Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Rockies @ Cubs: Butler vs. Lester (Game 100 Thread)

COL (43-55): RHP Eddie Butler (3-6, 4.77)

CHC (52-47): LHP Jon Lester (5-8, 3.32)

First pitch: 1:20pmCT

Blackmon* cf

Reyes# ss

Arenado 3b

Gonzalez* rf

Lemahieu 2b

Stubbs lf

Paulson* 1b

Hundley c

Butler p

 

Fowler# cf

Schwarber* lf

Bryant 3b

Rizzo* 1b

Coghlan* rf

Russell ss

Ross c

Lester* p

Herrera# 2b


Lester gave up 2 ER in 7 innings against the Phillies for a no-decision last Friday. He
pitched in Colorado in June 2010, giving up 1 ER and 6 hits and taking the loss in the 2-1 game. The Rockies are 11-59 against him (.186). Morneau is 7-22 (.318) with a HR.

Butler had a no decision (6 IP, 3 ER) against the Reds his last time out. He is 2-3 with a 3.89 ERA on the road and 2-1 with a 2.82 in day games. Only Montero (1-2) has faced him.

Ramirez (left ab soreness) returns to the DL and Beeler is back to AAA. To take their spots, Medina and RHP Ben Rowen are called up. For AA and AAA (BAL and CHC), Rowen was a combined 4-0 with a 1.93 ERA. The bigger news is that Castro and Soler sit and Schwarber gets his first start in LF. (I like it....discuss.)

So back to 5 over .500 we go, which means the Cubs have been playing .500 ball since April 28, when they went 12-7 after beating the Pirates.

For the series with the Brewers, we’ll see Nelson vs. Arrieta, Jungmann vs. Hammel, Garza (and his mouth) vs. Hendricks, and Lohse vs. Someone Who is not Named Beeler.

Go Cubs!

 

Comments

It will be interesting to see what Rowen can do. I am not sure why Medina is back up, though he did do a noble job of eating innings on Sunday with 70 pitches.

I still hope Castro is getting traded. I know it's wishful thinking. It's a day game after a night game and he has been struggling. But two nights ago he had a good game ... so it's not out of the realm of possibility they are dealing him. And yes his value is low but he's gotta go. It's Russell time at SS. I think Soler resting is because of health precautions and pacing. Schwarber in LF is awesome - today it's because of Lester/Ross but this team will be much better with Montero and Schwarber in lineup if Montero regains full strength or anything close to it!

[ ]

In reply to by Carlito

Yeah, no matter what happens the final two months, it has been great finally seeing some of this long term planning come to fruition. Fun to think that for five years or so we could have Schwarber, Rizzo, Baez (?), Russell, Bryant, and Soler. When you have 6-7 positions with young, club controlled guys entering their primes, good things will come. And Castro just seems like the odd man out at this point. They want paitent hitters who play good defense, etc. and Castro just doesn't fit the mold.

Sammy who? Rameriez ab strain due to sneeze.

everyone's running today. as of the 6th... cubs 0-2 rockies 3-1 lester would be pitching a gem of a scoreless game if he could actually hold a runner.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

COL's 4th sb in the 8th gives lester 30sb given up in 21 games. he passed his career high many games ago. the sb's are cruddy, but the leads the runners are taking that never make it to the stat sheet probably hurt more. this is a guy who throws cy young ball who takes on extra ERA baggage because of his issue with controlling the base running game. man...

[ ]

In reply to by WISCGRAD

in a world where we debate the pros/cons of having a "pitch framing catcher" getting an extra strike or 2 a game no one should care about the combo of lester giving up huge leads and being on a pace for 45+ steals given up a year? ...not to mention what happens when he loses a couple mph off his fastball or age takes away a few ticks of time from his speedy delivery. this isn't something huge like, "he needs to learn another pitch" or "he needs to change his arm slot or he's gonna get injured." he should have only given up 1er today.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

While it's a glaring issue that really needs to be addressed I've been going under the assumption they'll probably do so in the offseason. Seems like most of these kinds of things aren't really dealt with during the season, especially as it seems Lester has also has maybe had a few more control issues than normal and is on a team. I think everyone at this point knows it's an issue but I'm not really seeig It being worked on right now. Lot of things I think this off season that will hopefully get worked on to make this a better team, like Soler with breaking balls. Have him hit breaking all after breaking ball in the cage till he can see the spin in his sleep.

[ ]

In reply to by johann

i hope to see him do something different with the running game later this season or next season. he doesn't even have to become some ace pickoff artist. the mere threat of him being able to pick off someone knocks the breath out of a lot of baserunning issues...not just the SB threat or the huge-lead threat.

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

the SBs seem to be minor compared to the crazy leads...the blown double play opportunities, guys going 1st/3rd or 2nd/home on what should be a station-to-station hit, etc. there's too many advantages lost solely because there is no threat to the runner unless it's coming from the catcher. obviously, the SBs have caused runs, but the leads have cost outs and caused runs.

lester with 3 sac bunts today...8th of his career. it took until mid-june for the team's 1st pitcher sac bunt.

cubs win! rondon with a painless save.

OK boys -- how about a few easy wins?? Can't remember the last one of those. Bryant's day/night splits are more brutal than Soler -- KB is now under .200 during day games. Get to bed early boys -- you can party all winter. Scharber with another good day - love young guys who can take a walk.

Off topic -- I'm sitting here in my office at Olivet Nazarene and there's a bunch of football journalists in the next room frantically typing up their Bears' Camp stories on their tablets and laptops. It's in a room called the "Fishbowl" -- the interior walls are all glass. Most are sitting at separate tables -- maybe so nobody can look over their shoulder and see what they are writing?

I wonder if this takes them out of future competitive balance draft lotteries? Bob Nightengale ‏@BNightengale The #STLCards will now even be more dangerous with new 15 year TV extension worth in excess of $1.5 billion and potentially worth much more

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.