Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Mets @ Cubs: Lugo vs Tseng (Game 146)

NYM (63-82): RHP Seth Lugo (6-4, 4.64)
CHC (79-66): RHP Jen-ho Tseng (0-0, —)
First pitch: 7:05pmCST

Tseng—not even AZ Phil saw this one coming!—went 13-4 with a 2.54 ERA in a combined 24 starts for Double-A Tennessee and Triple-A Iowa. 

Even the worst-case scenario can’t be worse than the alternative, Montgomery, who gave up 4 ER 2+ innings against the Brewers on Saturday. At least this will be interesting. None of the Mets have faced him. Even the Cubs might not be able to pick him out of a crowd.

Lugo beat the Reds his last time out (6 IP, 0 ER, 4 K, 1 BB). He’s 4-3 with a  5.74 on the road this season. Overall, the Cubs are 3-12 against him. Martin is 1-2 with a HR.

Martinez (11-10) and the Cardinals are in for another weekend of division baseball starting tomorrow at 1:20pmCST. Lackey (11-11) gets the start. Let’s not get swept.

Go Tseng! Welcome to the Show, kid.

Comments

"Let’s not get swept." Can we get the marketing department to work on a better slogan?

tseng is the youngest cub starter making a debut since sergio meattray in 2003 hopefully he can do better than 3.2ip 10h 3bb 0k, 8r/er

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Strange how your memory works, but I remember Mitre's debut. He had a bunch of family there, it was on the road and and it was very ugly. I think he got sent back down immediately after the game. My lasting memory was a quote from someone in the Cubs organization who basically said his stuff isn't very good but he competes out there.

a.russell ran bases and hit in the cage today without issue...could rejoin the club next week at some point.

I don't get it: Albert has 6 RBI. Against a righty. Yet singles-slashing Jon Jay, who has been sinkng for the last six weeks gets the start. Nice.

A little shaky -- leadoff BB, fielding error, HBP -- but he only gives up one run. But, the no-htter is still intact. OK, kid. Deep breath and go get 'em.

t.davis isn't known to be a great catcher with the glove or arm, but tseng has a slight pause in his delivery that pretty much gives the runner an extra step or 2. doesn't seem like he pitches from the stretch much different than how he pitches with none on.

new rule: when every game counts let's not have AAA exhibition night in september

cubs tie! i almost forgot the cubs were playing the mets. woo.

I'm really beginning to dislike Maddon, sorry. There's a lot of Dusty in this dude.

Just like last night, Baez can score a run if he can just put his bat on the ball. Just like last night, he can't.

[ ]

In reply to by Jackstraw

On second thought....Javy Baez has the talent to be the best player in baseball. He can be Michael Jordan...both the best offensive player and best defensive player. And, just from the eye test, he is currently a poor situational hitter. He could have added two RBI to his impressive totals of the last two games with a different approach. I hope over the next few years he learns how to do that. And I really really hope he does all of it as a Cub. Whether he was 5 for 9 or 0 for 9 doesn't change any of what I said about his situational hitting abilities at present. Nor does the Cubs position in the standings.

[ ]

In reply to by Jackstraw

I think he has made a lot of progress this year -- going up the middle and to the opposite field a lot more. His first hit last night was a solid line drive to right-center field. We are beginning to see how good he can be -- since the A-S break, in 53 games (roughly 1/3 of a season) -- .296 BA, .345 OBP, 12 HR and 36 RBI, plus 6 SB. Translates to 36 HR and 108 RBI over a full season. Still too many bad strikeouts, but I think playing every day has really made him a much better hitter.

Hey, I had the best idea ever. Bryant with runners not in scoring position = MVP Bryant with runners in scoring position = Scrub (tonight not included) Kris Bryant = Cubs 2018 lead off man.

Cubs versus Brewers = 3 runs in 27 innings Cubs versus Mets = 33 runs in 21+ innings Cubs versus Cardinals = 2 runs in 27 innings

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

"the home crowd is playoff quality hype. crazy stuff." When they make a documentary 20 years from now about what happened if there was no rain delay in Game 7 2016, and the Indians walked off to win the WS....they'll use footage from that fan celebration today.

[ ]

In reply to by blockhead25

I happened to be in Cleveland on business on the night of Game 7 last year (the meeting was planned months in advance). I wore a Cubs sweatshirt to the airport the following day -- and at least 10 Cleveland fans came up to me and said they were so happy for the Cubs, and that if Cleveland couldn't win, they were happy the Cubs did. Several actually shook my hand and congratulated me. My brother-in-law took his 9-year old son to game 7, dressed in Cubs gear, and said the Indians fans around them could not have been nicer. So -- if the Cubs don't repeat, I'm all in on the Indians. Between the Indians and the Browns droughts, Cleveland fans deserve a champion. I know LeBron and the Cavs won, but winning a World Series or Super Bowl is so much bigger than winning an NBA (or NHL) championship.

heyward finally hits HR #10. this mets pitching sure is something. 9 run cubs lead on 14 runs total in the bottom 6th.

[ ]

In reply to by RichK

i buy a lot of things direct from china and one of the best parts is the instruction manuals. it still amazes me that in the internet age where finding talent and moving money is easy, a lot of product producers don't spend a few bucks to outsource their technical writing for a final "clean up" of the language.

Wow! Heyward just crushing Mets pitching! I hate the Mets. Not as much as the Cards, but thrilled we can beat their asses for a bit.

Cubs averaged 1 run per game against the Brewers and 13 against the Mets. What say we take the average -- 7 per game -- and apply it to the Cardinal series? I have watched a lot of baseball over the years -- don't know that I've ever seen an MLB team as bad as these Mets. My goodness.

Cubs take care of business against the Mets, while the Brewers and Cards both drop one to inferior teams. In a September pennant race, "winning series" doesn't cut it -- every game is precious. Cubs add a game to their lead, and now are 0.5 up on Colorado.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

Still don't see any possibility that the Cubs lose 3 games in the division, but remain ahead of the two other teams for the WC. I suppose either the Brewers or Cards could win out while the other team AND colorado falters, but seems highly unlikely. Division champ or bust.

[ ]

In reply to by blockhead25

You touched on the basic idea. Let's say St. Louis goes 13-2 the rest of the way and the Cubs only go 9-7. It's nice to know they still have a shot if the Rockies happen to go 9-7 or worse over the same stretch. Not that a one-game do-or-die road trip to Arizona is a great blessing, but the Cubs have officially reached the "survive and advance" portion of the season.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

I think the more likely (but still unlikely) math is that the Brewers finish strong (13-3 or 12-4)-- they have an easy schedule, particularly given this weekend's gift of playing Miami at home rather than on the road. The Cubs could split 2-2 with them while going 8-8 or 9-7 and finish behind MIL but ahead of COL. Given that the Cubs still play the Cards 7 times, if the Cards finish 13-3 or 12-4, that would most likely come at the Cubs' expense. Hopefully, this is merely an academic exercise.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

At this point, whichever of the 3 teams that wins the most remaining games has a good chance for either winning the division or grabbing the wild card away from the Rockies, but the Cubs 3 game cushion is huge with only 2.5 weeks left. Also, as for both teams being able to pass the Cubs (if they falter in head to head matchups), the Cards and Brewers still play a 3 game series to end their season. So one of those 2 teams will lose at least 2 of their last 3 to end the season, while the Cubs are playing the Reds. I just can't see the Cubs laying down and getting swept by either those teams (none of them are just that good). So even if they lose 3 of 4 that's still only a 2 game swing. If they split the series, that's a huge win for the Cubs.

Mets are truly a cautionary tale about not taking the good times for granted. In the World Series in 2105, wild card team in 2016, and now look at them. Enjoy this year!

[ ]

In reply to by Rob Richardson

One of the downsides of this approach - the biggest - is you need really deep pockets to afford multiple FA stud or very servicable pitchers. I wish the Cubs had pulled the trigger on a Pomerantz trade, however. Red Sox beat them to it/ EDIT: Adding to this - I just looked at the FA starting pitcher list for 2017-2018. It is not good. Of the pitchers not tied to vetting club options, Jake may be the best available.

Recent comments

  • crunch (view)

    happ, right hamstring tightness, day-to-day (hopefully 0 days).

    he will be reevaluated tomorrow.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I guess I'm not looking for that type of AB 

    Just a difference of opinion

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.