's any chance that they move Marshall, as the pen becomes a big question now.

[ ]

In reply to by toonsterwu

Fri, 12/23/2011 - 12:56pm — toonsterwu The fact that I'm not as high on Torreyes or Sappelt (or even Wood for that matter) doesn't diminish the fact that this was a good trade and a "win" for us relative to the direction of the organization. The FO certainly didn't believe it could compete now, so Marshall's value to us was minimal, and in return, we get some assets to look at. I could see Sappelt fight for big league time, or be a reserve in Iowa, and Torreyes probably fits into Daytona to start 2012 (although I was thinking Silva/DeVoss/LePage would get 2nd base time there so not sure how that works out .... Silva is probably better in the OF, and I guess they could "slow-play" DeVoss and keep him in Peoria, or play both in the OF). ================================== TOONSTER: Both Zeke DeVoss and Rubi Silva got extensive workout & game reps at 2B in Instructs, and no question Silva can play there (he has no trouible turning the DP, he has a strong arm, and good range). He even got one start at SS, and looked passable there. On the other hand, DeVoss is a very poor defensive 2B (stone hands and has trouble going to his right), and looks much more comfortable in the OF (LF more than CF). Defensively I would compare DeVoss to Eric Patterson, except E-Pat has a stronger arm. I would project DeVoss as the starting LF (and he'll play some CF, too) and lead-off hitter at Peoria on Opening Day 2012, with Silva batting 2nd or 3rd and playing RF, CF, and 2B at Daytona. I would be surprised if Pierre LePage survives Minor League Camp. Sappelt should get regular playing time at Iowa, although probably not at the same OF spot every day. He will probably rotate between LF-CF-RF. BTW, with Sappelt added to the Iowa mix, and with Brett Jackson in CF and Jim Adduci capable of playing all three OF slots, and with both Josh Vitters and Rebel Ridling likely to get some starts in LF (and Vitters will probably get some PT in RF, too, like he did in the AFL), it might be hard for Ty Wright (who is basically just a LF) to survive in the Cubs organization.

Yes ... Selling at peak value and buying others at low value. Things we haven't seen in a Cubs FO. I am excited to see the old place finally gutted for a redecoration! Also the Cubs were always the idiots buying other people's hot set-up men. And they always seemed to fall short. I believe more than any other position that relievers are mercurial and streaky. To trade one who had been possibly over-worked for two seasons and who was on fire, for three intriguing inexpensive young talents. Woo woo! Veteran relievers are for contenders . . . and are always expensive. Love it!

Micah Gibbs (Peoria Chiefs 2011 catcher) twitter banter going on (including SDunstonJr) about Torreyes (Torreyes twitter site is empty)... http://twitter.com/MicahGibbs --- MicahGibbs Cubs fans welcome @RonaldTorreyes to the Cubs via the Sean Marshall trade, guy just hits, we couldn't get him out glad he's on our side now! He only scored 7 runs on you. What? Only 3 games? never mind RonaldTorreyes 9 for 10 the first 2 games but then he ran into Jokisch haha took advantage of Hamilton's speed in front of him too

Bruce Levine article with Theo quotes including stuff about Garza as an asset for trading or long term extension...
"Matt Garza is the type of pitcher you want to build around," Epstein said Friday. "He's a proven top-of-the-rotation guy, a proven performer in the playoffs. I think last year he had his best season, all things being equal
"We aren't in a situation where we have to do anything with Garza," Epstein said. "But generally we are in the business right now of taking our short-term assets and turning them into long-term assets. In the case of Sean Marshall, that ended up happening in a trade. We turned a short-term asset in Marshall into what we hope will be three long-term assets."
http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/id/7384275/chicago-cubs-add-pitc…

as the pen becomes a big question now. --- As long as we get the 2011 version of Carlos Marmol, isn't the pen a question (good 7th and 8th inning guys or not)? can't be much worse than the late 2000's with Heilman, Howry, Stevie Eyre as the main setup people. 2011: Marmol (9), Wood (8), Marshall (8), Samardzija (7), Russell, Grabow, Mateo, Stevens... 2010: Marmol (9), Marshall (8), Howry (7), Grabow (L), Samardzija, Russell, Caridad, Berg, etc... 2009: Kevin Gregg, Marmol (8), Heilman (7), Marshall (L)... 2008: KWood (9), Marmol (8), Howry (7), Eyre (L), Wuertz...

Bruce Levine calls the Chicago NL team, the Chicago Carps (bottom feeding in 2012)... Also some interesting speculation on what kind of return Garza might get from the Bluejays
Toronto’s No. 1 pick from 2010, right-hander Deck McGuire, will be the focal point of any negotiations between the Cubs and Jays. The 22-year-old pitcher was a combined 9-5 at three different minor-league levels in 2011. The Blue Jays are convinced he’s near major-league ready. The Cubs will also inquire about the availabilities of left-handed pitcher Justin Nicolino and power-hitting outfielder Jake Marisnick. Nicolino, a 20-year-old pitcher, was 6-2 with a 1.33 ERA at two minor league levels last season. He allowed just 39 hits in 61 innings. Marisnick is considered a five-tool prospect and hit 14 homers at the lower-A level last year.
http://t.co/kbt2Y25b

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

Fri, 12/23/2011 - 9:28pm — Dr. aaron bNew Agree completely. In my view Snider would be the 3rd piece in that deal. Just a throw in with huge potential upside. I'd trade Marlon Byrd for him today if the Jays are really that down on the kid. He should still have at least 1 ML option year. So who knows what 450 at bats in Iowa could do for him? ================================= DR AARON B: Travis Snider has one minor league option left, but would have to clear Optional Assignment Waivers (which are revocable) before he can be sent to the minors. Snider is still an auto-renewal player, so he would get a split contract that would pay him a much lower salary if he is sent to the minors.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

Sat, 12/24/2011 - 12:43am — Dr. aaron b Thanks Phil. What is your opinion on Sniderif I may inquire? ============================= DR AARON B: I saw Travis Snider play in the AFL quite a bit about three years ago when he was one of the top 5 or 6 prospects in baseball (that was the year Sam Fuld was AFL MVP), and he was one of the most-impressive hitters in the league. He was ropin' line drives all over the yard. But something happened to him over the past three years where he too frequently goes into prolonged slumps where he can't hit anything, and then he seems to lose confidence. He also has struggled to hit MLB-quality breaking balls and off-speed pitches, resulting in extremely high K/PA rates. The problem with a player like Snider is you see where he is at age 20 or 21 and figure he's really good now and just think how good he'll be once he matures, but sometimes prospects don't get better. Sometimes they regress. There is something they can't ovecome, it eventually becomes an achilles heel, and once it does major league pitchers are sure to exploit it. I would think the Jays are probably at the point with Snider now where they would listen to an offer, something that would have been inconceivable three years ago. (He's a lot like Ian Stewart in that respect). And if the Cubs were to acquire him, it's possible that Rudy J could help him realize his potential. He's only 23 going on 24. But right now it would appear that Snider is more of a suspect than a prospect, so I doubt that Epstein-Hoyer would give up a lot to get him.

[ ]

In reply to by The Joe

ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็ MERRY DIPSHIT EVERYONE!

Quick poll: Which Cub veteran paid more than $3MM/year will be next to be traded by Jedstein? A. -- Zambrano B. -- Soriano C. -- Dempster D. -- Marmol E. -- Byrd F. -- Soto I vote D, then F, then B.

I get the feeling that Soto will be the next to be traded, although it may be that Hoyer would hope for a good year for him this summer to increase his trade value. I will be amazed if Soto starts 2013 as a Cub

Keith Law has a full article on the Marshall deal titled, "Reds give up a lot for a year of Marshall". KL takes a few pokes at Dusty, saying the plan is to maximize Votto before he shreds every last arm on their pitching staff. his conclusion: "Wood alone justifies this deal for the Cubs, but the chance that Torreyes becomes an everyday guy turns it into a potential big win." a subscription is needed and there is an anecdote by KL about Sean Marshall from 2003 when KL was a part of the Toronto draft room...scouts said Marshall (after his Junior year at VCU) did not having the frame to hold up as a starter and that he'd lose velocity from pitching every 5th day, but they didn't discuss his possibilities as a reliever. His take on Travis Wood...
Wood leads the trio coming back to the Cubs as a solid back-end starter with a chance to be more if he alters his pitch selection. Wood has four pitches, but his worst offering is his four-seamer, which he uses more than all other pitches combined. His 86-88 mph cutter is going to be much more effective because it moves in on right-handed batters, while the four-seamer is flat and too easy to hit in the air. His 74-78 mph curveball is sharp, a two-plane breaker with pretty good depth, and his upper-70s changeup is solid-average due more to action than arm speed. Wood was overworked by Dusty Baker -- I know, I'm as shocked as you are -- in 2010, throwing more than 200 innings across all levels despite a small frame and no history of pitching past Labor Day, and that also likely contributed to his rough 2011. Managed properly, with more emphasis on the off-speed pitches, he could be a league-average starter, and he has five years of control left, two of them at the minimum salary.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog/_/name/law_keith/id/7384097/mlb-cin…

and regarding Sappelt...
Sappelt looks like a very good extra outfielder. He has a simple swing, short to the ball with good use of his lower half, but he can't handle center field except on an emergency basis, and his size and swing aren't going to produce the power to profile every day in left. He makes a lot of contact, however, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him hit .300 -- but without the OBP or power to make him a regular.

and Bull-Eyes...
Torreyes is a tiny second baseman -- Baseball-Reference has him at 5-foot-9, 140 pounds, and I would bet he's shorter than that -- but he has two above-average tools: hitting and running, with good bat speed and a simple swing for high contact rates. He could end up an average regular at second, but he is probably three full years away from the majors.

Recent comments

  • Bill (view)

    A good rule of thumb is that if you trade a near-ready high ceiling prospect, you should get at least two far-away high ceiling prospects in return.  Like all rules-of-thumb, it depends upon the specific circumstances, but certainly, we weren't going to get Busch for either prospect alone.

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Right on schedule, just read an article in Baseball America entitled "10 MLB Prospects Outside The Top 100 Who Have Our Attention".  Zyhir Hope was one of the prospects featured. It stated that he's "one of the biggest arrow-up sleeper prospects in the lower levels right now."

     

    Not sharing to be negative about the trade, getting a top 100 prospect who is MLB ready should carry a heavy prospect cost.  But man, Dodger sure are good at identifying and developing young talent. Andrew Friedman seems to have successfully merged Ray's development with Yankees financial might to create a juggernaut of an organization.  

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    I suspect Brown will spend some time in the bullpen due to inning restrictions.  Pitched only 93 innings last year and career high is 104 innings in 2022.  I would expect them to be cautious with a young player with his injury history.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Teheran minor league deal is done, per MLB.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Based on Phil’s sound analysis it sounds like a no brainer for Almonte to be placed on waivers as today’s roster move. We shall see.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team.