Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Saturday funnies: Travis Wood fails to break Cubs' pitching record.

 

 

Travis Wood allowed a home run in each of the first 5 innings of yesterdays latest loss to the St. Louis Cardinals, this one 6 to 9.
That tied some kind of record with the 5 consecutive innings, but it also tied a more personal team record of 5 homers allowed in the same game by a single Cub pitcher.
The others were Carlos Zambrano, Ismael Valdez, Steve Stone and Warren Hacker (who pitched for the Cubs from 1948 - 1956).

But there were signs of life yesterday, and the Cubs did score more runs than in the entire last series so, you know, not that bad for this year.
Anthony Rizzo, he looks like he puts about as much effort into his swing as it takes me to hit this "X" key.

Ready?

X

See how easy that was?
Only Rizzo's effort produces a number on the scoreboard at Wrigley and generates fabulous crowd excitement.
Mine's just a stupid X. 

(I was searching for a subject for today's drawing, and found it here. Thanks Cubster!)

Comments

My dumb predictions, but I'll stick by 'em: Dempster: going to braves (darkhorses Yankees/BoSox) Soto and Maholm: White Sox Reed Johnson and Camp: Tigers Garza and LaHair: Dodgers (backup: Texas or BoSox) Soriano: Rays (Darkhorses Dodgers Yankees) Bonus: Marmol DOES get traded (no idea where unless Cubs pay all his salary - then I say Braves).

So what’s still available on the pitching market? Ryan Dempster, obviously. We won’t rehash his resume, since we’ve done it a half-dozen times in the past couple of weeks. Suffice to say, I think if you’re going to give up a top-10 prospect – one, not multiple top-10 prospects — for a rental player, he’d be a reasonable one to do it for, given his seasonal and recent performance, the fact he badly wants another trip to the postseason and to finish strong in his free-agent walk year, and this: In the past three seasons, he’s 9-5 with a 3.47 ERA in 17 August starts, with 99 strikeouts in 106-1/3 innings, and 6-7 with a 3.42 ERA in 17 September starts, with 95 strikeouts in 110-1/3 innings. And no, neither he nor the Braves have ruled out the deal, despite all the water under that bridge. Still won’t surprise me if it happens. http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-braves-blog/2012/07/28/braves-wouldnt-make…

[ ]

In reply to by QuietMan

Agreed! Ideally: 1.) Dempster goes to braves for Delgado. Cubs give extra cash and/or a player like Soto Marmol or Reed Johnson to compensate for the shit storm. 2.) Garza goes to LA with Soriano and a shitload of $$ for Zach Lee and/or Alan Webster and change. then I stop whining like a baby and once again feel there is a purpose in the universe that knows the Cubs exist!! ha! I won't hold my breath . . .

I guess the Dempster for Brian Roberts deal is off the table. Again. --- Per Rotoworld: Brian Roberts - 2B - Orioles Brian Roberts will undergo season-ending surgery to repair a right labral hip tear. Roberts realized the hip wasn't going to get any better after playing in a rehab game Saturday and decided to have the surgery now so he can be ready for the start of spring training. The rehab will take 4-6 months, so he'll have to avoid setbacks if he indeed wants to be ready for the first drills in Sarasota.

new GM...same as the old GM... SD signs H.Street to a 2/$14m extension...because a team with already existing decent pen arms needs to spend 1/8th of their payroll on a closer. decent deal...but for a $50-$60m team? ...from the team that made ernesto frieri expendable for a utility/bench guy.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

So I rarely post, but since the "they can do both" argument is being repeated again I think it's worth pointing out how difficult this new CBA makes it to do both. You all know the CBA rules, so I won't repeat them, but singing anyone who has received the QO is out of the question for the Cubs, who value the draft as highly as any improvement opportunity. They will not give up a first or second round pick (I know the first will be protected) due to the loss of draft spending pool . So if you want to spend on a bunch on non-QO guys, then yes, to some extent, you can do both. But that will just result in more DeJesus's and Maholm's. So I sure hope the people who are bitching about not doing both now aren't going to bitch when we sign the next crop of second tier FA's this offseason.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

All that seems like it could still happen. Why rush into it? The scouting, minor leagues and facilities (like batting cages and clubhouse under the field) all need to be closely looked at first, and that has at least taken 1/2 a season. Even though the flaws are pretty obvious, getting the right people in place, scouting new players, etc., does take time, and no one wants to panic spend or panic trade until The Cub Way is put in (yes, I believe, heck, we've tried everything else). I think you will see some spending - just not right away. Not many people can put a jigsaw puzzle together in a few minutes... epilogue - I would like to see some Ameritrade money go into a Wrigley refurb, too, before the centennial year. No Gov. money unless they tax the White Sox for it...

[ ]

In reply to by MikeC

"I seem to remember some fool who was all over the LaHair band wagon and jumping down my throat" I doubt that was me. I rarely jump down anyone's throat about anything here. I just don't get emotionally invested in sports the way I used to. I have, however, always been on the LaHair bandwagon. So, I'm not convinced yet LaHair is done. He still gets a league high average of pitches per plate appearance. A lot of his strikeouts seem like he is just not seeing the ball well right now, and he has fallen into that trap that any slumping player, such as Josh Hamilton, gets into: trying too hard. I'd like to see how this plays out as the season goes on. It's not like he is holding anybody back by playing, and it's not like the Cubs are contending. I'd be more concerned if the players hadn't voted him as an All Star. When your peers show that kind of respect, there is something there.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/14088559-419/ryan-dempsters-trade-saga-i… Could this bozo possibly be a bigger dick about this? This is not free agency, they are trade options and require: A.) anticipating the obvious and being ready WHILE THE TRADE IS ON THE TABLE. B.) recognizing that trades are hard to make even without veto rights and that is why Theo approached him early and tried to take his preferences in order. Respect and common sense come into play. I am convinced he is having a very emotional reaction and probably doesn't want to leave. I've never seen anything like it. Have you guys? It seems he thinks there will be a bunch of options laid in front of him at 2:55 Tuesday and he'll get out his magnifying glass and make a decision. Wtf?

After reading that Sun-Times article, I've just come to the conclusion that Dempster is not a very smart human being. And terribly unprofessional... Also certain is this: His reluctance to waive his hard-earned no-trade rights for a deal to the Atlanta Braves last week had nothing to do with the ‘‘personal issues’’ Braves general manager Frank Wren repeatedly mentioned when talking about the would-be trade. So let's stop waving that excuse around.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

So Rob, I obviously agree. If you were Cubs do you cut and run with the best available deal if possible? Or do you hold to your guns, requiring a top prospect, and risk keeping him around all year and risk him accepting the $12mil next year. (If indeed those are the available options). I was clearly in the former, but after reading the suntimes article and knowing how pissed Theo reportedly is . . . maybe the damn Dodgers get their way - a cheap deal? But Theo is notoriously unemotional . . . maybe he holds onto him and lets Sveum look at his beard all year when Theo doesn't have to . . . and evaluates it in October.

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/7/30/3200012/prospect-josh-vitters-… "I had given Vitters a rating downgrade pre-season, giving him a C+ grade and kicking him out of the Cubs Top 10 prospects, though I still had him at #11. Although his game still has flaws, I think he's made enough progress to move his grade back up to B-. Depending on what happens in August, and what the final scouting reports (especially about his defense) indicate, he could end up a notch higher at Grade B. Either way, his stock is back up, and he will be in the Cubs Top 10 again for 2013."

Ken Rosenthal‏@Ken_Rosenthal Holdup in Dempster talks remains quality of prospects #Cubs would receive from #Dodgers. Want actual talent back.

I wonder what kind of a market there is or isn't for DeJesus. His name hasn't been mentioned much, so I doubt any, but the fact that there is apparently a market for Denard Span means a guy like DDJ, with identical numbers and a slightly preferable contract, might be worth a chip to someone. I'm happy keeping the guy as I like what he brings to the field. He's earning his money this year, which is both a veiled compliment and critique for a veteran. He's certainly preferable to a Campana/Mather combo. But if his rights can be swapped for a decent pitching prospect, he's certainly expendable.

With 24 hours to go, it's not over yet. But considering the Cubs haven't done anything at all at this time indicates they're in line to be one of the big losers of the deadline this year. It's not all on management - Garza got hurt, Dempster is acting non-predictably, and LaHair as of late couldn't hit a tree in the forest. But the fact that no one has left at all - Camp, Soto, Johnson, Maholm, Soriano and cash, Marmol and cash, Baker, and the above-named guys are all still on this team - means that things have not gone according to plan. I don't mean to write the obit while the patient's still on the deathbed, but even at this time I think it's fair to say this hasn't gone wonderfully. There's only 24 hours left to "acquire more assets," as TheoThink would state.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

You will have to admit that the trades have been down in general this year, except for major players - which we are not. Things are changed now with the current rules in place and lots more teams are in the hunt still Grienke got a nice haul, or a nice player. The Phillies made a huge investment. Sox got an injury risk just like Peavey. The Tigers deal was really sweet for them, but the Marlins did ok. The other big dominoes have not fallen yet. If the shot is not there, why take it? They still have control of many of the players talked about - except for Demp.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

I would think that the Cubs will be very active (trade-wise) in August, since that's when a lot of contending teams look to set-up their post-season rosters prior to the 8/31 post-season roster eligibility deadline. Post-2012 FA who aren't candidates to receive a "Qualifying Offer" like Reed Johnson, Shawn Camp, and Jeff Baker will probably get traded in August (albeit only for marginal prospects), likewise arbitration-eligible (and non-tender) candidates like Geovany Soto and Manuel Corpas. One pitcher who should be in demand among some of the contenders is Paul Maholm, because he is a "hot" starting pitcher who is signed to a reasonable contract and who is under control through the 2013 season.

Almost all tweets right now are saying one of three things: 1) cubs are bending over backwards and want to grant Dempster his dodgers' wish. 2) specifically saying dodgers have taken Lee, Webster, and Reed off table. 3) cubs need real talent to make deal. Y'all smell a theo PR campaign here? I do: I think those are Chicago leaks setting Dempster up to go to Atlanta. Hope it works!

I saw this on Arguello's blog the other day. It's a video attached to a tweet by Matt Cerda. Cerda comments, "check out this catch by @superSZCZ4 (Matt Szczur) of your Daytona Cubs. Top ten worthy!" A stationary camera behind home plate shows a ball driven high and deep toward center field, never to reappear in the frame. What does appear dimly in the distance is an outfielder (Szczur) streaking from right to left--and back--and then diving. From beginning to end, Szczur is never out of the frame, except at the very end when he has either gone slightly too far to the left, or else is hidden by the curve of the field (since he's flat on the ground and nearer the wall than where he started). I just find the sequence fascinating, not so much for ball fans--you don't get a good look at the play--as much as for video buffs (like a son of mine) who tend to appreciate maximal capture with minimal editing and camera movement.

Ryan Dempster is a jack wagon. The Cubs owe him?!? What, paying you $52 million over the last 4 years for a middling 2009 thru 2011 isn't enough?!? This from the same douche bag who said in the aftermath of the Cubs getting swept by the Dodgers in the 2008 playoffs...and I quote..."I wasn't ready for playoff baseball." Guess that explains the 7 walk outing in Game 1, huh. I don't care if TheJedi trade Dempster for a can of spinach...just get rid of him. He's self-entitlement and me first attitude makes me want to vomit. Gee, I wonder why the guy's marriage broke up.

I was just working on a Dempster twitter-stop equation: (Salary / (salary - #followers))+300*number of foundations you have in your hometown + 2 * the % chance you will end up on espn = # minutes you wait before you tweet after a nap. So if you make $30k and you have 256 followers and no foundations and espn doesnt care, you must wait about 1 minute before you tweet after a nap. However if you make $10mil and you have 15,000 followers and 1 foundation + 99% chance espn reports on it, you must wait 499 minutes or 8.3 hours before you tweet after a nap.

Theo and Jed are reduced to the following options... 1. Trade Dempster to the Dodgers for whatever warm body they are willing to provide. The cancer that is Dempster needs to be removed. Dempster stole all the leverage the Cubs had, so its time to dump him. 2. Hope like heck Garza has an outstanding final two months, thereby raising his off-season trade value to a contender. He's the only trading chip to get desperately needed young pitching potential into the organization. 3. Pray to heavens that Maples or some of the 2012 pitching draftees develop in a BIG HURRY. 4. Curse Hendry some more.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

You're right. Ryan Dempster is a swell fella and there are zero hard feelings between him and the Cub front office. It IS my opinion that the guy is a cancer. He torpedeoed a trade to Atlanta having told Theo and Jed that the Braves were an acceptable destination. This being the same douche bag who said "he wasn't ready to play playoff baseball" in aftermath of getting smoked in game 1 of the Dodgers v. Cubs playoff series in 2008. And he's got the arrogance and ignorance to say the Cubs "owe him" for his 9 years of service...this for a pitcher who is currenty playing on a $52 million contract foolishly handed over by Diamond Jim Hendry in aftermath of the 2008 playoff debacle. He loves the country club atmosphere of the Jim Hendry regime...that's why he so vehemently objects to leaving Chicago.

lolol...d.barney with a 3 run homer that bounces out of the park off the back of the bleachers. nailed. i know a lot of people look at the 10-120 record and want to pass judgement, but if you haven't been watching there's been some good cubs baseball for over a month now.

9 homes in 27 games is like 53 homers in 160 games.

Man, Jeff Belliveau sure gets the yips when he takes a MLB mound. I hope he can get over that or he will not last long in this profession. Of course, maybe he could be reverse-positioned to a catcher.

Recent comments

  • crunch (view)

    happ, right hamstring tightness, day-to-day (hopefully 0 days).

    he will be reevaluated tomorrow.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I guess I'm not looking for that type of AB 

    Just a difference of opinion

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.